Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

News shocks and learning-by-doing

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 5, 2014

Abstract

The idea that expectations about future economic fundamentals can drive business cycles dates back to the early 20th century. However, the standard real business cycle (RBC) model fails to generate positive comovement in output, consumption, labor-hours and investment in response to news shocks. This paper proposes a simple and intuitive solution to this puzzling feature of the RBC model, based on a mechanism that has strong empirical support: learning-by-doing (LBD). First, we show that the one-sector RBC model augmented by LBD can generate aggregate comovement in response to news shock about technology. Second, we show that in the two-sector RBC model, LBD along with an intratemporal adjustment cost can generate sectoral comovement in response to news about three types of shocks: i) neutral technology shock, ii) consumption technology shock, and iii) investment technology shock. We show that these results hold for contemporaneous technology shocks and for different specifications of LBD.


Corresponding author: Hammad Qureshi, The Brattle Group, 1850 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA, e-mail:

References

Bahk, B. H., and M. Gort. 1993. “Decomposing Learning-By-Doing in New Plants.” Journal of Political Economy 101: 561–583.10.1086/261888Search in Google Scholar

Barro, R. J., and R. G. King. 1984. “Time-Separable Preferences and Intertemporal-Substitution Models of Business Cycles.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 817–839.10.2307/1883127Search in Google Scholar

Beaudry, P., and F. Portier. 2004. “An Exploration in Pigou’s Theory of Cycles.” Journal of Monetary Economics 51: 1183–1216.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Beaudry, P., and F. Portier. 2007. “When Can Changes in Expectations Cause Business Cycle Fluctuations in Neo-Classical Setting.” Journal of Economic Theory 135: 458–477.10.1016/j.jet.2006.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Beaudry, P., and E. Wincoop. 1996. “The Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution: An Exploration using a US Panel of State Data.” Economica 63: 495–512.10.2307/2555019Search in Google Scholar

Benkard, L. 2000. “Learning and Forgetting: The Dynamics of Aircraft Production.” American Economic Review 90: 1034–1054.10.1257/aer.90.4.1034Search in Google Scholar

Beveridge, W. H. 1909. Unemployment: A Problem of Industry. London: Longmans Green.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, A. F., and W. C. Mitchell. 1946. Measuring Business Cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Y., J. F. Gomes, and F. Schorfheide. 2002. “Learning-by-Doing as a Propagation Mechanism.” American Economic Review 92: 1498–1520.10.1257/000282802762024601Search in Google Scholar

Christiano, L., C. Illut, R. Motto, and M. Rostagno. 2008. “Monetary Policy and Stock Market Boom-Bust Cycles.” European Central Bank Working Paper Series 955.10.2139/ssrn.1285421Search in Google Scholar

Clark, J. M. 1934. Strategic Factors in Business Cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, R., and A. Johri. 2002. “Learning-By-Doing and Aggregate Fluctuations.” Journal of Monetary Economics 49: 1539–1566.10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00180-0Search in Google Scholar

Den Haan, W. J., and G. Kaltenbrunner. 2007. Anticipated Growth and Business Cycles in Matching Models. University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Dupor, B., and M. S. Mehkari. 2013. The Analytics of Technology News Shocks, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and University of Richmond.10.20955/wp.2013.036Search in Google Scholar

Eusepi, S. 2009. “On Expectations-Driven Business Cycles in Economies with Production Externalities.” International Journal of Economic Theory 5 (1): 9–23.10.1111/j.1742-7363.2008.00101.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gali, J., and T. V. Rens. 2010. The Vanishing Procyclicality of Labor Productivity, CREI, Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona GSE.10.2139/ssrn.1651744Search in Google Scholar

Gunn, C. M., and A. Johri. 2011. “News and Knowledge Capital.” Review of Economic Dynamics 14: 92–101.10.1016/j.red.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, G. 1985. “Indivisible Labor and the Business Cycles.” Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 309–327.10.1016/0304-3932(85)90039-XSearch in Google Scholar

Huffman, G., and M. Wynne. 1999. “The Role of Intratemporal Adjustment Costs in a Multi-Sector Economy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 317–350.10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00059-2Search in Google Scholar

Imai, S. 2000. “Intertemporal Labor Supply and Human Capital Accumulation.” Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University.Search in Google Scholar

Jaimovich, N., and S. Rebelo. 2009. “Can News About the Future Drive the Business Cycle?, Mimeo, Northwestern University.” American Economic Review 99: 1097–1118.10.1257/aer.99.4.1097Search in Google Scholar

Li, N., and M. S. Mehkari. 2009. Expectation Driven Firm Dynamics and Business Cycles. Mimeo: Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Lucas, R. E. Jr. 1977. “Understanding Business Cycles.” In Studies in Business Cycle Theory, edited by Lucas, R. E. Jr., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Mehkari, M. S. 2010. Markups, Dynamic Demand Curves, News Shocks, and Business Cycles. Mimeo, Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Mulligan, C. 2002. “Capital, Interest, and Aggregate Intertemporal Substitution.” NBER Working Paper:9373.10.3386/w9373Search in Google Scholar

Nah, S. 2009. Financial Frictions, Intersectoral Adjustment Costs, and News-Driven Business Cycles. Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Pigou, A. 1927. Industrial Fluctuations. London: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt-Grohe, S., and M. Uribe. 2012. “What’s News in Business Cycles.” Econometrica 80 (6): 2733–2764.10.3982/ECTA8050Search in Google Scholar

Vissing-Jorgensen, A., and O. P. Attanasio. 2003. “Stock Market Participation, Intertemporal Substitution, and Risk Aversion.” American Economic Review 93: 383–391.10.1257/000282803321947399Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Pengfei. 2012. “Understanding Expectation-Driven Fluctuations-A Labor Market Approach.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44: 487–506.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00497.xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-3-5
Published in Print: 2014-1-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Advances
  3. Optimal portfolios with wealth-varying risk aversion in the neoclassical growth model
  4. Inventories and the stockout constraint in general equilibrium
  5. Optimal second best taxation of addictive goods in dynamic general equilibrium: a revenue raising perspective
  6. Inflation effects on capital accumulation in a model with residential and non-residential assets
  7. Optimal capital-income taxation in a model with credit frictions
  8. Contributions
  9. Interest rate fluctuations and equilibrium in the housing market
  10. News shocks and learning-by-doing
  11. Capacity utilization and the effects of energy price increases in Japan
  12. Small-scale New Keynesian model features that can reproduce lead, lag and persistence patterns
  13. Optimal policy and Taylor rule cross-checking under parameter uncertainty
  14. The impact of American and British involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq on health spending, military spending and economic growth
  15. Why does natural resource abundance not always lead to better outcomes? Limited financial development versus political impatience
  16. The skill bias of technological change and the evolution of the skill premium in the US since 1970
  17. Aggregate impacts of recent US natural gas trends
  18. Organizational learning and optimal fiscal and monetary policy
  19. Industrial specialization, financial integration and international consumption risk sharing
  20. Leverage, investment, and optimal monetary policy
  21. Public debt in an OLG model with imperfect competition: long-run effects of austerity programs and changes in the growth rate
  22. Temporal aggregation and estimated monetary policy rules
  23. International transmission of productivity shocks with nonzero net foreign debt
  24. Did the euro change the effect of fundamentals on growth and uncertainty?
  25. Topics
  26. Real factor prices and factor-augmenting technical change
  27. Monetary policy and TIPS yields before the crisis
Downloaded on 19.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2012-0076/html
Scroll to top button