Political Rhetoric in the Hán Fēizǐ 韓非子

Bibliography

Behr, Wolfgang (2005): “Three Sound-correlated Text Structuring Devices in Pre-Qín Philosophical Prose.” In: Komposition und Konnotation – Figuren der Kunstprosa im alten China. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Joachim Gentz. Special issue of Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 29: 15–33. Search in Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang, Gentz, Joachim (eds.) (2005): Komposition und Konnotation – Figuren der Kunstprosa im alten China. Special issue of Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 29. Search in Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang, Indraccolo, Lisa (eds.) (2014): Masters of Disguise? Conceptions and Misconceptions of ‘Rhetoric’ in Chinese Antiquity. Special issue of Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 68.4. 10.1515/asia-2014-0064Search in Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang, Indraccolo, Lisa (forthc.): “Transition Terms in the Hán Fēizǐ 韓非子.” In: Warp, Woof, Wen/Phoneme, Pattern, Pun – Structural Approaches to Early Chinese Texts. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Lisa Indraccolo.Search in Google Scholar

Boltz, Willian G. (1999): “The Fourth-Century B.C. Guodiann Manuscripts from Chuu and the Composition of the Laotzyy.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 119: 590–608.10.2307/604836Search in Google Scholar

Boltz, Willian G. (2005): “The Composite Nature of Early Chinese Texts.” In: Text and Ritual in Early China. Edited by Martin Kern. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 50–78.10.1515/9780295800318-003Search in Google Scholar

Chan, Shirley (2004): The Confucian Shi, Official Service, and the Confucian Analects. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.Search in Google Scholar

Chemla, Karine (ed.) (1992): Regards obliques sur l’argumentation en China, Special issue of Extrême Orient-Extrême Occident 14.10.3406/oroc.1992.964Search in Google Scholar

Chén Huìjuān 陳蕙娟 (2004): Hán Fēizǐ zhéxué xīntàn 韓非子哲學新探 (A New Discussion on Han Feizi’s Philosophy). Táiběi 台北: Wénshǐzhé 文史哲.Search in Google Scholar

Crone, Thomas, Schwermann, Christian (eds.) (forthc.): The History of Remonstrance in China: From the Beginnings to the Medieval Period. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht/Bonn University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crump, James I. Jr. (1964): 戰國策 Intrigues: Studies of the Chan-kuo Ts’e. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crump, James I. Jr. (1979): Chan-kuo Ts’e. San Francisco: Chinese Materials Center Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mark (2002): “Traditional Taxonomies and Revealed Texts in the Han.” In: Daoist Identity – History, Lineage, and Ritual. Edited by Livia Kohn, Harold D. Roth. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 81–101.10.1515/9780824862138-006Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mark, Nylan, Michael (2003): “Constructing Lineages and Inventing Traditions through Exemplary Figures in Early China.” T’oung Pao 83: 59–99.10.1163/156853203322691329Search in Google Scholar

Debon, Günther (1996) [1993]: „Der Reimspruch im philosophischen Schrifttums Chinas.“ So der Westen wie der Osten. Dichtung, Kunst und Philosophie in Deutschland und China. Edited by Günther Debon. Heidelberg: Guderjahn, 36–42.Search in Google Scholar

Du, Heng (2010): The Tapestry of Vignette Collections – A Study of the “Chu Shuo” Chapters of the Hanfeizi, M.A. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Du, Heng (2017): “From Villains Outwitted to Pedants Out-Wrangled: The Function of Anecdotes in the Shifting Rhetoric of the Han Feizi.” In: Between History and Philosophy – Anecdotes in Early China. Edited by Paul van Els, Sarah A. Queen. Albany: SUNY, 193–228.10.1515/9781438466132-008Search in Google Scholar

Du, Heng (2020): “The Mastery of Miscellanea: Information Management and Knowledge Acquisition in the ‘Chu shuo’ Chapters of the Hanfeizi.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 140.1: 115–141.10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.1.0115Search in Google Scholar

Galvany, Albert (2012): “Sly Mouths and Silver Tongues: The Dynamics of Psychological Persuasion in Ancient China.” In: Political Rhetoric in Early China/Rhétorique et politique en Chine ancienne. Edited by Paul van Els, Romain Graziani, Yuri Pines, Elisa Sabattini. Special issue of Extrême Orient/Extrême Occident 34: 15–40. 10.4000/extremeorient.250Search in Google Scholar

Galvany, Albert (2017): “The Court as a Battlefield: The Art of War and the Art of Politics in the Han Feizi.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 80.1: 73–96.10.1017/S0041977X16001063Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, Mary M. (1993): “Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion.” Argumentation and Advocacy 29.3: 105–115.10.1080/00028533.1993.11951559Search in Google Scholar

Gentz, Joachim (2005): “Zwischen den Argumenten lesen. Doppelt gerichtete Parallelismen zwischen Argumenten als zentrale Thesen in frühen chinesischen Texten.” In: Komposition und Konnotation – Figuren der Kunstprosa im alten China. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Joachim Gentz. Special issue of Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung Vol. 29: 35–56.Search in Google Scholar

Gentz, Joachim (2007): “Zum Parallelismus in der chinesischen Literatur.” In: Parallelismus Membrorum. Edited by Andreas Wagner. Fribourg: Academic Press, Göttingen: Vendenhoeck and Ruprecht, 241–269.Search in Google Scholar

Gentz, Joachim, Meyer, Dirk (eds.) (2015): Literary Forms of Argument in Early China. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004299702Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul R. (1993): “Miching Mallecho: The Zhanguoce and Classical Rhetoric.” Sino-Platonic Papers 41: 1–27.Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul R. (2005a): “The Theme of the Primacy of the Situation in Classical Chinese Philosophy and Rhetoric.” Asia Major, Third Series 18.2: 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul R. (2005b): “Rhetoric and Machination in Stratagems of the Warring States.” In: After Confucius – Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. Goldin is the author of the volume, not the editor. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 76–89.Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul R. (2005c): “Han Fei’s Doctrine of Self Interest.” In: After Confucius – Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. Goldin is the author of the volume, not the editor. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 58–65.Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul R. (ed.) (2013): Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei. Dordrecht/ Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4318-2Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul R. (2020): The Art of Chinese Philosophy – Eight Classical Texts and How to Read Them. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691200811Search in Google Scholar

Graziani, Romain (2012): “Rhetoric that Kills, Rhetoric that Heals.” In: Political Rhetoric in Early China/ Rhétorique et politique en Chine ancienne. Edited by Paul van Els, Romain Graziani, Yuri Pines, Elisa Sabattini. Special issue of Extrême Orient-Extrême Occident 34: 41–78.10.4000/extremeorient.252Search in Google Scholar

Graziani, Romain (2017): “Monarch and Minister: The Problematic Partnership in the Building of Absolute Monarchy in the Han Feizi 韩非子.” In: Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Edited by Yuri Pines, Paul R. Goldin, Martin Kern. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill, 155–180.10.1163/9789004299337_007Search in Google Scholar

Harbsmeier, Christoph (1997): “Xunzi and the Problem of Impersonal First Pronouns.” Early China 22: 181–220.10.1017/S0362502800003278Search in Google Scholar

Heirman, Ann, Dessein, Bart (1998): “*NGO 吾 and *NGÂ 我.” Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 52.3: 695–761.Search in Google Scholar

Huáng Shèngzhāng 黃盛璋 (1963): ““Gǔ Hànyǔ de rénshēn dàicí yánjiū” 古漢語的人身代詞研究 (A Study of Personal Pronouns in Ancient Chinese)”. Zhongguó Yuwén 中国语文 6: 443–472.Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, Michael (2013): “The Difficulty with the ‘Difficulties of Persuasion’ (“Shuinan” 說難).” In: Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei. Edited by Paul R. Goldin. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer, 169–195.10.1007/978-94-007-4318-2_9Search in Google Scholar

Indraccolo, Lisa (2020): “Argumentation (Biàn 辯).” In: Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic. Edited by Fung Yiu-ming. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_10Search in Google Scholar

Indraccolo, Lisa (forthc.): “Argumentation and Persuasion in Classical Chinese Literature.” In: Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Edited by Joseph Bjelde, David Merry, Christopher Roser. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Karapet’janc, Artemij M. [=Карапетья́нц, Арте́мий Миха́йлович]/Krushinskij, Andrej A. [Крушинский, Андрей Андре́евич] (1998): “Современные достижения B Формальном aнализе ‘Дао Дэ Цзина’” (“Sovremennye dostiženija v formal’nom analize ‘Dao De Dzina’” “Recent Advances in the Formal Analysis of the ‘Dao De Jing’”). Оm mагической cилы k mоральному императиву: kатегория дэ b китайской культуре (Ot magičeskoj sily k moral’nomu imperativu: kategorija de v kitajskoj kul’ture). Moscow: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk, 340–406.Search in Google Scholar

Karapet’janc, Artemij M. [=Карапетья́нц, Арте́мий Миха́йлович] (2015): Раннекитайская Системология [Rannekitaiskaja Sistemologija, Early Chinese ‘Systemology’]. Moscow: Vostočnaja Literatura.Search in Google Scholar

Kern, Martin (2000): “‘Persuasion’ or ‘Treatise’? the Prose Genre Shui 說 and Shuo 說 in the Light of the Guwenci Leizhuan of 1779.” Ad Seres et Tungusos – Festschrift für Martin Gimm zu seinem 65. Geburtstag am 25. Mai 1995. Edited by Lutz Bieg, Erling von Mende, Martina Siebert. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz Verlag, 221–245.Search in Google Scholar

Kern, Martin (ed.) (2005): Text and Ritual in Early China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kern, Martin (2015a): “Language and the Ideology of Kingship in the ‘Canon of Yao’.” In: Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Edited by Yuri Pines, Paul R. Goldin, Martin Kern. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill, 118–151.10.1163/9789004299337_006Search in Google Scholar

Kern, Martin (2015b): “Speaking of Poetry: Pattern and Argument in the ‘Kongzi Shilun’.” In: Literary Forms of Argument in Early China. Edited by Joachim Gentz, Dirk Meyer. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill, 175–200.10.1163/9789004299702_008Search in Google Scholar

Kern, Martin, Meyer, Dirk (eds.) (2017): Origins of Chinese Political Philosophy – Studies in the Composition and Thought of the Shangshu (Classic of Documents). Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004343504Search in Google Scholar

Krijgsman, Rens (2014): “Traveling Sayings as Carriers of Philosophical Debate: From the Intertextuality of the *Yucong 語叢 to the Dynamics of Cultural Memory and Authorship in Early China.” Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 68.1: 83–115.10.1515/asia-2014-0006Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, Jurij L. (1985-86): “Disputation in Ancient Chinese Culture.” Early China 11–12: 119–145.10.1017/S0362502800003989Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Jean (1992): “L’Art de la Persuasion à l’Epoque des Royaumes Combattants (V^e–III^e Siècles a.v. J.C.).” Extrême Orient-Extrême Occident 14: 49–89.10.3406/oroc.1992.963Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark E. (1999): Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: SUNY.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xing Frank, David A. (1993): “On the Study of Ancient Chinese Rhetoric/Bian 辩.” Western Journal of Communication 57.4: 445–463.10.1080/10570319309374467Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xing (1998): Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century B.C.E. – A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lundahl, Bertil (1992): Han Fei Zi. The Man and the Work. Stockholm: Institute of Oriental Languages, University of Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

McCraw, David (1995): “Pursuing Zhuangzi as Rhymester: A Snark-hunt in Eight Fits.” Sino-Platonic Papers 67: 1–38.Search in Google Scholar

McCraw, David (2006): “Criss-Cross: Introducing Chiasmus in Old Chinese Literature.” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews 28: 67–124.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Dirk (2005): “A Device for Conveying Meaning: The Structure of the Guodian Tomb One Manuscript ‘Zhong xin zhi dao’”. In: Komposition und Konnotation – Figuren der Kunstprosa im alten China. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Joachim Gentz. Special issue of Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 29: 57–78. Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Dirk (2005–6): “Structure as a Means of Persuasion as Seen in the Manuscript Qiong da yi shi 窮達以時 from Tomb One, Guodian.” Oriens Extremus 45: 173–210.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Dirk (2011): Philosophy on Bamboo: Text and the Production of Meaning in Early China. Leiden/ Boston: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004208087Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Dirk (forthc.): Documentation and Argument in Early China: The Shàngshū 尚書 (Venerated Scriptures) and the “Shū” Traditions. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110708530Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Dirk, Indraccolo, Lisa (forthc.): “Sentences, Paragraphs, and Sections.” In: Literary Information in China – A History. Edited by Jack W. Chen, Anatoly Detwyler, Xiao Liu, Christopher Nugent, Bruce Rusk. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nylan, Michael (2000): “Textual Authority in Pre-Han and Han.” Early China 25: 205–258.10.1017/S0362502800004314Search in Google Scholar

Nylan, Michael (2014): “Logical Connectives in the Huainanzi.” In: The Huainanzi and Textual Production in Early China. Edited by Sarah A. Queen, Michael J. Puett. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill, 225–266.10.1163/9789004265325_009Search in Google Scholar

Olberding, Garret P. (ed.) (2013): Facing the Monarch – Modes of Advice in the Early Chinese Court. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.10.1163/9781684175345Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, Jens Østergaard (1995): “Which Books Did the First Emperor of Ch’in Burn? On the Meaning of Pai Chia in Early Chinese Sources.” Monumenta Serica 43: 1–52.10.1080/02549948.1995.11731268Search in Google Scholar

Pines, Yuri (2009): Envisioning Eternal Empire – Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.10.21313/hawaii/9780824832759.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pines, Yuri (2012): The Everlasting Empire – The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691134956.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pines, Yuri (2013): “From Teachers to Subjects: Ministers Speaking to the Rulers from Yan Ying 晏嬰 to Li Si 李斯.” In: Facing the Monarch – Modes of Advice in the Early Chinese Court. Edited by Garret P. Olberding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1163/9781684175345_005Search in Google Scholar

Pines, Yuri, Goldin, Paul R., Kern, Martin (eds.) (2015): Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004299337Search in Google Scholar

Pohl, Karl-Heinz, Wöhrle, Georg (eds.) (2011): Form und Gehalt in Texten der griechischen und chinesischen Philosophie. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Queen, Sarah A., Puett, Michael (eds.) (2014): The Huainanzi and Textual Production in Early China. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004265325Search in Google Scholar

Reding, Jean-Paul (1985): Les fondements philosophiques de la rhétorique chez les sophistes grecs et chez les sophistes chinois. Berne/Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, Michael (2003): Demonstrating the World: Mind and Society in the ‘Shuo Lin’ Chapters of the Han Fei Zi, Ph.D. Diss, Princeton University, unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Richter, Matthias L. (2005): Guan ren: Texte der altchinesischen Literatur zur Charakterkunde und Beamtenrekrutierung. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Richter, Matthias L. (2013): The Embodied Text – Establishing Textual Identity in Early Chinese Manuscripts. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004243811Search in Google Scholar

Richter, Matthias L. (2014): “Handling a Double-edged Sword: Controlling Rhetoric in Early China.” In: Masters of Disguise? Conceptions and Misconceptions of ‘Rhetoric’ in Chinese Antiquity. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Lisa Indraccolo. Special issue of Asiatische Studien/Études asiatiques 68.4: 1021–1068. 10.1515/asia-2014-0048Search in Google Scholar

Roetz, Heiner (2019): “On Political Dissent in Warring States China.” In: Criticising the Ruler in Pre-Modern Societies – Possibilities, Chances, and Methods. Edited by Karina Kellermann, Alheydis Plassmann, Christian Schwermann. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht/Bonn University Press, 211–236.10.14220/9783737010887.211Search in Google Scholar

Róng Zhàozǔ 容肇祖 (repr. 1982): “Hán Fēizǐ zhùzuò kǎo” 韓非子著作考 (“A Study on the Authorship of the Han Feizi”).” In: Gǔshǐ biàn 古史辨 (Distinguishing Ancient History). Edited by Gù Jiégāng 顧頡剛, Luó Gēnzé 羅根澤, Lǚ Sīmiǎn 呂思勉, Tóng Shūye 童書業. Vol. 4. Shànghǎi 上海: Shànghǎi Gǔjí Chūbǎnshè 上海古籍出版社, 653–674.Search in Google Scholar

Ryden, Edmund (1996): “Was Confucius a Confucian? Confusion over the Use of the Term ‘School’ in Chinese Philosophy.” Early China News 9.5–9: 28–29.Search in Google Scholar

Rykov, Stanislav (2016): “The ‘School of Structural Analysis’ in Modern Russian Sinology.” Journal of World Philosophies 1.1: 26–40.10.2979/jourworlphil.1.1.03Search in Google Scholar

Schaberg, David (2002): A Patterned Past – Form and Thought in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1163/9781684173617Search in Google Scholar

Schaberg, David (2005): “Playing at Critique: Indirect Remonstrance and Formation of Shi Identity.” In: Text and Ritual in Early China. Edited by Martin Kern. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 194–225.10.1515/9780295800318-007Search in Google Scholar

Schaberg, David (2015): “On the Range and Performance of Laozi-Style Tetrasyllables.” In: Literary Forms of Argument in Early China. Edited by Joachim Gentz, Dirk Meyer. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill, 87–111.10.1163/9789004299702_005Search in Google Scholar

Schaberg, David (2016): “The Ruling Mind. Persuasion and the Origins of Chinese Psychology.” In: The Rhetoric of Hiddenness in Traditional Chinese Culture. Edited by Paula Varsano. Albany: SUNY.10.1515/9781438463049-004Search in Google Scholar

Schilling, Dennis (2011): „Parataktische Strukturen in den Lehrsprüchen der frühen konfuzianischen Schulen. Eine Studie zum Zusammenhang von Form und Gehalt im Lun yǔ.“ In: Form und Gehalt in Texten der griechischen und chinesischen Philosophie. Edited by Karl-Heinz Pohl, Georg Wöhrle. Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 59–76.Search in Google Scholar

Schwermann, Christian (2005): „Collage-Technik als Kompositionsprinzip klassischer chinesischer Prosa: Der Aufbau des Kapitels ‚Tāng wèn‘ (Die Fragen des Tāng) im Liè zǐ.“ In: Komposition und Konnotation – Figuren der Kunstprosa im alten China. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Joachim Gentz. Special issue of Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 29: 125–160. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Kidder (2003): “Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, ‘Legalism’ Et Cetera.” The Journal of Asian Studies 62.1: 129–156.10.2307/3096138Search in Google Scholar

Spirin, Vladimir S. [Спирин, Владимир Семёнович] (1976): Построение древнекитайских Tекстов [Postroenie drevnekitajskih tekstov, The Construction of Old Chinese Texts]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Spirin, Vladimir S. (1991): “Composition des textes chinois anciens.” In: Modèles et structures des textes chinois anciens: les formalistes soviétiques en sinologie. Edited by Karine Chemla, Alexeï Volkov, Vera Dorofeeva-Lichtmann. Special issue of Extrême Orient-Extrême Occident 13: 31–57. 10.3406/oroc.1991.1042Search in Google Scholar

Suddath, Virginia D. (2005): The Junzi Doth Protest. Toward a Philosophy of Remonstrance in Confucianism. Ph.D. Diss., University of Hawai’i, unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Tharsen, Jeffrey R. (2015): Chinese Euphonics. Phonetic Patterns, Phonorhetoric and Literary Artistry in Early Chinese Narrative Texts. Ph.D. Diss, University of Chicago, unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

van Els, Paul, Graziani, Romain, Pines, Yuri, Sabattini, Elisa (eds.) (2012): Political Rhetoric in Early China/Rhétorique et politique en Chine ancienne, Special Issue of Extrême Orient-Extrême Occident 34.10.4000/extremeorient.247Search in Google Scholar

van Ess, Hans (2005–06): “Argument and Persuasion in the First Chapter of the Huainanzi and Its Use of Particles.” Oriens Extremus 45: 250–270.Search in Google Scholar

Volkov, Alexeï (1991): “La structure des textes chinois anciens: quelques remarques.” In: Modèles et structures des textes chinois anciens: les formalistes soviétiques en sinologie. Edited by Karine Chemla, Alexeï Volkov, Vera Dorofeeva-Lichtmann. Special issue of Extrême Orient-Extrême Occident 13: 155–161. 10.3406/oroc.1991.1048Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Rudolph G. (1980): “Interlocking Parallel Style: Laozi and Wang Bi.” Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 34.1: 18–58.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Rudolph G. (1999): “The Impact of Conceptions of Rhetoric and Style upon the Formation of Early Laozi Editions: Evidence from Guodian, Mawangdui and the Wang Bi Laozi.” Transactions of the International Conference of Eastern Studies 44: 32–56.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Rudolph G. (2015): “A Building Block of Chinese Argumentation: Initial Fu 夫 as A Phrase Status Marker.” In: Literary Forms of Argument in Early China. Edited by Joachim Gentz, Dirk Meyer. Leiden/Boston: E.J. Brill, 37–66.10.1163/9789004299702_003Search in Google Scholar

Weingarten, Oliver (2016): “The Singing Sage: Rhymes in Confucius Dialogues.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 79.3: 581–607.10.1017/S0041977X16000574Search in Google Scholar

Weingarten, Oliver (2019): “Intertextuality and Memory in Early Chinese Writing: A Case Study from Huainanzi.” Early China 42: 201–236.10.1017/eac.2019.4Search in Google Scholar

Xú Shìduān 徐适端 (1990): “Hán Fēizǐ rénchēng dàicí de shǐyòng tèdiǎn” 《韩非子》人称代词的使用特点 (The Characteristics of the Use of Personal Pronouns in the Hán Fēizǐ). Xinán Shifàn Dàxué Xuébào 西南师范大学学报 1: 102–111.Search in Google Scholar

Zádrapa, Lukáš (transl.) (2011–13): Chan-fej-c’, Vol. 2 . Praha: Academia.Search in Google Scholar

Zádrapa, Lukáš (2014): “A Weapon in the Battle of Definitions: A Special Rhetorical Strategy in Hanfēizǐ.” In: Masters of Disguise? Conceptions and Misconceptions of ‘Rhetoric’ in Chinese Antiquity. Edited by Wolfgang Behr, Lisa Indraccolo. Special issue of Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 68.4: 969–999. 10.1515/asia-2014-0044Search in Google Scholar

Zhào Púsōng 赵璞嵩 (2018): Shànggǔ Hànyǔ yùnsù yánjiū – yǐ ‘wú’ ‘wǒ’ wéi lì 上古汉语韵素研究—以 “吾” “我” 为例 (A Study of Mora in Old Chinese – Taking “I” (“wú”) and “I, me” (“wǒ”) as a case study). Běijīng 北京: Běijīng Yǔyán Dàxué Chūbǎnshè 北京语言大学出版社.Search in Google Scholar

Zhōu Shēngyà 周生亚 (1980): “Lùn Shànggǔ Hànyǔ rénchēng dàicí fánfù de yuányīn” 论上古汉语人称代词繁复的原因 (“Debating the Diverse and Complex Origins of Personal Pronouns in Old Chinese”)”. Zhōngguó Yuwén 中国语文 2: 127–136, 139.Search in Google Scholar

Zōu Qiūzhēn 邹秋珍 / Zhāng Yùjīn 张玉金 / Hú Wěi 胡伟 (2010): “Shànggǔ Hànyǔ dì yī rénchēng dàicí jùfǎ gōngnéng yánjiū” 上古汉语第一人称代词句法功能研究 (“A Study of the Syntactic Function of First-Person Pronouns in Old Chinese”)”. Níngxià Dàxué Xuébào 宁夏大学学报 32.5: 20–25.Search in Google Scholar