Home Mathematics Asymptotic behavior of global mild solutions to the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in Lorentz spaces
Article Open Access

Asymptotic behavior of global mild solutions to the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in Lorentz spaces

  • Taiki Takeuchi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 7, 2025

Abstract

The Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in R N is considered, where N 3 . We show the existence and uniqueness of local mild solutions for arbitrary initial data and gravitational potential in scaling invariant Lorentz spaces. Although such a result has already been shown by Kozono, Miura, and Sugiyama (Existence and uniqueness theorem on mild solutions to the Keller-Segel system coupled with the Navier-Stokes fluid, J. Funct. Anal. 270 (2016), no. 5, 1663–1683), we reveal the precise regularities of mild solutions by showing the smoothing estimates of the heat semigroup on Lorentz spaces. The method is based on the real interpolation. In addition, we prove that the mild solutions exist globally in time, provided that the initial data are sufficiently small. Compared with the usual result, a part of the smallness conditions is reduced. We also obtain the asymptotic behavior of the global mild solutions. In the proof of the asymptotic behavior, to overcome a lack of density for the space L ( R N ) to which one c 0 of the initial data belongs, we show the decay of the global solutions without any approximation for c 0 .

1 Introduction

Let us consider the following initial value problem for the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in R N , N 3 :

(1.1) t n + u n = Δ n ( n c ) , t > 0 , x R N , t c + u c = Δ c n c , t > 0 , x R N , t u + ( u ) u = Δ u p + n φ , t > 0 , x R N , u = 0 , t > 0 , x R N , ( n , c , u ) ( 0 , x ) = ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) ( x ) , x R N ,

where n = n ( t , x ) , c = c ( t , x ) , u = u ( t , x ) , and p = p ( t , x ) are the unknown functions denoting the density of the cell, the concentration of the oxygen, the velocity of the fluid, and the pressure, respectively. Moreover, n 0 = n 0 ( x ) , c 0 = c 0 ( x ) , and u 0 = u 0 ( x ) are the given initial data and φ = φ ( x ) is the given gravitational potential.

In this article, we show the existence of local mild solutions of system (1.1) with arbitrary initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) and gravitational potential φ in scaling invariant Lorentz spaces. By analyzing the smoothing effects of the heat semigroup on Lorentz spaces precisely, we reveal the regularities of mild solutions of (1.1) corresponding to those of the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) . We also obtain the uniqueness result of mild solutions under the assumption based on the weak Lebesgue spaces. Moreover, if we take the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) sufficiently small, then we show that the mild solutions of (1.1) exist globally in time. The asymptotic behavior of the global mild solutions is also revealed.

The Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system given by (1.1) has been proposed in [45]. More precisely, from experimental observations, it is known that certain bacteria move in fluid drops and concentrate in special regions [19]. From the viewpoint of mathematical and theoretical biology, it is assumed that such a phenomenon occurs by the effect of the chemotaxis, i.e., bacteria swim due to the consumption of oxygen in fluid drops. In addition, the swimming of bacteria, a gravitational effect for bacteria, and a convective flow stir up the fluid, and hence the fluid flow also affects the diffusion of bacteria strongly. Such a hypothesis is discussed in [19,36,45]. We also mention that the original mathematical model of chemotaxis is called the Keller-Segel system [27] and given as follows:

(1.2) t n = Δ n ( n v ) , t > 0 , x R N , t v = Δ v v + n , t > 0 , x R N , ( n , v ) ( 0 , x ) = ( n 0 , v 0 ) ( x ) , x R N .

We note that the right-hand side of the second equation is not Δ c n c but Δ v v + n : Recall that the unknown function c of system (1.1) denotes the concentration of the oxygen. Compared with (1.1), in the original Keller-Segel system (1.2), we usually consider the unknown function v describing the concentration of the chemo-attractant instead of the oxygen. This is the reason why the structure of the second equation is different. Here, we mention that Lorz [37] considers the Keller-Segel-Stokes system described by the concentration v of the chemo-attractant.

1.1 Existence of global solutions to the chemotaxis(-fluid) system

While chemotaxis is one of the significant features in the biological field, the Keller-Segel system (1.2) also has a special property in the mathematical sense, critical mass phenomena. One of the typical problems for evolution equations may be the construction of solutions. However, in general, we do not know whether we may construct global solutions of nonlinear evolution equations for arbitrarily large initial data. Concerning this problem, in the 2D Keller-Segel system (1.2), it is known that solutions exist globally in time if the initial density n 0 satisfies R 2 n 0 ( x ) d x < 8 π . Conversely, for any M > 8 π , we may take some initial density n 0 such that R 2 n 0 ( x ) d x = M and corresponding solutions of (1.2) blow up in finite time. We refer to [25,14,16,18,39,40] for such results and related topics. In addition, similar results hold even if we consider the case of the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system [23,29,34]. We also note that there have been a lot of studies on the existence and asymptotic behavior of global solutions to the 2D Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in various domains. For instance, we refer to [6,810,15,35,43,46,47,49].

As mentioned above, mathematical models of chemotaxis in the 2D case have the critical mass phenomenon, and thus, the global existence of solutions may be characterized by the mass of the initial density n 0 . However, we do not know the corresponding results in the higher dimensional case N 3 . Therefore, to construct global solutions in such a case, we have to consider weak solutions or we have to assume that all of the initial data are sufficiently small. In the former case, there have been various kinds of the existence results of global weak solutions to the 3D Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system. In fact, Liu and Lorz [35] considered the case where the term Δ n appearing in (1.1) is replaced by Δ n 4 3 , nonlinear diffusion type. Winkler [46] studied the case where the domain is bounded and the Navier-Stokes system is replaced by the Stokes system. Chae et al. [8] considered the case where some nonlinear terms have special structures. Tao and Winkler [44] treated the case where the domain is bounded and Δ n is replaced by Δ n m , m > 8 7 . In addition, Winkler [48] considered the case of a bounded domain and achieved obtaining global weak solutions without any restriction, such as considering nonlinear diffusion and Stokes system and assuming structures of nonlinear terms. Kang et al. [25] also treated the whole space case.

Next, we mention another way to construct global solutions, assuming the smallness conditions. A starting point to obtain such a result may be the article by Duan et al. [20]. In fact, they considered the 3D case and constructed global classical solutions for small initial data in the Sobolev spaces H 3,2 ( R 3 ) framework. After that, several results were obtained by following the well-known method of Kato [26]. Here, let us consider the scaling invariant spaces to system (1.1). Suppose that ( n , c , u , p ) is a global classical solution of (1.1) with a gravitational potential φ . Then, by setting

(1.3) ( n λ ( t , x ) , c λ ( t , x ) , u λ ( t , x ) , p λ ( t , x ) ) ( λ 2 n ( λ 2 t , λ x ) , c ( λ 2 t , λ x ) , λ u ( λ 2 t , λ x ) , λ 2 p ( λ 2 t , λ x ) )

for ( t , x ) ( 0 , ) × R N and 0 < λ < , we observe that ( n λ , c λ , u λ , p λ ) also satisfies (1.1) with φ replaced by φ λ ( x ) φ ( λ x ) for all 0 < λ < . Since it holds that

n λ ( 0 , ) L N 2 ( R N ) = n ( 0 , ) L N 2 ( R N ) , c λ ( 0 , ) L ( R N ) = c ( 0 , ) L ( R N ) , u λ ( 0 , ) L N ( R N ) = u ( 0 , ) L N ( R N ) , φ λ L N ( R N ) = φ L N ( R N )

for all 0 < λ < , we see that

n 0 L N 2 ( R N ) , c 0 L ( R N ) , u 0 ( L N ( R N ) ) N , φ ( L N ( R N ) ) N

is one of the scaling invariant spaces to (1.1). Kozono et al. [28] considered a more involved system by adding a new unknown function v to system (1.1), where v stands for the concentration of the chemo-attractant. From the viewpoint of the scaling invariance, they obtained global mild solutions by assuming that the given data ( n 0 , c 0 , v 0 , u 0 ) and φ are sufficiently small in the following spaces:

n 0 L N 2 , ( R N ) , c 0 L ( R N ) , c 0 ( L N , ( R N ) ) N , v 0 ( L N , ( R N ) ) N , u 0 P ( L N , ( R N ) ) N , φ ( L N , ( R N ) ) N ,

where P denotes the Helmholtz projection operator. Note that their result is valid for all N 3 and that the case of N = 2 is also valid if n 0 L N 2 , ( R N ) is replaced by n 0 L 1 ( R 2 ) . Cao and Lankeit [6] treated the case of a bounded domain Ω R N for N { 2,3 } and assumed that the initial data satisfy either n 0 n ¯ 0 L q ( Ω ) + c 0 L ( Ω ) + u 0 L N ( Ω ) 1 with N 2 < q < or n 0 L q ( Ω ) + c 0 L N ( Ω ) + u 0 L N ( Ω ) 1 with N 2 < q < N and some suitable assumptions, where n ¯ 0 Ω 1 Ω n 0 ( x ) d x . Then, they constructed global classical solutions. Jiang [24] considered a similar system to (1.1) in a bounded domain with N 2 by replacing c with the concentration v of the chemo-attractant. He assumed that the initial data satisfy n 0 n ¯ 0 L N 2 ( Ω ) + v 0 L N ( Ω ) + u 0 L N ( Ω ) 1 with certain assumptions to show the existence of global classical solutions. Moreover, concerning more involved scaling invariant spaces, Choe et al. [13] and Choe and Lkhagvasuren [12] considered the 3D case in the homogeneous Besov spaces framework; n 0 B ˙ q , 1 2 + 3 q ( R 3 ) , c 0 B ˙ q , 1 3 q ( R 3 ) , u 0 P ( B ˙ q , 1 1 + 3 q ( R 3 ) ) 3 , and φ B ˙ q , 1 3 q ( R 3 ) for 1 q < 3 . For the case of the other function spaces based on Besov-type spaces, we refer to, e.g., [17,22,42,5155].

1.2 Our motivations in this article

In this article, we consider the case where the given data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) and φ satisfy

(1.4) n 0 L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) , c 0 L ( R N ) , c 0 ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N , u 0 P ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N , φ ( L N , ( R N ) ) N ,

where N 3 and 1 ρ < . In particular, we focus on scaling invariant Lorentz spaces. As stated before, Kozono et al. [28] have already shown the existence of global solutions to a more involved system under the condition ρ = . One of the reasons why we consider the scaling invariant spaces is to enlarge the spaces of the given data that ensure the existence of global solutions. Although our assumption (1.4) does not seem to provide an advantage from this viewpoint, what we want to do is to reveal the detailed properties of solutions of system (1.1) by focusing on a difference of the index 1 ρ < . More precisely, we show that mild solutions of (1.1) have higher regularities than those of [28]. We also reduce a part of the smallness conditions of the given data. In addition, we improve the asymptotic behavior of the global mild solutions to (1.1) by relying on the condition 1 ρ < .

Before stating our main results, we shall mention the key ideas of the analysis in this article. The method to obtain regularities of solutions is mainly based on the real interpolation. We recall that the Lorentz spaces are characterized by the real interpolation spaces of the usual Lebesgue spaces. Kozono and Shimizu [33, Proposition 2.1] focused on the smoothing estimates of the heat semigroup defined on homogeneous Besov spaces, which were shown by Kozono et al. [30, Lemma 2.2 (ii)], and relied on the real interpolation technique to obtain the space-time estimates of the heat semigroup:

Δ e t Δ f L α , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; B ˙ q , 1 s 2 + 2 α ( R N ) ) C f B ˙ q , ρ s ( R N ) .

From this result, we may expect that a similar estimate is valid in the case of the Lorentz spaces. By showing the corresponding estimate, we will observe that mild solutions of (1.1) have higher regularities. It should be noted that Yamazaki [50, Corollary 2.3] has obtained almost the same estimate as ours. We also refer to [31,32] for related papers. Concerning the reduction of the smallness condition of the given data, we note that the term n φ appearing in (1.1) is a linear term with respect to n . From the viewpoint of perturbation theory, we have to assume that φ is small to obtain solutions. However, we may reduce such a condition by a simple modification of the usual method in the construction of solutions. We remark that Choe and Lkhagvasuren [12] have used such a method. Moreover, for the initial datum c 0 L ( R N ) with c 0 ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N , we only assume that c 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) is small to obtain global solutions, while it is not necessary to assume that c 0 L ( R N ) is small. In other words, we may construct global solutions even if c 0 is close to a large constant. We shall refer to the result of Cao and Lankeit [6, Theorem 1.2], who have obtained a similar result through a different approach. Finally, let us mention the asymptotic behavior; by following the approach due to Kato [26], we may show that the global solutions decay as t with suitable rates. For instance, Kozono et al. [28] obtained the decay of global solutions n such that

n ( t ) L q ( R N ) = O ( t ( N 2 ) ( 2 N 1 q ) )

as t for some q > N 2 . Compared with this result, we show that

n ( t ) L q , 1 ( R N ) = o ( t ( N 2 ) ( 2 N 1 q ) ) , n ( t ) L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) = o ( 1 )

as t for some q > N 2 and 1 ρ < . Such a result is obtained by the method of Kato [26, Note]. Mention that the set C 0 ( R N ) of smooth functions with compact support is dense in L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) for 1 ρ < but not dense in L N 2 , ( R N ) . This is an advantage of considering the case of 1 ρ < . However, we should remark that our condition (1.4) contains c 0 L ( R N ) , and thus, the problem of a lack of density still remains. To overcome this problem, we show the decay of the global solutions without any approximation for the initial datum c 0 . In particular, we approximate only the initial data n 0 and u 0 .

1.3 Main results

In what follows, we shall state our main results. To this end, we consider the integral forms of system (1.1). Let P denote the Helmholtz projection operator defined on R N , namely, we set P I + ( Δ ) 1 . Then, since P ( p ) = 0 and P u = u under the condition u = 0 , we observe that the third equation of (1.1) is given by t u Δ u = P ( ( u ) u n φ ) . We also note that u n = ( n u ) and ( u ) u = ( u u ) due to u = 0 . As the Laplacian Δ generates the heat semigroup e t Δ G t for 0 < t < , where G t ( x ) ( 4 π t ) N 2 e x 2 ( 4 t ) for ( t , x ) ( 0 , ) × R N , we obtain the following integral forms of system (1.1):

(1.5) n = e t Δ n 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n u ) + ( n c ) ) d τ in  ( 0 , ) × R N , c = e t Δ c 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( u c + n c ) d τ in  ( 0 , ) × R N , u = e t Δ u 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( u u ) n φ ) d τ in  ( 0 , ) × R N .

A solution ( n , c , u ) of the integral forms (1.5) may be called a mild solution of the original system (1.1). Throughout this article, we assume that N 3 .

Our first result is the existence and uniqueness theorem of local mild solutions of (1.1) with initial data in scaling invariant Lorentz spaces.

Theorem 1.1

(Local mild solution) Let 1 ρ < and let q , r , α , and β satisfy

(1.6) N 2 < q < N , N < r < min { 2 N , N q ( 2 q N ) , N q ( N q ) } ,

(1.7) 1 α = ( N 2 ) ( 2 N 1 q ) , 1 β = ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r ) .

Suppose that the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) and the gravitational potential φ satisfy (1.4). Then, the following statements hold:

(i) There exist T > 0 and a solution ( n , c , u ) on ( 0 , T ) × R N of (1.5) satisfying

n BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) ) L α , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; L q , 1 ( R N ) ) , t 1 α n BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; L q , 1 ( R N ) ) , c BC ( ( 0 , T ) ; BUC ( R N ) ) , c BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N ) L β , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; ( L r , 1 ( R N ) ) N ) , t 1 β c BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; ( L r , 1 ( R N ) ) N ) , u BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; P ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N ) L β , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; P ( L r , 1 ( R N ) ) N ) , t 1 β u BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; P ( L r , 1 ( R N ) ) N ) .

Moreover, the solution has the properties

(1.8) ( n , c , u ) X T n L T ( L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) ) + c L T ( L ( R N ) ) + c L T ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) + u L T ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) + sup 0 < t < T ( t 1 α n ( t ) L q , 1 ( R N ) + t 1 β c ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) + t 1 β u ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) ) + n L T α , ρ ( L q , 1 ( R N ) ) + c L T β , ρ ( L r , 1 ( R N ) ) + u L T β , ρ ( L r , 1 ( R N ) ) 2 c 0 L ( R N ) + C ( 1 + φ L N , ( R N ) ) ( 1 + c 0 L ( R N ) ) × ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) + c 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) + u 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) ) ,

(1.9) c L T ( L ( R N ) ) 2 c 0 L ( R N )

and

(1.10) lim t + 0 ( n ( t ) n 0 L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) + c ( t ) c 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) + u ( t ) u 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) ) = 0 ,

(1.11) lim t + 0 c ( t ) e t Δ c 0 L ( R N ) = 0 ,

(1.12) lim t + 0 ( t 1 α n ( t ) L q , 1 ( R N ) + t 1 β c ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) + t 1 β u ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) ) = 0 ,

where C > 0 is a constant independent of T , n 0 , c 0 , u 0 , φ , n , c , and u .

(ii) Let 0 < T 0 . There exists a constant 0 < δ < 1 independently of T 0 , n 0 , c 0 , u 0 , and φ such that a solution ( n , c , u ) on ( 0 , T 0 ) × R N of (1.5) satisfying

n L α , ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; L q , ( R N ) ) , c L ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; L ( R N ) ) , c L β , ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; ( L r , ( R N ) ) N ) , u L β , ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; P ( L r , ( R N ) ) N ) , limsup λ { λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) n ( t ) L q , ( R N ) > λ ) 1 α + λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) c ( t ) L r , ( R N ) > λ ) 1 β + λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) u ( t ) L r , ( R N ) > λ ) 1 β } δ ( 1 + φ L N , ( R N ) ) 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ( R N ) ) ) 1

is unique, where μ denotes the usual Lebesgue measure on ( 0 , T 0 ) .

(iii) In the statement of (i), suppose that ( n , c , u ) is the solution on ( 0 , T ) × R N of (1.5) with the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) and the gravitational potential φ . In addition, suppose that ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) is a solution on ( 0 , T ) × R N of (1.5) with initial data ( n ˜ 0 , c ˜ 0 , u ˜ 0 ) and a gravitational potential φ ˜ such that

n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) , c ˜ 0 L ( R N ) , c ˜ 0 ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N , u ˜ 0 P ( L N , ρ ( R N ) ) N , φ ˜ ( L N , ( R N ) ) N .

Then, it holds that

(1.13) ( n n ˜ , c c ˜ , u u ˜ ) X T C ( 1 + φ L N , ( R N ) ) ( 1 + c 0 L ( R N ) ) n 0 n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) + C ( 1 + φ ˜ L N , ( R N ) ) c 0 c ˜ 0 L ( R N ) + C c 0 c ˜ 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) + C ( 1 + c 0 L ( R N ) ) ( φ φ ˜ L N , ( R N ) + u 0 u ˜ 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) ) ,

where C > 0 is a constant independent of T , n 0 , c 0 , u 0 , φ , n ˜ 0 , c ˜ 0 , u ˜ 0 , φ ˜ , n , c , u , n ˜ , c ˜ , and u ˜ .

Remark 1.2

(i) The spaces of solutions of (1.1) are scaling invariant spaces, which correspond to those of the initial data. In particular, for the function ( n λ , c λ , u λ ) given by (1.3), we observe that ( n λ , c λ , u λ ) X = ( n , c , u ) X for all 0 < λ < .

(ii) In Theorem 1.1, we focus on the local solvability. In this case, we do not have to assume the smallness conditions of the given data unlike the result of [28]. Moreover, even though C 0 ( R N ) is not dense in L ( R N ) , it is not necessary to assume that c 0 L ( R N ) is small. We remark that the smallness condition of φ is also reduced by the method of [12].

(iii) A main difference between our result and that of [28] is the regularities of solutions in both space and time directions. Concerning the space direction, we see that t 1 α n ( t ) L q , 1 ( R N ) for all 0 < t < T , where L q , 1 ( R N ) L q ( R N ) . Moreover, we also have n L α , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; L q , 1 ( R N ) ) , which may be regarded as a gain of regularities in the time direction. Note that ρ is the same as the index appearing in (1.4), and thus, this is an advantage of considering general 1 ρ < . We refer to [50, Corollary 2.3] and [33, Proposition 2.1] for such results.

(iv) We also mention that properties (1.10) and (1.12) are obtained by considering the case of 1 ρ < ; this is also different from the result of [28]. Since (1.10) and (1.12) rely on the density argument, for the space L ( R N ) , we only know that c BC ( ( 0 , T ) ; BUC ( R N ) ) with (1.11). Specifically, we do not know whether lim t + 0 c ( t ) c 0 L ( R N ) = 0 holds. However, by combining (1.11) and the duality argument, we see that lim t + 0 c ( t ) c 0 , ψ = 0 for all ψ L 1 ( R N ) .

(v) The statement of (ii) states the uniqueness of mild solutions. To ensure the uniqueness in weaker assumptions, we consider the case of weak Lebesgue spaces in both space and time. Note that some smallness conditions are needed. Recall that the weak Lebesgue spaces are characterized as follows:

n L T 0 α , ( L q , ( R N ) ) = sup 0 < λ < λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) n ( t ) L q , ( R N ) > λ ) 1 α .

Therefore, the smallness condition implies that a part of the norm is sufficiently small. We also remark that [42, Proposition 3.7] yields

lim λ λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) n ( t ) L q , ( R N ) > λ ) 1 α = 0 ,

provided that t 1 α n L ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; L q , ( R N ) ) satisfies lim t + 0 t 1 α n ( t ) L q , ( R N ) = 0 . Thus, we observe that the solution obtained in the statement of (i) satisfies the assumption of uniqueness. We refer to [33, Theorem 2 (ii)] for a similar assumption.

Our second result states that if the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) are sufficiently small, then we may obtain global mild solutions of (1.1). In addition, the asymptotic behavior of the global mild solutions is obtained.

Theorem 1.3

(Global existence and asymptotic behavior) In the statement of Theorem 1.1 (i), there exists a constant 0 < ε < 1 independently of n 0 , c 0 , u 0 , and φ such that if

(1.14) n 0 L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) + c 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) + u 0 L N , ρ ( R N ) ε ( 1 + φ L N , ( R N ) ) 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ( R N ) ) 2 ,

then, the solution ( n , c , u ) of (1.5) exists globally in time, namely, the existence time interval T in the statement of Theorem 1.1 (i) may be chosen as T = . In addition, the following properties hold:

(1.15) lim t ( n ( t ) L N 2 , ρ ( R N ) + c ( t ) L N , ρ ( R N ) + u ( t ) L N , ρ ( R N ) ) = 0 ,

(1.16) lim t c ( t ) e t Δ c 0 L ( R N ) = 0 ,

(1.17) lim t ( t 1 α n ( t ) L q , 1 ( R N ) + t 1 β c ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) + t 1 β u ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) ) = 0 .

Remark 1.4

(i) As stated before, we do not have to assume that c 0 L ( R N ) and φ L N , ( R N ) are small unlike the result of [28]. In particular, we may take c 0 such that c 0 is close to a large constant. This consequence is regarded as a whole space version of [6, Theorem 1.2]. In addition, the dependence of the smallness of the initial data with respect to c 0 L ( R N ) and φ L N , ( R N ) is given by (1.14). We also remark that a similar result to Theorem 1.3 is still valid even if ρ = . However, in this case, we have to modify the regularities of solutions and the properties (1.10), (1.11), (1.12), (1.15), (1.16), and (1.17) due to a lack of density.

(ii) Noting (1.7), we see that property (1.17) implies

n ( t ) L q , 1 ( R N ) = o ( t ( N 2 ) ( 2 N 1 q ) ) , c ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) = o ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r ) ) , u ( t ) L r , 1 ( R N ) = o ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r ) )

as t . Hence, we see that these decay rates coincide with those of the solutions to the linear heat equation. In addition, our result is regarded as an improved version compared with [28]. Here, we mention that our method of construction of global solutions is based on the linear analysis and perturbation theory. We also refer to [911] for the decay property of global solutions to (1.1).

(iii) Such a result and the remaining property (1.15) are shown by the density argument. In particular, our condition 1 ρ < plays a key role in the proof of refined decay properties. More precisely, we use the method of Kato [26, Note]. To this end, we combine the continuous dependence of solutions given in Theorem 1.1 (iii) and the density argument. However, from estimate (1.13), we see that the term c 0 c ˜ 0 L ( R N ) disturbs the decay of the global solutions since C 0 ( R N ) is not dense in L ( R N ) . Therefore, to show the properties (1.15) and (1.17), we consider smooth initial data n 0 C 0 ( R N ) and u 0 ( C 0 ( R N ) ) N and the original initial datum c 0 L ( R N ) . Even if we consider such a case, we may show that the corresponding solutions have the desired decay properties. We also mention that a similar remark to property (1.11) may be said for (1.16); although a lack of density disturbs the usual decay property, we see that lim t c ( t ) , ψ = 0 for all ψ L 1 ( R N ) from the duality argument.

This article is organized as follows: In the next section, we recall the notation and definitions of function spaces. Some fundamental properties of the Lorentz spaces are also stated. In Section 3, we show the smoothing estimates of the heat semigroup on Lorentz spaces. We also prove the standard decay properties of the heat semigroup. Section 4 is devoted to the proof of our main results. To this end, we show the suitable estimates of the nonlinear terms. After that, we construct local solutions of (1.5), i.e., we show Theorem 1.1. Finally, we also show the existence of global solutions and asymptotic behavior, i.e., we show Theorem 1.3.

2 Preliminaries

2.1 Notation and function spaces

Here, we recall the notation and definitions of the function spaces: Let d N . Assume that Ω R d is a domain and E is a Banach space. Then, BC ( Ω ; E ) and BUC ( Ω ; E ) denote the spaces of all bounded continuous E -valued functions on Ω and bounded uniformly continuous E -valued functions on Ω , respectively. Note that BC ( Ω ; E ) and BUC ( Ω ; E ) are the Banach spaces equipped with the norm f L ( Ω ; E ) sup x Ω f ( x ) E of the Bochner-Lebesgue space L ( Ω ; E ) . In particular, we set B U C BUC ( R N ; C ) .

For the Bochner-Lebesgue space L 1 ( Ω ; E ) , let L loc 1 ( Ω ; E ) denote the set of all functions f such that f L 1 ( K ; E ) for any compact subset K Ω . In addition, for the function f L loc 1 ( Ω ; E ) , let us define the rearrangement f * of f by setting

f * ( λ ) inf { η ( 0 , ) μ ( x Ω f ( x ) E > η ) λ } , 0 < λ < ,

where μ denotes the usual Lebesgue measure on Ω . We also define the Lorentz spaces L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) { f L loc 1 ( Ω ; E ) f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) < } for 1 < q < and 1 ρ , where

f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) 0 ( λ 1 q f * ( λ ) ) ρ d λ λ 1 ρ if  1 ρ < , sup 0 < λ < λ 1 q f * ( λ ) if  ρ = .

We remark that f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) = f E L q , ρ ( Ω ; C ) holds from a simple calculation. In particular, we set L q , ρ ( Ω ) L q , ρ ( Ω ; C ) and L q , ρ L q , ρ ( R N ; C ) . We also abbreviate as follows:

f L T ( E ) f L ( ( 0 , T ) ; E ) , f L T α , ρ ( E ) f L α , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; E ) , f L ( E ) f L ( ( 0 , ) ; E ) , f L α , ρ ( E ) f L α , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; E ) .

For the Helmholtz projection operator P , we set P ( L q , ρ ) N { P u ( L q , ρ ) N u ( L q , ρ ) N } , where the boundedness of P : ( L q , ρ ) N ( L q , ρ ) N is mentioned in, e.g., [50, p. 641].

2.2 Fundamental properties of the Lorentz spaces

In this article, we focus on the Lorentz spaces, and thus, we recall the fundamental properties here.

Proposition 2.1

Let d N . Assume that Ω R d is a domain and E is a Banach space. Then, the following statements hold:

(i) Let 1 < q < and 1 ρ . Then, for every f , g L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) , it holds that f + g L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) with the estimate

f + g L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) 2 1 q ( f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) + g L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) ) .

In addition, it holds that L q , q ( Ω ; E ) = L q ( Ω ; E ) . Furthermore, for every f L q , ( Ω ; E ) , the following equality

f L q , ( Ω ; E ) = sup 0 < λ < λ μ ( x Ω f ( x ) E > λ ) 1 q

holds.

(ii) Let 1 < q < and 1 ρ 0 ρ 1 . Then, the following continuous embeddings

L q , 1 ( Ω ; E ) L q , ρ 0 ( Ω ; E ) L q , ρ 1 ( Ω ; E ) L q , ( Ω ; E )

hold.

(iii) Let 1 < q < and 1 ρ . Suppose that q 0 , q 1 ( 1 , ) and ρ 0 , ρ 1 [ 1 , ] satisfy 1 q = 1 q 0 + 1 q 1 and 1 ρ = 1 ρ 0 + 1 ρ 1 , respectively. Then, for every f L q 0 , ρ 0 ( Ω ) and g L q 1 , ρ 1 ( Ω ) , it holds that f g L q , ρ ( Ω ) with the estimate

f g L q , ρ ( Ω ) 2 1 q f L q 0 , ρ 0 ( Ω ) g L q 1 , ρ 1 ( Ω ) .

(iv) Let 1 < q < and 1 ρ . Then, for every f L ( Ω ) and g L q , ρ ( Ω ) , it holds that f g L q , ρ ( Ω ) with the estimate

f g L q , ρ ( Ω ) 2 1 q f L ( Ω ) g L q , ρ ( Ω ) .

(v) Let 1 q 0 < q 1 , 1 ρ , and 0 < θ < 1 . Then, it holds that

( L q 0 ( Ω ; E ) , L q 1 ( Ω ; E ) ) θ , ρ = L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) ,

where q satisfies

(2.1) 1 q = ( 1 θ ) q 0 + θ q 1

and ( , ) θ , ρ denotes the real interpolation spaces. In addition, let 1 < q 0 < q 1 < , ρ , ρ 0 , ρ 1 [ 1 , ] , and 0 < θ < 1 . Then, it holds that

( L q 0 , ρ 0 ( Ω ; E ) , L q 1 , ρ 1 ( Ω ; E ) ) θ , ρ = L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) ,

where q satisfies (2.1).

(vi) Let 1 < q < and 1 ρ < . Then, the set C 0 ( Ω ) of smooth functions with compact support is dense in L q , ρ ( Ω ) .

Proof

The assertions of (i), (ii), and (v) are shown by Castillo and Rafeiro [7, p. 216 and Theorems 6.3 (b), 6.4 (a), and 6.6] and Bergh and Löfström [1, Theorems 5.2.1 and 5.3.1]. Hence, it remains to verify the assertions of (iii), (iv), and (vi).

Concerning (iii), we assume that ρ , ρ 0 , ρ 1 [ 1 , ) . Then, since ( f g ) * ( λ ) f * ( λ 2 ) g * ( λ 2 ) for all 0 < λ < from [7, Theorem 4.11], we see by the Hölder inequality that

0 ( λ 1 q ( f g ) * ( λ ) ) ρ d λ λ 0 ( λ 1 q f * ( λ 2 ) g * ( λ 2 ) ) ρ d λ λ = 2 ρ q 0 ( η 1 q 0 f * ( η ) η 1 q 1 g * ( η ) ) ρ d η η 2 ρ q f L q 0 , ρ 0 ( Ω ) ρ g L q 1 , ρ 1 ( Ω ) ρ ,

which yields the desired result. The remaining cases are shown in the same way. Moreover, we may show the assertion of (iv) as well.

Finally, we show (vi). The condition 1 ρ < and [7, Theorem 6.19] imply that we may take a sequence { f j } j N ( L 1 L ) ( Ω ) of simple functions satisfying lim j f f j L q , ρ ( Ω ) = 0 . In addition, since C 0 ( Ω ) is dense in L 1 ( Ω ) , for each j N , there exists a sequence { f j , k } k N C 0 ( Ω ) of functions such that lim k f j f j , k L 1 ( Ω ) = 0 . Noting that the assertion of (v) yields ( L 1 ( Ω ) , L ( Ω ) ) 1 1 q , ρ = L q , ρ ( Ω ) , we see by [38, Corollary 1.7] that

f f j , k L q , ρ ( Ω ) C ( f f j L q , ρ ( Ω ) + f j f j , k L q , ρ ( Ω ) ) C ( f f j L q , ρ ( Ω ) + f j f j , k L 1 ( Ω ) 1 q f j f j , k L ( Ω ) 1 1 q ) ,

which gives

limsup k f f j , k L q , ρ ( Ω ) C f f j L q , ρ ( Ω ) .

Therefore, by letting j , we have the desired result.□

Remark 2.2

(i) Proposition 2.1 (i) gives the quasi-triangle inequality on the Lorentz spaces L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) . More precisely, it is known that L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) are not normed spaces in general [7, Theorem 6.5 (a)]. However, by introducing

f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) 0 ( λ 1 q f * * ( λ ) ) ρ d λ λ 1 ρ if  1 ρ < , sup 0 < λ < λ 1 q f * * ( λ ) if  ρ = ,

where f * * ( λ ) λ 1 0 λ f * ( η ) d η for 0 < λ < , we may show that L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) are norms and

f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) q ( q 1 ) 1 f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E )

holds for all f L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) [7, p. 228 and Theorem 6.14]. In addition, the Lorentz spaces L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) equipped with the norms L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) become Banach spaces [7, Theorem 6.18]. Hence, we may regard L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) as Banach spaces even though L q , ρ ( Ω ; E ) do not satisfy the triangle inequality.

(ii) In this article, we consider the Lorentz spaces L q , ρ for 1 < q < . If we consider the case of q = 1 , then we do not know the equivalence of norms L 1 , ρ ( Ω ; E ) and L 1 , ρ ( Ω ; E ) due to the coefficient q ( q 1 ) 1 . In addition, if we consider the case of q = , then we see by [7, p. 216] that L , ρ ( Ω ; E ) = { 0 } for any 1 ρ < . Thus, we exclude the marginal cases q = 1 and q = .

3 Heat semigroup on Lorentz spaces

In this section, we show the properties of the heat semigroup { e t Δ } t > 0 defined on Lorentz spaces L q , ρ . We first show the smoothing estimates and space-time estimates of the heat semigroup. These estimates play a key role in the proof of our main results. We may regard the assertions of (iii) and (iv) below as the result corresponding to that given by Kozono and Shimizu [33, Proposition 2.1]; they showed the space-time estimate in the homogeneous Besov spaces framework, where the homogeneous Besov spaces are characterized by the real interpolation spaces of the homogeneous Sobolev spaces. Our method also relies on real interpolation. We have to remark that Yamazaki [50, Corollary 2.3] has shown a part of our estimates: Even so, we attach all the proofs in detail for the convenience of the readers.

Proposition 3.1

Let 1 < q 0 < q 1 < and 1 ρ . Set ( H f ) ( t ) e t Δ f for f L loc 1 and 0 < t < . Then, the following assertions hold:

(i) For every f L q 0 , ρ , it holds that H f L ( ( 0 , ) ; L q 0 , ρ ) with the estimate

H f L ( L q 0 , ρ ) C f L q 0 , ρ ,

where C > 0 is a constant independent of f. In addition, it holds that ( H f ) ( t ) ( L q 0 , ρ ) N and 2 ( H f ) ( t ) ( L q 0 , ρ ) N 2 for all 0 < t < with the estimate

j ( H f ) ( t ) L q 0 , ρ C t j 2 f L q 0 , ρ

for j { 1 , 2 } , where C > 0 is a constant independent of t and f.

(ii) For every f L q 0 , , it holds that ( H f ) ( t ) L q 1 , 1 L and ( H f ) ( t ) ( L q 1 , 1 L ) N for all 0 < t < with the estimates

j ( H f ) ( t ) L q 1 , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L q 0 , , j ( H f ) ( t ) L C t N ( 2 q 0 ) j 2 f L q 0 ,

for j { 0 , 1 } . In addition, for every f L 1 , it holds that ( H f ) ( t ) L q 1 , 1 and ( H f ) ( t ) ( L q 1 , 1 ) N for all 0 < t < with the estimate

j ( H f ) ( t ) L q 1 , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L 1

for j { 0 , 1 } .

(iii) Let j { 0 , 1 } and let α j satisfy 1 α j = ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 . Suppose that 1 q 0 1 q 1 < 2 N . Then, for every f L q 0 , ρ , it holds that H f L α 0 , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; L q 1 , 1 ) with the estimate

H f L α 0 , ρ ( L q 1 , 1 ) C f L q 0 , ρ .

In addition, suppose that 1 q 0 1 q 1 < 1 N . Then, for every f L q 0 , ρ , it holds that H f L α 1 , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; ( L q 1 , 1 ) N ) with the estimate

H f L α 1 , ρ ( L q 1 , 1 ) C f L q 0 , ρ .

(iv) Let j { 0 , 1 } and let β j satisfy 1 β j = N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 . Suppose that N 2 < q 0 < . Then, for every f L q 0 , ρ , it holds that H f L β 0 , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; L ) with the estimate

H f L β 0 , ρ ( L ) C f L q 0 , ρ .

In addition, suppose that N < q 0 < . Then, for every f L q 0 , ρ , it holds that H f L β 1 , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; ( L ) N ) with the estimate

H f L β 1 , ρ ( L ) C f L q 0 , ρ .

Proof

(i) Since 1 < q 0 < q 1 < , we may take q , q + ( 1 , ) so that

(3.1) 1 < q < q 0 < q + < q 1 .

In addition, we take 0 < θ < 1 satisfying

(3.2) 1 q 0 = ( 1 θ ) q + θ q + .

Then, we see by the usual estimates of the heat semigroup that

j e t Δ f L q C t j 2 f L q , j e t Δ f + L q + C t j 2 f + L q +

for all 0 < t < , j { 0 , 1 , 2 } , f L q , and f + L q + . Since (3.2) and Proposition 2.1 (v) yield ( L q , L q + ) θ , ρ = L q 0 , ρ for all 1 ρ , we see by [38, Theorem 1.6] that the desired estimates are valid.

(ii) We consider q , q + ( 1 , ) and 0 < θ < 1 satisfying (3.1) and (3.2) again. The usual estimates of the heat semigroup yield

j e t Δ f L q 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L q , j e t Δ f + L q 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q + 1 q 1 ) j 2 f + L q + , j e t Δ f L C t N ( 2 q ) j 2 f L q , j e t Δ f + L C t N ( 2 q + ) j 2 f + L q +

for all 0 < t < , j { 0 , 1 } , f L q , and f + L q + . Therefore, by applying Proposition 2.1 (v) and [38, Theorem 1.6], we deduce that

j e t Δ f L q 1 C ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) j 2 ) 1 θ ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q + 1 q 1 ) j 2 ) θ f L q 0 , = C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L q 0 , , j e t Δ f L C ( t N ( 2 q ) j 2 ) 1 θ ( t N ( 2 q + ) j 2 ) θ f L q 0 , = C t N ( 2 q 0 ) j 2 f L q 0 ,

for all 0 < t < and f L q 0 , . Since the first estimate is valid for all q 0 < q 1 < , by taking r , r + ( 1 , ) and 0 < σ < 1 such that

q 0 < r < q 1 < r + < , 1 q 1 = ( 1 σ ) r + σ r + ,

we have

j e t Δ f L r C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 r ) j 2 f L q 0 , , j e t Δ f L r + C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 r + ) j 2 f L q 0 ,

for all 0 < t < and f L q 0 , . As Proposition 2.1 (v) yields ( L r , L r + ) σ , 1 = L q 1 , 1 , we see by [38, Corollary 1.7] that

j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 C j e t Δ f L r 1 σ j e t Δ f L r + σ C ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 r ) j 2 f L q 0 , ) 1 σ ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 r + ) j 2 f L q 0 , ) σ = C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L q 0 , .

Similarly, noting that

j e t Δ f L r C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 r ) j 2 f L 1 , j e t Δ f L r + C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 r + ) j 2 f L 1

for all 0 < t < and f L 1 , we also see by Proposition 2.1 (v) and [38, Corollary 1.7] that

j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 C j e t Δ f L r 1 σ j e t Δ f L r + σ C ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 r ) j 2 f L 1 ) 1 σ ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 r + ) j 2 f L 1 ) σ = C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L 1 ,

which yields the desired estimate.

(iii) Let 1 < q < q 1 . Then, we see by the assertion of (ii) that

μ ( t ( 0 , ) j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 > λ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) + j 2 μ ( t ( 0 , ) C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) j 2 f L q , > λ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) + j 2 = μ ( t ( 0 , ) ( C λ 1 f L q , ) { ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) + j 2 } 1 > t ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) + j 2 = C λ 1 f L q ,

for all 0 < λ < and f L q , . In what follows, we consider the case of j = 0 . Suppose that 1 q 0 1 q 1 < 2 N . Then, we may take q , q + ( 1 , ) so that (3.1) and 1 q 1 q 1 < 2 N . We also take 0 < θ < 1 such that (3.2). In addition, let α and α + satisfy

1 α = ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 q 1 ) , 1 α + = ( N 2 ) ( 1 q + 1 q 1 ) .

Then, we obtain α , α + ( 1 , ) and

( 1 θ ) α + θ α + = 1 α 0

from condition (3.2). Therefore, since setting q = q and q = q + in the above estimate yields

μ ( t ( 0 , ) e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 > λ ) 1 α C λ 1 f L q , , μ ( t ( 0 , ) e t Δ f + L q 1 , 1 > λ ) 1 α + C λ 1 f + L q + ,

for all 0 < λ < , f L q , , and f + L q + , , we see by Proposition 2.1 (i) that

H f L α , ( L q 1 , 1 ) C f L q , , H f + L α + , ( L q 1 , 1 ) C f + L q + , .

By using Proposition 2.1 (v), we have

( L α , ( ( 0 , ) ; L q 1 , 1 ) , L α + , ( ( 0 , ) ; L q 1 , 1 ) ) θ , ρ = L α 0 , ρ ( ( 0 , ) ; L q 1 , 1 ) , ( L q , , L q + , ) θ , ρ = L q 0 , ρ .

Hence, it holds by [38, Theorem 1.6] that the desired estimate is valid. The case of j = 1 may be shown in the same way.

(iv) We may show in the same way as in the proof of the assertion of (iii). This proves Proposition 3.1.□

By combining Proposition 3.1 and the standard density argument, we may show the following properties:

Proposition 3.2

Let 1 < q 0 < q 1 < and 1 ρ < . Then, for every f L q 0 , ρ , it holds that

(3.3) lim t + 0 e t Δ f f L q 0 , ρ + lim t e t Δ f L q 0 , ρ = 0 ,

(3.4) lim t + 0 , t j = 0 1 ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L ) = 0 ,

where the limit of (3.4) implies either t + 0 or t . In particular, the heat semigroup e t Δ : L q 0 , ρ L q 0 , ρ is a bounded analytic C 0 -semigroup.

Proof

Since 1 ρ < , by applying Proposition 2.1 (vi), we may take a sequence { f k } k N C 0 of functions so that lim k f f k L q 0 , ρ = 0 . Here, noting that Proposition 2.1 (v) yields ( L 1 , L ) 1 1 q 0 , ρ = L q 0 , ρ , we see by [38, Corollary 1.7] that

e t Δ f k f k L q 0 , ρ C e t Δ f k f k L 1 1 q 0 e t Δ f k f k L 1 1 q 0 C e t Δ f k f k L 1 1 q 0 ( 2 f k L ) 1 1 q 0

for all 0 < t < and k N . Since the heat semigroup e t Δ : L 1 L 1 is a C 0 -semigroup, we have lim t + 0 e t Δ f k f k L q 0 , ρ = 0 . Hence, by the condition q 0 > 1 and Proposition 3.1 (i) and (ii), we observe that

e t Δ f f L q 0 , ρ C ( e t Δ f e t Δ f k L q 0 , ρ + e t Δ f k f k L q 0 , ρ + f k f L q 0 , ρ ) C ( f k f L q 0 , ρ + e t Δ f k f k L q 0 , ρ ) , e t Δ f L q 0 , ρ C ( e t Δ f e t Δ f k L q 0 , ρ + e t Δ f k L q 0 , ρ ) C ( f f k L q 0 , ρ + t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 q 0 ) f k L 1 ) ,

which yield

limsup t + 0 e t Δ f f L q 0 , ρ + limsup t e t Δ f L q 0 , ρ C f k f L q 0 , ρ .

By letting k , we obtain (3.3). Moreover, since Proposition 3.1 (i) yields Δ e t Δ f L q 0 , ρ C t 1 f L q 0 , ρ for all 0 < t < and f L q 0 , ρ , by applying [21, Theorem 4.6], we observe that the heat semigroup e t Δ : L q 0 , ρ L q 0 , ρ is a bounded analytic C 0 -semigroup.

In addition, by considering the sequence { f k } k N C 0 again, we also obtain

t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 ( j e t Δ f j e t Δ f k L q 1 , 1 + j e t Δ f k L q 1 , 1 ) + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 ( j e t Δ f j e t Δ f k L + j e t Δ f k L )

for all 0 < t < , k N , and j { 0 , 1 } . Hence, Proposition 3.1 (i) and (ii) imply that

t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L C ( f f k L q 0 , ρ + t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 j f k L q 1 , 1 + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 j f k L )

and

t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L C ( f f k L q 0 , ρ + t ( N 2 ) ( 1 1 q 0 ) f k L 1 ) .

Noting that 1 < q 0 < q 1 , we have

limsup t + 0 , t j = 0 1 ( t ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q 1 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L q 1 , 1 + t N ( 2 q 0 ) + j 2 j e t Δ f L ) C f k f L q 0 , ρ ,

and thus, we obtain (3.4) by letting k . This proves Proposition 3.2.□

4 Construction of mild solutions in scaling invariant Lorentz spaces

4.1 Nonlinear estimates

In this section, we shall show our main results (Theorems 1.1 and 1.3). To this end, we follow the approach due to Kato [26]. Particularly, we show the suitable estimates of the nonlinear terms of the integral systems (1.5) by using the estimate of the heat semigroup in Proposition 3.1. We begin with the following estimates:

Proposition 4.1

Let 1 < α < , 1 ρ , 1 α < σ < 1 , and 0 < T . For the function f L loc 1 ( 0 , T ) , define I σ [ f ] by setting

( I σ [ f ] ) ( t ) 0 t ( t τ ) σ f ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < T .

Then, the following statements hold:

(i) Suppose that f L α 0 , ρ ( 0 , T ) , where 1 < α 0 < satisfies 1 α 0 = 1 α + 1 σ . Then, it holds that I σ [ f ] L α , ρ ( 0 , T ) with the estimate

I σ [ f ] L T α , ρ C f L T α 0 , ρ ,

where C > 0 is a constant independent of T and f.

(ii) Suppose that f L α 0 , ρ ( 0 , T ) and g L α 1 , ρ ( 0 , T ) , where α 0 , α 1 ( 1 , ) satisfy 1 α 0 + 1 α 1 = 1 α + 1 σ . Then, it holds that I σ [ f g ] L α , ρ ( 0 , T ) with the estimate

I σ [ f g ] L T α , ρ C f L T α 0 , ρ g L T α 1 , ρ ,

where C > 0 is a constant independent of T , f , and g .

Proof

(i) Let 1 < α * < satisfy 1 α * < σ . Then, we have 0 < 1 α * + 1 σ < 1 . Suppose that f L ( 1 α * + 1 σ ) 1 ( 0 , T ) . By setting

f E ( τ ) f ( τ ) τ ( 0 , T ) , 0 τ R \ ( 0 , T ) , ( I σ , E [ f ] ) ( t ) ( I σ [ f ] ) ( t ) t ( 0 , T ) , 0 t R \ ( 0 , T ) ,

we obtain ( I σ , E [ f ] ) ( t ) R t τ σ f E ( τ ) d τ for all t R . Hence, the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality [41, V, Theorem 1] yields

(4.1) I σ [ f ] L T α * = I σ , E [ f ] L α * ( R ) C f E L ( 1 α * + 1 σ ) 1 ( R ) = C f L T ( 1 α * + 1 σ ) 1 .

Next, take α , α + ( 1 , ) so that 1 < α < α < α + < and 1 α < σ . We also take 0 < θ < 1 satisfying 1 α = ( 1 θ ) α + θ α + . Then, we see by (4.1) that

I σ [ f ] L T α C f L T ( 1 α + 1 σ ) 1 , I σ [ f + ] L T α + C f + L T ( 1 α + + 1 σ ) 1

for all f L ( 1 α + 1 σ ) 1 ( 0 , T ) and f + L ( 1 α + + 1 σ ) 1 ( 0 , T ) . Since

( 1 θ ) ( 1 α + 1 σ ) + θ ( 1 α + + 1 σ ) = 1 α + 1 σ = 1 α 0 ,

Proposition 2.1 (v) implies that

( L α ( 0 , T ) , L α + ( 0 , T ) ) θ , ρ = L α , ρ ( 0 , T ) , ( L ( 1 α + 1 σ ) 1 ( 0 , T ) , L ( 1 α + + 1 σ ) 1 ( 0 , T ) ) θ , ρ = L α 0 , ρ ( 0 , T ) .

Therefore, the result of [38, Theorem 1.6] yields the desired estimate.

(ii) In the assertion of (i), by replacing f with f g , we have

I σ [ f g ] L T α , ρ C f g L T ( 1 α + 1 σ ) 1 , ρ .

Noting that 1 α + 1 σ = 1 α 0 + 1 α 1 , we see by Proposition 2.1 (ii) and (iii) that the desired estimate holds.□

By combining the estimates in Propositions 3.1 and 4.1, we show the estimates of the nonlinear terms in the Lorentz spaces framework.

Lemma 4.2

Let N 2 < q < , N < r < , 1 ρ , and 0 θ < 1 and let α , β ( 1 , ) satisfy (1.7). In addition, let 0 < T and set

( [ f ] ) ( t ) 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ f ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < T

for f L loc 1 ( ( 0 , T ) ; L loc 1 ) . Then, the following assertions hold:

(i) Assume that ( θ + 1 ) N < 1 q + 1 r < 1 and let 1 < q * < satisfy 0 < 1 q + 1 r 1 q * < 1 N . Then, it holds that

[ ( n u ) ] ( t ) L q * , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 2 N 1 q * ) θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β u ( τ ) L r , , [ ( n c ) ] ( t ) L q * , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 2 N 1 q * ) θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β c ( τ ) L r , , [ ( n u ) ] L t α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) C n L t α , ρ ( L q , ) u L t β , ρ ( L r , ) , [ ( n c ) ] L t α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) C n L t α , ρ ( L q , ) c L t β , ρ ( L r , )

for all 0 < t < T , where C > 0 is a constant independent of T , t , n , c , and u .

(ii) Assume that u ( t ) P ( L r , ) N for all 0 < t < T . Then, it holds that

[ u c ] ( t ) L C t θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β + θ 2 u ( τ ) L r , , [ n c ] ( t ) L C t θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L

for all 0 < t < T .

(iii) Assume that θ < 2 N r and let 1 < r * < satisfy 0 < 2 r 1 r * < 1 N . Then, it holds that

[ u c ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r * ) θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β + θ 2 u ( τ ) L r , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β c ( τ ) L r , , [ P ( u u ˜ ) ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r * ) θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β + θ 2 u ( τ ) L r , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β u ˜ ( τ ) L r , , [ u c ] L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C u L t β , ρ ( L r , ) c L t β , ρ ( L r , ) , [ P ( u u ˜ ) ] L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C u L t β , ρ ( L r , ) u ˜ L t β , ρ ( L r , )

for all 0 < t < T , where C > 0 is a constant independent of T , t , c , u , and u ˜ . Here, denotes the tensor product.

(iv) Assume that θ < N q and let 1 < r * < satisfy 0 < 1 q 1 r * < 1 N . Then, it holds that

[ n c ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r * ) θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L

for all 0 < t < T . In addition, if q and r satisfy 0 < 1 q 1 r < 1 N , then, it holds that

[ n c ] L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C n L t α , ρ ( L q , ) sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L

for all 0 < t < T .

(v) Assume that θ < N q and let 1 < r * < satisfy 1 N < 1 q 1 r * < 1 N . Then, it holds that

[ P ( n φ ) ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C t ( N 2 ) ( 1 N 1 r * ) θ 2 φ L N , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q ,

for all 0 < t < T , where C > 0 is a constant independent of T , t , φ , and n. In addition, if q and r satisfy 1 N < 1 q 1 r < 1 N , then, it holds that

[ P ( n φ ) ] L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C φ L N , n L t α , ρ ( L q , )

for all 0 < t < T .

Proof

(i) Take q 0 so that 1 q 0 = 1 q + 1 r . Then, the assumption yields

max { ( θ + 1 ) N , 1 q * } < 1 q 0 < min { 1 , 1 N + 1 q * } .

Since it holds that 0 t ( t τ ) a 1 τ b 1 d τ = B ( a , b ) t a + b 1 for all 0 < t < and a , b ( 0 , ) , where B ( a , b ) denotes the beta function given by B ( a , b ) 0 1 ( 1 λ ) a 1 λ b 1 d λ < , we see by Propositions 2.1 (iii) and 3.1 (ii) that

[ ( n u ) ] ( t ) L q * , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q * ) 1 2 ( n u ) ( τ ) L q 0 , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q * ) 1 2 n ( τ ) L q , u ( τ ) L r , d τ C B ( 1 2 ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 0 1 q * ) , N ( 2 q 0 ) 1 2 θ 2 ) t 1 + N ( 2 q * ) θ 2 × sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 N ( 2 q ) + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 2 N ( 2 r ) u ( τ ) L r ,

for all 0 < t < T . In addition, since we may take q * = q , there holds

[ ( n u ) ] ( t ) L q , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( 1 1 β ) n ( τ ) L q , u ( τ ) L r , d τ .

Noting that 1 α + 1 β = 1 α + 1 ( 1 1 β ) , we see by Proposition 4.1 (ii) that

[ ( n u ) ] L q , 1 L t α , ρ C n L q , L t α , ρ u L r , L t β , ρ .

The remaining estimates are obtained by replacing u with c .

(ii) We remark that u c = ( c u ) due to u = 0 . Since q > N 2 and r > N , it holds by Propositions 2.1 (iv) and 3.1 (ii) that

[ u c ] ( t ) L C 0 t ( t τ ) N ( 2 r ) 1 2 ( c u ) ( τ ) L r , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) N ( 2 r ) 1 2 c ( τ ) L u ( τ ) L r , d τ C B ( 1 2 N ( 2 r ) , N ( 2 r ) + 1 2 θ 2 ) t θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 2 N ( 2 r ) + θ 2 u ( τ ) L r ,

and

[ n c ] ( t ) L C 0 t ( t τ ) N ( 2 q ) ( n c ) ( τ ) L q , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) N ( 2 q ) n ( τ ) L q , c ( τ ) L d τ C B ( 1 N ( 2 q ) , N ( 2 q ) θ 2 ) t θ 2 sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 N ( 2 q ) + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L

for all 0 < t < T .

(iii) Since r > N , N r θ 2 > 0 , and 0 < 2 r 1 r * < 1 N , we see by Propositions 2.1 (iii) and 3.1 (ii) that

[ u c ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 2 r 1 r * ) 1 2 ( u c ) ( τ ) L r 2 , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 2 r 1 r * ) 1 2 u ( τ ) L r , c ( τ ) L r , d τ C B ( 1 2 ( N 2 ) ( 2 r 1 r * ) , N r θ 2 ) t 1 2 + N ( 2 r * ) θ 2 × sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 2 N ( 2 r ) + θ 2 u ( τ ) L r , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 2 N ( 2 r ) c ( τ ) L r ,

and

[ P ( u u ˜ ) ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 2 r 1 r * ) 1 2 ( u u ˜ ) ( τ ) L r 2 , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 2 r 1 r * ) 1 2 u ( τ ) L r , u ˜ ( τ ) L r , d τ C B ( 1 2 ( N 2 ) ( 2 r 1 r * ) , N r θ 2 ) t 1 2 + N ( 2 r * ) θ 2 × sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 2 N ( 2 r ) + θ 2 u ( τ ) L r , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 2 N ( 2 r ) u ˜ ( τ ) L r ,

for all 0 < t < T . Since we may take r * = r , we deduce that

[ u c ] ( t ) L r , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( 1 1 β ) u ( τ ) L r , c ( τ ) L r , d τ , [ P ( u u ˜ ) ] ( t ) L r , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( 1 1 β ) u ( τ ) L r , u ˜ ( τ ) L r , d τ .

Noting that 1 β + 1 β = 1 β + 1 ( 1 1 β ) , we apply Proposition 4.1 (ii) to obtain the desired estimates.

(iv) Since N ( 2 q ) θ 2 > 0 and 0 < 1 q 1 r * < 1 N , it holds by Propositions 2.1 (iv) and 3.1 (ii) that

[ n c ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 r * ) 1 2 ( n c ) ( τ ) L q , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 r * ) 1 2 n ( τ ) L q , c ( τ ) L d τ C B ( 1 2 ( N 2 ) ( 1 q 1 r * ) , N ( 2 q ) θ 2 ) t 1 2 + N ( 2 r * ) θ 2 × sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 N ( 2 q ) + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q , sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L

for all 0 < t < T . Since the condition 0 < 1 q 1 r < 1 N implies that we may take r * = r , it holds that

[ n c ] ( t ) L r , 1 C sup 0 < τ < t c ( τ ) L 0 t ( t τ ) ( 1 1 α + 1 β ) n ( τ ) L q , d τ .

Hence, we see by 1 α = 1 β + 1 ( 1 1 α + 1 β ) and Proposition 4.1 (i) that the desired estimate holds.

(v) Take r 0 so that 1 r 0 = 1 q + 1 N . Then, the assumption yields 1 r * < 1 r 0 < 2 N + 1 r * . Thus, we see by N ( 2 q ) θ 2 > 0 and Propositions 2.1 (iii) and 3.1 (ii) that

[ P ( n φ ) ] ( t ) L r * , 1 C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 r 0 1 r * ) n ( τ ) φ L r 0 , d τ C 0 t ( t τ ) ( N 2 ) ( 1 r 0 1 r * ) n ( τ ) L q , φ L N , d τ C B ( 1 ( N 2 ) ( 1 r 0 1 r * ) , N ( 2 q ) θ 2 ) t 1 2 + N ( 2 r * ) θ 2 × φ L N , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 N ( 2 q ) + θ 2 n ( τ ) L q ,

for all 0 < t < T . Since the condition 1 N < 1 q 1 r < 1 N implies that we may take r * = r , it holds that

[ P ( n φ ) ] ( t ) L r , 1 C φ L N , 0 t ( t τ ) ( 1 1 α + 1 β ) n ( τ ) L q , d τ ,

which yields the desired estimate with the aid of Proposition 4.1 (i). This completes the proof of Lemma 4.2.□

Remark 4.3

Let N 2 < q < N . Then, it holds that max { 2 N 1 q , 1 q 1 N } < 1 N , namely, N < min { N q ( 2 q N ) , N q ( N q ) } , and thus, we may take r so that (1.6). Hence, α and β given by (1.7) satisfy 2 < α < and 4 < β < , respectively. In addition, since q and r satisfy

1 ( 2 N ) < 1 r < 1 N < 1 q < 2 N , 2 N < 1 q + 1 r < 3 N , 0 < 1 q 1 r < 1 N ,

by setting q * = N 2 or q * = q and r * = N or r * = r , we observe that all the estimates given in Lemma 4.2 are valid for any 0 θ < 1 .

4.2 Local mild solutions: Proof of Theorem 1.1

Once we show the nonlinear estimates in Lemma 4.2, we may show the existence of mild solutions of (1.1) by the Banach fixed point theorem. We mention that since the term n φ appearing in (1.5) is regarded as a linear term, we have to choose φ sufficiently small in general. However, by a slight modification of the definition of the mapping, we may show that the mapping is a contraction mapping without assuming any smallness of φ . In addition, it is not necessary to assume the smallness condition of the norm c 0 L although C 0 is not dense in L .

Proof of Theorem 1.1

(i) Take α and β so that (1.7). Let T > 0 and define the function space X T by setting

(4.2) X T ( n , c , u ) n BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; L N 2 , ρ ) L α , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; L q , 1 ) , c BC ( ( 0 , T ) ; BUC ) , c BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; ( L N , ρ ) N ) L β , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; ( L r , 1 ) N ) , u BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; P ( L N , ρ ) N ) L β , ρ ( ( 0 , T ) ; P ( L r , 1 ) N ) , t 1 α n BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; L q , 1 ) , t 1 β c BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; ( L r , 1 ) N ) , t 1 β u BC ( [ 0 , T ) ; P ( L r , 1 ) N ) , lim t + 0 t 1 α n ( t ) L q , 1 = 0 , lim t + 0 t 1 β c ( t ) L r , 1 = 0 , lim t + 0 t 1 β u ( t ) L r , 1 = 0

and set

( n , c , u ) X t n L t ( L N 2 , ρ ) + c L t ( L ) + c L t ( L N , ρ ) + u L t ( L N , ρ ) + [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t , [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t sup 0 < τ < t ( τ 1 α n ( τ ) L q , 1 + τ 1 β c ( τ ) L r , 1 + τ 1 β u ( τ ) L r , 1 ) + n L t α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) + c L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) + u L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 )

for 0 < t < T and ( n , c , u ) X T . First, we consider v 0 ( t ) ( e t Δ n 0 , e t Δ c 0 , e t Δ u 0 ) for 0 < t < . By applying Propositions 3.1 (i), (ii), and (iii) and 3.2, we observe that

(4.3) [ v 0 ] X T C ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + c 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ ) , v 0 X T C ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + c 0 L + c 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ )

and

(4.4) lim t + 0 [ v 0 ] X t = 0 .

Hence, we see that v 0 X T . Next we take ( n , c , u ) X T and set v ( n , c , u ) . Define the mapping Φ v ( Φ 0 v , Φ 1 v , Φ 2 v ) , where Φ 0 , Φ 1 , and Φ 2 are given by

( Φ 0 v ) ( t ) e t Δ n 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n u ) + ( n c ) ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < T , ( Φ 1 v ) ( t ) e t Δ c 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( Φ 2 v ) c + ( Φ 0 v ) c ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < T , ( Φ 2 v ) ( t ) e t Δ u 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( u u ) ( Φ 0 v ) φ ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < T .

Then, we see by Proposition 3.1 (i) and Lemma 4.2 (i) that

Φ 0 v L T ( L N 2 , ρ ) C n 0 L N 2 , ρ + C [ v ] X T 2 , ( Φ 0 v ) ( t ) L q , 1 C e t Δ n 0 L q , 1 + C t 1 α [ v ] X t 2 , Φ 0 v L t α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) C [ v 0 ] X t + C [ v ] X t 2

for all 0 < t < T . Thus, we have

(4.5) sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( τ ) L q , 1 + Φ 0 v L t α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) C ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 ) .

By combining the estimate (4.5), Proposition 3.1 (i), and Lemma 4.2 (iii) and (v), we deduce that

Φ 2 v L T ( L N , ρ ) C u 0 L N , ρ + C [ v ] X T 2 + C φ L N , sup 0 < τ < T τ 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( τ ) L q , C u 0 L N , ρ + C ( 1 + φ L N , ) ( [ v 0 ] X T + [ v ] X T 2 ) , ( Φ 2 v ) ( t ) L r , 1 C e t Δ u 0 L r , 1 + C t 1 β [ v ] X t 2 + C t 1 β φ L N , sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( τ ) L q , C e t Δ u 0 L r , 1 + C t 1 β ( 1 + φ L N , ) ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 ) , Φ 2 v L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C [ v 0 ] X t + C [ v ] X t 2 + C φ L N , Φ 0 v L t α , ρ ( L q , ) C ( 1 + φ L N , ) ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 )

for all 0 < t < T . Hence, there holds

(4.6) sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β ( Φ 2 v ) ( τ ) L r , 1 + Φ 2 v L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C K φ ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 ) ,

where

(4.7) K φ 1 + φ L N , .

In addition, since (4.5) and (4.6) hold, we use Proposition 3.1 (i) and Lemma 4.2 (ii), (iii), and (iv) to obtain

(4.8) Φ 1 v L T ( L ) c 0 L + C c L T ( L ) sup 0 < τ < T ( τ 1 β ( Φ 2 v ) ( τ ) L r , + τ 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( τ ) L q , ) c 0 L + C K φ c L T ( L ) ( [ v 0 ] X T + [ v ] X T 2 )

and

Φ 1 v L T ( L N , ρ ) C c 0 L N , ρ + C [ v ] X T sup 0 < τ < T τ 1 β ( Φ 2 v ) ( τ ) L r , + C c L T ( L ) sup 0 < τ < T τ 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( τ ) L q , C c 0 L N , ρ + C K φ ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( [ v 0 ] X T + [ v ] X T 2 ) , ( Φ 1 v ) ( t ) L r , 1 C e t Δ c 0 L r , 1 + C t 1 β [ v ] X t sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 β ( Φ 2 v ) ( τ ) L r , + C t 1 β c L T ( L ) sup 0 < τ < t τ 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( τ ) L q , C e t Δ c 0 L r , 1 + C K φ t 1 β ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X t ) ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 ) , Φ 1 v L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C [ v 0 ] X t + C ( [ v ] X t Φ 2 v L t β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) + c L T ( L ) Φ 0 v L t α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) ) C [ v 0 ] X t + C K φ ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X t ) ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 )

for all 0 < t < T . Therefore, we observe that

(4.9) [ Φ v ] X t C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X t ) ( [ v 0 ] X t + [ v ] X t 2 )

and

Φ v X T c 0 L + C ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + c 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ ) + C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( [ v 0 ] X T + [ v ] X T 2 ) .

Here, definition (4.2) of X T and (4.4) imply that lim t + 0 [ Φ v ] X t = 0 . Moreover, estimate (4.3) yields

(4.10) Φ v X T c 0 L + C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + c 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ + [ v ] X T 2 ) .

Thus, we observe that Φ v X T for all v X T . Let ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) X T and set v ˜ ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) . Since we have

( Φ 0 v ) ( t ) ( Φ 0 v ˜ ) ( t ) = 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n ( u u ˜ ) ) + ( ( n n ˜ ) u ˜ ) + ( ( n n ˜ ) c ) + ( n ˜ ( c c ˜ ) ) ) ( τ ) d τ , ( Φ 1 v ) ( t ) ( Φ 1 v ˜ ) ( t ) = 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( Φ 2 v Φ 2 v ˜ ) c + ( Φ 2 v ˜ ) ( c c ˜ ) + ( Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ ) c + ( Φ 0 v ˜ ) ( c c ˜ ) ) ( τ ) d τ , ( Φ 2 v ) ( t ) ( Φ 2 v ˜ ) ( t ) = 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( ( u u ˜ ) u ) + ( u ˜ ( u u ˜ ) ) ( Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ ) φ ) ( τ ) d τ

for all 0 < t < T , in the same way as the derivation of the above estimates, we obtain

Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ 0 Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ L T ( L N 2 , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 α ( Φ 0 v ) ( t ) ( Φ 0 v ˜ ) ( t ) L q , 1 + Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ L T α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) C ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T .

In addition, it holds that

Φ 2 v Φ 2 v ˜ 2 Φ 2 v Φ 2 v ˜ L T ( L N , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 β ( Φ 2 v ) ( t ) ( Φ 2 v ˜ ) ( t ) L r , 1 + Φ 2 v Φ 2 v ˜ L T β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T + C φ L N , Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ 0 C K φ ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T

and

Φ 1 v Φ 1 v ˜ L T ( L ) + Φ 1 v Φ 1 v ˜ L T ( L N , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 β ( Φ 1 v ) ( t ) ( Φ 1 v ˜ ) ( t ) L r , 1 + Φ 1 v Φ 1 v ˜ L T β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( Φ 2 v Φ 2 v ˜ 2 + Φ 0 v Φ 0 v ˜ 0 ) + C ( c c ˜ L T ( L ) + [ v v ˜ ] X T ) ( sup 0 < t < T t 1 α ( Φ 0 v ˜ ) ( t ) L q , + Φ 0 v ˜ L T α , ρ ( L q , ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 β ( Φ 2 v ˜ ) ( t ) L r , + Φ 2 v ˜ L T β , ρ ( L r , ) ) C K φ ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T + C K φ ( [ v 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) v v ˜ X T ,

which yield

(4.11) Φ v Φ v ˜ X T C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) v v ˜ X T + C K φ [ v 0 ] X T v v ˜ X T .

By property (4.4), we may assume that

(4.12) [ v 0 ] X T 2 5 ( 1 + C ) 2 K φ 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 2

for sufficiently small T > 0 . For such a T > 0 , we define the closed subspace of X T as follows:

(4.13) B ( X T ) ( n , c , u ) X T [ ( n , c , u ) ] X T 2 3 ( 1 + C ) 1 K φ 1 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 1 , c L T ( L ) 2 c 0 L .

Let ( n , c , u ) , ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) B ( X T ) and set v ( n , c , u ) and v ˜ ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) . Then, estimates (4.8), (4.9), (4.11), and (4.12) imply that

[ Φ v ] X T C K φ ( 1 + 2 c 0 L + 1 ) ( 2 5 + 2 6 ) ( 1 + C ) 2 K φ 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 2 2 3 ( 1 + C ) 1 K φ 1 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 1 , Φ 1 v L T ( L ) c 0 L + C K φ 2 c 0 L ( 2 5 + 2 6 ) ( 1 + C ) 2 K φ 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 2 2 c 0 L , Φ v Φ v ˜ X T C K φ ( 1 + 2 c 0 L + 1 ) 2 2 ( 1 + C ) 1 K φ 1 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 1 v v ˜ X T + C K φ 2 5 ( 1 + C ) 2 K φ 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 2 v v ˜ X T ( 3 4 ) v v ˜ X T .

Therefore, we deduce that the mapping Φ : B ( X T ) B ( X T ) is a contraction mapping. The Banach fixed point theorem ensures the existence of a unique v = ( n , c , u ) B ( X T ) such that Φ v = v . In particular, we have Φ 0 v = n , Φ 1 v = c , and Φ 2 v = u with estimate (1.9). In addition, since v B ( X T ) , it holds by (4.10) that

v X T c 0 L + C K φ ( 1 + 2 c 0 L + 1 ) ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + c 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ ) + C K φ ( 1 + 2 c 0 L + 1 ) 2 3 ( 1 + C ) 1 K φ 1 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 1 v X T c 0 L + C K φ ( 1 + c 0 L ) ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + c 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ ) + ( 1 4 ) v X T ,

which yields (1.8). Concerning properties (1.10) and (1.11), since (1.5) yields

n ( t ) n 0 = e t Δ n 0 n 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n u ) + ( n c ) ) ( τ ) d τ , c ( t ) c 0 = e t Δ c 0 c 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( u c + n c ) ( τ ) d τ , u ( t ) u 0 = e t Δ u 0 u 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( u u ) n φ ) ( τ ) d τ

for all 0 < t < T , we see by Lemma 4.2 (i), (iii), (iv), and (v) that

n ( t ) n 0 L N 2 , ρ C e t Δ n 0 n 0 L N 2 , ρ + C [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t 2 , c ( t ) c 0 L N , ρ C e t Δ c 0 c 0 L N , ρ + C ( c L T ( L ) + [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t ) [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t , u ( t ) u 0 L N , ρ C e t Δ u 0 u 0 L N , ρ + C ( φ L N , + [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t ) [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t .

Thus, we have (1.10) by virtue of definition (4.2) of X T and Proposition 3.2. Moreover, we also see by Lemma 4.2 (ii) that

c ( t ) e t Δ c 0 L C [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t c L T ( L ) ,

which yields (1.11).

(ii) Let 0 < T 0 and set

Y T 0 ( n , c , u ) n L α , ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; L q , ) , c L ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; L ) , c L β , ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; ( L r , ) N ) , u L β , ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; P ( L r , ) N ) , M ( n , c , u ) δ K φ 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1

for sufficiently small 0 < δ < 1 , where K φ is the constant given by (4.7) and

M ( n , c , u ) limsup λ { λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) n ( t ) L q , > λ ) 1 α + λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) c ( t ) L r , > λ ) 1 β + λ μ ( t ( 0 , T 0 ) u ( t ) L r , > λ ) 1 β } .

We first show that there is 0 < h < 1 satisfying

(4.14) n L α , ( ( t , t + h ) ; L q , ) + c L β , ( ( t , t + h ) ; L r , ) + u L β , ( ( t , t + h ) ; L r , ) C δ K φ 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1

for all 0 t < T 0 h and ( n , c , u ) Y T 0 , where C > 0 is a constant independent of T 0 , δ , h , t , φ , n , c , and u . By applying [42, Proposition 4.9], we may take R δ > 0 and n B L ( ( 0 , T 0 ) ; L q , ) so that

n B L T 0 ( L q , ) R δ , n n B L T 0 α , ( L q , ) 2 δ K φ 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1 .

Hence, we observe that

n L α , ( ( t , t + h ) ; L q , ) C ( n B L α ( ( t , t + h ) ; L q , ) + n n B L T 0 α , ( L q , ) ) C { R δ h 1 α + 2 δ K φ 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1 } .

Thus, we have

n L α , ( ( t , t + h ) ; L q , ) C δ K φ 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1

by taking 0 < h < 1 sufficiently small. In the same way, we obtain (4.14). We assume that ( n , c , u ) , ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) Y T 0 are solutions of (1.5) and set

D ( t ) n n ˜ L α , ( ( 0 , t ) ; L q , ) + c c ˜ L ( ( 0 , t ) ; L ) + c c ˜ L β , ( ( 0 , t ) ; L r , ) + u u ˜ L β , ( ( 0 , t ) ; L r , )

for 0 < t < T 0 . Then, since (4.14) holds and since

n ( t ) n ˜ ( t ) = 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n ( u u ˜ ) ) + ( ( n n ˜ ) u ˜ ) + ( ( n n ˜ ) c ) + ( n ˜ ( c c ˜ ) ) ) ( τ ) d τ , c ( t ) c ˜ ( t ) = 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( u u ˜ ) c + u ˜ ( c c ˜ ) + ( n n ˜ ) c + n ˜ ( c c ˜ ) ) ( τ ) d τ , u ( t ) u ˜ ( t ) = 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( ( u u ˜ ) u ) + ( u ˜ ( u u ˜ ) ) ( n n ˜ ) φ ) ( τ ) d τ

for all 0 < t < T 0 , we see by Lemma 4.2 that

n n ˜ L α , ( ( 0 , h ) ; L q , ) C δ K φ 1 ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1 D ( h ) , u u ˜ L β , ( ( 0 , h ) ; L r , ) C δ ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1 D ( h ) + C φ L N , n n ˜ L α , ( ( 0 , h ) ; L q , ) C δ ( 1 + c L T 0 ( L ) ) 1 D ( h )

and

c c ˜ L ( ( 0 , h ) ; L ) + c c ˜ L β , ( ( 0 , h ) ; L r , ) C δ D ( h ) + C c L T 0 ( L ) ( n n ˜ L α , ( ( 0 , h ) ; L q , ) + u u ˜ L β , ( ( 0 , h ) ; L r , ) ) C δ D ( h ) ,

which yield D ( h ) C δ D ( h ) . By taking 0 < δ < 1 so that C δ 1 2 , we have D ( h ) = 0 . Thus, we deduce that ( n , c , u ) = ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) in ( 0 , h ) × R N . In addition, since

D ( 2 h ) = n n ˜ L α , ( ( h , 2 h ) ; L q , ) + c c ˜ L ( ( h , 2 h ) ; L ) + c c ˜ L β , ( ( h , 2 h ) ; L r , ) + u u ˜ L β , ( ( h , 2 h ) ; L r , ) ,

by setting t = h in (4.14), we may show that D ( 2 h ) C δ D ( 2 h ) in a similar way to the derivation of the above estimates. Thus, we have ( n , c , u ) = ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) in ( 0,2 h ) × R N . By repeating the same argument, we have the desired result.

(iii) Note that

n ( t ) n ˜ ( t ) = e t Δ ( n 0 n ˜ 0 ) 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n ( u u ˜ ) ) + ( ( n n ˜ ) u ˜ ) + ( ( n n ˜ ) c ) + ( n ˜ ( c c ˜ ) ) ) ( τ ) d τ , c ( t ) c ˜ ( t ) = e t Δ ( c 0 c ˜ 0 ) 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( u u ˜ ) c + u ˜ ( c c ˜ ) + ( n n ˜ ) c + n ˜ ( c c ˜ ) ) ( τ ) d τ , u ( t ) u ˜ ( t ) = e t Δ ( u 0 u ˜ 0 ) 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( ( u u ˜ ) u ) + ( u ˜ ( u u ˜ ) ) ( n n ˜ ) φ n ˜ ( φ φ ˜ ) ) ( τ ) d τ

for all 0 < t < T . We set v ( n , c , u ) and v ˜ ( n ˜ , c ˜ , u ˜ ) . In the same way as the derivation of the estimate (4.11), we observe that

n n ˜ 0 n n ˜ L T ( L N 2 , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 α n ( t ) n ˜ ( t ) L q , 1 + n n ˜ L T α , ρ ( L q , 1 ) C n 0 n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ + C ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T .

In addition, it holds that

u u ˜ 2 u u ˜ L T ( L N , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 β u ( t ) u ˜ ( t ) L r , 1 + u u ˜ L T β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) C u 0 u ˜ 0 L N , ρ + C ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T + C φ L N , n n ˜ 0 + C φ φ ˜ L N , ( sup 0 < t < T t 1 α n ˜ ( t ) L q , + n ˜ L T α , ρ ( L q , ) ) C ( K φ n 0 n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u ˜ 0 L N , ρ ) + C ( [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) φ φ ˜ L N , + C K φ ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T

and

c c ˜ L T ( L ) + c c ˜ L T ( L N , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 β c ( t ) c ˜ ( t ) L r , 1 + c c ˜ L T β , ρ ( L r , 1 ) c 0 c ˜ 0 L + C c 0 c ˜ 0 L N , ρ + C ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( u u ˜ 2 + n n ˜ 0 ) + C ( c c ˜ L T ( L ) + [ v v ˜ ] X T ) ( sup 0 < t < T t 1 α n ˜ ( t ) L q , + n ˜ L T α , ρ ( L q , ) + sup 0 < t < T t 1 β u ˜ ( t ) L r , + u ˜ L T β , ρ ( L r , ) ) c 0 c ˜ 0 L + C c 0 c ˜ 0 L N , ρ + C ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) × { K φ n 0 n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u ˜ 0 L N , ρ + ( [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) φ φ ˜ L N , } + C K φ ˜ ( [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) ( c c ˜ L T ( L ) + [ v v ˜ ] X T ) + C K φ ( c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T ,

where K φ is the constant given by (4.7). Therefore, we deduce that

v v ˜ X T c 0 c ˜ 0 L + C c 0 c ˜ 0 L N , ρ + C ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) × { K φ n 0 n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u ˜ 0 L N , ρ + ( [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) φ φ ˜ L N , } + C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) ( [ v ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T ) [ v v ˜ ] X T + C K φ ˜ ( [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) v v ˜ X T .

Since v , v ˜ , and v ˜ 0 satisfy

[ v ] X T 2 3 ( 1 + C ) 1 K φ 1 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 1 , [ v ˜ ] X T 2 3 ( 1 + C ) 1 K φ ˜ 1 ( 1 + c ˜ 0 L ) 1 , [ v ˜ 0 ] X T 2 5 ( 1 + C ) 2 K φ ˜ 2 ( 1 + c ˜ 0 L ) 2 , c L T ( L ) 2 c 0 L , c ˜ L T ( L ) 2 c ˜ 0 L

from condition (4.12) and definition (4.13) of B ( X T ) , we obtain

1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ) , [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 1 , C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) [ v ] X T [ v v ˜ ] X T 2 2 v v ˜ X T , C K φ ˜ ( [ v ˜ 0 ] X T + [ v ˜ ] X T 2 ) v v ˜ X T 2 4 v v ˜ X T

and

C K φ ( 1 + c L T ( L ) + [ v ] X T ) [ v ˜ ] X T [ v v ˜ ] X T C ( φ φ ˜ L N , + K φ ˜ ) ( 1 + c 0 L ) [ v ˜ ] X T [ v v ˜ ] X T C ( 1 + c 0 L ) φ φ ˜ L N , + C K φ ˜ ( c 0 c ˜ 0 L + 1 + c ˜ 0 L ) [ v ˜ ] X T [ v v ˜ ] X T C ( 1 + c 0 L ) φ φ ˜ L N , + C K φ ˜ c 0 c ˜ 0 L + C K φ ˜ ( 1 + c ˜ 0 L ) [ v ˜ ] X T v v ˜ X T C ( 1 + c 0 L ) φ φ ˜ L N , + C K φ ˜ c 0 c ˜ 0 L + 2 3 v v ˜ X T ,

which imply that

v v ˜ X T C K φ ( 1 + c 0 L ) n 0 n ˜ 0 L N 2 , ρ + C K φ ˜ c 0 c ˜ 0 L + C c 0 c ˜ 0 L N , ρ + C ( 1 + c 0 L ) ( u 0 u ˜ 0 L N , ρ + φ φ ˜ L N , ) + ( 1 2 ) v v ˜ X T .

Hence, we have (1.13), which completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.□

4.3 Global mild solutions and asymptotic behavior: Proof of Theorem 1.3

Finally, we show the global existence of mild solutions to (1.1). We also show that the global solutions decay as t in the suitable norms, namely, we show Theorem 1.3. Such a result is also mentioned by Kato [26, Note], but we have to pay attention to the proof of Theorem 1.3; recall the method of [26, Note]. To show the decay of the global solutions, we use the continuous dependence (1.13) of solutions ( n , c , u ) with respect to the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) . However, since estimate (1.13) contains the term c 0 c ˜ 0 L and since C 0 is not dense in L , the initial datum c 0 L disturbs the proof of the decay of the global solutions. Concerning this problem, we note that system (1.5) does not contain the nonlinear term given by the product of c with itself. Therefore, we obtain the additional regularities of the solutions without an additional condition of c 0 .

Lemma 4.4

Let 1 ρ < and 0 < θ < 1 . Suppose that q , r , α , and β satisfy (1.6) and (1.7). In addition, suppose that the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) and the gravitational potential φ satisfy (1.4). Then, the following statements hold:

  1. In the statement of Theorem 1.1 (i), there exists a constant 0 < ε < 1 independently of n 0 , c 0 , u 0 , and φ such that if (1.14), then the solution ( n , c , u ) of (1.5) exists globally in time, namely, the existence time interval T in the statement of Theorem 1.1 (i) may be chosen as T = .

  2. In the statement of (i), suppose that the initial data ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) satisfy the additional conditions n 0 L N ( θ + 2 ) and u 0 P ( L N ( θ + 1 ) ) N . Then, the global solution ( n , c , u ) of (1.5) satisfies (1.15), (1.16), and (1.17).

Remark 4.5

As 0 < θ < 1 is given before the assertion of (i), the constant 0 < ε < 1 will be chosen depending on θ although it is related only to the assertion of (ii). However, choosing ε in such a way, we will not have to assume any smallness conditions of the norms n 0 L N ( θ + 2 ) and u 0 L N ( θ + 1 ) even though the additional conditions n 0 L N ( θ + 2 ) and u 0 P ( L N ( θ + 1 ) ) N are assumed in (ii); we emphasize that the smallness assumption of the norm only of scaling invariant spaces will be sufficient to obtain the desired decay properties.

Proof of Lemma 4.4

(i) We recall that in the proof of Theorem 1.1 (i), it is necessary to take T > 0 sufficiently small so that (4.12) holds. Since we see that (4.3), assumption (1.14) ensures that (4.12) holds for any T > 0 . Thus, we may take T = .

(ii) Let X X , where X is defined by (4.2). We also set

Z ( n * , u * ) ( n * , 0 , u * ) X , t 1 α + θ 2 n * BC ( [ 0 , ) ; L q , 1 ) , t 1 β + θ 2 u * BC ( [ 0 , ) ; P ( L r , 1 ) N )

and

( n * , u * ) Z ( n * , 0 , u * ) X + sup 0 < t < ( t 1 α + θ 2 n * ( t ) L q , 1 + t 1 β + θ 2 u * ( t ) L r , 1 )

for ( n * , u * ) Z . In addition, let v * ( n * , u * ) Z and let Ψ v * ( Ψ 0 v * , Ψ 2 v * ) be the mapping such that

( Ψ 0 v * ) ( t ) e t Δ n 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n * u ) + ( n * c ) ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < , ( Ψ 2 v * ) ( t ) e t Δ u 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( u * u ) + ( Ψ 0 v * ) φ ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < ,

where ( n , c , u ) B ( X ) denotes the global solution of (1.5). By applying Lemma 4.2 (i) and (ii), we have

( Ψ 0 v * ) ( t ) L q , 1 C e t Δ n 0 L q , 1 + C t 1 α θ 2 [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t v * Z

for all 0 < t < , which yields

sup 0 < τ < τ 1 α + θ 2 ( Ψ 0 v * ) ( τ ) L q , 1 C n 0 L N ( θ + 2 ) + C [ ( n , c , u ) ] X v * Z

from Proposition 3.1 (ii). Similarly, we deduce that

( Ψ 2 v * ) ( t ) L r , 1 C e t Δ u 0 L r , 1 + C t 1 β θ 2 [ ( n , c , u ) ] X t v * Z + C t 1 β θ 2 φ L N , sup 0 < τ < τ 1 α + θ 2 ( Ψ 0 v * ) ( τ ) L q , C e t Δ u 0 L r , 1 + C K φ t 1 β θ 2 ( n 0 L N ( θ + 2 ) + [ ( n , c , u ) ] X v * Z )

for all 0 < t < , where K φ is the constant given by (4.7). Moreover, in a similar way to the derivation of the estimate (4.10), we obtain

( Ψ 0 v * , 0 , Ψ 2 v * ) X C K φ ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + u 0 L N , ρ + [ ( n , c , u ) ] X v * Z ) .

Hence, it holds by Proposition 3.1 (ii) that

Ψ v * Z C K φ ( n 0 L N 2 , ρ + n 0 L N ( θ + 2 ) + u 0 L N , ρ + u 0 L N ( θ + 1 ) + [ ( n , c , u ) ] X v * Z ) ,

which yields Ψ v * Z . In a similar way to the derivation of the above estimate, we also see that

( Ψ 0 v * Ψ 0 v ˜ * , 0 , Ψ 2 v * Ψ 2 v ˜ * ) X C K φ [ ( n , c , u ) ] X ( n * n ˜ * , 0 , u * u ˜ * ) X , Ψ v * Ψ v ˜ * Z C K φ [ ( n , c , u ) ] X v * v ˜ * Z

for all v * = ( n * , u * ) Z and v ˜ * = ( n ˜ * , u ˜ * ) Z . Recall definition (4.13) of B ( X ) and note that the constant C > 0 appearing in the above estimates might be larger than that in (4.13). However, we may follow the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 1.1 even if the constant C > 0 in (4.13) is replaced with a larger one. Since we have assumed that (1.14), we may regard these two constants as the same ones by going back to the proof of the assertion of (i) and choosing 0 < ε < 1 sufficiently small if necessary. Then, as the condition ( n , c , u ) B ( X ) implies that

( Ψ 0 v * Ψ 0 v ˜ * , 0 , Ψ 2 v * Ψ 2 v ˜ * ) X 2 3 ( n * n ˜ * , 0 , u * u ˜ * ) X , Ψ v * Ψ v ˜ * Z 2 3 v * v ˜ * Z ,

we observe that the mapping Ψ : Z Z is a contraction mapping. Hence, by the Banach fixed point theorem, we obtain a unique v * = ( n * , u * ) Z such that Ψ v * = v * . Note that ( n * , u * ) Z satisfies

(4.15) n * ( t ) = e t Δ n 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ ( ( n * u ) + ( n * c ) ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t < , u * ( t ) = e t Δ u 0 0 t e ( t τ ) Δ P ( ( u * u ) + n * φ ) ( τ ) d τ , 0 < t <

and the global solution ( n , c , u ) X of (1.5) also satisfies (4.15). Furthermore, we deduce that a global solution ( n * , u * ) of (4.15) is unique under the condition ( n * , 0 , u * ) X , and thus, we have n * = n and u * = u . Therefore, we observe that the global solution ( n , c , u ) of (1.5) satisfies ( n , u ) Z .

Now, we shall verify that (1.15), (1.16), and (1.17). To this end, we estimate the original system (1.5). By applying Lemma 4.2 (i), (iii), (iv), and (v) again, we have

n ( t ) L N 2 , ρ C e t Δ n 0 L N 2 , ρ + C t θ 2 ( n , c , u ) X ( n , u ) Z , n ( t ) L q , 1 C e t Δ n 0 L q , 1 + C t 1 α θ 2 ( n , c , u ) X ( n , u ) Z , c ( t ) L N , ρ C e t Δ c 0 L N , ρ + C t θ 2 ( n , c , u ) X ( n , u ) Z , c ( t ) L r , 1 C e t Δ c 0 L r , 1 + C t 1 β θ 2 ( n , c , u ) X ( n , u ) Z , u ( t ) L N , ρ C e t Δ u 0 L N , ρ + C t θ 2 ( φ L N , + ( n , c , u ) X ) ( n , u ) Z , u ( t ) L r , 1 C e t Δ u 0 L r , 1 + C t 1 β θ 2 ( φ L N , + ( n , c , u ) X ) ( n , u ) Z

for all 0 < t < . Thus, we see by Proposition 3.2 that (1.15) and (1.17). In addition, since Lemma 4.2 (ii) yields

c ( t ) e t Δ c 0 L C t θ 2 ( n , c , u ) X ( n , u ) Z ,

we obtain (1.16). This completes the proof of Lemma 4.4.□

Proof of Theorem 1.3

Since we may construct a global solution ( n , c , u ) of (1.5) from Lemma 4.4 (i), in the following, we show properties (1.15), (1.16), and (1.17). We take sequences { n 0 , j } j N C 0 and { u 0 , j } j N ( C 0 ) N of functions satisfying the following conditions:

lim j ( n 0 n 0 , j L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u 0 , j L N , ρ ) = 0 , sup j N ( n 0 , j L N 2 , ρ + u 0 , j L N , ρ ) + c 0 L N , ρ ε K φ 2 ( 1 + c 0 L ) 2 ,

where K φ is the constant given by (4.7). Then, we see that the initial data ( n 0 , j , c 0 , u 0 , j ) satisfy the conditions corresponding to (1.14), and thus, we may obtain a sequence { ( n j , c j , u j ) } j N of global solutions of (1.5). In addition, Theorem 1.1 (iii) implies that

n n j L ( L N 2 , ρ ) + c c j L ( L ) + c c j L ( L N , ρ ) + u u j L ( L N , ρ ) + sup 0 < t < ( t 1 α n ( t ) n j ( t ) L q , 1 + t 1 β c ( t ) c j ( t ) L r , 1 + t 1 β u ( t ) u j ( t ) L r , 1 ) C K φ ( 1 + c 0 L ) ( n 0 n 0 , j L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u 0 , j L N , ρ )

for all j N . Therefore, by setting

E ( n , c , u ) ( t ) n ( t ) L N 2 , ρ + t 1 α n ( t ) L q , 1 + c ( t ) L N , ρ + t 1 β c ( t ) L r , 1 + u ( t ) L N , ρ + t 1 β u ( t ) L r , 1 + c ( t ) e t Δ c 0 L , 0 < t < ,

we have

E ( n , c , u ) ( t ) C E ( n j , c j , u j ) ( t ) + C ( n n j L ( L N 2 , ρ ) + c c j L ( L ) + c c j L ( L N , ρ ) + u u j L ( L N , ρ ) ) + C sup 0 < τ < ( τ 1 α n ( τ ) n j ( τ ) L q , 1 + τ 1 β c ( τ ) c j ( τ ) L r , 1 + τ 1 β u ( τ ) u j ( τ ) L r , 1 ) C E ( n j , c j , u j ) ( t ) + C K φ ( 1 + c 0 L ) ( n 0 n 0 , j L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u 0 , j L N , ρ )

for all 0 < t < and j N . Since Lemma 4.4 (ii) implies that lim t E ( n j , c j , u j ) ( t ) = 0 for all j N , we have

limsup t E ( n , c , u ) ( t ) C K φ ( 1 + c 0 L ) ( n 0 n 0 , j L N 2 , ρ + u 0 u 0 , j L N , ρ ) ,

and hence we obtain (1.15), (1.16), and (1.17) by letting j . This completes the proof of Theorem 1.3.□

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers (JP22KJ2930, JP24KJ0122, and JP24K16954).

  2. Author contribution: The author confirms the sole responsibility for the conception of the study, presented results and manuscript preparation.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest. The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

References

[1] J. Bergh and J. Löfström, Interpolation Spaces. An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223. 10.1007/978-3-642-66451-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] P. Biler, I. Guerra, and G. Karch, Large global-in-time solutions of the parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system on the plane, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14 (2015), no. 6, 2117–2126. 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.2117Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Blanchet, J. A. Carrillo, and N. Masmoudi, Infinite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-Segel model in R2, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2008), no. 10, 1449–1481. 10.1002/cpa.20225Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Blanchet, J. Dolbeault, and B. Perthame, Two-dimensional Keller-Segel model: optimal critical mass and qualitative properties of the solutions, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2006 (2006), no. 44, 32. Search in Google Scholar

[5] V. Calvez and L. Corrias, The parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel model in R2, Commun. Math. Sci. 6 (2008), no. 2, 417–447. 10.4310/CMS.2008.v6.n2.a8Search in Google Scholar

[6] X. Cao and J. Lankeit, Global classical small-data solutions for a three-dimensional chemotaxis Navier-Stokes system involving matrix-valued sensitivities, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 55 (2016), no. 4, 107, 39. 10.1007/s00526-016-1027-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. E. Castillo and H. Rafeiro, CMS Books in Mathematics/Ouvrages de Mathématiques de la SMC, Springer, Cham, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Chae, K. Kang, and J. Lee, Existence of smooth solutions to coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 33 (2013), no. 6, 2271–2297. 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2271Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Chae, K. Kang, and J. Lee, Global existence and temporal decay in Keller-Segel models coupled to fluid equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 39 (2014), no. 7, 1205–1235. 10.1080/03605302.2013.852224Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Chae, K. Kang, and J. Lee, Asymptotic behaviors of solutions for an aerotaxis model coupled to fluid equations, J. Korean Math. Soc. 53 (2016), no. 1, 127–146. 10.4134/JKMS.2016.53.1.127Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Chae, K. Kang, and J. Lee, Global well-posedness and long time behaviors of chemotaxis-fluid system modeling coral fertilization, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 40 (2020), no. 4, 2135–2163. 10.3934/dcds.2020109Search in Google Scholar

[12] H. J. Choe and B. Lkhagvasuren, Global existence result for chemotaxis Navier-Stokes equations in the critical Besov spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 446 (2017), no. 2, 1415–1426. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.09.050Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. J. Choe, B. Lkhagvasuren, and M. Yang, Wellposedness of the Keller-Segel Navier-Stokes equations in the critical Besov spaces, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14 (2015), no. 6, 2453–2464. 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.2453Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Conca, E. Espejo, and K. Vilches, Remarks on the blowup and global existence for a two species chemotactic Keller-Segel system in R2, European J. Appl. Math. 22 (2011), no. 6, 553–580. 10.1017/S0956792511000258Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Di Francesco, A. Lorz, and P. Markowich, Chemotaxis-fluid coupled model for swimming bacteria with nonlinear diffusion: Global existence and asymptotic behavior, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 28 (2010), no. 4, 1437–1453. 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1437Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Ildefonso Diaz, T. Nagai, and J.-M. Rakotoson, Symmetrization techniques on unbounded domains: application to a chemotaxis system on RN, J. Differential Equations 145 (1998), no. 1, 156–183. 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3389Search in Google Scholar

[17] G. Diebou Yomgne, Well-posedness for chemotaxis-fluid models in arbitrary dimensions, Nonlinearity 35 (2022), no. 12, 6241. 10.1088/1361-6544/ac98ecSearch in Google Scholar

[18] J. Dolbeault and B. Perthame, Optimal critical mass in the two-dimensional Keller-Segel model in R2, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 339 (2004), no. 9, 611–616. 10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.011Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. Dombrowski, L. Cisneros, S. Chatkaew, R. E. Goldstein, and J. O. Kessler, Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004), 098103. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.098103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] R. Duan, A. Lorz, and P. Markowich, Global solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), no. 9, 1635–1673. 10.1080/03605302.2010.497199Search in Google Scholar

[21] K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 194, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000, With contributions by S. Brendle, M. Campiti, T. Hahn, G. Metafune, G. Nickel, D. Pallara, C. Perazzoli, A. Rhandi, S. Romanelli and R. Schnaubelt. 10.1007/s002330010042Search in Google Scholar

[22] L. C. F. Ferreira and M. Postigo, Global well-posedness and asymptotic behavior in Besov-Morrey spaces for chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes fluids, J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019), no. 6, 061502, 19. 10.1063/1.5080248Search in Google Scholar

[23] Y. Gong and S. He, On the 8pi-critical-mass threshold of a Patlak-Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021), no. 3, 2925–2956. 10.1137/20M1340629Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. Jiang, Global stability of homogeneous steady states in scaling-invariant spaces for a Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system, J. Differential Equations 267 (2019), no. 2, 659–692. 10.1016/j.jde.2019.01.022Search in Google Scholar

[25] K. Kang, J. Lee, and M. Winkler, Global weak solutions to a chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system in R3, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 42 (2022), no. 11, 5201–5222. 10.3934/dcds.2022091Search in Google Scholar

[26] T. Kato, Strong Lp-solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation in Rm, with applications to weak solutions, Math. Z. 187 (1984), no. 4, 471–480. 10.1007/BF01174182Search in Google Scholar

[27] E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability, J. Theoret. Biol. 26 (1970), no. 3, 399–415. 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90092-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] H. Kozono, M. Miura, and Y. Sugiyama, Existence and uniqueness theorem on mild solutions to the Keller-Segel system coupled with the Navier-Stokes fluid, J. Funct. Anal. 270 (2016), no. 5, 1663–1683. 10.1016/j.jfa.2015.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[29] H. Kozono, M. Miura, and Y. Sugiyama, Time global existence and finite time blow-up criterion for solutions to the Keller-Segel system coupled with the Navier-Stokes fluid, J. Differential Equations 267 (2019), no. 9, 5410–5492. 10.1016/j.jde.2019.05.035Search in Google Scholar

[30] H. Kozono, T. Ogawa, and Y. Taniuchi, Navier-Stokes equations in the Besov space near Linfty and BMO, Kyushu J. Math. 57 (2003), no. 2, 303–324. 10.2206/kyushujm.57.303Search in Google Scholar

[31] H. Kozono, A. Okada, and S. Shimizu, Characterization of initial data in the homogeneous Besov space for solutions in the Serrin class of the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 5, 108390, 47. 10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108390Search in Google Scholar

[32] H. Kozono and S. Shimizu, Navier-Stokes equations with external forces in Lorentz spaces and its application to the self-similar solutions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 458 (2018), no. 2, 1693–1708. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.10.048Search in Google Scholar

[33] H. Kozono and S. Shimizu, Strong solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations based on the maximal Lorentz regularity theorem in Besov spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 276 (2019), no. 3, 896–931. 10.1016/j.jfa.2018.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[34] C.-C. Lai, J. Wei, and Y. Zhou, Global existence of free-energy solutions to the 2D Patlak-Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system with critical and subcritical mass, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 72 (2023), no. 1, 43–87. 10.1512/iumj.2023.72.9304Search in Google Scholar

[35] J.-G. Liu and A. Lorz, A coupled chemotaxis-fluid model: global existence, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire 28 (2011), no. 5, 643–652. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2011.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Lorz, Coupled chemotaxis fluid model, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20 (2010), no. 6, 987–1004. 10.1142/S0218202510004507Search in Google Scholar

[37] A. Lorz, A coupled Keller-Segel-Stokes model: global existence for small initial data and blow-up delay, Commun. Math. Sci. 10 (2012), no. 2, 555–574. 10.4310/CMS.2012.v10.n2.a7Search in Google Scholar

[38] A. Lunardi, Interpolation Theory, Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Nuova Serie). [Lecture Notes. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (New Series)], Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

[39] N. Mizoguchi, Global existence for the Cauchy problem of the parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system on the plane, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 48 (2013), no. 3–4, 491–505. 10.1007/s00526-012-0558-4Search in Google Scholar

[40] T. Nagai, T. Senba, and K. Yoshida, Application of the Trudinger-Moser inequality to a parabolic system of chemotaxis, Funkcial. Ekvac. 40 (1997), no. 3, 411–433. Search in Google Scholar

[41] E. M. Stein, Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970. Search in Google Scholar

[42] T. Takeuchi, Various regularity estimates for the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in Besov spaces, J. Differential Equations 343 (2023), 606–658. 10.1016/j.jde.2022.10.035Search in Google Scholar

[43] Y. Tao and M. Winkler, Global existence and boundedness in a Keller-Segel-Stokes model with arbitrary porous medium diffusion, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 32 (2012), no. 5, 1901–1914. 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1901Search in Google Scholar

[44] Y. Tao and M. Winkler, Locally bounded global solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire 30 (2013), no. 1, 157–178. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2012.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[45] I. Tuval, L. Cisneros, C. Dombrowski, C. W. Wolgemuth, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005), no. 7, 2277–2282. 10.1073/pnas.0406724102Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] M. Winkler, Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes system modeling cellular swimming in fluid drops, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 37 (2012), no. 2, 319–351. 10.1080/03605302.2011.591865Search in Google Scholar

[47] M. Winkler, Stabilization in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 211 (2014), no. 2, 455–487. 10.1007/s00205-013-0678-9Search in Google Scholar

[48] M. Winkler, Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire 33 (2016), no. 5, 1329–1352. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2015.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[49] M. Winkler, Small-mass solutions in the two-dimensional Keller-Segel system coupled to the Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020), no. 2, 2041–2080. 10.1137/19M1264199Search in Google Scholar

[50] M. Yamazaki, The Navier-Stokes equations in the weak-Ln space with time-dependent external force, Math. Ann. 317 (2000), no. 4, 635–675. 10.1007/PL00004418Search in Google Scholar

[51] M. Yang, Global solutions to Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes equations with a class of large initial data in critical Besov spaces, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40 (2017), no. 18, 7425–7437. 10.1002/mma.4538Search in Google Scholar

[52] M. Yang, Z. Fu, and S. Liu, Analyticity and existence of the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 18 (2018), no. 3, 517–535. 10.1515/ans-2017-6046Search in Google Scholar

[53] M. Yang, Z. Fu, and J. Sun, Existence and large time behavior to coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations in Besov-Morrey spaces, J. Differential Equations 266 (2019), no. 9, 5867–5894. 10.1016/j.jde.2018.10.050Search in Google Scholar

[54] J. Zhang, Y. Yang, and Q. Zhang, On the stability to Keller-Segel system coupled with Navier-Stokes equations in Besov-Morrey spaces, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 71 (2023), Paper No. 103828, 25. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2022.103828Search in Google Scholar

[55] J. Zhao, Global existence in critical Besov spaces for the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 465 (2018), no. 2, 1010–1024. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.05.041Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-11-05
Revised: 2025-03-04
Accepted: 2025-03-05
Published Online: 2025-05-07

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Incompressible limit for the compressible viscoelastic fluids in critical space
  3. Concentrating solutions for double critical fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with p-Laplacian in ℝ3
  4. Intervals of bifurcation points for semilinear elliptic problems
  5. On multiplicity of solutions to nonlinear Dirac equation with local super-quadratic growth
  6. Entire radial bounded solutions for Leray-Lions equations of (p, q)-type
  7. Combinatorial pth Calabi flows for total geodesic curvatures in spherical background geometry
  8. Sharp upper bounds for the capacity in the hyperbolic and Euclidean spaces
  9. Positive solutions for asymptotically linear Schrödinger equation on hyperbolic space
  10. Existence and non-degeneracy of the normalized spike solutions to the fractional Schrödinger equations
  11. Existence results for non-coercive problems
  12. Ground states for Schrödinger-Poisson system with zero mass and the Coulomb critical exponent
  13. Geometric characterization of generalized Hajłasz-Sobolev embedding domains
  14. Subharmonic solutions of first-order Hamiltonian systems
  15. Sharp asymptotic expansions of entire large solutions to a class of k-Hessian equations with weights
  16. Stability of pyramidal traveling fronts in time-periodic reaction–diffusion equations with degenerate monostable and ignition nonlinearities
  17. Ground-state solutions for fractional Kirchhoff-Choquard equations with critical growth
  18. Existence results of variable exponent double-phase multivalued elliptic inequalities with logarithmic perturbation and convections
  19. Homoclinic solutions in periodic partial difference equations
  20. Classical solution for compressible Navier-Stokes-Korteweg equations with zero sound speed
  21. Properties of minimizers for L2-subcritical Kirchhoff energy functionals
  22. Asymptotic behavior of global mild solutions to the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in Lorentz spaces
  23. Blow-up solutions to the Hartree-Fock type Schrödinger equation with the critical rotational speed
  24. Qualitative properties of solutions for dual fractional parabolic equations involving nonlocal Monge-Ampère operator
  25. Regularity for double-phase functionals with nearly linear growth and two modulating coefficients
  26. Uniform boundedness and compactness for the commutator of an extension of Riesz transform on stratified Lie groups
  27. Normalized solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations with mixed fractional Laplacians
  28. Existence of positive radial solutions of general quasilinear elliptic systems
  29. Low Mach number and non-resistive limit of magnetohydrodynamic equations with large temperature variations in general bounded domains
  30. Sharp viscous shock waves for relaxation model with degeneracy
  31. Bifurcation and multiplicity results for critical problems involving the p-Grushin operator
  32. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a free boundary model with seasonal succession and impulsive harvesting
  33. Blowing-up solutions concentrated along minimal submanifolds for some supercritical Hamiltonian systems on Riemannian manifolds
  34. Stability of rarefaction wave for relaxed compressible Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity
  35. Singularity for the macroscopic production model with Chaplygin gas
  36. Global strong solution of compressible flow with spherically symmetric data and density-dependent viscosities
  37. Global dynamics of population-toxicant models with nonlocal dispersals
  38. α-Mean curvature flow of non-compact complete convex hypersurfaces and the evolution of level sets
  39. High-energy solutions for coupled Schrödinger systems with critical growth and lack of compactness
  40. On the structure and lifespan of smooth solutions for the two-dimensional hyperbolic geometric flow equation
  41. Well-posedness for physical vacuum free boundary problem of compressible Euler equations with time-dependent damping
  42. On the existence of solutions of infinite systems of Volterra-Hammerstein-Stieltjes integral equations
  43. Remark on the analyticity of the fractional Fokker-Planck equation
  44. Continuous dependence on initial data for damped fourth-order wave equation with strain term
  45. Unilateral problems for quasilinear operators with fractional Riesz gradients
  46. Boundedness of solutions to quasilinear elliptic systems
  47. Existence of positive solutions for critical p-Laplacian equation with critical Neumann boundary condition
  48. Non-local diffusion and pulse intervention in a faecal-oral model with moving infected fronts
  49. Nonsmooth analysis of doubly nonlinear second-order evolution equations with nonconvex energy functionals
  50. Qualitative properties of solutions to the viscoelastic beam equation with damping and logarithmic nonlinear source terms
  51. Shape of extremal functions for weighted Sobolev-type inequalities
  52. One-dimensional boundary blow up problem with a nonlocal term
  53. Doubling measure and regularity to K-quasiminimizers of double-phase energy
  54. General solutions of weakly delayed discrete systems in 3D
  55. Global well-posedness of a nonlinear Boussinesq-fluid-structure interaction system with large initial data
  56. Optimal large time behavior of the 3D rate type viscoelastic fluids
  57. Local well-posedness for the two-component Benjamin-Ono equation
  58. Self-similar blow-up solutions of the four-dimensional Schrödinger-Wave system
  59. Existence and stability of traveling waves in a Keller-Segel system with nonlinear stimulation
  60. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a class of superlinear p-Laplacian equations
  61. On the global large regular solutions of the 1D degenerate compressible Navier-Stokes equations
  62. Normal forms of piecewise-smooth monodromic systems
  63. Fractional Dirichlet problems with singular and non-locally convective reaction
  64. Sharp forced waves of degenerate diffusion equations in shifting environments
  65. Global boundedness and stability of a quasilinear two-species chemotaxis-competition model with nonlinear sensitivities
  66. Non-existence, radial symmetry, monotonicity, and Liouville theorem of master equations with fractional p-Laplacian
  67. Global existence, asymptotic behavior, and finite time blow up of solutions for a class of generalized thermoelastic system with p-Laplacian
  68. Formation of singularities for a linearly degenerate hyperbolic system arising in magnetohydrodynamics
  69. Linear stability and bifurcation analysis for a free boundary problem arising in a double-layered tumor model
  70. Hopf's lemma, asymptotic radial symmetry, and monotonicity of solutions to the logarithmic Laplacian parabolic system
  71. Generalized quasi-linear fractional Wentzell problems
  72. Existence, symmetry, and regularity of ground states of a nonlinear Choquard equation in the hyperbolic space
  73. Normalized solutions for NLS equations with general nonlinearity on compact metric graphs
  74. Boundedness and global stability in a predator-prey chemotaxis system with indirect pursuit-evasion interaction and nonlocal kinetics
  75. Review Article
  76. Existence and stability of contact discontinuities to piston problems
Downloaded on 29.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2025-0080/html
Scroll to top button