Startseite Sharp asymptotic expansions of entire large solutions to a class of k-Hessian equations with weights
Artikel Open Access

Sharp asymptotic expansions of entire large solutions to a class of k-Hessian equations with weights

  • Haitao Wan EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 31. März 2025

Abstract

It is well-known that it is a quite interesting topic to study the asymptotic expansions of entire large solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations near infinity. But very little is done. In this study, we establish the ( m + 1 ) -expansions of entire k -convex large solutions near infinity to the k -Hessian equation S k ( D 2 u ) = b ( x ) f ( u ) in R N , where m N + , 1 k < N 2 , N 3 , f ( u ) = u p ( p > k ) near infinity or f ( u ) = u p + u q ( p > k and p > q > 1 ) near infinity. In particular, inspired by some ideas in partition theory of integer, we give a recursive formula of the coefficient of ( n + 1 ) -order terms ( 2 n m ) of the expansions. And if f ( u ) = u p + u q near infinity, we reveal the influence of the lower term of f ( u ) on the expansion of any entire large solution.

MSC 2010: 35J60; 35J15; 35B08; 35B40

1 Introduction

In this work, we study the ( m + 1 ) -expansions of entire k -convex large solutions to the k -Hessian equation

(1.1) S k ( D 2 u ) = b ( x ) f ( u ) in R N ,

where m N + , 1 k < N 2 , N 3 . Moreover, D 2 u denotes the Hessian of u C 2 ( R N ) and

S k ( D 2 u ) σ k ( λ ( D 2 u ) ) = 1 i 1 < < i k N λ i 1 , , λ i k ,

where λ = ( λ 1 , , λ N ) are the eigenvalues of D 2 u in R N and σ k ( λ ) denotes the k th elementary symmetric function for λ R N . We call u C 2 ( R N ) an entire large solution to equation (1.1) if u is a k -convex solution of equation (1.1) in R N and u ( x ) as x . The function u is called k -convex if λ ( D 2 u ) Γ k , where Γ k = { λ R N : σ l ( λ ) > 0 , 1 l k } .

When k = 1 , equation (1.1) reduces to the semilinear elliptic equation

(1.2) Δ u = b ( x ) f ( u ) in R N .

The study of entire large solutions to equation (1.2) has a long history. In 1957, a famous theorem was established by Keller [27] and Osserman [32]: if f C [ 0 , ) is positive and increasing on ( 0 , ) and f ( 0 ) = 0 , then equation (1.2) with b 1 has an entire positive large solution if and only if f satisfies the Keller-Osserman condition 1 ( F ( t ) ) 1 2 d t = , where F ( t ) = 0 t f ( s ) d s . We know that the existence of positive solutions to equation (1.2) has a wide range of applications in conformal geometry. Let g = ( δ i j ) be the usual Euclidean metric on R N . Kazdan and Warner [26] (or Ni [31]) provided a brief description of how the entire positive solution to equation (1.2) with f ( u ) = u ( N + 2 ) ( N 2 ) gives a new metric g ˜ such that b is the scalar curvature of g ˜ and g ˜ is conformal to g . If f ( u ) = u p with p > 1 and there exists some positive constant C 0 such that ( 1 C 0 ) x γ < b ( x ) < C 0 x γ near infinity for some constant γ > 2 , Cheng and Ni [11] studied the existence, convergence and the complete classification of entire positive solutions. Especially, for the maximal solution U , they showed there exists a positive constant C such that

( 1 C ) x γ 2 p 1 U ( x ) C x γ 2 p 1 as x .

For further study on the existence of entire large solutions to (1.2), we refer the readers to the works of Lair [28], Cîrstea and Rădulescu [13], Tao and Zhang [35], Ye and Zhou [40], Yang [39], and Dupaigne et al. [19]. On the other hand, we know that the first, second, or higher expansions of solutions to semilinear (or quasilinear) elliptic boundary blow-up problems in bounded domains have been studied by many authors (refer for instance, Anedda and Porru [1,2], Alarcón et al. [3], Bandle and Marcus [4], Bandle [5], Cîrstea and Rădulescu [1416], del Pino and Letelier [17], Du and Guo [18], Huang et al. [20], Mohammed [30], Takimoto and Zhang [34], Zhang et al. [41], and references therein), but very little is considered when the domain is R N . Recently, Wan [36] and Wan et al. [37] investigated the first expansions of entire large solutions near infinity to equation (1.2) by utilizing a fine truncation technique. In this study, our results will include the arbitrary expansions of entire large solutions near infinity to (1.2).

Now, let us return to equation (1.1). If k > 1 , then equation (1.1) is a fully nonlinear equation. When f 1 , equation (1.1) becomes

(1.3) S k ( D 2 u ( x ) ) = b ( x ) in R N .

When k = N and b 1 , a famous result of Jörgens [25] for N = 2 , Calabi [10] for N 5 , and Pogorelov [33] for N 2 asserts that each classical convex solution of equation (1.3) is sure to be a quadratic polynomial. Then, Caffarelli [9] extended the Bernstein-type result for classical solutions to viscosity solutions. Bao et al. [6] investigated a similar result for a Hessian quotient equation. If b is a measurable function and there exists some positive constant C 0 such that C 0 1 b C 0 in R N , then Chou and Wang [12] showed that equation (1.3) with k = N has infinitely many convex solutions. Then, Jian and Wang [24] extended the existence of solutions in [12] to the case of nonnegative functions b . If f satisfies the doubling condition, then they showed that the solution is of polynomial growth. When f 1 , Jin et al. [22] proved that if b 1 in R N and f ( u ) = u p with p > k , then equation (1.1) has no entire k -convex positive subsolution. If f ( u ) = u p is replaced by f and f C [ 0 , ) is a positive non-decreasing function on ( 0 , ) and f ( 0 ) = 0 , then Ji and Bao [21] showed that this equation has an entire k -convex positive large subsolution if and only if f satisfies 1 ( F ( t ) ) 1 k d t = , where F ( t ) = 0 t f ( s ) d s . Recently, Bao and Feng [7] proved the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of subsolutions to a class of p - k -Hessian equations. For the existence of radial entire large solutions and bounded solutions of equation (1.1) (or systems) with radially symmetric weights, we refer the readers to the works of Zhang and Zhou [42]. Recently, when b C ( R N ) is positive in R N and

(1.4) 0 t k N 0 t s N 1 B ( s ) d s 1 k d t < , B ( s ) max x = s b ( x ) ,

Wan et al. [38] proved the existence of classical entire k -convex large solutions to equation (1.1). Furthermore, we established the first expansions of entire large solutions near infinity to equation (1.1). As Bhattacharya and Mohammed mentioned in Appendix B of [8] that the condition (1.4) implies 1 k < N 2 . Most recently, under some appropriate assumptions on b , Zhang and Xia [43] gave a necessary and sufficient condition on f for the existence of radial entire large solutions to (1.1). Li and Bao [29] studied the existence and nonexistence results for non-radial entire large solutions to equation (1.1) with 0 < p < k . In particular, they proved that if b ( x ) = x γ + O ( x m ) near infinity for γ k 1 and m > γ + ( 2 k γ ) k ( k p ) , then equation (1.1) admits an entire k -convex positive solution satisfying ( 1 C ) x 2 k γ k p u ( x ) C x 2 k γ k p as x , where C is a positive constant.

Inspired by the above works, in this study, for an arbitrary m N + , we established the ( m + 1 ) -expansions of entire k -convex large solutions as x to equation (1.1). Our results are new even for the case of equation (1.2).

2 Main results

For 1 k < N 2 , Wan et al. [38] proved the existence of classical entire k -convex large solutions to equation (1.1). Moreover, inspired by the class of Karamata functions introduced by Cîrstea and Rădulescu [1416] for non-decreasing functions and by Mohammed [30] for non-increasing functions, Wan et al. [38] defined a class of functions Λ and further obtained the first expansions of entire large solutions to equation (1.1) with the help of Λ . The set Λ is defined as follows: Λ denotes the set of all positive non-increasing functions θ C 1 [ R , ) L 1 [ R , ) , which satisfy

lim t d d t Θ ( t ) θ ( t ) D θ ( 0 , ) , Θ ( t ) = t θ ( s ) d s , t R .

Choose a positive constant λ such that λ > k + 1 . Define θ ( t ) k k + 1 k λ k 1 1 k + 1 t λ k + 1 , t R and Θ ( t ) t θ ( s ) d s = k λ k 1 k k + 1 t k + 1 λ k + 1 , t R . By a direct calculation, we see that θ Λ with D θ = k + 1 λ k 1 . We suppose that b satisfies

  1. b C ( R N ) is positive in R N ;

  2. there exists some constant λ > k + 1 such that b ( x ) = x λ k + 1 ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) as x ,

the nonlinearity f satisfies
  1. f C 1 [ 0 , )   ( or f C 1 ( R ) ) is positive and non-decreasing on [ 0 , ) (or on R ),

and one of the following conditions between;
  1. there exists some sufficiently large positive constant t * such that f ( t ) = t p (with p > k ) for all t [ t * , ) ;

and
  1. there exists some sufficiently large positive constant t * such that f ( t ) = t p + t q (with p > k and p > q > 1 ) for all t [ t * , ) .

By Theorem 1.2 and Lemma A.2 (ii) of [38], we obtain the first expansion for solutions as follows:

Lemma 2.1

(Theorem 1.2 of [38]) Let f satisfy ( f 1 ) ( f 2 )   ( o r ( f 3 ) ) , b satisfy ( b 1 ) ( b 2 ) , and

(2.1) λ k < ( N k ) ( k + 1 ) ,

then any entire k-convex large solution u to equation (1.1) satisfies

u ( x ) = ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) a s x ,

where

(2.2) ξ = ( N 1 ) ! [ ( ( N k ) ( k + 1 ) λ k ) ( p k ) + k ( λ k 1 ) ( p + 1 ) ] λ k 1 k + 1 k ( k + 1 ) ! ( N k ) ! ( p + 1 ) 1 p k

and Φ is given by

(2.3) Φ ( t ) ( ( k + 1 ) F ( s ) ) 1 ( k + 1 ) d s = t , F ( t ) = 0 t f ( s ) d s .

Remark 2.2

Inequality (2.1) is equivalent to the condition (1.7) in Theorem 1.2 of [38].

Next, we establish the ( m + 1 ) -expansions of entire large solutions to equation (1.1) with 1 k < N 2 . To our aims, we further assume that b satisfies

  1. let m 1 be a positive integer and there exist some constant λ > k + 1 , T n R and σ ( m , m + 1 ) such that

    b ( x ) = x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m T n x n + o ( x σ ) a s x .

Our main results can be summarized as follows.

Theorem 2.3

Let f satisfy ( f 1 ) ( f 2 ) , b satisfy ( b 1 ) and ( b 3 ) , m , σ be given in ( b 3 ) and

(2.4) ( λ k 1 ) ( k + 1 ) m ( p k ) .

If we further assume that (2.1) holds, then any entire k-convex large solution u to equation (1.1) satisfies

u ( x ) = ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + O ( x σ ) as x ,

where ξ is given by (2.2), Φ is given by (2.3) and A n is given as follows:

if m = 1 , then

(2.5) A 1 = ( λ k 1 ) ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) T 1 ( k p ) ζ 1 ,

where

ζ 1 = ( ( λ k ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) ( λ k 1 ) + ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k 1 ) ) k > 0 ;

if m 2 , then A 1 is given by (2.5) and

(2.6) A n = ( λ k 1 ) ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) n 1 ( A 1 , , A n 1 ) ( k p ) ζ n ,

where 2 n m ,

ζ n = ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) ( λ k 1 + n k ) + n k ( λ k 1 n ( p k ) ) > 0

and

n 1 ( A 1 , , A n 1 ) = T n + s = 2 n p ( p s + 1 ) s ! D s n ( A 1 , , A n s + 1 ) + s = 1 n 1 T s l = 1 n s p ( p l + 1 ) l ! D l n s ( A 1 , , A n s l + 1 ) ( 1 C 2 ) C 1 s = 2 n ( k 1 ) ( k s ) s ! × D s n ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n s + 1 ) + s = 1 n 1 A ˜ n s P n s l = 1 s ( k 1 ) ( k l ) l ! D l s ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ s l + 1 ) C N 1 k 1 + p k p + 1 C N 1 k s = 2 n k ( k s + 1 ) s ! D s n ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n s + 1 )

with

(2.7) D s n ( A 1 , , A n s + 1 ) n = 1 = 1 s i l 1 i l n s + 1 A i 1 A i s

and

(2.8) A ˜ l = A l 1 l ( p k ) λ k 1 , C 1 = λ p 1 p + 1 , P l = C 1 + l ( k p ) p + 1 , C 2 = C 1 C N 1 k 1 + p k p + 1 C N 1 k ,

where

C N 1 k 1 = ( N 1 ) ! ( k 1 ) ! ( N k ) ! a n d C N 1 k = ( N 1 ) ! k ! ( N k 1 ) ! .

Remark 2.4

In Theorem 2.3, if ( f 2 ) holds, then Φ ( t ) = k + 1 p + 1 1 k p p k k + 1 k + 1 k p t k + 1 k p , t > 0 .

Remark 2.5

The discovery of formula (2.7) originates from an idea of number theory, i.e., the ordered s -gon partitions of the positive integer n . Some simple examples of D s n ( ) are as follows:

if n = 6 and s = 3 , then

D 3 6 ( A 1 , A 2 , A 3 , A 4 ) = 3 A 1 2 A 4 + 3 ! A 1 A 2 A 3 + A 2 3 ;

if n = 5 and s = 4 , then D 4 5 ( A 1 , A 2 ) = 4 A 1 3 A 2 ; if n = 3 and s = 1 , then D 1 3 ( A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = A 3 .

Theorem 2.6

Let f satisfy ( f 1 ) and ( f 3 ) , b satisfy ( b 1 ) and ( b 3 ) , m , σ be given in ( b 3 ) and γ ( λ k 1 ) ( p q ) p k ( m , σ ) . If we further assume that (2.1) and (2.4) hold, then any entire k-convex large solution u to equation (1.1) satisfies

u ( x ) = ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ + O ( x σ ) a s x ,

where Φ is uniquely determined by (2.3), ξ and A n are given in Theorem 2.3 and

A γ = ( λ k 1 ) ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) ϑ λ k + 1 C N 1 k 1 C N 1 k ( 1 C 2 ) + η c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k ( k p ) ζ γ ,

where C 2 is given by (2.8),

ζ γ = ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) ( λ k 1 + γ k ) + γ k ( λ k 1 γ ( p k ) ) > 0 ,

(2.9) ϑ = ( p k ) k ( q + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) p k p + 1 c 1 c 0 + 1 , η = ξ q p 1

and

(2.10) c 0 = p + 1 k + 1 1 ( k + 1 ) k + 1 p k , c 1 = p + 1 k + 1 1 ( k + 1 ) p + 1 ( q + 1 ) [ ( p q ) ( k + 1 ) + p k ] .

3 Proof of Theorem 2.3

In this section, we prove Theorem 2.3. Lemma 2.1 is a useful auxiliary result in our proof.

Proof

Take R 0 > 0 and define

(3.1) Ω R 0 { x R N : x > R 0 } .

Let A   ( A > 1 ) be a large positive constant and

u ± ( x ) w ± ( x ) = ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n ± A x σ , x Ω R 0 ,

where A 1 is given by (2.5) and A n   ( n 2 ) is given by (2.6). In fact, we always adjust R 0 (large enough) such that

1 + n = 1 m A n x n ± A x σ > 0 , x Ω R 0

and

(3.2) min Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 , u ± ( x ) > t * , x Ω R 0 ,

where t * is given in ( f 2 ) .

By a direct calculation, we have

w ± ( x ) = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A ˜ n x n ± A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 x σ

and

(3.3) w ± ( x ) = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 x 2 λ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 C 1 + n = 1 m A ˜ n P n x n ± A 1 σ ( p k ) λ k 1 P σ x σ ,

where C 1 , A ˜ n , P n , and P σ are given as shown in (2.8). Furthermore, we obtain

(3.4) ( w ± ( x ) ) k 1 = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 x λ ( k 1 ) k + 1 × 1 + n = 1 m B n ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) x n ± A ( k 1 ) 1 σ ( p k ) λ k 1 x σ + O ( A x σ ) x 1 + O ( x m 1 ) ) ,

where

(3.5) B n ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) s = 1 n ( k 1 ) ( k s ) s ! D s n ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n s + 1 ) .

Similarly, we arrive at

( w ± ( x ) ) k = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 k Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 1 λ p k p + 1 + n = 1 m p k p + 1 B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) x n ± A k ( p k ) p + 1 1 σ ( p k ) λ k 1 x σ + O ( A x σ ) x 1 + O ( x m 1 ) ,

where B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) is given as shown in (3.5). Moreover, (3.3)–(3.4) imply that

( w ± ( x ) ) k 1 w ± ( x ) = ξ k λ k 1 k + 1 k x λ Φ ( x k + 1 λ k + 1 ) k 1 Φ ( x k + 1 λ k + 1 ) × C 1 + ( A ˜ 1 P 1 + C 1 B 1 ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 ) ) x 1 + n = 1 m n x n ± A 1 σ ( p k ) λ k 1 × ( C 1 ( k 1 ) + P σ ) x σ + O ( A x σ ) x 1 + O ( x m 1 ) ] ,

where 1 = 0 and when n 2 ,

(3.6) n = A ˜ n P n + C 1 B n ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) + s = 1 n 1 B s ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ s ) A ˜ n s P n s .

So, we obtain that for any x Ω R 0 , there hold

(3.7) S k ( D 2 u ± ( x ) ) = ( w ± ( x ) ) k 1 w ± ( x ) C N 1 k 1 x k 1 + ( w ± ( x ) ) k C N 1 k x k = C 2 ξ λ k 1 k + 1 k x λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 × 1 + ( 1 C 2 ) ( A ˜ 1 P 1 + C 1 B 1 ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 ) ) C N 1 k 1 + p k p + 1 B 1 ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 ) C N 1 k x 1 + n = 1 m N n x n ± A 1 σ ( p k ) λ k 1 ( 1 C 2 ) ( ( k 1 ) C 1 + P σ ) C N 1 k 1 + k p k p + 1 C N 1 k × x σ + O ( A x σ ) x 1 + O ( x m 1 ) } ,

where N 1 = 0 and when n 2 ,

(3.8) N n = ( 1 C 2 ) n C N 1 k 1 + B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) p k p + 1 C N 1 k ,

where n is given by (3.6).

On the other hand, for any

(3.9) 0 < ε < ( p k ) ( λ k 1 ) k ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ,

we can adjust R 0 large enough (if necessary) such that

(3.10) b ( x ) < b ( x ) < b + ( x ) , x Ω R 0 ,

where

(3.11) b ± ( x ) = x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m T n x n ± ε x σ .

A straightforward calculation shows that

(3.12) b ( x ) ( u ± ( x ) ) p = ξ p Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 p x λ k + 1 1 + ( T 1 + B n ( p ) ( A 1 ) ) x 1 + n = 1 m W n x n ± p A x σ ε x σ + O ( A x σ ) x 1 + O ( x m 1 ) ] ,

where W 1 = 0 and when n 2 ,

(3.13) W n = T n + B n ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n ) + s = 1 n 1 T s B n s ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n s )

and B n ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n ) and B n s ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n s ) are given as shown in (3.5).

By the definitions of Φ , ξ , C 2 in Theorem 2.3, we observe that

Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 = Φ ( x k + 1 λ k + 1 ) p and ξ λ k 1 k + 1 k C 2 = ξ p .

By (2.5), we observe that A 1 is given by

(3.14) ( 1 C 2 ) ( A ˜ 1 P 1 + C 1 B 1 ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 ) ) C N 1 k 1 + p k p + 1 B 1 ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 ) C N 1 k = T 1 + p A 1

and 1 k < N 2 implies ζ 1 > 0 . By (2.6), we observe that A n   ( n 2 ) is given by

(3.15) ( 1 C 2 ) n C N 1 k 1 + B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) p k p + 1 C n 1 k = W n

and 1 k < N 2 and (2.4) imply

(3.16) ζ n ( λ k 1 ) 2 k + ( p k ) ( λ k 1 ) + n k ( ( λ k 1 ) ( k + 1 ) ( n 1 ) ( p k ) ) > ( λ k 1 ) 2 k > 0 .

These facts, combined with (3.7) and (3.12), show that

S k ( D 2 u ± ( x ) ) b ( x ) ( u ± ( x ) ) p = ξ p x λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 p A x σ ± C ± ε A + O ( A x σ ) x 1 A x σ + O ( x σ m 1 ) A ,

where

(3.17) C = ( k p ) ζ σ ( λ k 1 ) ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) )

with

ζ σ = ( λ k 1 + σ k ) ( ( λ k 1 ) k + ( p k ) ( N 2 k ) ) + σ k ( λ k 1 σ ( p k ) ) .

Since 1 k < N 2 , we obtain by the similar calculation as (3.16) that

ζ σ ( λ k 1 ) 2 k + ( p k ) ( λ k 1 ) + σ k ( ( λ k 1 ) ( k + 1 ) ( p k ) ( σ 1 ) ) .

The conditions (2.4) and σ ( m , m + 1 ) imply ζ σ > ( λ k 1 ) 2 k > 0 . Moreover, by the similar calculation as (3.7), we obtain for any x Ω R 0 and l { 1 , , k } , there hold

S l ( D 2 u ± ( x ) ) = ξ l λ k 1 k + 1 l x λ l + 1 x λ ( k l ) k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 l 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 × C 1 C N 1 l 1 + p k p + 1 C N 1 l + O ( x 1 ) ,

where

C 1 C N 1 l 1 + p k p + 1 C N 1 l = ( λ p 1 ) l ( p + 1 ) ( N l ) + p k p + 1 C N 1 l = ( λ k 1 ) l + ( p k ) ( N 2 l ) ( p + 1 ) ( N l ) C N 1 l > 0 .

Take some small positive constant ε 0 ( 0 , 1 3 ) . We can always adjust A large enough and choose some sufficiently large positive constant R 1 with R 1 R 0 such that

(3.18) A R 1 σ = 2 ε 0 , ε 0 < n = 1 m A n R 1 n < ε 0

and for any x Ω R 1 , the following hold

(3.19) C + ε A + O ( A x σ ) A x σ x 1 + O ( 1 ) A x σ m 1 < 0 , C ε A + O ( A x σ ) A x σ x 1 + O ( 1 ) A x σ m 1 > 0

and

(3.20) S l ( D 2 u ± ( x ) ) > 0 for all l { 1 , , k } .

So, we obtain that u + and u are k -convex supersolution and subsolution to equation (1.1) in Ω R 1 , respectively.

Let u be an arbitrary entire k -convex large solution to Eq. (1.1). It follows by Lemma 2.1 that we can always adjust A and R 1 such that (3.18)–(3.20) still hold and

1 ε 0 < u ( x ) ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 < 1 + ε 0 , x Ω R 1 .

This fact together with (3.18) implies that for any x R N with x = R 1 , there hold

u ( x ) u + ( x ) < 1 + ε 0 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A x σ < 1 and u ( x ) u ( x ) > 1 ε 0 1 + n = 1 m A n x n A x σ > 1 .

So, we have

u + u and u u on Ω R 1 .

Choose some sufficiently small positive constant τ ( 0,1 ) and define

u ¯ = ( 1 + τ ) u + and u ̲ = ( 1 τ ) u in Ω R 1 .

By Lemma 2.1, we see that

lim x u ¯ ( x ) u ( x ) = lim x u ¯ ( x ) ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 lim x ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 u ( x ) = 1 + τ

and

lim x u ̲ ( x ) u ( x ) = lim x u ̲ ( x ) ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 lim x ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 u ( x ) = 1 τ .

This implies that we can take some sufficiently large positive constant R 2 > R 1 such that

(3.21) u ¯ u and u ̲ u in Ω ¯ R 2 .

Define

D Ω R 1 \ Ω ¯ R 2 .

We obtain by a simple calculation that

S k ( D 2 u ¯ ( x ) ) = ( 1 + τ ) k S k ( D 2 u + ( x ) ) < b ( x ) ( 1 + τ ) k ( u + ( x ) ) p < b ( x ) ( u ¯ ( x ) ) p , x D

and

S k ( D 2 u ̲ ( x ) ) = ( 1 τ ) k S k ( D 2 u ( x ) ) > b + ( x ) ( 1 τ ) k ( u ( x ) ) p > b ( x ) ( u ̲ ( x ) ) p , x D .

By using the comparison principle (please refer to Lemma 2.1 of Jian’s study [23]), we arrive at u ̲ u u ¯ in D . This fact, combined with (3.21), implies that u ̲ u u ¯ in Ω R 1 . Passing to τ 0 , we obtain

u u u + in Ω R 1 .

The proof is completed.□

4 Proof of Theorem 2.6

In this section, we prove Theorem 2.6.

As before, let A   ( A > 1 ) be a large positive constant and define

u ± ( x ) w ± ( x ) = ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ , x Ω R 0 ,

where R 0 is a large positive constant, Ω R 0 is defined as shown in (3.1), and A n and A γ are given in Theorem 2.6. As before, we can always adjust R 0 such that

1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ > 0 , x Ω R 0

and (3.2) holds, where t * is given in ( f 3 ) . Next our proof is divided into four steps as follows.

Step 1. To calculate S k ( D 2 u ± ) , in this step we will give the representations of Φ and Φ near zero as follows:

(4.1) Φ ( s ) = Φ ( s ) p k k + 1 s + C ˜ 1 s ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k + 1 + O s 2 ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k + 1 as s 0 +

and

(4.2) Φ ( s ) = Φ ( s ) p k p + 1 s + C ˜ 2 s ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k + 1 + O s 2 ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k + 1 as s 0 + ,

where

C ˜ 1 = α c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k and C ˜ 2 = ϑ c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k ,

ϑ is given in (2.9) and α = p k k + 1 p + 1 ( q + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) + c 1 c 0 . We first show that (4.1) holds. Let Ψ denote the inverse of Φ . Then, a straightforward calculation shows that

(4.3) Ψ ( t ) = c 0 t k p k + 1 + c 1 t q p + k p k + 1 + O t 2 ( q p ) + k p k + 1 , t > t * ,

where c 1 and c 0 are given by (2.10). Moreover, it is clear that

Φ ( s ) Φ ( s ) s = Φ ( s ) ( ( k + 1 ) F ( Φ ( s ) ) ) 1 ( k + 1 ) Ψ ( Φ ( s ) ) , s ( 0 , Ψ ( t * ) ) .

Let t = Φ ( s ) , then we have

(4.4) Φ ( s ) Φ ( s ) s = t ( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) 1 ( k + 1 ) Ψ ( t ) .

By (4.3), we arrive at

t ( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) 1 ( k + 1 ) Ψ ( t ) = k + 1 p + 1 1 ( k + 1 ) c 0 1 + p + 1 ( q + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) 1 + c 1 c 0 t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) 1 = k + 1 p k 1 + p + 1 ( q + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) + c 1 c 0 t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) 1 .

Furthermore, we have

(4.5) t ( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) 1 ( k + 1 ) Ψ ( t ) p k k + 1 = α t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) .

This fact together with (4.3) implies that

t ( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) 1 ( k + 1 ) Ψ ( t ) p k k + 1 ( Ψ ( t ) ) ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k = C ˜ 1 + O ( t q p ) .

Moreover, it follows from (4.3) that Ψ ( t ) t k p k + 1 near infinity , i.e., there exist positive constants t ˜ and c > 1 such that ( 1 c ) t k p k + 1 < Ψ ( t ) < c t k p k + 1 , t t ˜ . Since Ψ is the inverse of Φ , we obtain

(4.6) Φ ( s ) s k + 1 k p near zero .

This, combined with (4.4)–(4.5), shows that

Φ ( s ) Φ ( s ) s p k k + 1 s ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k = C ˜ 1 + O s ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k .

So, we obtain that (4.1) holds.

We next show that (4.2) holds. As before, let t = Φ ( s ) , it is clear that

Φ ( s ) Φ ( s ) s = ( ( k + 1 ) F ( Φ ( s ) ) ) k ( k + 1 ) f ( Φ ( s ) ) s = ( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) k ( k + 1 ) f ( t ) Ψ ( t ) = p k p + 1 1 + ( p + 1 ) k ( q + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) 1 + 1 + c 1 c 0 t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) .

On the other hand, a direct calculation shows that

( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) k ( k + 1 ) f ( t ) Ψ ( t ) p k p + 1 = ϑ t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) .

Furthermore, by (4.3), we have

( ( k + 1 ) F ( t ) ) k ( k + 1 ) f ( t ) Ψ ( t ) p k p + 1 ( Ψ ( t ) ) ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k = C ˜ 2 + O ( t q p ) .

This, combined with (4.6), implies that

Φ ( s ) Φ ( s ) s p k p + 1 s ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k = C ˜ 2 + O s ( k + 1 ) ( p q ) p k .

So, we obtain that (4.2) holds.

 Step 2. In this step, we calculate S k ( D 2 u ± ) . A straightforward calculation shows that

w ± ( x ) = ξ k + 1 λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ + ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 n = 1 m n A n x n 1 γ A γ x γ 1 σ A x σ 1 = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ + ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 p k k + 1 x k + 1 λ k + 1 + C ˜ 1 x γ + k + 1 λ k + 1 + O x 2 γ + k + 1 λ k + 1 × n = 1 m n A n x n 1 γ A γ x γ 1 σ A x σ 1

= ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ + p k λ k 1 1 + C ˜ 1 k + 1 p k x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) n = 1 m n A n x n γ A γ x γ σ A x σ ) ] = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ n = 1 m ( p k ) n λ k 1 A n x n ( p k ) γ λ k 1 A γ x γ ( p k ) σ λ k 1 A x σ + O ( x γ 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x γ ] = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ x λ k 1 k + 1 x λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A ˜ n x n + A ˜ γ x γ ± A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 x σ + O ( x γ 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x γ

and

w ± ( x ) = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 2 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 2 λ k + 1 ξ k + 1 λ k + 1 λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ + k + 1 k + 1 × 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ + 2 ξ k + 1 λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 × n = 1 m n A n x n 1 γ A γ x γ 1 σ A x σ 1 + ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 × n = 1 m n ( n + 1 ) A n x n 2 + γ ( γ + 1 ) A γ x γ ± σ ( σ + 1 ) A x n 2 = ξ λ k 1 k + 1 2 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 2 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ ξ λ k 1 k + 1 λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 2 λ k + 1 p k k + 1 + C ˜ 2 x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) × 1 + n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ

+ 2 ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ ( x k + 1 λ k + 1 ) x 2 λ k + 1 p k p + 1 + C ˜ 2 x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) × n = 1 m n A n x n 1 γ A γ x γ 1 σ A x γ 1 + ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 2 λ k + 1 p k k + 1 + C ˜ 1 x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) p k p + 1 + C ˜ 2 x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) ) n = 1 m n ( n + 1 ) A n x n + γ ( γ + 1 ) A γ x γ ± σ ( σ + 1 ) A x σ

= ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ ( x k + 1 λ k + 1 ) x 2 λ k + 1 λ k 1 k + 1 + k p p + 1 λ k + 1 + n = 1 m λ k 1 k + 1 + k p p + 1 λ k + 1 + ( k p ) 2 n p + 1 + ( p k ) 2 n ( n + 1 ) ( λ k 1 ) ( p + 1 ) A n x n + λ k 1 k + 1 + k p p + 1 λ k + 1 + ( k p ) 2 γ p + 1 + ( p k ) 2 γ ( γ + 1 ) ( λ k 1 ) ( p + 1 ) A γ C ˜ 2 λ k + 1 x γ ± λ k 1 k + 1 + k p p + 1 λ k + 1 + ( k p ) 2 σ p + 1 + ( p k ) 2 σ ( σ + 1 ) ( λ k 1 ) ( p + 1 ) A x σ + O ( x γ 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x γ

= ξ λ k 1 k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 2 λ k + 1 C 1 + n = 1 m A ˜ n P n x n + A ˜ γ P γ C ˜ 2 λ k + 1 x γ ± A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 P σ x σ + O ( x γ 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x γ ] ,

where C 1 , A ˜ n , A ˜ γ , P n , P γ , and P σ are given as shown in (2.8).

By the calculation of w ± ( x ) , we arrive at

( w ± ( x ) ) k 1 = ξ k 1 λ k 1 k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 x λ ( k 1 ) k + 1 × 1 + n = 1 m B n ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) x n + ( k 1 ) A ˜ γ x γ ± ( k 1 ) A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 ,

where B n k 1 ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) is given as shown in (3.5). Similarly, we arrive at

(4.7) ( w ± ( x ) ) k = ξ k λ k 1 k + 1 k Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 1 λ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x k + 1 λ k + 1 × 1 + n = 1 m B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) x n + k A ˜ γ x γ ± k A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 ]

= ξ k λ k 1 k + 1 k Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 1 λ p k p + 1 + C ˜ 2 x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) × 1 + n = 1 m B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) x n + k A ˜ γ x γ ± k A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 = ξ k λ k 1 k + 1 k Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x 1 λ × p k p + 1 + m = 1 n p k p + 1 B n ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 , , A ˜ n ) x n + k ( p k ) p + 1 A ˜ γ + C ˜ 2 x γ ± ( p k ) k p + 1 A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 .

Moreover, we have

(4.8) ( w ± ( x ) ) k 1 w ± ( x ) = ξ k λ k 1 k + 1 k Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ × C 1 + ( A ˜ 1 P 1 + C 1 B 1 ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 ) ) x 1 + n = 1 m n x n + A ˜ γ ( P γ + C 1 ( k 1 ) ) C ˜ 2 λ k + 1 x γ ± A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 × ( P σ + C 1 ( k 1 ) ) x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 ] ,

where 1 = 0 and n   ( n 2 ) is given as shown in (3.6). By (4.7)–(4.8), we obtain that for any x Ω R 0 , there hold

S k ( D 2 u ± ( x ) ) = ( w ± ( x ) ) k 1 w ± ( x ) C N 1 k 1 x k 1 + ( w ± ( x ) ) k C N 1 k x k = C 2 ξ k λ k 1 k + 1 k Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 × 1 + ( 1 C 2 ) ( A ˜ 1 P 1 + C 1 B 1 ( k 1 ) ( A ˜ 1 ) ) C N 1 k 1 + p k p + 1 B 1 ( k ) ( A ˜ 1 ) C N 1 k x 1 + n = 1 m N n x n + A ˜ γ ( P γ + C 1 ( k 1 ) ) C ˜ 2 λ k + 1 C N 1 k 1 + ( p k ) k p + 1 A ˜ γ + C ˜ 2 C N 1 k x γ ± A 1 ( p k ) σ λ k 1 ( P σ + C 1 ( k 1 ) ) C N 1 k 1 + ( p k ) k p + 1 C N 1 k x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 } ,

where N 1 = 0 and N n   ( n 2 ) is given as shown in (3.8).

  Step 3. In this step, we calculate the expansion of the nonlinearity f ( u ± ) . By using Taylor’s formula, we obtain

(4.9) f ( u ± ( x ) ) = f ( u 0 ( x ) ) 1 + l = 1 m f ( l ) ( u 0 ( x ) ) u 0 l ( x ) n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ l f ( u 0 ( x ) ) l ! + f ( m + 1 ) ( u ˜ ± ( x ) ) u 0 m + 1 ( x ) n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ m + 1 f ( u 0 ( x ) ) ( m + 1 ) ! ,

where

u ˜ ± ( x ) = u 0 ( x ) 1 + θ ± n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ with θ ± ( 0,1 )

and

u 0 ( x ) = ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 .

In fact, we can always adjust R 0 (if necessary) such that u 0 ( x ) > t * as x > R 0 . By a direct calculation, we can arrive at

(4.10) f l ( t ) t l l ! f ( t ) = α p , l + ( α p , l α q , l ) t q p + O ( t 2 ( q p ) ) as t ,

where

α p , l = p ( p l + 1 ) l ! and α q , l = q ( q l + 1 ) l ! .

Since (4.3) holds, we conclude by letting t = Φ ( s ) that

Φ ( s ) = s c 0 k + 1 k p 1 + c 1 c 0 ( Φ ( s ) ) q p + O ( ( Φ ( s ) ) 2 ( q p ) ) k + 1 p k as s 0 + .

By using (4.6) again, we have

(4.11) Φ ( s ) = s c 0 k + 1 k p 1 + O s ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) k p as s 0 + .

This fact, combined with (4.10), shows that

(4.12) f ( l ) ( u 0 ( x ) ) u 0 l ( x ) f ( u 0 ( x ) ) l ! = α p , l + β l x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) as x ,

where

β l = ( α p , l α q , l ) ξ q p c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k .

Moreover, a direct calculation shows that

(4.13) ( ξ Φ ( s ) ) p + ( ξ Φ ( s ) ) q ξ p ( ( Φ ( s ) ) p + ( Φ ( s ) ) q ) 1 = η ( Φ ( s ) ) q Φ p ( s ) + Φ q ( s ) ,

where η is given in (2.9). Furthermore, we obtain

(4.14) η ( Φ ( s ) ) q Φ p ( s ) + Φ q ( s ) η ( Φ ( s ) ) q p = η ( Φ ( s ) ) 2 ( q p ) 1 + ( Φ ( s ) ) q p = O ( ( Φ ( s ) ) 2 ( q p ) ) as s 0 + .

Combining (4.13)–(4.14) with (4.11), we arrive at

(4.15) ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 p + ξ Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 q = ξ p Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 p + Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 q × 1 + η c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) as x .

On the other hand, it is clear that

(4.16) f m + 1 ( u ˜ ± ( x ) ) u 0 m + 1 ( x ) ( m + 1 ) ! f ( u 0 ( x ) ) = f m + 1 ( u ˜ ± ( x ) ) u ˜ ± m + 1 ( x ) ( m + 1 ) ! f ( u ˜ ± ( x ) ) f ( u ˜ ± ( x ) ) f ( u 0 ( x ) ) u 0 m + 1 ( x ) u ˜ ± m + 1 ( x ) = O ( 1 ) as x .

We obtain by (4.9), (4.12), (4.15)–(4.16) that

f ( u ± ( x ) ) = f ( u 0 ( x ) ) 1 + l = 1 m ( α p , l + β l x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) ) n = 1 m A n x n + A γ x γ ± A x σ l + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x m = ξ p f Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + η c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k x γ + O ( x 2 γ ) × 1 + n = 1 m B n ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n ) x n + p A γ x γ ± p A x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 = ξ p f Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 1 + n = 1 m B n ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n ) x n + p A γ + η c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k x γ ± p A x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 ) ,

where B n ( p ) ( A 1 , , A n ) is given as shown in (3.5).

Let ε satisfy (3.9). We can always adjust R 0 large enough (if necessary) such that (3.10) holds, where b ± ( x ) are given as shown in (3.11). By the similar calculation as (3.12), we arrive at

b ( x ) f ( u ± ( x ) ) = ξ p f Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 x λ k + 1 1 + ( T 1 + B n ( p ) ( A 1 ) ) x 1 + n = 1 m W n x n + ( p A γ + η c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k x γ ± p A x σ ε x σ + O ( x m 1 ) + O ( A x σ ) x 1 ,

where W 1 = 0 and W n   ( n 2 ) is given as shown in (3.13). By the similar arguments as the proof of Theorem 2.3, we see that

Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 k 1 Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 = Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 p + Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 q , ξ λ k 1 k + 1 k C 2 = ξ p ,

and A 1 , A n   ( n 2 ) are given as shown in (3.14) and (3.15), respectively. Furthermore, by the choice of A γ in Theorem 2.6, we see that A γ satisfies

( 1 C 2 ) A ˜ γ ( P γ + C 1 ( k 1 ) ) C ˜ 2 λ k + 1 C N 1 k 1 + k ( p k ) p + 1 A ˜ γ + C ˜ 2 C N 1 k = p A γ + η c 0 ( k + 1 ) ( q p ) p k .

Since γ ( m , m + 1 ) , 1 k < N 2 and (2.4) hold, by the similar calculation as (3.16), we can obtain

ζ γ > ( λ k 1 ) 2 k > 0 .

 Step 4. By the above arguments, we obtain

S k ( D 2 u ± ( x ) ) b ( x ) f ( u ± ( x ) ) = ξ p x λ k + 1 f Φ x k + 1 λ k + 1 A x σ ± C ± ε A + O ( A x σ ) x 1 A x σ + O ( x σ m 1 ) A ,

where C is given as shown in (3.17).

The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.3 and hence, is omitted.

Acknowledgements

The author is greatly indebted to the anonymous referees for the careful reading of the manuscript and the invaluable suggestions and comments which significantly improved the quality of the presentation.

  1. Funding information: This work is supported by NSF of Shandong Province, P. R. China (under grant ZR2021MA007).

  2. Author contribution: The author confirms the sole responsibility for the conception of the study, presented results and manuscript preparation.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

References

[1] C. Anedda and G. Porru, Higher order boundary estimates for blow-up solutions of elliptic equations, Differential Integral Equations 19 (2006), 345–360, https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1356050517. Suche in Google Scholar

[2] C. Anedda and G. Porru, Second order estimates for boundary blow-up solutions of elliptic equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2007 (2007), 54–63, https://doi.org/10.3934/proc.2007.2007.54. Suche in Google Scholar

[3] S. Alarcón, G. Díaz, R. Letelier, and J. M. Rey, Expanding the asymptotic explosive boundary behavior of large solutions to a semilinear elliptic equation, Nonlinear Anal. 72 (2010), 2426–2443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2009.10.040. Suche in Google Scholar

[4] C. Bandle and M. Marcus, “Large” solutions of semilinear elliptic equations: existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behaviour, J. Anal. Math. 58 (1992), 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02790355. Suche in Google Scholar

[5] C. Bandle, Asymptotic behaviour of large solutions of quasilinear elliptic problems, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 54 (2003), 731–738, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-003-3207-0. Suche in Google Scholar

[6] J. G. Bao, J. Y. Chen, B. Guan, and M. Ji, Liouville property and regularity of a Hessian quotient equation, Amer. J. Math. 125 (2003), 301–316, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25099175. Suche in Google Scholar

[7] J. G. Bao and Q. L. Feng, Necessary and sufficient conditions on global solvability for the p-k-Hessian inequalities, Canad. Math. Bull. 65 (2022), no. 4, 1004–1019, https://doi.org/10.4153/S0008439522000066. Suche in Google Scholar

[8] T. Bhattacharya and A. Mohammed Maximum principles for k-Hessian equations with lower order terms on unbounded domains, J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), 3820–3862, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-020-00415-0. Suche in Google Scholar

[9] L. A. Caffarelli, Topics in PDEs: The Monge-Ampère equation, Graduate course, Courant Institute, New York University, 1995. Suche in Google Scholar

[10] E. Calabi, Improper affine hyperspheres of convex type and a generalization of a theorem by K. Jörgens, Michigan Math. J. 5 (1958), 105–126, https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1028998055. Suche in Google Scholar

[11] K. Cheng and W. M. Ni, On the structure of the conformal scalar curvature equation on RN, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41 (1992), 261–278, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1992.41.41015. Suche in Google Scholar

[12] K. S. Chou and X. J. Wang, Entire solutions to Monge-Ampère equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 49 (1996), 529–539, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199605)49:5<529::AID-CPA2>3.0.CO;2-D.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] F. Cîrstea, and V. Rădulescu, Blow-up boundary solutions of semilinear elliptic problems, Nonlinear Anal. 48 (2002), 521–534, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00202-9. Suche in Google Scholar

[14] F. Cîrstea and V. Rădulescu, Uniqueness of the blow-up boundary solution of logistic equations with absorption, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris I. 335 (2002), 447–452, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-073X(02)02503-7. Suche in Google Scholar

[15] F. Cîrstea and Rădulescu, Asymptotics for the blow-up boundary solution of the logistic equation with absorption, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris I. 336 (2003), 231–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-073X(03)00027-XSuche in Google Scholar

[16] F. Cîrstea and V. Rădulescu, Boundary blow-up in nonlinear elliptic equations of Bieberbach-Rademacher type, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), 3275–3286, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20161728. Suche in Google Scholar

[17] M. del Pino and R. Letelier, The influence of domain geometry in boundary blow-up elliptic problems, Nonlinear Anal. 48 (2002), 897–904, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00222-4. Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Y. H. Du and Z. M. Guo, Boundary blow-up solutions and their applications in quasilinear elliptic equations, J. Anal. Math. 89 (2003), 277–302, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893084. Suche in Google Scholar

[19] L. Dupaigne, M. Ghergu, O. Goubet, and G. Warnault, Entire large solutions for semilinear elliptic equations, J. Differ. Equ. 253 (2012), 2224–2251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.024. Suche in Google Scholar

[20] S. B. Huang, Q. Y. Tian, S. Z. Zhang, and J. H. Xi, A second-order estimate for blow-up solutions of elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011), 2342–2350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2010.11.037. Suche in Google Scholar

[21] X. H. Ji and J. G. Bao, Necessary and sufficient conditions on solvability for Hessian inequalities, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), 175–188, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40590606. Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Q. N. Jin, Y. Y. Li, and H. Y. Xu, Nonexistence of positive solutions for some fully nonlinear elliptic equations, Methods Appl. Anal. 12 (2005), 441–450, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2005.v12.n4.a5. Suche in Google Scholar

[23] H. Y. Jian, Hessian equations with infinite Dirichlet boundary, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 55 (2006), 1045–1062, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24902432. Suche in Google Scholar

[24] H. Y. Jian and X. J. Wang, Existence of entire solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation, Amer. J. Math. 136 (2014), 1093–1106, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24477275. Suche in Google Scholar

[25] K. Jörgens, Über die Lösungen der Differentialgleichung rt−s2=1, Math. Ann. 127 (1954), 130–134, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01361114. Suche in Google Scholar

[26] J. Kazdan and F. Warner, Scalar curvature and conformal deformation of Riemannian structure, J. Differential Geom. 10 (1975), 113–134, https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214432678. Suche in Google Scholar

[27] J. B. Keller, On solutions of Δu=f(u), Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 10 (1957), 503–510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160100402. Suche in Google Scholar

[28] A. Lair, A necessary and sufficient condition for existence of large solutions to semilinear elliptic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 240 (1999), 205–218, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6609. Suche in Google Scholar

[29] X. Li and J. G. Bao, Existence and asymptotic behavior of entire large solutions for Hessian equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 23 (2024), no. 2, 253–268, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2024009. Suche in Google Scholar

[30] A. Mohammed, Boundary asymptotic and uniqueness of solutions to the p-Laplacian with infinite boundary values, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 325 (2007), 480–489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.02.008. Suche in Google Scholar

[31] W. M. Ni, On the elliptic equation Δu+K(x)u(n+2)⁄(n−2)=0, its generalizations, and applications in geometry, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 31 (1982), 493–529, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1982.31.31040. Suche in Google Scholar

[32] R. Osserman, On the inequality Δu≥f(u), Pacific J. Math. 7 (1957), 1641–1647. Suche in Google Scholar

[33] A. V. Pogorelov, On the improper convex affine hyperspheres, Geom. Dedicata 1 (1972), 33–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147379. Suche in Google Scholar

[34] K. Takimoto and Y. X. Zhang, Higher order estimate near the boundary of a large solution to semilinear Poisson equation with double-power like nonlinearity, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 527 (2023), 127382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127382. Suche in Google Scholar

[35] S. P. Tao and Z. J. Zhang, On the existence of explosive solutions for semilinear elliptic problems, Nonlinear Anal. 48 (2002), 1043–1050, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00233-9. Suche in Google Scholar

[36] H. T. Wan, Asymptotic behavior of entire large solutions to semilinear elliptic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 448 (2017), 44–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.10.071. Suche in Google Scholar

[37] H. T. Wan, X. H. Li, B. Li and Y. X. Shi, Entire large solutions to semilinear elliptic equations with rapidly or regularly varying nonlinearities, Nonlinear Anal-Real 45 (2019), 506–530, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2018.07.021. Suche in Google Scholar

[38] H. T. Wan, Y. X. Shi and X. Y. Qiao, Entire large solutions to the k-Hessian equations with weights: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 503 (2021), 125301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125301. Suche in Google Scholar

[39] H. T. Yang, On the existence and asymptotic behavior of large solutions for a semilinear elliptic problem in RN, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 4 (2005), 187–198, https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.197. Suche in Google Scholar

[40] D. Ye and F. Zhou, Invariant criteria for existence of bounded positive solutions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 12 (2005), 413–424, https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2005.12.413. Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Z. J. Zhang, Y. J. Ma, L. Mi, and X. H. Li, Blow-up rates of large solutions for elliptic equations, J. Differ. Equ. 249 (2010), no. 1, 180–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2010.02.019. Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Z. J. Zhang and S. Zhou, Existence of entire positive k-convex radial solutions to Hessian equations and systems with weights, Appl. Math. Lett. 50 (2015), 48–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2015.05.018. Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Z. J. Zhang and S. S. Xia, Existence of entire large convex radially solutions to a class of Hessian type equations with weights, J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ. 9 (2023), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41808-023-00231-x. Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-06-10
Revised: 2025-01-07
Accepted: 2025-02-25
Published Online: 2025-03-31

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Incompressible limit for the compressible viscoelastic fluids in critical space
  3. Concentrating solutions for double critical fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with p-Laplacian in ℝ3
  4. Intervals of bifurcation points for semilinear elliptic problems
  5. On multiplicity of solutions to nonlinear Dirac equation with local super-quadratic growth
  6. Entire radial bounded solutions for Leray-Lions equations of (p, q)-type
  7. Combinatorial pth Calabi flows for total geodesic curvatures in spherical background geometry
  8. Sharp upper bounds for the capacity in the hyperbolic and Euclidean spaces
  9. Positive solutions for asymptotically linear Schrödinger equation on hyperbolic space
  10. Existence and non-degeneracy of the normalized spike solutions to the fractional Schrödinger equations
  11. Existence results for non-coercive problems
  12. Ground states for Schrödinger-Poisson system with zero mass and the Coulomb critical exponent
  13. Geometric characterization of generalized Hajłasz-Sobolev embedding domains
  14. Subharmonic solutions of first-order Hamiltonian systems
  15. Sharp asymptotic expansions of entire large solutions to a class of k-Hessian equations with weights
  16. Stability of pyramidal traveling fronts in time-periodic reaction–diffusion equations with degenerate monostable and ignition nonlinearities
  17. Ground-state solutions for fractional Kirchhoff-Choquard equations with critical growth
  18. Existence results of variable exponent double-phase multivalued elliptic inequalities with logarithmic perturbation and convections
  19. Homoclinic solutions in periodic partial difference equations
  20. Classical solution for compressible Navier-Stokes-Korteweg equations with zero sound speed
  21. Properties of minimizers for L2-subcritical Kirchhoff energy functionals
  22. Asymptotic behavior of global mild solutions to the Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system in Lorentz spaces
  23. Blow-up solutions to the Hartree-Fock type Schrödinger equation with the critical rotational speed
  24. Qualitative properties of solutions for dual fractional parabolic equations involving nonlocal Monge-Ampère operator
  25. Regularity for double-phase functionals with nearly linear growth and two modulating coefficients
  26. Uniform boundedness and compactness for the commutator of an extension of Riesz transform on stratified Lie groups
  27. Normalized solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations with mixed fractional Laplacians
  28. Existence of positive radial solutions of general quasilinear elliptic systems
  29. Low Mach number and non-resistive limit of magnetohydrodynamic equations with large temperature variations in general bounded domains
  30. Sharp viscous shock waves for relaxation model with degeneracy
  31. Bifurcation and multiplicity results for critical problems involving the p-Grushin operator
  32. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a free boundary model with seasonal succession and impulsive harvesting
  33. Blowing-up solutions concentrated along minimal submanifolds for some supercritical Hamiltonian systems on Riemannian manifolds
  34. Stability of rarefaction wave for relaxed compressible Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity
  35. Singularity for the macroscopic production model with Chaplygin gas
  36. Global strong solution of compressible flow with spherically symmetric data and density-dependent viscosities
  37. Global dynamics of population-toxicant models with nonlocal dispersals
  38. α-Mean curvature flow of non-compact complete convex hypersurfaces and the evolution of level sets
  39. High-energy solutions for coupled Schrödinger systems with critical growth and lack of compactness
  40. On the structure and lifespan of smooth solutions for the two-dimensional hyperbolic geometric flow equation
  41. Well-posedness for physical vacuum free boundary problem of compressible Euler equations with time-dependent damping
  42. On the existence of solutions of infinite systems of Volterra-Hammerstein-Stieltjes integral equations
  43. Remark on the analyticity of the fractional Fokker-Planck equation
  44. Continuous dependence on initial data for damped fourth-order wave equation with strain term
  45. Unilateral problems for quasilinear operators with fractional Riesz gradients
  46. Boundedness of solutions to quasilinear elliptic systems
  47. Existence of positive solutions for critical p-Laplacian equation with critical Neumann boundary condition
  48. Non-local diffusion and pulse intervention in a faecal-oral model with moving infected fronts
Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2025-0076/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen