Home Philosophy 66 Correspondence with Frederick Adams Woods, 1911–1913
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

66 Correspondence with Frederick Adams Woods, 1911–1913

  • Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Correspondence
This chapter is in the book Correspondence

 

R L 477, Houghton Library. Peirce’s nearly decade-long dialogue with biologist Frederick Adams Woods bridges logic, historiography, and developmental studies. Initially praising Woods’s “historiometry” (Heredity in Royalty, 1906) in the first, and the now-lost part of their epistles, Peirce lauds his statistical rigor but critiques historians’ nonsensical singular counterfactuals (e.g., “If Napoleon had won at Leipzig…”) as pragmatically void without generalisable insights. His late 1913 letters, penned during Peirce’s severe illness, expand on epistemology: Peirce famously classifies reasoning into Deduction, Induction, and Retroduction (abductive conjecture-making), defends instincts as evolutionarily tuned, and laments his unpublished legacy, with “many important propositions” held back for decades. Woods, seeking endorsements for his second book (The Influence of Monarchs, 1911), receives trenchant feedback on causation and probability, and their correspondence evolves into a rich exchange about scientific methods. Peirce’s 1913 note—scribbled mid-influenza—laments his weakened memory but affirms his 50-year devotion to logic since childhood encounters with Whately’s Logic. Post-1914, Woods’s recollections to James Haughton Woods and Albert Wiggam depict Peirce’s mix of demonic brilliance, poverty (“almost starving”), and complex character (Royce: “a hard man to suit”), including epicurean tastes (Roquefort, Burgundy), offering intimate glimpses of his final years. The correspondence highlights Peirce’s interdisciplinary reach and unyielding intellectual standards, painting a poignant portrait of his final years.

 

R L 477, Houghton Library. Peirce’s nearly decade-long dialogue with biologist Frederick Adams Woods bridges logic, historiography, and developmental studies. Initially praising Woods’s “historiometry” (Heredity in Royalty, 1906) in the first, and the now-lost part of their epistles, Peirce lauds his statistical rigor but critiques historians’ nonsensical singular counterfactuals (e.g., “If Napoleon had won at Leipzig…”) as pragmatically void without generalisable insights. His late 1913 letters, penned during Peirce’s severe illness, expand on epistemology: Peirce famously classifies reasoning into Deduction, Induction, and Retroduction (abductive conjecture-making), defends instincts as evolutionarily tuned, and laments his unpublished legacy, with “many important propositions” held back for decades. Woods, seeking endorsements for his second book (The Influence of Monarchs, 1911), receives trenchant feedback on causation and probability, and their correspondence evolves into a rich exchange about scientific methods. Peirce’s 1913 note—scribbled mid-influenza—laments his weakened memory but affirms his 50-year devotion to logic since childhood encounters with Whately’s Logic. Post-1914, Woods’s recollections to James Haughton Woods and Albert Wiggam depict Peirce’s mix of demonic brilliance, poverty (“almost starving”), and complex character (Royce: “a hard man to suit”), including epicurean tastes (Roquefort, Burgundy), offering intimate glimpses of his final years. The correspondence highlights Peirce’s interdisciplinary reach and unyielding intellectual standards, painting a poignant portrait of his final years.

Downloaded on 30.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110766325-017/html
Scroll to top button