Home Philosophy 63 Letter to James Howard Kehler, June 22, 1911
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

63 Letter to James Howard Kehler, June 22, 1911

  • Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Correspondence
This chapter is in the book Correspondence

 

R L 231, R 514, R 764, Houghton Library. In this extensive autobiographical letter, prompted by Victoria Welby’s introduction, Peirce recounts his life’s work to a business executive and journalist James Howard Kehler. He traces his logical journey from mastering Whately’s Logic at age 13 to critiquing Kant and Boole, culminating in his Existential Graphs—a Diagrammatic Syntax designed to dissect reasoning into elemental steps. Peirce details the Graphs’ rules (erasure, insertion, de/iteration) and their pedagogical value for exposing fallacies in mathematical deduction. The letter then pivots to probability, where it dismantles Laplace’s inverse probabilities and defines chance via endless sequences and limit-convergence. Peirce classifies reasoning into three types: Deduction (necessary or probable, corollarial or theorematic), Induction (or Adduction, self-correcting over time), and Retroduction (abductive conjecture-making), positioning the latter as the wellspring of scientific discovery. Amid reflections on his gravity research and academic marginalisation, he frames logic as a critic anchoring truth in communal inquiry. The letter stands as Peirce’s intellectual testament combining technical rigor, metaphysical urgency, and a defense of the powers of retroduction to exalt conjectures in the mental realm.

 

R L 231, R 514, R 764, Houghton Library. In this extensive autobiographical letter, prompted by Victoria Welby’s introduction, Peirce recounts his life’s work to a business executive and journalist James Howard Kehler. He traces his logical journey from mastering Whately’s Logic at age 13 to critiquing Kant and Boole, culminating in his Existential Graphs—a Diagrammatic Syntax designed to dissect reasoning into elemental steps. Peirce details the Graphs’ rules (erasure, insertion, de/iteration) and their pedagogical value for exposing fallacies in mathematical deduction. The letter then pivots to probability, where it dismantles Laplace’s inverse probabilities and defines chance via endless sequences and limit-convergence. Peirce classifies reasoning into three types: Deduction (necessary or probable, corollarial or theorematic), Induction (or Adduction, self-correcting over time), and Retroduction (abductive conjecture-making), positioning the latter as the wellspring of scientific discovery. Amid reflections on his gravity research and academic marginalisation, he frames logic as a critic anchoring truth in communal inquiry. The letter stands as Peirce’s intellectual testament combining technical rigor, metaphysical urgency, and a defense of the powers of retroduction to exalt conjectures in the mental realm.

Downloaded on 30.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110766325-014/html
Scroll to top button