A data-driven computational semiotics: The semantic vector space of Magritte’s artworks

References

Arora, Ravneet Singh. 2012. Towards automated classification of fine-art painting style: A comparative study. Rutgers University PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Arthur, D. & S. Vassilvitskii. 2007. k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, 1027–1035. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Suche in Google Scholar

Bar, Yaniv, Noga Levy & Lior Wolf. 2014. Classification of artistic styles using binarized features derived from a deep neural network. Workshop at the European conference on computer vision, 71–84. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-16178-5_5Suche in Google Scholar

Baroni, Marco & Alessandro Lenci. 2010. Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics 36(4). 673–721.10.1162/coli_a_00016Suche in Google Scholar

Blei, David M. & John D. Lafferty. 2009. Topic models. Text Mining 10(71). 34.10.1201/9781420059458.ch4Suche in Google Scholar

Bordag, Stefan & Gerhard Heyer. 2007. A structuralist framework for quantitative linguistics. In Alexander Mehler & Reinhard Köhler (eds.), Aspects of automatic text analysis, 171–189. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-37522-7_8Suche in Google Scholar

Bouma, Gerlof. 2009. Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In C. Chiarcos, R. Eckart de Castilho & M. Stede (eds.), Proceedings of Biennial GSCL Conference, 31–40. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Burgess, Curt. 2000. Theory and operational definitions in computational memory models: A response to Glenberg and Robertson. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3). 402–408.10.1006/jmla.2000.2715Suche in Google Scholar

Burgess, Curt, Kay Livesay & Kevin Lund. 1998. Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes 25(2–3). 211–257.10.1080/01638539809545027Suche in Google Scholar

Carneiro, Gustavo, Nuno Pinho Da Silva, Alessio Del Bue & João Paulo Costeira. 2012. Artistic image classification: An analysis on the Printart database. In A. Fitzgibbon, S. Lazebnik, P. Perona, Y. Sato & C. Schmid (eds.), Computer vision – ECCV 2012 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7575), 143–157. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33765-9_11Suche in Google Scholar

Crowley, Elliot J. & Andrew Zisserman. 2014. The state of the art: Object retrieval in paintings using discriminative regions. In M. Valstar, A. French & T. Pridmore (eds.), Proceedings of the British machine vision conference. Birmingham: BMVA Press.10.5244/C.28.38Suche in Google Scholar

De Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius. 2005. The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6175.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dunning, Ted. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Journal Computational Linguistics 19(1). 61–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Erk, Katrin. 2009. Supporting inferences in semantic space: Representing words as regions. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on computational semantics, 104–115. Morristown: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1693756.1693769Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, James A. & Pedro Aceves. 2016. Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology 42. 21–50.10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074206Suche in Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Special issue, Studies in Linguistic Analysis, 1–32.Suche in Google Scholar

Floridi, Luciano. 1999. Philosophy and computing: An introduction. London: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. 2000. Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. 2014. The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9629.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel J., Jay D. Friedenberg, Daniel N. Rockmore & David J. Field. 2010. Mapping the similarity space of paintings: Image statistics and visual perception. Visual Cognition 18(4). 559–573.10.1080/13506280902934454Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien, Frank Collins & Paul Perron. 1989. Figurative semiotics and the semiotics of the plastic arts. New Literary History 20(3). 627–649.10.2307/469358Suche in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas L., Mark Steyvers & Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2007. Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review 114(2). 211–244.10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.211Suche in Google Scholar

Groupe Mu. 1992. Traité du signe visuel: Pour une rhétorique de l’image. Paris: Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Hamilton, William L., Jure Leskovec & Dan Jurafsky. 2016. Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. In A. van Den Bosch, K. Erk & N. A. Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, 1489–1501. Stroudsbourg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/P16-1141Suche in Google Scholar

Hare, Jonathon S., Paul H. Lewis, Peter G. B. Enser, Christine J. Sandom, et al. 2006. Mind the gap: Another look at the problem of the semantic gap in image retrieval. In Ei Y. Chang (ed.), Proceedings of multimedia content analysis, management, and retrieval 2006, 75–86. San Jose, CA: SPIE.10.1117/12.647755Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig S. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig S. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10(23). 146–162.10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520Suche in Google Scholar

He, Kaiming, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren & Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90Suche in Google Scholar

Hébert, L. 2013. Magritte: Toutes les œuvres. tous les thèmeshttp://www.magrittedb.com/ (accessed16 March 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Hébert, L. & Éric Trudel. 2013. Analyse des images. http://magrittedb.com (accessed 16 March 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson Jr., C Richard, Ella Hendriks, Igor J. Berezhnoy, Eugene Brevdo, Shannon M. Hughes, Ingrid Daubechies, Jia Li, Eric Postma & James Z. Wang. 2008. Image processing for artist identification. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE 25(4). 37–48.10.1109/MSP.2008.923513Suche in Google Scholar

Kell, Douglas B. & Stephen G. Oliver. 2004. Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. Bioessays 26(1). 99–105.10.1002/bies.10385Suche in Google Scholar

Kelling, Steve, Wesley M. Hochachka, Daniel Fink, Mirek Riedewald, Rich Caruana, Grant Ballard & Giles Hooker. 2009. Data-intensive science: A new paradigm for biodiversity studies. BioScience 59(7). 613–620.10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12Suche in Google Scholar

Khan, Fahad Shahbaz, Shida Beigpour, Joost van de Weijer & Michael Felsberg. 2014. Painting-91: A large scale database for computational painting categorization. Machine Vision and Applications 25(6). 1385–1397.10.1007/s00138-014-0621-6Suche in Google Scholar

Kiela, Douwe & Stephen Clark. 2014. A systematic study of semantic vector space model parameters. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality (CVSC) at EACL, 21–30.10.3115/v1/W14-1503Suche in Google Scholar

Kitchin, Rob. 2014. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 1(1). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053951714528481.10.1177/2053951714528481Suche in Google Scholar

Krizhevsky, Alex, Ilya Sutskever & Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou & K. Q. Weinberger (eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 25, 1097–1105. Red Hook, NY: Curran.Suche in Google Scholar

Landauer, Thomas K., Peter W. Foltz & Darrell Laham. 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2–3). 259–284.10.1080/01638539809545028Suche in Google Scholar

Landauer, T. K. & S. T. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104(2). 211–240.10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen, Kai R. & David E. Monarchi. 2004. A mathematical approach to categorization and labeling of qualitative data: The latent categorization method. Sociological Methodology 34(1). 349–392.10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00156.xSuche in Google Scholar

Lemaire, Benoît & Guy Denhière. 2006. Effects of high-order co-occurrences on word semantic similarity. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition 18(1). https://journals.openedition.org/cpl/471.10.4000/cpl.471Suche in Google Scholar

Leopold, Edda. 2005. On semantic spaces. LDV Forum 20. 63–86.10.21248/jlcl.20.2005.69Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Jia & James Z. Wang. 2004. Studying digital imagery of ancient paintings by mixtures of stochastic models. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions 13(3). 340–353.10.1109/TIP.2003.821349Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Ying, Dengsheng Zhang, Lu Guojun & Ma Wei-Ying. 2007. A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recognition 40(1). 262–282.10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045Suche in Google Scholar

Lombardi, Thomas Edward. 2005. The classification of style in fine-art painting. Pace University PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Qin. 2015. When similarity becomes opposition: Synonyms and antonyms discrimination in DSMs. Italian Journal on Computational Linguistics 1(1).10.4000/ijcol.311Suche in Google Scholar

Lund, Kevin & Curt Burgess. 1996. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28(2). 203–208.10.3758/BF03204766Suche in Google Scholar

Manning, C. & H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mayaffre, Damon. 2008. De l’occurrence à l’isotopie: Les co-occurrences en lexicométrie. Syntaxe & Sémantique 9. 53–72.10.3917/ss.009.0053Suche in Google Scholar

Mehler, Alexander. 2003. Methodological aspects of computational semiotics. SEED Journal 3(3). 71–80.Suche in Google Scholar

Meunier, Jean-Guy. 1989. Artificial intelligence and sign theory. Semiotica 77(1/3). 43–64.10.1515/semi.1989.77.1-3.43Suche in Google Scholar

Meunier, J. G. 2014. Humanités numériques ou computationnelles: Enjeux herméneutiques. Sens Public. http://www.sens-public.org/spip.php?article1121&lang=fr (accessed 17 June 2019).10.7202/1043651arSuche in Google Scholar

Meunier, J. G. 2017. Vers une sémiotique computationnelle edited by S. Badir, I. Darrault, L. Hébert, P. Michelucci, and É. Trudel. Applied Semiotics/Sémiotique Appliquée 16.Suche in Google Scholar

Michel, J. B., Yuan Kui Shen, Aviva Presser Aiden, Adrian Veres, Matthew K. Gray, The Google Books Team, Joseph P. Pickett, Dale Hoiberg, Dan Clancy, Peter Norvig, Jon Orwant, Steven Pinker, Martin A. Nowak & Erez Lieberman Aiden. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014). 176–182.10.1126/science.1199644Suche in Google Scholar

Mikolov, Tomas, Wen-tau Yih & Geoffrey Zweig. 2013. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 746–751.Suche in Google Scholar

Mimno, David. 2012. Computational historiography: Data mining in a century of classics journals. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 5(1). 1–19.10.1145/2160165.2160168Suche in Google Scholar

Mitchell, Jeff & Mirella Lapata. 2010. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science 34(8). 1388–1429.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01106.xSuche in Google Scholar

Nadin, Mihai. 2011. Information and semiotic processes the semiotics of computation. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 18(1–2). 153–175.Suche in Google Scholar

Neuman, Yair, Yochai Cohen & Dan Assaf. 2015. How do we understand the meaning of connotations? A cognitive computational model. Semiotica 205(1/4). 1–16.10.1515/sem-2015-0013Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles E. 1952. The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin 49(3). 197–237.10.1037/h0055737Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles E. 1964. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American Anthropologist 66(3). 171–200.10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles Egerton, George John Suci & Percy H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pankratius, Victor, Li Justin, Michael Gowanlock & David M. Blair. 2016. Computer-aided discovery: Toward scientific insight generation with machine support. IEEE Intelligent Systems 31(4). 3–10.10.1109/MIS.2016.60Suche in Google Scholar

Pincemin, Bénédicte. 1999. Sémantique interprétative et analyses automatiques de textes: Que deviennent les sèmes? Sémiotiques 17. 71–120.Suche in Google Scholar

Rastier, F. 1996. La sémantique des textes: Concepts et applications. Hermes 9(16). 15–37.10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25382Suche in Google Scholar

Rastier, F. 2011. La mesure et le grain: Sémantique de corpus. Paris: Honoré Champion.Suche in Google Scholar

Rieger, Burghard B. 1981. Feasible fuzzy semantics: On some problems of how to handle word meaning empirically. In H. J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics (Research in Text Theory 6), 193–209. Berlin: de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Rieger, Burghard B. 1983. Clusters in semantic space. Actes Du Congrès International Informatique et Science Humaines. 805–814.Suche in Google Scholar

Rieger, Burghard B. 1989. Distributed semantic representation of word meanings. Workshop on parallel processing: Logic, organization, and technology, 243–273. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/3-540-55027-5_15Suche in Google Scholar

Rieger, Burghard B. 1992. Fuzzy computational semantics. Fuzzy systems: Proceedings of the Japanese-German-Center symposium, series, vol. 3, 197–217. Berlin: Publications of the JGCB.Suche in Google Scholar

Rieger, Burghard B. 1999. Semiotics and computational linguistics. In L. A. Zadeh (ed.), Computing with words in information/intelligent systems, vol. 1, 93–118. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4_5Suche in Google Scholar

Rousseeuw, Peter J. 1987. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics 20. 53–65.10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7Suche in Google Scholar

Sahlgren, M. 2006. The word-space model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. University of Stockholm PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Sahlgren, Magnus. 2005. An introduction to random indexing. Methods and applications of semantic indexing workshop at the 7th international conference on terminology and knowledge engineering, TKE, vol. 5.Suche in Google Scholar

Sahlgren, Magnus. 2008. The distributional hypothesis. Italian Journal of Linguistics 20(1). 33–54.Suche in Google Scholar

Saleh, Babak & Ahmed Elgammal. 2016. Large-scale classification of fine-art paintings: Learning the right metric on the right feature. Digital Art History 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Santus, Enrico, Alessandro Lenci, Lu Qin & Sabine Schulte Im Walde. 2014. Chasing hypernyms in vector spaces with entropy. Proceedings of the 14th conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, 38–42.10.3115/v1/E14-4008Suche in Google Scholar

Schütze, Hinrich & Jan Pedersen. 1993. A vector model for syntagmatic and paradigmatic relatedness. Proceedings of the 9th annual conference of the UW centre for the new OED and text research, 104–113.Suche in Google Scholar

Shamir, Lior. 2012. Computer analysis reveals similarities between the artistic styles of Van Gogh and Pollock. Leonardo 45(2). 149–154.10.1162/LEON_a_00281Suche in Google Scholar

Shamir, Lior. 2015. What makes a Pollock Pollock: A machine vision approach. International Journal of Arts and Technology 8(1). 1–10.10.1504/IJART.2015.067389Suche in Google Scholar

Shamir, Lior & Jane A. Tarakhovsky. 2012. Computer analysis of art. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 5(2). 7.10.1145/2307723.2307726Suche in Google Scholar

Shen, Jialie. 2009. Stochastic modeling Western paintings for effective classification. Pattern Recognition 42(2). 293–301.10.1016/j.patcog.2008.04.016Suche in Google Scholar

Shutova, Ekaterina. 2010. Models of metaphor in NLP. Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 688–697. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Smeulders, Arnold W. M., Marcel Worring, Simone Santini, Amarnath Gupta & Ramesh Jain. 2000. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions 22(12). 1349–1380.10.1109/34.895972Suche in Google Scholar

Stork, David G. 2009. Computer vision and computer graphics analysis of paintings and drawings: An introduction to the literature. In Gerald Sommer, Kostas Daniilidis & Josef Pauli (eds.), Computer analysis of images and patterns, 9–24. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-03767-2_2Suche in Google Scholar

Sylvestre, David (ed.). 1997. René Magritte: Catalogue raisonné. Anvers: Fonds Mercator.Suche in Google Scholar

Tanaka-Ishii, Kumiko. 2010. Semiotics of programming. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tanaka-Ishii, Kumiko. 2015. Semiotics of computing: Filling the gap between humanity and mechanical inhumanity. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 981–1002. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_44Suche in Google Scholar

Turney, P. D. & P. Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37(1). 141–188.10.1613/jair.2934Suche in Google Scholar

Van Rijsbergen, Cornelis Joost. 2004. The geometry of information retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511543333Suche in Google Scholar

Widdows, Dominic. 2003. Orthogonal negation in vector spaces for modelling word-meanings and document retrieval. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, 136–143. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1075096.1075114Suche in Google Scholar

Widdows, Dominic. 2004. Geometry and meaning. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Widdows, Dominic. 2008. Semantic vector products: Some initial investigations. https://ai.google/research/pubs/pub33477 (accessed 17 June 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Widdows, Dominic & Trevor Cohen. 2014. Reasoning with vectors: A continuous model for fast robust inference. Logic Journal of IGPL 23(2). 141–173.10.1093/jigpal/jzu028Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Dengsheng, Md Monirul Islam & Lu Guojun. 2012. A review on automatic image annotation techniques. Pattern Recognition 45(1). 346–362.10.1016/j.patcog.2011.05.013Suche in Google Scholar

Zujovic, Jana, Lisa Gandy, Scott Friedman, Bryan Pardo & Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas. 2009. Classifying paintings by artistic genre: An analysis of features & classifiers. Multimedia signal processing, 2009, 1–5. IEEE.10.1109/MMSP.2009.5293271Suche in Google Scholar