Startseite General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning

  • Wei-Lun Chung ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Januar 2024
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Aus der Zeitschrift International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching Band 63 Heft 3

Abstract

This study examined general auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and the relations with English L2 word learning. Participants were 61 Mandarin-speaking children who learned English as an L2 in Taiwan. They received the following tasks: general auditory processing (i.e., amplitude envelope rise time, pitch contour and interval), Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning (at Time 1 and 2). The results revealed that (1) only amplitude envelope rise time discrimination, independent of years of English learning, predicted English L2 word learning at Time 1, (2) Mandarin L1 phonological awareness, relative to Mandarin L1 prosodic awareness, made more contributions to English L2 word learning after controlling amplitude envelope rise time discrimination, and (3) successful English learners outperformed their unsuccessful peers on Mandarin L1 phonological awareness. Taken together, beginning English learners might use amplitude envelop rise time cuing syllable boundaries and rely on L1 prosodic and phonological awareness for English L2 word learning.

Keywords: auditory perception; phonological awareness; prosodic awareness; word learning
Corresponding author: Wei-Lun Chung, Department of Special Education, National Taipei University of Education, No. 134, Sec. 2, Heping E. Rd., Da-an District, Taipei 10671, Taiwan, E-mail:

Funding source: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST 107-2410-H-152-027, MOST 108-2410-H-152-009, MOST 109-2410-H-152-028, MOST 110-2410-H-152-004

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grants: MOST 107-2410-H-152-027, MOST 108-2410-H-152-009, MOST 109-2410-H-152-028 and MOST 110-2410-H-152-004.

  2. Data availability statement: The author has not been granted by children’s parents in written consent to share data with other researchers. Thus, the data that support the findings of this study are not available in a public repository and on request. Future studies would secure data sharing in written consent.

  3. Competing interests: The author reports there are no competing interests to declare.

References

Antoniou, Mark, Carol K. S. To & Patrick C. M. Wong. 2015. Auditory cues that drive language development are language specific: Evidence from Cantonese. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(6). 1493–1507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000514.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, William, Xiuli Tong & Kate Cain. 2016. Lexical prosody beyond first-language boundary: Chinese lexical tone sensitivity predicts English reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 148. 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, William, Xiuli Tong & Helene Deacon. 2019. From Cantonese lexical tone awareness to second language English vocabulary: Cross-language mediation by segmental phonological awareness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62(6). 1875–1889. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-17-0323.Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, Wei-Lun & Gavin M. Bidelman. 2016. Cortical encoding and neurophysiological tracking of intensity and pitch cues signaling English stress patterns in native and nonnative speakers. Brain and Language 155–156. 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, Wei-Lun & Gavin M. Bidelman. 2021. Mandarin-speaking preschoolers’ pitch discrimination, prosodic and phonological awareness, and their relation to receptive vocabulary and reading abilities. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 34(2). 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10075-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, Wei-Lun & Linda Jarmulowicz. 2017. Stress judgment and production in English derivation, and word reading in adult Mandarin-speaking English learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46. 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9475-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, Wei-Lun, Linda Jarmulowicz & Gavin M. Bidelman. 2017. Auditory processing, linguistic prosody awareness, and word reading in Mandarin-speaking children learning English. Reading and Writing 30(7). 1407–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9730-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, Wei-Lun, Linda Jarmulowicz & Gavin M. Bidelman. 2021. Cross-linguistic contributions of acoustic cues and prosodic awareness to first and second language vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading 44(2). 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12349.Suche in Google Scholar

Corriveau, Kathleen H. & Usha Goswami. 2009. Rhythmic motor entrainment in children with speech and language impairments: Tapping to the beat. Cortex 45(1). 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne. 1996. Prosody and the word boundary problem. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 87–99. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Echols, Catharine H. 1996. A role for stress in early speech segmentation. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 151–170. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Foxton, Jessica M., Joel B. Talcott, Caroline Witton, Hal Brace, Fiona McIntyre & Timothy D. Griffiths. 2003. Reading skills are related to global, but not local, acoustic pattern perception. Nature Neuroscience 6. 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1035.Suche in Google Scholar

Fry, Dennis B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1(2). 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100207.Suche in Google Scholar

Ganschow, Leonore, Richard L. Sparks, James Javorsky, Jane Pohlman & Angela Bishop-Marbury. 1991. Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A ‘foreign’ language learning disability? Journal of Learning Disabilities 24(9). 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949102400905.Suche in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Susan E. & Alan D. Baddeley. 1990. The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names. British Journal of Psychology 81(4). 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02371.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Susan E., Graham J. Hitch, Elisabet Service & Amanda J. Martin. 1997. Phonological short-term memory and new word learning in children. Developmental Psychology 33(6). 966–979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.966.Suche in Google Scholar

Goswami, Usha, Danielle Gerson & Luisa Astruc. 2010. Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 23(8). 995–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9186-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Goswami, Usha, Natasha Mead, Tim Fosker, Martina Huss, Lisa Barnes & Victoria Leong. 2013. Impaired perception of syllable stress in children with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language 69(1). 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Holliman, Andrew, Sarah Critten, Tony Lawrence, Emily Harrison, Clare Wood & David Hughes. 2014. Modeling the relationship between prosodic sensitivity and early literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 49(4). 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.82.Suche in Google Scholar

Holliman, Andrew J., Ian R. Mundy, Lesly Wade-Woolley, Clare Wood & Chelsea Bird. 2017. Prosodic awareness and children’s multisyllabic word reading. Educational Psychology 37(10). 1222–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1330948.Suche in Google Scholar

Holliman, Andrew J., Clare Wood & Kieron Sheehy. 2008. Sensitivity to speech rhythm explains individual differences in reading ability independently of phonological awareness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 26(3). 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X241623.Suche in Google Scholar

Howie, John M. 1976. Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, Chieh-Fang. 2003. Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language Learning 53(3). 429–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00231.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, Chieh-Fang. 2008. Rate of acquiring and processing L2 color words in relation to L1 phonological awareness. The Modern Language Journal 92(1). 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00685.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, Chieh-Fang. 2014. Extracting phonological patterns for L2 word learning: The effect of poor phonological awareness. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43(5). 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9269-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, Chieh-Fang & Hugh W. Catts. 1998. The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading 2(1). 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_3.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, Chieh-Fang & Clare Melanie Schuele. 2005. Learning nonnative names: The effect of poor native phonological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics 26(3). 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050204.Suche in Google Scholar

Jarmulowicz, Linda, Valentina L. Taran & Sarah E. Hay. 2007. Third graders’ metalinguistic skills, reading skills, and stress production in derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50(3). 1593–1605. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/107).Suche in Google Scholar

Jong, Peter F. de, Marie-José Seveke & Marjo van Veen. 2000. Phonological sensitivity and the acquisition of new words in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 76(4). 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2549.Suche in Google Scholar

Kehoe, Margaret, Carol Stoel-Gammon & Eugene H. Buder. 1995. Acoustic correlates of stress in young children’s speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38(2). 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3802.338.Suche in Google Scholar

Levitt, Harry. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2B). 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912375.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, Lu-Chun & Cynthia J. Johnson. 2010. Phonological patterns in Mandarin-English bilingual children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 24(4–5). 369–386. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200903532482.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindfield, Kimberly C., Arthur Wingfield & Harold Goodglass. 1999. The role of prosody in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 68(1–2). 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2094.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Yu-Hsin & Chieh-Fang Hu. 2010. The role of Chinese EFL learners’ sensitivity to English lexical stress patterns in grammatical category assignments. English Teaching and Learning 34(4). 1–32.Suche in Google Scholar

Marecka, Marta, Jakub Szewczyk, Anna Jelec, Donata Janiszewska, Karolina Rataj & Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2018. Different phonological mechanisms facilitate vocabulary learning at early and late stages of language acquisition: Evidence from Polish 9-year-olds learning English. Applied Psycholinguistics 39(1). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000455.Suche in Google Scholar

Mehta, Gita & Anne Cutler. 1988. Detection of target phonemes in spontaneous and read speech. Language and Speech 31(2). 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098803100203.Suche in Google Scholar

Morton, John & Wiktor Jassem. 1965. Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech 8(3). 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096500800303.Suche in Google Scholar

Ou, Shu-Chen. 2010. Taiwanese EFL learners’ perception of English word stress. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 36(1). 1–23.Suche in Google Scholar

Reeves, Carolyn, Anna René Schmauder & Robin Morris. 2000. Stress grouping improves performance on an immediate serial list recall task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(6). 1638–1654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1638.Suche in Google Scholar

Saito, Kazuya, Magdalena Kachlicka, Hui Sun & Adam Tierney. 2020. Domain-general auditory processing as an anchor of post-pubertal second language pronunciation learning: Behavioural and neurophysiological investigations of perceptual acuity, age, experience, development, and attainment. Journal of Memory and Language 115. 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104168.Suche in Google Scholar

Sparks, Richard L. 1993. The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic cooling deficit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal 77(1). 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01946.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Sparks, Richard L. & Leonore Ganschow. 1993. Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 77(3). 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01974.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Sparks, Richard L. & Leonore Ganschow. 1995. A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to MacIntyre. The Modern Language Journal 79(2). 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05436.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Sturges, Persis T. & James G. Martin. 1974. Rhythmic structure in auditory temporal pattern perception and immediate memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102(3). 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035866.Suche in Google Scholar

Swan, Denise & Usha Goswami. 1997. Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 66(1). 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2375.Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, Xiuli, Xinjie He & Hélène Deacon. 2017. Tone matters for Cantonese–English bilingual children’s English word reading development: A unified model of phonological transfer. Memory & Cognition 45(2). 320–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0657-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Wade-Woolley, Lesly, Clare Wood, Jessica Chan & Sarah Weidman. 2022. Prosodic competence as the missing component of reading processes across languages: Theory, evidence and future research. Scientific Studies of Reading 26(2). 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1995390.Suche in Google Scholar

Whalley, Karen & Julie Hansen. 2006. The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading 29(3). 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00309.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Wiener, Seth. 2020. Second language learners develop non-native lexical processing biases. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(1). 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001165.Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, Clare & Colin Terrell. 1998. Poor readers’ ability to detect speech rhythm and perceive rapid speech. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 16(3). 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00760.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, Clare, Lesly Wade-Woolley & Andrew J. Holliman. 2009. Phonological awareness: Beyond phonemes. In Clare Wood & Vincent Connelly (eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling, 7–23. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Vickie Y. & Jean E. Andruski. 2010. A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 39. 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9142-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Juan & Catherine McBride-Chang. 2010. Auditory sensitivity, speech perception, and reading development and impairment. Educational Psychology Review 22. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9137-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yanhong, Shawn L. Nissen & Alexander L. Francis. 2008. Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(6). 4498–4513. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2902165.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Chaoqun, Kazuya Saito & Adam Tierney. 2022. Successful second language pronunciation learning is linked to domain-general auditory processing rather than music aptitude. Second Language Research 38(3). 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320978493.Suche in Google Scholar
Received: 2023-07-20
Accepted: 2023-12-11
Published Online: 2024-01-04
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
  4. Research Articles
  5. Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
  6. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
  7. Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
  8. Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
  9. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
  10. Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
  11. Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
  12. “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
  15. A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
  16. Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
  17. Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
  18. Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
  19. General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
  20. Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
  21. Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
  22. Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
  23. The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
  24. An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
  25. “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
  26. Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
  27. Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
  28. A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
  29. Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
  30. The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0168
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
auditory perception; phonological awareness; prosodic awareness; word learning

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
  4. Research Articles
  5. Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
  6. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
  7. Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
  8. Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
  9. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
  10. Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
  11. Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
  12. “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
  15. A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
  16. Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
  17. Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
  18. Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
  19. General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
  20. Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
  21. Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
  22. Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
  23. The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
  24. An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
  25. “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
  26. Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
  27. Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
  28. A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
  29. Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
  30. The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2023-0168/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen