Startseite Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach

  • Rhonda Oliver ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Tetiana Bogachenko ORCID logo und Sender Dovchin ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Oktober 2024

Abstract

This study was undertaken at a Mongolian community language school which aims to support Mongolian heritage children to learn their home language and culture. The learners were aged 4–15 years with diverse abilities in the Mongolian language. Informed by both purpose-developed Needs and Interest Analyses, a task-based language teaching (TBLT) program was developed and implemented over a six-month period. To evaluate the usefulness of this, two methods were utilised. Firstly, learners’ task-based interactions were recorded regularly, transcribed and qualitatively analysed. Secondly, stakeholder feedback was elicited via interviews. The findings showed that the learners interacted in ways facilitative of second language acquisition (i.e., they received abundant input, used a variety of interactive strategies, provided peer scaffolding, and modified their output according to the feedback). They also engaged in translanguaging to support their understanding and meaning making. Stakeholder feedback pointed to some challenges, but also many positive outcomes.


Corresponding author: Rhonda Oliver, Curtin University, Kent St., Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, E-mail:

Funding source: School of Education, Curtin University

Award Identifier / Grant number: Small research grant

Acknowledgments

The research team wishes to acknowledge the contribution of the teachers and students of the Western Australian Mongolian Community School.

  1. Research ethics: Ethics approval for Human Research was sought and gained from Curtin University’s Ethics Committee. Curtin University’s ethics comply with national and international regulations. All participants, including the students, provided informed consent to be involved in this study; parental consent was also gained for the minors involved in this study.

  2. Author contributions: Each author: made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; contributed to drafting the work and revising of the intellectual content; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

  3. Research funding: A small research grant from the School of Education, Curtin University supported the research component of this study.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Data availability: All data for this study is stored in Curtin University’s data repository and is accessible through this by appropriate request.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2017. Annual report 2016–2017. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/by%20subject/1001.0∼2016-17 (Accessed 24 April 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2021. Annual report 2021–22. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government. https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/6104_5GPER (accessed 17 May 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Colin. 2011. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar

Bogachenko, Tetiana. 2016. Contextualizing educational innovation: Task-based language teaching and post-Soviet schools in Ukraine. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Australia: Curtin University.Suche in Google Scholar

Bogachenko, Tetiana & Rhonda Oliver. 2020. The potential use of tasks in post-Soviet schools: Case studies from Ukraine. In Craig Lambert & Rhonda Oliver (eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts, 162–177. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730569.13Suche in Google Scholar

Candlin, Christopher. 2009. Towards task-based language teaching. In Kris Van den Branden, Martin Bygate & John Norris (eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader, 21–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.1.03towSuche in Google Scholar

Community Languages Australia. 2020. Strategic Positioning Paper 2020–23: A National Plan Outlining Organizational Purpose, Vision, Values, Objectives, Strategies and KPIs. Available at: https://www.communitylanguagesaustralia.org.au/publications/.Suche in Google Scholar

Dovchin, Sender. 2017. Uneven distribution of resources in the youth linguascapes of Mongolia. Multilingua 36(2). 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0065.Suche in Google Scholar

Dovchin, Sender. 2019. Inverted youth Language in Mongolia as macroscopic and microscopic chronotopes. In Sjaak Kroon & Jos Swanenberg (eds.), Chronotopic identity work, 25–48. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730714.6Suche in Google Scholar

Dovchin, Sender & Stephanie Dryden. 2021. Translingual discrimination: Skilled transnational migrants in the labour market of Australia. Applied Linguistics 43(2). 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab041.Suche in Google Scholar

Dovchin, Sender & Min Wang. 2024. The resistance to translanguaging, spontaneous translanguagers and native speaker saviorism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2024.2336469.Suche in Google Scholar

Dovchin, Sender, Rhonda Oliver & Wei Li. 2024. Translingual practices: Precariousness and playfulness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009072779Suche in Google Scholar

East, Martin. 2012. Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.3Suche in Google Scholar

East, Martin. 2014. Encouraging innovation in a modern foreign language initial teacher education programme: What do beginning teachers make of task-based language teaching? The Language Learning Journal 42(3). 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.856455.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2009a. Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19(3). 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2009b. Task-based research and language pedagogy. In Kris Van den Branden, Martin Bygate & John M. Norris (eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader, 109–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.1.07tasSuche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2018. Reflections of task-based language teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/ELLIS0131Suche in Google Scholar

Forrest, James, Phil Benson & Frank Siciliano. 2020. Linguistic shift and heritage language retention in Australia. In Stanley Brunn & Roland Kehrein (eds.), Handbook of the changing world language map, vol. 2, 1069–1086. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_37Suche in Google Scholar

Gilabert, Roger. 2005. Evaluating the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis: A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). In Michael Long (ed.), Second language needs analysis, 182–199. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667299.007Suche in Google Scholar

Grote, Ellen & Rhonda Oliver. 2022. A task-based needs analysis framework for TBLT: Theory, purpose and application. In Assandro Benati & John Schwieter (eds.), Second language theory: The legacy of Professor Michael H. Long, 235–255. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/bpa.14.12groSuche in Google Scholar

Iizuka, Takehiro. 2019. Task-based needs analysis: Identifying communicative needs for study abroad students in Japan. System 80. 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Lambert, Craig. & Rhonda Oliver. 2020. Introduction. In Craig Lambert & Rhonda Oliver (eds.), Using tasks in diverse contexts, 1–12. Briston: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730569.4Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Dianne. 2018. Task repetition or task iteration: It does make a difference. In Martin Bygate (ed.), Language learning through task repetition, 311–329. Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.11.12larSuche in Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Joseph. 1987. The national policy on languages. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael. 2015. Second language acquisition and task-based language acquisition. Hoboken, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael & Mohammad Ahmadian. 2021. Preface the origins and growth of task-based language teaching. In Mohammad. J. Ahmadian & Michael Long (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of TBLT, xxv–xxxii. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9781108868327.001Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael & John M. Norris. 2000. Task-based teaching and assessment. In Michael Byram (ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching, 597–603. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Nunan, David. 2004. Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667336Suche in Google Scholar

Oliver, Rhonda, Ellen Grote, Judith Rochecouste & Mike Exell. 2013. A task-based needs analysis for Australian Aboriginal students: Going beyond the target situation to address cultural issues. International Journal of Training Research 11(3). 246–259. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.2013.11.3.246.Suche in Google Scholar

Oliver, Rhonda & Philp Jenefer. 2014. Focus on oral interaction. Key concept series. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Oliver, Rhonda & Masatoshi Sato. 2021. Tasks for children: Using mainstream content to learn a language. In Mohammad J. Ahmadian & Michael Long (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of TBLT, 416–431. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9781108868327.024Suche in Google Scholar

Oliver, Rhonda, Masatoshi Sato, Susan Ballinger & Lanlan Pan. 2019. Content and language integrated learning classes for child Mandarin L2 learners: A longitudinal observational study. In Masatoshi Sato & Shawn Loewen (eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy, 81–102. NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781351190558-4Suche in Google Scholar

Riestenberg, Kate & Aris Sherris. 2018. Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: Investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlispe Revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review 74(3). 434–459. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.4051.Suche in Google Scholar

Rubino, Antonia. 2010. Multilingualism in Australia: Reflections on current and future research trends. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33(2). 17.1–17.21. https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1017.Suche in Google Scholar

Samuda, Virginia & Martin Bygate. 2008. Tasks in second language learning. London: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230596429Suche in Google Scholar

Seals, Corinne A., Jonathan Newton, Madeline Ash & Bao Nguyen. 2020. Translanguaging and task based language teaching: Crossovers and challenges. In Zhongfeng Tian, Laila Aghai, Peter Sayer & Jamie L. Schissel (eds.), Envisioning TESOL through a translanguaging lens. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-47031-9_13Suche in Google Scholar

Shintani, Natsuko. 2012. Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process-product study. Language Teaching Research 16(2). 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811431378.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 471–484. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Anna Tsendina, Anastasia Karlsson & Vivan Franzén. 2005. The phonology of Mongolian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Xinmin & Simon Borg. 2014. Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research 18(2). 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505941.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lube, Linda Tsung & Xian Qi. 2023. Home language use and shift in Australia: Trends in the new millennium. Frontiers in Psychology 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096147.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-21
Accepted: 2024-09-24
Published Online: 2024-10-11
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
  4. Research Articles
  5. Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
  6. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
  7. Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
  8. Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
  9. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
  10. Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
  11. Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
  12. “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
  15. A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
  16. Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
  17. Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
  18. Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
  19. General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
  20. Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
  21. Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
  22. Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
  23. The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
  24. An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
  25. “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
  26. Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
  27. Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
  28. A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
  29. Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
  30. The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2024-0157/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen