Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association

About this journal

The Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association documents the exchange of ideas in the Cognitive Linguistics research community and related fields, not just in Germany but all over the world. It brings together researchers from a variety of theoretical and methodological frameworks, whose work is informed by a broad view of language both as an integral part of human cognition and as a set of socially situated communicative practices.

Volume 11 (Published December 2023)
Edited by Stefan Hartmann and Antje Quick

Back Issues

Volume 10 (published in December 2022)
edited by Beate Hampe and Anja Binanzer

Volume 9 (2021)
edited by Stefan Hartmann

Volume 8 (2020)
edited by Anatol Stefanowitsch

Volume 7 (2019)
edited by Constanze Juchem-Grundmann, Michael Pleyer and Monika Pleyer

Volume 6 (2018)
edited by Beate Hampe and Susanne Flach

Volume 5 (2017)
edited by Stefan Hartmann

Volume 4 (2016)
edited by Juliana Goschler and Susanne Niemeier

Volume 3 (2015)
edited by Peter Uhrig and Thomas Herbst

Volume 2 (2014)
edited by Martin Hilpert and Susanne Flach

Volume 1 (2013)
edited by Anatol Stefanowitsch and Juliana Goschler

Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

How literacy acquisition changes L1 grammatical knowledge

July 1, 2025

Tan Arda Gedik

Article number: 20250004

Download PDF

Literacy, the ability to read and write, is a relatively recent cultural invention, however, it has profound effects on cognition, and emerging studies also show that it may influence the mental representations of grammar among native speakers. This contradicts the widely-held assumption that all individuals within an L1 community acquire the same grammar unconsciously. The emerging studies indicate that the availability of a writing system, alongside nonverbal reasoning (i.e., reasoning and problem solving skills), and metalinguistic skills fostered by literacy, contributes significantly to ultimate language attainment. Recent scholarship suggests that illiterate individuals exhibit large individual differences in linguistic knowledge and how well they abstracted various grammatical forms, challenging the notion of uniform grammar that is thought to be achieved successfully across native speakers. This article reports on the state-of-the-art of illiteracy-grammar studies and reevaluates this hypothesis by investigating the impact of literacy on L1 grammar knowledge among illiterate speakers and makes suggestions for future studies.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

The development of flexibility and abstraction in the acquisition of the German ditransitive construction

July 1, 2025

Laura Patrizzi

Article number: 20250002

Download PDF

According to usage-based accounts of language acquisition, abstract linguistic representations emerge gradually from lexically specific formulas. Higher levels of abstractness are typically associated with increased flexibility, that is, variability in the use of constructions. Developing flexibility can be measured in different ways, e.g., diversity of word use in specific slots of the construction (absolute lexical flexibility), variability in the combination of lexical items (relative lexical flexibility), and the range of semantic meanings expressed within the construction (semantic flexibility). While prior research has mostly focused on the development of flexibility in the verb slot, less is known about how flexibility develops in other slots, and whether different measures of flexibility develop simultaneously or along individual pathways. The present study aims to describe the development of absolute and relative lexical flexibility as well as semantic flexibility in one German-speaking child’s acquisition of the ditransitive construction. The results indicate that lexical and semantic flexibility in the verb slot increase over the course of development. At the same time, the argument slots show considerable flexibility from early on and, contrary to expectations, the construction does not appear to emerge from a small set of highly frequent lexicalized patterns. In particular, conventionalized expressions, which are common in the input, emerge only later in development. The emergence of these lexicalized patterns may in turn support the development of flexibility in other aspects of the construction. These findings suggest that the child acquires both more abstract representations of the construction, as indicated by an increase in flexibility, as well as routinized and highly frequent formulas stored at lower levels of abstraction.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Individual differences in the constructicon: German noun phrase agreement

January 1, 2000

Hendrik A. Kligge, Ewa Dąbrowska, Thorsten Piske

Article number: 20250009

Download PDF

Traditional linguistic reference works are static artefacts that diverge from the representation of language as a cognitive phenomenon in several ways: Historically, these artefacts are rooted in the intuitions of highly educated speakers, they impose an artificial division between lexicon and grammar, and they lack psychological plausibility. Constructionist approaches break with this tradition and attempt to model language in cognitively plausible networks, known as constructicons , that are intended to mirror the linguistic knowledge as represented in speakers’ minds. However, there are numerous concepts of constructicons, including the concepts of reference and mental constructicons. This dichotomy reintroduces an old problem in a new guise. These two concepts fundamentally differ from each other, as the former describes language as an individual, cognitive phenomenon, and the latter describes language as a social phenomenon, extrapolating over more than one mental constructicon. This paper explores these fundamental differences using the example of German noun phrase agreement. First, it models NP agreement within a reference constructicon framework, followed by a comparison with elicited production data, which reveals substantial differences between reference and mental constructicons.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

The role of phonemic and subphonemic cues in morphological learning

January 1, 2000

Dinah Baer-Henney, Dominic Schmitz

Article number: 20250001

Download PDF

Building upon recent discoveries highlighting the direct interplay between phonetics and morphology in production, perception, and comprehension, our study adds another dimension to this area of research: language learning. We use as template the case of English word-final /s/, where segment duration has been shown to serve as a critical cue for morphological category differentiation (non-morphemic, suffix, or clitic). In a study with German adults, employing an artificial language learning paradigm, we compared the ability to learn the distinction between singular and plural forms, where in one group, singular and plural were distinguished by phonemic content (/p/ vs. /f/), and in two other groups, singular and plural were distinguished by durational differences varying in length (/f/). The experimental design consisted of a training phase, followed by a number decision task involving new items. We employed a mouse-tracking paradigm, which allowed us to not only assess the success rate, but also analyze the reaction times and trajectories of participants’ responses in detail. Our findings reveal that the artificial language relying on the phonemic cues is learned easily, while learners of the artificial language relying on the subphonemic cues lag behind but apparently show signs of initial learning. Our results contribute to the understanding of the intricate relationship between phonetics and morphology, shedding light on the role of subphonemic information in linguistic categorization.
Open Access
A dynamic network approach to language in aphasia: individual differences in spoken and non-verbal communication

January 1, 2000

Antje Endesfelder Quick, Marvin Zurek, Rachel Hatchard

Article number: 20250003

Download PDF

Aphasia is an acquired language disorder that can affect comprehension and production. While traditionally categorized into subtypes such as Broca’s, Wernicke’s, and anomic aphasia, many individuals exhibit features from multiple types, challenging rigid classifications. Historically, linguistic research into aphasia has often been guided by rule-based theories, influencing both assessment and treatment. However, alternative perspectives, such as the Usage-Based (UB) approach, offer a more dynamic view, emphasizing individual differences in language capabilities, and predicting variation along a continuum. Within this theoretical perspective, we apply a “Dynamic Network Model” (DNM), which combines word frequencies and transitional probabilities to elucidate individual networks of usage patterns for each person’s language. This study extends the DNM approach to clinical data, analyzing the language networks of six speakers with aphasia (two each with anomic, Wernicke’s, and Broca’s) alongside two control participants, to explore individual differences in spoken language and non-verbal communication. Results reveal that the speakers with aphasia generally have smaller networks, with disrupted connections. However, network size varies within and across aphasia types. Additionally, the speakers with aphasia use more non-verbal communication than control participants, with those with Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasias using it the most. While some findings may be predicted based on traditional aphasia sub-classifications, the results indicate considerable individual differences within each of the participant groups, both in their spoken language and non-verbal communication, supporting a usage-based approach and adding to questions about the validity of discrete aphasia classifications.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Light verb constructions and the Principle of No Synonymy – A case study on German stehen unter-LVCs

January 1, 2000

Jens Fleischhauer

Article number: 20250008

Download PDF

Light verb constructions (LVCs) are complex predicates that consist of a desemanticized (light) verb and a phrasal element. A recurring element in the discussion of German light verb constructions is the claim that these multi-word units can be substituted by simplex verbs and are thus synonymous with simplex verbs. In this paper, I examine the question of synonymy based on a selected data sample of LVCs consisting of stehen ‘stand’ and the preposition unter ‘under’. Based on the assumption that total synonyms should not exist, I demonstrate that stehen unter -LVCs not only differ semantically from corresponding simplex verb constructions but also from seemingly synonymous LVCs, and therefore do not form synonyms with the mentioned construction types. While the first type of synonymy (LVCs and simplex verbs) has already been discussed in depth in the literature, the discussion of seemingly synonymous LVCs represents a new step in the discourse on LVCs.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

The effect of cognitive load on linguistic fluency, lexical production, and emotional polarity: An exploratory study on self-directed French

January 1, 2000

Mathilde Hutin, Frédéric Tomas

Article number: 20250007

Download PDF

Cognitive load refers to the mental resources available in working memory, which can vary due to, e.g., the inherent complexity of a task. Studies have investigated the effect of a higher cognitive demand on speech, either on fluency, lexical use or linguistic display of emotions. Fewer have investigated all these parameters jointly, and most focus on English. Here we manipulate working memory load with an image-depiction task with or without access to the image and investigate whether cognitive load impacts speech production in French, i.e., correlates with both fluency metrics (number of word tokens and lemmas, lemma-token ratio, counts and rates of filled pauses, interruptions and repetitions) and/or with lexical metrics (use of words from a given lexical field or with a given connotation). Our results show that, compared to their peers in the low cognitive load condition (with access to the image), speakers under high cognitive load (who describe the image from memory) indeed tend to use more disfluencies but show little differences in the use of specific vocabulary or in emotional words. Although the absence of lexical differences may be due to inherent language- or task-specific differences, the confirmation that an increase in cognitive load implies an increase in disfluency indicates that at least this one parameter is a cross-linguistic indicator of speech production under high cognitive load.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Names, semantics, and cognition in native varieties of the potato tubercle in the peasant community of Pampacorral (Lares, Cuzco): Towards a cognitive approach to the naming process

January 1, 2000

Frank Joseph Domínguez Chenguayen

Article number: 20250006

Download PDF

This study examines the naming of the diverse native potato species in the peasant community of Pampacorral, proposing an analytical approach grounded in the theoretical framework of Cognitive Linguistics. From this perspective, processes such as perception, conceptualisation, and symbolisation converge, each encompassing various cognitive mechanisms, including perspective, profiling, encyclopaedic knowledge, metaphor, metonymy, and codification. The names of the native potato species in Pampacorral are thus understood as the outcome of a complex yet realistic process involving multiple phases, processes, and mechanisms, with the nomenclature of varietal diversity serving to validate this novel approach. Thus, the names of potatoes reveal a set of metaphorical and metonymic patterns.
Open Access
From linguistic creativity to conformity: the case of [zur N_ung kommen/bringen]¹

January 1, 2000

Fabian Fleissner

Article number: 20250005

Download PDF

This study explores the diachronic changes in the pattern [ zur N ung kommen / bringen ], arguing for its status as a semi-schematic construction in late 19th-century German, expressing converse/anti-converse diathesis, constituted through the interplay of the two verbs. Through evidence supporting this status, I aim to show that the role of creativity in the emergence of new schematic constructions should, in part, be reconsidered — a perspective that diverges from the recent argument presented by Norde and Trousdale (2024). In particular, I challenge the proposal to categorize diachronic developments leading to schematization as E-creative within the framework proposed by Sampson (2016). While creativity introduces linguistic innovations, I propose shifting the focus to conformity as a driving force in schematization, as norm-oriented language users adopt and entrench these patterns through consistent usage.

Issue 0

Issue 1

Volume Editors: Peter Uhrig and Thomas Herbst

Issue 1

Volume Editors: Martin Hilpert and Susanne Flach

Issue 1

Volume Editors: Anatol Stefanowitsch and Juliana Goschler

Call for Papers:

We invite paper submissions for the Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (DGKL/GCLA). The Yearbook aims to enable the dynamic exchange of ideas relating to all aspects of Cognitive Linguistics both within the association and in the global Cognitive Linguistics community.

The spectrum of topics covered by the Yearbook is as broad as Cognitive Linguistics itself. As such, the Yearbook of the DGKL/GCLA does not impose specific topical requirements on contributions, as it aims to document the full range of topics investigated by members of the Cognitive Linguistics community. This includes work not just in Cognitive Linguistics in a narrow sense, but also in closely related fields such as psycholinguistics, gesture research, and Cognitive Poetics. It also includes work by researchers in related frameworks that do not (yet?) consider themselves part of the Cognitive Linguistics research program, as long as there is a clear connection to the perspective adopted by the latter.

For more details and how to submit read the full Call for Papers here.

Submission

Please send your papers (7,000–10,000 words without references) to the editors (hartmast@hhu.de and antje.quick@uni-leipzig.de). Feel free to approach the editors with expressions of interest ahead of time, to see if your envisaged paper is a good fit for the Yearbook.

Initial submissions should be in PDF format (with no restrictions on printing, copying, commenting etc.). Upon acceptance, the final version should be submitted in an editable format (.docx or LaTeX source file).

Submission process

The Yearbook of the DGKL/GCLA operates a double-blind review process. The referees are asked to assess the following aspects:

Are the research questions and hypotheses convincing?

Are the methods used appropriate for addressing the research question?

Is the paper well-structured?

Is the paper written in a clear and accessible style?

Reviewers will then make one of the following recommendations to the editors:

accept as-is

accept with minor revisions

revise and resubmit for review

reject

The final decision is made by the editors. In the initial round of reviewing, each paper is assessed by at least two independent experts from the field. If there is a second round of reviewing, the editors will usually consult one of the two original reviewers.

Hybrid Open Access

In this journal, authors have the option to publish their article under an open access license. Open Access allows you as an author to retain copyright and share your findings with colleagues and interested parties worldwide without any restraints.

Please note that authors from institutions with which we have a transformative agreement can publish open access without paying an article processing charge (APC). More information on the eligible institutions and articles can be found under the “Funding and Support” tab here.

Editor-in-Chief

Jun.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Hartmann, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf
Email: hartmast@hhu.de

Dr. Antje Quick, Universität Leipzig, Beethovenstraße 15, 04107 Leipzig
Email: antje.quick@uni-leipzig.de

Emeritus Editors:

Anatol Stefanowitsch, Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Englische Philologie, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany, anatol.stefanowitsch@fu-berlin.de

Thomas Herbst, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Bismarckstr. 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany thomas.herbst@fau.de

Editorial Board:

Kim-Kristin Droste, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück
Ad Foolen, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen
Thomas Herbst, Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Erlangen
Lara Höttecke, Universität Osnabrück,　Osnabrück
Claudia Lehmann, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt
Katja Politt, Bielefeld University Bielefeld
Peter Uhrig, Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Erlangen
Alexander Willich, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf

Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Ingenta Connect
J-Gate
Linguistic Bibliography
Linguistics Abstracts Online
MLA International Bibliography
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
ScienceON (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
Scilit
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Linguistics and Semiotics Theoretical Frameworks and Disciplines Cognitive Linguistics

German Cognitive Linguistics Association

Journal information

Additional information

eISSN:

2197-2796

ISSN:

2197-2788

Language:

English

Publisher:

De Gruyter Mouton

Additional information

First published:

December 20, 2013

Publication Frequency:

1 issue per year

Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association

About this journal

Back Issues

Supplementary Materials

Topics

Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association

Overview

About this journal

Back Issues

Ahead of Publication / Just Accepted

Issues

Submit

Editorial

Abstracting and Indexing

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Topics

Topics

External Links

Bibliographic data