How literacy acquisition changes L1 grammatical knowledge
-
Tan Arda Gedik
Abstract
Literacy, the ability to read and write, is a relatively recent cultural invention, however, it has profound effects on cognition, and emerging studies also show that it may influence the mental representations of grammar among native speakers. This contradicts the widely-held assumption that all individuals within an L1 community acquire the same grammar unconsciously. The emerging studies indicate that the availability of a writing system, alongside nonverbal reasoning (i.e., reasoning and problem solving skills), and metalinguistic skills fostered by literacy, contributes significantly to ultimate language attainment. Recent scholarship suggests that illiterate individuals exhibit large individual differences in linguistic knowledge and how well they abstracted various grammatical forms, challenging the notion of uniform grammar that is thought to be achieved successfully across native speakers. This article reports on the state-of-the-art of illiteracy-grammar studies and reevaluates this hypothesis by investigating the impact of literacy on L1 grammar knowledge among illiterate speakers and makes suggestions for future studies.
References
Birdsong, David. 2004. Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In Alan Davies & Catherine Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 82–105). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch3Search in Google Scholar
Birdsong, David. 2021. Analyzing variability in L2 ultimate attainment. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 12 (1), 133–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.21001.birSearch in Google Scholar
Blasi, Damián E., Joseph Henrich, Evangelia Adamou, David Kemmerer, & Asifa Majid. 2022. Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26, P1153–P1170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.015Search in Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert. 2009. The Evolving Context of the Fundamental Differnce Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31 (2), 175–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090275Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar
Chipere, Ngoni. 2001. Variations in native speaker competence: Implications for first-language teaching. Language Awareness, 10 (2–3), 107–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667029Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on language. Temple Smith London.Search in Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, & Rosalind Thornton. 2021. Universal Grammar and language acquisition. A Companion to Chomsky. Wiley Online Library 348–363.10.1002/9781119598732.ch21Search in Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Rosalind Thornton, & Keiko Murasugi. 2009. Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition, 16 (2), 123–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220902769234Search in Google Scholar
Cunningham, Anne E., & Keith E. Stanovich. 1998. What reading does for the mind. American Educator/American Federation of Teachers 22, 8–17.Search in Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Laurent Cohen, José Morais, & Régine Kolinsky. 2015. Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 16 (4), 234–244.10.1038/nrn3924Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 1997. The LAD goes to school: a cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35 (4). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.735Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2 (3), 219–253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dabSearch in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2015. Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 650–668). Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-033Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Looking into introspection. In Grzegorz Drożdż (Ed.), Studies in lexicogrammar (pp. 55–74). John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.54.03dabSearch in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2017. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 479–491. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0059Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition, 178, 222–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2020. How writing changes language. In A. Mauranen & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Language change: the impact of english as a lingua franca (pp. 75–94). Cambridge University Press. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CJES/article/view/7821910.1017/9781108675000.006Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2021. How writing changes language. In A. Mauranen & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Language change: The impact of english as a lingua franca (pp. 75–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CJES/article/view/78219Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa, Esther Pascual, & Beatriz Macías Gómez-Estern. 2022. Literacy improves the comprehension of object relatives. Cognition, 224, 104958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104958Search in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa, Esther Pascual, Beatriz Macías-Gómez-Estern, & Miquel Llompart. 2023. Literacy-related differences in morphological knowledge: A nonce-word study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1136337. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136337Search in Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Felipe Pegado, Lucia W Braga, Paulo Ventura, Gilberto Nunes Filho, Antoinette Jobert, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz, Régine Kolinsky, José Morais, & Laurent Cohen. 2010. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330 (6009), 1359–1364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194140Search in Google Scholar
Durgunoglu, A. Y., Aslan, F., Canturk, M., Gencay, H., Karakulak, O., Kuscul, H., Oney, B., Sahan, O., Ural, N., Yasa, M., & Zengin, F. 2012. Adult literacy and empowerment: Description and evaluation of a program in Turkey. LESLLA Symposium Proceedings, 7 (1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8019479Search in Google Scholar
Eme, Elsa, Agnès Lacroix, & Yves Almecija. 2010. Oral narrative skills in French adults who are functionally illiterate: Linguistic features and discourse organization. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1349–1371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/08-0092)Search in Google Scholar
Fingeret, Arlene. 1983. Social Network: A New Perspective on Independence and Illiterate Adults. Adult Education, 33 (3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368303300301Search in Google Scholar
Gedik, Tan Arda. 2024. Print exposure leads to individual differences in the Turkish aorist. Language Sciences, 104, 101632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101632Search in Google Scholar
Gedik, Tan Arda, & Dabrowska, E. 2024. When good-enough processing is not good-enough. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kognitive Linguistik 2024. Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück.Search in Google Scholar
Gedik, Tan Arda & Ewa Dąbrowska. (in prep). Literacy and complex syntax production: When good-enough is not good-enough.Search in Google Scholar
Gedik, Tan Arda. (under review). Literacy at work: Ultimate native language attainment in Turkish. Book ManuscriptSearch in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Goldwater, Micah B. 2017. Grammatical constructions as relational categories. Topics in Cognitive Science. Wiley Online Library 9 (3), 776–799.10.1111/tops.12272Search in Google Scholar
Gruszka, Aleksandra, Gerald Matthews, & Blazej Szymura (Eds.). 2010. Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality). New York, NY: Springer New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7Search in Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2017. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.12Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195102352.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kidd, Evan, Seamus Donnelly, & Morten H. Christiansen. 2018. Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22 (2), 154–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006Search in Google Scholar
Kosmidis, Mary H., Christina H. Vlahou, Panagiota Panagiotaki, & Grigorios Kiosseoglou. 2004. The verbal fluency task in the Greek population: Normative data, and clustering and switching strategies. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10 (2), 164–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704102014Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0907/2007009457-b.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey, & Alexander Williams. 2009. Constructions on holiday. Cognitive Linguistics, 20 (1), 177–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.011Search in Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. Routledge.10.4324/9780203342763Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Jim, & Weinart, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: syntax and discourse. Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236566.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin A., Natalia L. Komarova, & Partha Niyogi. 2001. Evolution of universal grammar. Science, 291 (5501), 114–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.114Search in Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K., & Barbara C. Scholz. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18 (1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9Search in Google Scholar
Reis, Alexandra, & Alexandre Castro-Caldas. 1997. Illiteracy: A cause for biased cognitive development. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3 (5), 444–450.10.1017/S135561779700444XSearch in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2017. The concept of explanatory adequacy. In Ian Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar (pp. 96–113). Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.5Search in Google Scholar
Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick, & Jeffrey L. Elman. 2007. Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57 (3), 348–379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Roth, Froma P., Deborah L, Speece, & David H. Cooper. 2002. A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 95 (5), 259–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596600Search in Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert J., & Brenda J. Willis. 1987. Age and education in oral language skills. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3 (3–4), 239–253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/87565648709540379Search in Google Scholar
Scholz, Barbara C., Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Geoffrey K. Pullum, & Ryan Nefdt. (Spring 2024). Philosophy of linguistics. In Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/linguistics/Search in Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S. 1997. Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275 (5306), 1599–1603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1599Search in Google Scholar
Serniclaes, Willy, Paulo Ventura, José Morais, & Régine Kolinsky. 2005. Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults. Cognition, 98 (2), B35–B44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., & Anne E. Cunningham. 1992. Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20 (1), 51–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208254Search in Google Scholar
Street, James A. 2020. More lexically-specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Language Sciences, 78, 101254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101254Search in Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2008. International Literacy statistics: A review of concepts, methodology, and current data. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Tong. 2020. A refutation of “a refutation of universal grammar” (Lin, f. 2017. Lingua 193. 1–22.). Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 56 (1), 169–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2020-0005Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Charles, Stephen Crain, Robert C. Berwick, Noam Chomsky, & Johan J Bolhuis. 2017. The growth of language: Universal Grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 103–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.023Search in Google Scholar
©2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
