Names, semantics, and cognition in native varieties of the potato tubercle in the peasant community of Pampacorral (Lares, Cuzco): Towards a cognitive approach to the naming process

References

Academia Mayor de la Lengua Quechua. 2005. Diccionario quechua – español – quechua. Cusco: Academia Mayor de la Lengua Quechua.Search in Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem. 1990. En pos de la lengua culle. In Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino & Gustavo Solís Fonseca (Eds.), Temas de lingüística amerindia (pp. 83–105). Lima: CONCYTEC.Search in Google Scholar

Ballón, Esteban, & Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2002. Terminología agraria andina. Nombres quechuamaras de la papa. Cuzco: Centro Internacional de la Papa.Search in Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In Antonio Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp. 1–28). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110894677.1Search in Google Scholar

Barcelona, Antonio, & Valenzuela, Javier. 2011. An overview of cognitive linguistics. In Stefan Gries Maja Brdar & Maja Zic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/hcp.32.05barSearch in Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2006. Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/hcp.19Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2015. A practical epistemology for semantic elicitation in the field and elsewhere. In Richard Bochnak & Lisa Matthewson (Eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork (pp. 13–46). Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire. 2008. Linguistic fieldwork. A practical guide. New York, Estados Unidos: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590168Search in Google Scholar

Caro Reina, Javier & Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2022. Morphosyntactic contrasts between proper names and common nouns: An introduction. In Javier Caro Reina & Johannes Helmbrecht (Eds.), Proper names versus common nouns (pp. 1–20). De Gruyter. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110672626-001Search in Google Scholar

Centro Internacional de la Papa & la Federación Departamental de Comunidades Campesinas. 2006. Catálogo de variedades de papa nativa de Huancavelica – Perú. Lima: Centro Intencional de la Papa.Search in Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1994. Quechua Sureño: diccionario unificado; quechua- castellano; castellano-quechua. Lima: Biblioteca Nacional del Perú.Search in Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2008. Voces del Ande. Ensayos sobre onomástica andina. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad del Perú.10.18800/9789972428562Search in Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2016. El lenguaje como hermenéutica en la comprensión del pasado: a propósito del puquina en la génesis del Imperio Incaico. Diálogo Andino. Revista de Historia, Geografía y Cultura Andina, 49, 11–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-26812016000100004Search in Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2017. Etimología popular y etimología científica: el caso de Atawallpa ~ wallpa para designar al gallo en el mundo andino y amazónico. Lingüística, 33 (2), 9–31.10.5935/2079-312X.20170015Search in Google Scholar

Chelliah, Shobhana, & Rouse de, William. 2011. Handbook of descriptive linguistic fieldwork. New York: Estados Unidos: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9026-3Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2009. Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stephen Purcell (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSearch in Google Scholar

Croft, William, & Cruse, David. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar, Milin, Petar, & Medimorec, Srdan. 2020. Construal in language: A visual-world approach to the effects of linguistic alternations on event perception and conception. Cognitive Linguistics, 31 (1), 37–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0103Search in Google Scholar

Dobrić, Nikola. 2010. Theory of names and cognitive linguistics: The case of the metaphor. Filozofija i društvo, 21 (1), 135–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1001135DSearch in Google Scholar

Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph. 2020. Los nombres del tubérculo papa en el quechua de Pampacorral: hacia un enfoque cognitivo en el proceso de nominación. Lingüística y Literatura, 41 (78), 269–296.10.17533/udea.lyl.n78art11Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph. 2022. Polisemia de los términos del cuerpo humano en quechua: metáfora, metonimia e interacción conceptual. In José Berenguer Antonio Collado, Luis Villavicencio, Lourdes Hidalgo & Ana Arredondo (Eds.), Discurso y gramática cognitiva: estudios de perfilamientos lingüísticos (pp. 249–261). San Juan: Universidad Nacional de San Juan.10.15381/tesis.v15i21.25218Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph & Haro Acuña, Jhotna Sindi. 2019. Una aproximación lingüístico-cognitiva en torno a la construcción de los topónimos en el quechua de Yurá, Huari (Ancash). Tierra Nuestra, 13 (2), 27–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.21704/rtn.v13i2.1401Search in Google Scholar

Dwinata, Erna. 2017. Language and perception. Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 1 (1), 71–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.29100/bright.v1i1.248Search in Google Scholar

Espinoza Apolo, Manuel. 2019. El onomástico “Quito”. Etimología y significado histórico-cultural. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. 2007. A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748629862Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan, & Green, Melanie. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174220Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, & Turner, Mark. 2007. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fonseca, Carmen, Rodríguez, Felipe, Muñoa, Luis, & Ordinola, Manuel. 2014. Catálogo de variedades de papa nativa con potencial para la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional de Apurímac y Huancavelica. Lima: Centro Internacional de la Papa.Search in Google Scholar

Gálvez, Isabel, & Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph. 2015. Animicidad y agentivización en las construcciones de la toponimia del quechua de Aurahuá- Chupamarca: un enfoque cognitivo. Escritura y Pensamiento, 37, 153–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.15381/escrypensam.v18i37.13693Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert (Eds.) 2007. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Godenzzi, Juan. 1999. Cognición y lenguas andinas. Apuntes: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 45, 10–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.21678/APUNTES.45.489Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goossens, Louis. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (3), 323–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes [doctoral thesis, University of California]. University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Raymundo, & Valencia, César. 2010. Las papas nativas de Canchis. Lima: Soluciones Prácticas.Search in Google Scholar

Hancco, Juan, Blas, Ricardo, Quispe, Manuel, & Ugás, José. 2008. Pampacorral. Catálogo de sus papas nativas. Lima: UNALM y ANPE.Search in Google Scholar

Herrera, Fortunato. 1929. Contribución a la flora del departamento de Cuzco. Revista Universitaria, 57, 66–88.Search in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2008. Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really crosslinguistic? Atlantis, 30 (1), 15–33.Search in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2013. La lingüística cognitiva y su lugar en la historia de la lingüística. RESLA, 26, 245–266.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Karpenko, Elena, & Golubenko, Lidiya. 2015. Problematics of cognitive onomastics. Запиcки з oномаcтики, 18, 285–293.Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, István. 2013. Encyclopedic knowledge, cultural models, and interculturality. In István Kecskes (Ed.), Intercultural pragmatics (pp. 81–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Kos, Peter. 2023. The role of metonymy in naming If longhair then apple tree and teacher. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (1), 86–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00128.kosSearch in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, & Turner, Mark. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: volume I theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language and thought and communication. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107338814Search in Google Scholar

Manerko, Larissa. 2016. Towards understanding of conceptualisation in cognitive terminology. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 1 (2), 129–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2016-0012Search in Google Scholar

Ministerio de Agricultura y Riego (MINAGRI), Grupo Yanapai, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP). 2017. Catálogo de variedades de papa nativa del sureste del departamento de Junín - Perú. Lima: Centro Internacional de la Papa.Search in Google Scholar

Negro, Isabel. 2019. Metaphor and metonymy in food idioms. Languages, 4, 47. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4030047Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa, César. 1955. Expedición colector de las papas del norte. Lima, Perú.Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa, César. 1964. Recuentos cromosómicos y determinación sistemática de las papas nativas cultivadas en el sur del Perú. Anales Científicos, 2 (1), 1–41.Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa, César. 1965. Determinación sistemática y recuentos cromosómicos de las papas indígenas cultivadas en el centro del Perú. Anales Científicos, 3 (2), 103–163.Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa, César. 1999. The Potatoes of South America: Perú. Lima: Centro Internacional de la Papa.Search in Google Scholar

Panther, Klaus, Thornburg, Linda, & Barcelona, Antonio. 2009. Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.25Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Gary. 1965. Gramática del quechua ayacuchano. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez, José Manuel, De Haan, Stefan, & Cabrera Hoyos, Hugo Alberto. 2015. Catálogo de variedades de papa nativa de Chungay, La Libertad - Perú. Lima: Centro Internacional de la Papa y Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria.Search in Google Scholar

Quispe, Natividad. 2013. Análisis de la cadena de valor de la papa nativa en los distritos de Huayana y Pomacocha – Provincia de Andahuaylas – Apurímac [Tesis de maestría, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Perú].Search in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter, & Kövecses, Zoltán. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.4.03radSearch in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter, & Panther, Klaus. 2004. Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In Gerhard Radden & Klaus Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, (pp. 1–46). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Reszegi, Krisztina. 2022. A cognitive approach in onomastics: Some notes on metaphorical place-names. Voprosy Onomastiki, 19 (1), 235–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.1.012Search in Google Scholar

Robbins, Stephen 2000. Bergson, perception and Gibson. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7 (5), 23–45.Search in Google Scholar

Rojas Domínguez, Percy. 2007. Análisis de la diversidad genética de papas nativas (Solanum sec. Petota) de la comunidad de Chahuaytire, integrante del Parque de la Papa (Pisaq-Cusco), y de las papas nativas repatriadas por el Centro Internacional de la Papa usando marcadores microsatélites [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú].Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco Jose. 1997. Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction. Atlantis, 19, 281–295.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco Jose. 1999. From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Laud, 492, 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2002.006Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco Jose, & Díez, Olga. 2002. Patterns of conceptual interaction. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Segura Salazar, Beatriz. 2014. Cadena de valor de papas nativas (Solanum andigenum sp.) en la provincia de Jauja, Perú [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, España].Search in Google Scholar

Sinha, Chris, & Jensen de López, K. 2000. Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (1), 17–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.008Search in Google Scholar

Solís, Gustavo. 1997. La gente pasa, los nombres quedan… Introducción a la toponimia. Lima: Herrera Editores.Search in Google Scholar

Solomon, Arlene. 2018. A cognitive linguistics study of Ekegusii onomastics: The case of the metaphor. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6 (2), 88–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2018.060206Search in Google Scholar

Soto, Clodoaldo. 1976. Gramática quechua ayacucho-chanca. Lima, Perú: Ministerio de Educación.Search in Google Scholar

Soto Torres, Julian. 2006. Análisis de la diversidad genética de papa nativa (Solanum spp.) de los departamentos de Ayacucho, Cajamarca, Cuzco, Huancavelica y Puno – Perú, mediante el uso de marcadores moleculares micro satelitales [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú].Search in Google Scholar

Torero, Alfredo. 1986. Deslindes lingüísticos en la costa norte peruana. Revista Andina, 4 (2), 523–548.Search in Google Scholar

Torero, Alfredo. 1989. Áreas toponímicas e idiomas en la sierra norte peruana. Un trabajo de recuperación lingüística. Revista Andina, 13 (1), 217–257.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 1991. The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, Andrea, & Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scene embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486517Search in Google Scholar

Ureña, José, & Faber, Pamela. 2010. Reviewing imagery in resemblance and non-resemblance metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (1), 123–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2010.004Search in Google Scholar

Vargas, César. 1954. Las papas sud peruanas. Parte I y II. Cusco: Universidad Nacional San Antonio de Abad.Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2007. Construal and perspectivization. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yoon, Jiyoung. 2013. Productivity of Spanish verb-noun compounds: Patterns of metonymy and metaphor. In Francisco Gonzálvez-García, María Peña, & Luis Pérez (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the contemporary theory of metaphor (pp. 85–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/bct.56.05yooSearch in Google Scholar