Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

CFD analysis of a void distribution benchmark in a rod bundle

  • and
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The NUPEC “PWR Subchannel and Bundle Tests” (PSBT) were designed to investigate critical heat flux phenomena in rod bundles and yield data to validate hot channel codes. Some of the tests are suitable for validating a CFD wall boiling model. The paper presents CFD calculations of the void distribution tests of the PSBT benchmark using ANSYS CFX-12.1. First, relevant aspects of the implemented wall boiling model are reviewed highlighting the uncertainties in several model parameters. It is then shown that the measured cross sectionally averaged values can be reproduced well with a single set of calibrated model parameters for different tests cases. For the reproduction of patterns of void distribution cross sections attention has to be focussed on the modelling of turbulence in the narrow channel. Only a turbulence model with the capability to resolve turbulent secondary flows is able to reproduce at least qualitatively the observed void distribution patterns.

Kurzfassung

Die NUPEC “PWR Subchannel and Bundle Tests” (PSBT) waren zur Untersuchung kritischer Wärmestromphänomene in Brennelementbündeln und zur Validierung von Heißkanalcodes ausgelegt. Einige der Tests sind zur Validierung von CFD-Wandsiedemodellen geeignet. Die Arbeit präsentiert CFD-Analysen der Gasgehaltsverteilung unter Verwendung des CFD-Codes ANSYS CFX-12.1. Zunächst werden die wichtigsten Aspekte des implementierten Modells und Unsicherheiten der Modellparameter herausgestellt. Es kann gezeigt werden, dass die gemessenen querschnittsgemittelten Messwerte mit einem Satz im Rahmen der Modellunsicherheiten kalibrierter Modellparameter reproduziert werden kann. Für die Reproduktion der Verteilungsmuster des Dampfgehaltes im Kanalquerschnitt muss die Modellierung der Turbulenz beachtet werden. Nur ein Turbulenzmodell, das die turbulenten Sekundärströmungen auflösen kann, ist in der Lage, die beobachteten Verteilungsmuster zu reproduzieren.


3 Dr. Eckhard Krepper, E-mail:

References

1 Drew, D. A.; Passman, S. L.: Theory of Multicomponent Fluids. Springer, 199810.1007/b97678Search in Google Scholar

2 Yeoh, G. H.; Tu, J. Y.: Computational Techniques for Multiphase Flows-Basics and Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science and Technology, 201010.1016/B978-0-08-046733-7.00009-6Search in Google Scholar

3 Ishii, M.; Hibiki, T.: Thermo-fluid dynamics of two-phase flow. Springer, 2nd ed., 201110.1007/978-1-4419-7985-8Search in Google Scholar

4 Kurul, N.; Podowski, M.: On the modeling of multidimensional effects in boiling channels. ANS Proceedings of 27th National Heat Transfer Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 1991Search in Google Scholar

5 Krepper, E.; Koncar, B.; Egorov, Y.: Modelling of subcooled boiling-concept, validation and application to fuel assembly design. Nuclear Engineering and Design237 (2007) 71673110.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.10.023Search in Google Scholar

6 Bartolomej, G. G.; Chanturiya, V. M.: Experimental study of true void fraction when boiling subcooled water in vertical tubes. Thermal Engineering14 (1967) 123128 translated from TeploenergeSearch in Google Scholar

7 7HoriK.; et al.: In Bundle Void Fraction Measurement of PWR Fuel Assembly. ICONE-2, Vol. 1, pp. 6976, San Francisco, California, March 1993Search in Google Scholar

8 8HoriK.; et al.: Void Fraction in A Single Channel Simulating One Subchannel of A PWR Fuel Assembly. Two-Phase Flow Modeling and Experimentation (1995) 10131027Search in Google Scholar

9 9JNES, OECD/NEA Benchmark Based on NUPEC PWR Sub-channel and Bundle Tests (PSBT). Assembly Specification and Benchmark Database (Volume 1), JNES/SAE-TH08-0019, April 2009Search in Google Scholar

10 10MenterF.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA-Journal32 (1994) 15981605Search in Google Scholar

11 11KrepperE.; RzehakR.: CFD for subcooled flow boiling: Simulation of DEBORA experiments. Nuclear Engineering and Design241 (2011) 38513866Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-11-2
Published Online: 2013-08-22
Published in Print: 2013-03-19

© 2013, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Contents/Inhalt
  2. Contents
  3. Summaries/Kurzfassungen
  4. Summaries
  5. Editorial
  6. Actual status of the research alliances “Condensation Induced Water Hammer” and “Boiling processes in Pressurized Water Reactors”
  7. Technical Contributions/Fachbeiträge
  8. High-resolution two-phase flow measurement techniques for the generation of experimental data for CFD code qualification
  9. Condensation induced water hammer (CIWH) – relevance in the nuclear industry and state of science and technology
  10. Experiments of condensation-induced water hammers at the UniBw Munich
  11. Development of a 1 D hybrid HTC model using CFD simulations for the analysis of direct contact condensation as the driving force for water hammers
  12. 1D Models for Condensation Induced Water Hammer in Pipelines
  13. Modelling, simulation and experiments on boiling processes in pressurized water reactors
  14. CFD analysis of a void distribution benchmark in a rod bundle
  15. CFD-modelling of subcooled boiling
  16. On the pair correlation function in a bubble swarm
  17. Large Eddy Simulation of the shear flow instability in a rod-bundle assembly
  18. Small scale boiling experiments using two-dimensional imaging with high-speed camera and optical coherence tomography
  19. Validation of mechanistic CHF models using optical measuring techniques
  20. Experimental investigations of single and two-phase flow in a heated rod bundle
  21. CFD-Modeling of turbulent flows in rod bundle and comparison to experiments
  22. About the change in boiling behaviour of water with coolant additives in PWR
  23. Simulation of external reactor vessel cooling in a lumped-parameter code
Downloaded on 3.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/124.110310/html
Scroll to top button