Home On the synthesis and crystal structure of praseodymium(III) metaborate molybdate(VI) – PrBO2MoO4
Article Open Access

On the synthesis and crystal structure of praseodymium(III) metaborate molybdate(VI) – PrBO2MoO4

  • Tobias A. Teichtmeister and Hubert Huppertz EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 8, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The praseodymium metaborate molybdate(VI) PrBO2MoO4 was synthesized by solid-state reaction methods at 850 °C under an argon atmosphere and identified by its powder X-ray diffraction pattern. The polycrystalline sample was placed in a Walker-type multianvil press, where pressure-induced crystal growth at 1 GPa and 850 °C was successful, yielding single crystals suitable for structure determination. PrBO2MoO4 crystallizes monoclinically in the space group P21/c (no. 14) with the unit cell parameters a = 10.1735(2), b = 4.1479(1), c = 11.9090(3) Å, β = 116.52(1)°, and four formula units per cell.

1 Introduction

Since their discovery, rare-earth molybdate borates were studied extensively due to their promising optical properties [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In the late 1970s, the first single-crystal structure solution for a compound with the sum formula LaBO2MoO4 was presented crystallizing in the monoclinic space-group P21 (no. 4) with the unit cell parameters a = 5.964(1), b = 4.147(1), c = 9.373(3) Å, and β = 99.28(2)° [13]. Similarities in the powder diffraction patterns revealed a structure family with the general sum formula LnBO2MoO4 (Ln = La–Nd) [14], which was subject to further studies from the mid-2000s until today. During thermal and optical investigations, LaBO2MoO4 was found to undergo a reversible first-order phase transition between a centrosymmetric high- and a non-centrosymmetric low-temperature polymorph [1]. To the best of our knowledge, similar findings were not reported for any other member of this structure family. More recent studies also relate to this finding. The re-determination of the crystal structures by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods showed several important insights into the crystal chemistry of these compounds:

  1. A centrosymmetric structure crystallizing in the space group P21/c (no. 14) was found for LaBO2MoO4 [3], CeBO2MoO4 [3], and NdBO2MoO4 [15].

  2. LaBO2MoO4 does not crystallize isotypically to CeBO2MoO4 and NdBO2MoO4. The c-axis of the unit cell of LaBO2MoO4 is doubled compared to the other compounds. The reason is a slight variation of the distortion of the polyhedra resulting in a superstructure, that is better described by the larger unit cell [3, 15].

  3. A single-crystal structure solution for the low-temperature polymorph has shown that LaBO2MoO4 crystallizes monoclinically in the space-group P21 (no. 4) [7]. However, the unit cell parameters differ clearly from those in references [2, 13]. It is assumed that these deviations stem from the different methods used for the cell determination [7].

  4. There are only minor differences between the proposed structure models of the high- and low-temperature form of LaBO2MoO4. Slightly different distortions of the coordination spheres resulting in different O–La–O, O–Mo–O, and especially O–B–O angles are the main differences [3, 7].

  5. Despite different unit cell data, the crystal structures of all compounds with the sum formula LnBO2MoO4 (Ln = La–Nd) display a very high degree of similarity [137, 13, 15].

Hitherto, two additional compounds in the field of praseodymium molybdenum compounds are reported in the literature. The single-crystal structure of Pr2B2O5MoO4 [16] was discussed representatively for the Ln 2B2O5MoO4 (Ln = Pr, Nd, Sm–Tb) [14] structure family in 2008, while we have recently presented the first high-pressure phase Pr3Mo4B6O24(OH)3 [17] in this system. Surprisingly, no single-crystal structure solution and refinement for PrBO2MoO4 is found in the literature. Herein, the structural features of PrBO2MoO4 based on single-crystal data are discussed and compared to that of related structures.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Synthesis of PrBO2MoO4

A polycrystalline sample of PrBO2MoO4 was synthesized from a mixture with the molar ratio 1:1:5 of Pr(NO3)3·6H2O (0.28 mmol, 99.9%, Strem Chemicals), MoO3 (0.28 mmol, >99%, Plansee, Reutte, Tyrol, Austria), and H3BO3 (1.36 mmol, >99.8%, Carl Roth GmbH). The starting materials were weighed and intimately ground in an agate mortar. The reactions were carried out in a platinum crucible at 850 °C under an argon atmosphere. From room temperature, the sample was heated to the reaction temperature of 850 °C at a rate of 5 K per minute. The temperature was kept constant for 48 h before it was reduced to room temperature at a cooling rate of 3 K per minute. To remove any excess of H3BO3, the polycrystalline sample was washed five times each with 1 ml of hot deionized water. Finally, the resulting green product could be identified as PrBO2MoO4 by its powder pattern. However, no single-crystals that were sufficiently sized for structure determination were found in the sample. Therefore, the compound was placed in an 18/11 assembly of a Walker-type multianvil press (Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Mainleus, Germany), on which more detailed information can be found in the related literature [18, 19]. Within 30 min, the sample was compressed to 1 GPa and subsequently heated to 850 °C in 10 min. This temperature was kept constant for the following 15 min. Within 2 h, the temperature was slowly decreased to 200 °C, and finally the reaction was stopped by quenching. After the decompression phase (90 min), green crystals of PrBO2MoO4, suitable for a single-crystal structure determination, were isolated from the sample under a polarization microscope.

2.2 Crystal structure determination

Single-crystals suitable for structure determination were mounted on a Bruker D8 Quest single-crystal diffractometer equipped with a Photon III C14 area detector. Data collection and processing were performed employing the programs Saint [20] and Apex4 [21]. With the program Sadabs [22, 23], a multi-scan absorption correction was carried out and the structure was solved via Shelxt [24, 25] algorithms. All atoms were refined anisotropically using Shelxl [26] algorithms incorporated into the Olex2 [27] software. The final structure was checked employing the Platon program package and standardized using the program’s Structure Tidy routine [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. In Tables 1 4, the refinement and structural data of PrBO2MoO4 are presented.

Table 1:

Crystallographic data of the single-crystal structure refinement of PrBO2MoO4.

Empirical formula PrBO2MoO4
Molar mass, g mol−1 343.66
Crystal system Monoclinic
Space group
P21/c (no. 14)
Single-crystal data

a, Å 10.1735(2)
b, Å 4.1479(1)
c, Å 11.9090(3)
β, deg 116.52(1)
Cell volume, Å3 449.65(2)
Formula units per cell 4
Calculated density, g cm−3 5.08
Temperature, K 293(2)
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Quest Photon III C14
Radiation type; wavelength, pm Mo-K α ; 71.073
Absorption coefficient 13.4
F(000), e 616
Crystal size, mm3 0.03 × 0.02 × 0.02
Range in θ, deg 3.5–41.2
Range in hkl −18 ≤ h ≥ 15; k = ±7; l = ±22
Reflections collected 21825
Independent reflections 2981
Reflections with I ≥ 2σ(I) 2783
R int/R σ 0.0378/0.0226
Completeness to θ = 25.24°, % 99.1
Refinement method Full matrix least squares on F 2
Data/parameters 2981/83
Absorption correction Multi-scan
Final R1/wR2 [I ≥ 2σ(I)] 0.0187/0.0437
Final R1/wR2 (all data) 0.0203/0.0443
Goodness-of-Fit on F 2 1.093
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−3 1.90/−2.00
Table 2:

Atom labels, atomic coordinates, and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (U eq) for all crystallographically different atoms. U eq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized U ij tensor (standard deviations in parentheses). All atoms are positioned on the Wyckoff-site 4d.

Atom x y z U eq
Pr1 0.19423(2) 0.71439(2) 0.02877(2) 0.00891(3)
Mo1 0.35460(2) 0.30759(3) 0.31817(2) 0.00719(3)
B1 0.0021(2) 0.3318(5) 0.3086(2) 0.0124(3)
O1 0.0040(2) 0.2274(3) 0.4152(2) 0.0095(2)
O2 0.0312(2) 0.6588(3) 0.3006(2) 0.0111(2)
O3 0.2595(2) 0.2175(3) 0.1508(2) 0.0123(2)
O4 0.2616(2) 0.2225(4) 0.4117(2) 0.0170(3)
O5 0.5429(2) 0.2291(4) 0.3937(2) 0.0165(2)
O6 0.6619(2) 0.2263(3) 0.1974(2) 0.0182(3)
Table 3:

Anisotropic displacement parameters for all crystallographically different atoms.

Atom U 11 U 22 U 33 U 23 U 13 U 12
Pr1 0.00738(4) 0.00866(4) 0.01007(4) −0.00144(2) 0.00332(3) −0.00067(2)
Mo1 0.00629(5) 0.00852(5) 0.00704(6) 0.00094(3) 0.00322(4) 0.00018(3)
B1 0.0200(8) 0.0081(6) 0.0099(7) 0.0002(5) 0.0075(7) −0.0001(6)
O1 0.0109(5) 0.0109(4) 0.0077(5) 0.0019(3) 0.0051(4) 0.0017(4)
O2 0.0204(6) 0.0051(4) 0.0073(5) 0.0005(3) 0.0058(4) 0.0009(4)
O3 0.0148(5) 0.0107(5) 0.0090(5) −0.0002(4) 0.0033(4) −0.0004(4)
O4 0.0220(7) 0.0174(6) 0.0189(7) 0.0041(5) 0.0157(6) 0.0018(5)
O5 0.0077(5) 0.0215(6) 0.0181(7) 0.0019(5) 0.0038(5) 0.0008(4)
O6 0.0224(7) 0.0100(5) 0.0231(7) −0.0013(5) 0.0110(6) 0.0000(4)
Table 4:

Comparison of selected interatomic distances (Å) and bond angles (deg) in LnBO2MoO4 (Ln = Ce, Pr, Nd) taken from the standardized crystal structure data.

Compound CeBO2MoO4 PrBO2MoO4 NdBO2MoO4
[Ref.] [3] This work [15]
Atoms Distance Distance Distance
Ln1–O1a 2.427(4) 2.391(2) 2.364(3)
Ln1–O5b 2.438(4) 2.409(2) 2.399(3)
Ln1–O3 2.450(3) 2.437(2) 2.431(3)
Ln1–O3c 2.472(3) 2.459(2) 2.452(3)
Ln1–O2d 2.556(3) 2.527(2) 2.498(3)
Ln1–O4e 2.577(3) 2.560(2) 2.551(3)
Ln1–O1e 2.619(3) 2.568(2) 2.528(3)
Ln1–O6b 2.939(4) 2.919(2) 2.901(4)
Ln1–O1d 2.929(3) 2.932(2) 2.930(3)
Ln1–O4d 2.918(3) 2.954(2) 2.981(4)
Average 2.633 2.616 2.604

Mo1–O5 1.734(4) 1.745(2) 1.745(3)
Mo1–O6b 1.750(3) 1.747(2) 1.740(4)
Mo1–O4 1.780(4) 1.789(2) 1.795(3)
Mo1–O3 1.823(4) 1.824(2) 1.816(3)
Average (CN = 4) 1.77175 1.77625 1.774
Mo1–O6f 2.417(3) 2.418(2) 2.419(3)
Average (CN = 5) 1.9008 1.9046 1.903

B1–O1 1.330(6) 1.334(3) 1.338(6)
B1–O2g 1.386(6) 1.388(3) 1.381(6)
B1–O2 1.396(5) 1.400(3) 1.406(6)
Average 1.371 1.374 1.375

Angle Angle Angle

O6f–Mo1–O3 74.1(2) 74.17(6) 74.1(2)
O6f–Mo1–O4 79.1(2) 79.22(6) 79.3(2)
O6f–Mo1–O5 82.6(2) 82.88(7) 82.8(2)
O6b–Mo1–O3 96.3(2) 96.26(7) 96.3(2)
O6b–Mo1–O4 102.4(2) 102.10(8) 102.1(2)
O6b–Mo1–O5 106.0(2) 105.76(8) 105.8(2)
Average (CN = 5) 90.07 90.07 90.05
O5–Mo1–O4 113.8(2) 113.98(8) 114.4(2)
O5–Mo1–O3 116.5(5) 116.73(7) 116.8(2)
O4–Mo1–O3 118.1(2) 118.00(7) 117.5(2)
Average (CN = 5) 116.13 116.24 116.22
Average (CN = 4) 108.83 108.81 108.80
O6f–Mo1–O6b 169.4(2) 169.5(2) 169.5(2)

O1–B1–O2g 127.9(4) 128.1(2) 128.1(4)
O1–B1–O2 117.8(4) 117.7(2) 117.4(4)
O2–B1–O2g 114.1(4) 114.1(2) 114.3(4)
Average 119.9 120.0 120.0

Symmetry operators for generating equivalent atoms
a. −x, y + 0.5, −z + 0.5 e. x, −y + 0.5, z − 0.5
b. −x + 1, y + 0.5, −z + 0.5 f. −x + 1, y − 0.5, −z + 0.5
c. x, y + 1, z g. −x, y − 0.5, −z + 0.5
d. x, −y + 1.5, z − 0.5

In Table 4, selected interatomic distances and bond angles of the isotypic compounds CeBO2MoO4, PrBO2MoO4, and NdBO2MoO4 are compared. To enable an easy comparison, we have also used the standardized crystal structure data for CeBO2MoO4 and NdBO2MoO4 by adjusting the crystal coordinates and atom names to those obtained for PrBO2MoO4 by the Structure Tidy-routine [33].

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from the joint CCDC/FIZ Karlsruhe online deposition service: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/ by quoting the deposition number CSD-2240481.

X-ray powder diffraction patterns were collected with a STOE Stadi P Powder Diffractometer (STOE & CIE GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) [3435], equipped with a Ge(111) monochromator and a MYTHEN 1K detector system (Dectris Ltd, Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland) [36]. The measurements were carried out in transmission mode using a flat sample holder [37]. Measured and calculated powder patterns are compared in Figure 1.

Figure 1: 
Comparison of the measured and calculated powder X-ray diffraction patterns (λ = 70.93 pm). Additional reflections marked with an asterisk stem from small amounts of an unidentified side-phase.
Figure 1:

Comparison of the measured and calculated powder X-ray diffraction patterns (λ = 70.93 pm). Additional reflections marked with an asterisk stem from small amounts of an unidentified side-phase.

2.3 Infrared spectroscopy

An infrared spectrum of the new compound was recorded on a Bruker Alpha Platinum attenuated total reflection (ATR) spectrometer on the bulk material. The spectrum was measured in the range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 and the data was processed and corrected for atmospheric influences employing the Opus 7.2 [38] software.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Crystal structure description

PrBO2MoO4 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c (no. 14) with the unit cell parameters a = 10.1735(2), b = 4.1479(1), c = 11.9090(3) Å, and β = 116.52(1)°, representing a crystal structure which is isotypic to that of CeBO2MoO4 [3] and NdBO2MoO4 [15], but not of LaBO2MoO4 [3]. From Tables 2, 4, and references [3, 15], it is apparent that although the standardized crystal coordinates of the structure solutions of LnBO2MoO4 (Ln = Ce, Pr, Nd) match quite well, there are subtle deviations, mainly resulting in slightly different distortions of the lanthanoid-centered polyhedra, as it was already observed from the comparison of CeBO2MoO4 [3] and NdBO2MoO4 [15]. Consequently, interatomic distances in the three compounds do not strictly follow the expected trend of smaller Ln–O distances with decreasing lanthanoid-cation radii. The praseodymium atoms are ten-fold coordinated by oxygen atoms forming a distorted bicapped square antiprismatic shape depicted in Figure 2. Through face- and edge-sharing, the bicapped square antiprisms form double chains of [PrO10] polyhedra running along the crystallographic b-axis. The interatomic distances vary from 2.391(2) to 2.954(2) Å, which is comparable to those of other compounds containing ten-fold coordinated praseodymium [1739], [40], [41], [42]. These bond lengths are also plausible considering the isotypic structures [3, 15].

Figure 2: 
A graphical depiction of the bicapped distorted [PrO10] square antiprism.
Figure 2:

A graphical depiction of the bicapped distorted [PrO10] square antiprism.

The molybdenum-centered polyhedra are shown in Figure 3 and can either be described as isolated [MoO4] tetrahedra with interatomic Mo–O-distances from 1.745(3) to 1.824(2) Å or as [MoO5] trigonal bipyramids, where the fifth oxygen atom is found in a distance of 2.418(2) Å from the molybdenum atom. The tetrahedral coordination sphere is built up by the atoms O3, O4, O5, and O6, while another atom O6 completes the trigonal bipyramid. In this case, the distorted [MoO5] trigonal bipyramids form chains running along the crystallographic b-axis. It is noteworthy that in reference [3], the structures of LaBO2MoO4 and CeBO2MoO4 are described via [MoO5] trigonal bipyramids, while later works concerning NdBO2MoO4 favored the approach via isolated [MoO4] tetrahedra [15]. A detailed look at the interatomic distances and bond angles within the molybdenum-centered polyhedra provides arguments for both points of view. Assuming coordination number four, the interatomic distances are well in the range of those reported in the literature including molybdenum oxides and rare-earth molybdates [43], [44], [45], [46]. However, with tetrahedral angles varying from 96.3(1) to 118.0(1)°, and mean values of 108.8° a relatively high deviation from the expected ideal tetrahedral angle of 109.5° [43], [44], [45], [46], [47] is observed. We assume that the interaction of the molybdenum atoms with this fifth oxygen atom leads to the observed distortion of the tetrahedra.

Figure 3: 
The molybdenum-centered polyhedra can either be described as isolated [MoO4] tetrahedra or as chains of trigonal bipyramidal [MoO5] units with one very long Mo–O bond along the crystallographic b-axis.
Figure 3:

The molybdenum-centered polyhedra can either be described as isolated [MoO4] tetrahedra or as chains of trigonal bipyramidal [MoO5] units with one very long Mo–O bond along the crystallographic b-axis.

Boron is centered in a trigonal planar coordination sphere with B–O-distances between 1.334(3) and 1.401(3) Å, which is close to the standard value of B–O bond lengths of 1.370(19) Å in triangular [BO3] units [48]. The [BO3] units are arranged in the form of “zigzag”-chains along the crystallographic b-axis via corner-sharing. For a graphical depiction of this structural motif see Figure 4.

Figure 4: 
“Zigzag”-chains of corner-sharing trigonal planar [BO3] units are formed along the crystallographic b-axis.
Figure 4:

“Zigzag”-chains of corner-sharing trigonal planar [BO3] units are formed along the crystallographic b-axis.

In Figure 5, the resulting crystal structure of PrBO2MoO4 is shown in its unit cell in the ac-plane. It is built up by the double-chains of square antiprismatic [PrO10] polyhedra being linked along the crystallographic a-axis via the molybdenum-centered polyhedra and through the chains of [BO3] triangles along the crystallographic c-axis.

Figure 5: 
The crystal structure of PrBO2MoO4 with a view along 



[
0

1
‾

0
]



$[0\overline{1}0]$



.
Figure 5:

The crystal structure of PrBO2MoO4 with a view along [ 0 1 0 ] .

The calculation of the bond valences according to the bond-length/bond-strength (BLBS)- and charge distribution (CHARDI)-concept [49, 50] indicates good congruency of the expected and calculated values. The results of the calculations are shown in Table 5.

Table 5:

Calculation of bond valences with BLBS [49] (∑V) and Chardi-2015 [50] (∑Q) in PrBO2MoO4.

Atom Pr1 Mo1 B1 O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6
V 3.18 5.97 2.99 −2.04 −2.23 −2.12 −1.81 −2.03 −1.91
Q 2.93 6.24 2.83 −2.09 −2.11 −1.97 −1.95 −1.95 −1.93

3.2 Infrared spectroscopy

In the infrared spectrum of PrBO2MoO4 (Figure 6), several sharp and intense signals are observed. It displays a high degree of similarity with the infrared spectra of LaBO2MoO4 and CeBO2MoO4 [3], and of the molybdenum-free compound λ-PrBO3 [41]. Hence, the vibration modes observed in PrBO2MoO4 can be assigned in a similar way. The signals at 1452, 1369, and 1175 cm−1 are assigned to the asymmetric stretching modes of the trigonal planar [BO3] units [3], which is in good agreement with the related literature values, where absorption bands in the range of 1200–1500 cm−1 in borates are generally attributed to the stretching modes of the triangular [BO3] units [51]. At lower wavenumbers, contributions of stretching and bending modes of the molybdenum-centered polyhedra and bending modes of the [BO3] triangles lead to the signals between 418 and 948 cm−1 [3, 52], which again display good congruency with the bands of the infrared spectra of rare-earth molybdates exhibiting crystal structures with tetrahedrally coordinated molybdenum [53, 54]. At 1063 cm−1, a weak signal is observed, which was not reported for LaBO2MoO4 or CeBO2MoO4, possibly due to the low intensity of the band. Although the presence of a side-phase containing [BO4] tetrahedra cannot be excluded [55], the weak absorption can also be explained differently. In Mo2B4O9 [56], minor contributions of Mo–O vibrations were found up to wavenumbers around 1250 cm−1 in theoretical investigations of the compound’s infrared spectrum.

Figure 6: 
The infrared spectrum of PrBO2MoO4 in the range from 4000 to 400 cm−1.
Figure 6:

The infrared spectrum of PrBO2MoO4 in the range from 4000 to 400 cm−1.

4 Conclusions

The title compound has been prepared in a high-temperature synthesis and crystallized under high pressure. The herein presented results of a single crystal structure solution have confirmed that PrBO2MoO4 crystallizes isotypically to CeBO2MoO4 and NdBO2MoO4 but not to LaBO2MoO4 [3, 15]. The comparison of the results with data of isotypic crystal structures in this family of compounds available in the literature and the assignment of the experimental infrared spectra support the analogies.


Corresponding author: Hubert Huppertz, Institut für Allgemeine, Anorganische und Theoretische Chemie, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 80–82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria, E-mail:
Dedicated to Professor Gerhard Müller on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Funding source: Vice Rector for Research, University of Innsbruck

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The authors want to thank the Vice Rector for Research for the grant of a doctoral fellowship at the University of Innsbruck.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Becker, P., van der Wolf, B., Bohatý, L., Dong, J., Kaminskii, A. A. Laser Phys. Lett. 2008, 5, 737–745; https://doi.org/10.1002/lapl.200810056.Search in Google Scholar

2. Becker, P., Bohatý, L., Rhee, H., Eichler, H. J., Hanuza, J., Kaminskii, A. A. Laser Phys. Lett. 2008, 5, 114–121; https://doi.org/10.1002/lapl.200710105.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhao, D., Cheng, W.-D., Zhang, H., Hang, S.-P., Fang, M. Dalton Trans. 2008, 3709–3714; https://doi.org/10.1039/b803062f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Zhao, W., Zhang, L., Wang, G., Song, M., Huang, Y., Wang, G. Opt. Mater. 2009, 31, 849–853; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2008.09.010.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhang, X., Qiao, X., Seo, H. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, J267; https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3430075.Search in Google Scholar

6. Zhang, X., Seo, H. J. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 2007–2010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.119.Search in Google Scholar

7. Yu, Y., Li, L., Lin, Z., Wang, G. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 5245; https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ce40364e.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kaewnuam, E. J. Met. Mater. Miner. 2018, 28, 63–68.Search in Google Scholar

9. Kaewnum, E., Wantana, N., Kaewkhao, J. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 13940–13947; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.044.Search in Google Scholar

10. Yang, S., Jiang, B., Wu, J., Duan, C., Shan, Y., Zhao, Q. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 9, 7065–7073; https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tc00254f.Search in Google Scholar

11. Hu, S., Lu, S., Hong, Y., Yao, A., Wang, B., Li, W., Chu, B., He, Q., Cheng, J., Wang, Y. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 2082–2091; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.295.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ruengsri, S., Insiripong, S., Sangwaranatee, N., Kim, H. J., Wantana, N., Angnanon, A., Kaewkhao, J. Integrated Ferroelectrics Int. J. 2017, 177, 39–47; https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2017.1285168.Search in Google Scholar

13. Palkina, K. K., Saifuddinov, V. Z., Kuznetsov, V. G., Dzhurinskii, B. F., Lysanova, G. V., Reznik, E. M. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 24, 663–666.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lysanova, G. V., Dzhurinskii, B. F., Komova, M. G., Tananaev, I. V. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 28, 1344–1349.Search in Google Scholar

15. Held, P., van der Wolf, B., Bohatý, L., Becker, P. Acta Crystallogr. 2011, E67, i36.10.1107/S1600536811017806Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Held, P., Becker, P. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, E64, i28.10.1107/S1600536808010386Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Teichtmeister, T. A., Bayarjargal, L., Wurst, K., Heymann, G., Huppertz, H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 26, e202200635.Search in Google Scholar

18. Walker, D. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 1092–1100.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar

19. Huppertz, H. Z. Kristallogr. 2004, 219, 330–338; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633.Search in Google Scholar

20. Bruker AXS Inc. Saint; Bruker AXS Inc: Madison (WI), USA, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

21. Bruker AXS Inc. Apex4; Bruker AXS Inc: Madison (WI), USA, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

22. Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M., Stalke, D. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 3–10; https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600576714022985.Search in Google Scholar

23. Bruker AXS GmBH. Sadabs; Bruker AXS GmBH: Karlsruhe (Germany), 2016.Search in Google Scholar

24. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8.10.1107/S2053273314026370Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Bruker AXS Inc. Shelxt – Crystal Structure Solution; Bruker AXS Inc: Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

26. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

27. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K., Puschmann, H. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889808042726.Search in Google Scholar

28. Spek, A. L. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7–13; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889802022112.Search in Google Scholar

29. Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr. 2009, D65, 148–155.10.1107/S090744490804362XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 9–18.Search in Google Scholar

31. Spek, A. L. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2018, 470, 232–237; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2017.04.036.Search in Google Scholar

32. Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr. 2020, E76, 1–11.10.1107/S2056989019016244Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Gelato, L. M., Parthé, E. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 139–143; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889887086965.Search in Google Scholar

34. STOE & CIE GmbH Stadi P. The Rapid Comprehensive Modular System with Unsurpassed Reliability; STOE & CIE GmbH: Darmstadt, Germany, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

35. STOE & CIE GmbH. WinXPOW; STOE & CIE GmbH: Darmstadt (Germany), 2021.Search in Google Scholar

36. B.-D. Dectris Ltd. Technical Documentation; B.-D. Dectris Ltd: Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

37. STOE & CIE GmbH. Accessories; STOE & CIE GmbH: Darmstadt (Germany), 2018.Search in Google Scholar

38. Bruker Corporation. Opus; Bruker Corporation: Billerica, MA, USA, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

39. Emme, H., Despotopoulou, C., Huppertz, H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004, 630, 2450–2457; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.200400202.Search in Google Scholar

40. Haberer, A., Heymann, G., Huppertz, H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 632, 2079; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.200670007.Search in Google Scholar

41. Haberer, A., Kaindl, R., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2010, 65b, 1206–1212.10.1515/znb-2010-1005Search in Google Scholar

42. Mukherjee, P., Suard, E., Dutton, S. E. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 405807; https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/aa8160.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Åsbrink, S., Kihlborg, L., Jackman, L. M., Sparrow, D. R. Acta Chem. Scand. 1964, 18, 1571–1573; https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.18-1571.Search in Google Scholar

44. Knorr, R., Müller, U. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1995, 621, 541–545; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19956210407.Search in Google Scholar

45. Schleid, T., Hartenbach, I. Z. Naturforsch. 2011, 66b, 763–770.10.1515/znb-2011-frontmatter08Search in Google Scholar

46. van der Wolf, B., Held, P., Becker, P. Acta Crystallogr. 2009, E65, i59.10.1107/S1600536809026415Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Zobetz, E. Z. Kristallogr. 1990, 191, 45–57; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1990.191.1-2.45.Search in Google Scholar

48. Zobetz, E. Z. Kristallogr. 1982, 160, 81–92; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1982.160.1-2.81.Search in Google Scholar

49. Brese, N. E., O’Keeffe, M. Acta Crystallogr. 1991, B47, 192–197.10.1107/S0108768190011041Search in Google Scholar

50. Nespolo, M., Guillot, B. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2016, 49, 317–321; https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600576715024814.Search in Google Scholar

51. Laperches, J. P., Tarte, P. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 1966, 22, 1201–1210; https://doi.org/10.1016/0371-1951(66)80023-1.Search in Google Scholar

52. Borovikova, E., Dobretsova, E. A., Boldyrev, K. N., Kurazhkovskaya, V. S., Maltsev, V. V., Leonyuk, N. I. Vib. Spectrosc. 2013, 68, 82–90; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2013.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

53. Banks, E., Nemiroff, M. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 2715–2718; https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50141a033.Search in Google Scholar

54. Tkachenko, E. A., Fedorov, P. P. Inorg. Mater. 2003, 39, S25–S45; https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024132818445.10.1023/A:1024132818445Search in Google Scholar

55. Ross, S. D. Spectrochim. Acta 1972, 28, 1555–1561; https://doi.org/10.1016/0584-8539(72)80126-0.Search in Google Scholar

56. Schmitt, M. K., Janka, O., Pöttgen, R., Benndorf, C., Oliveira, M. de, Eckert, H., Pielnhofer, F., Tragl, A.-S., Weihrich, R., Joachim, B., Johrendt, D., Huppertz, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6449–6453; https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201701891.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-02-10
Accepted: 2023-02-13
Published Online: 2023-03-08
Published in Print: 2023-03-28

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Preface
  4. Professor Dr. Gerhard Müller. Editor-in-Chief der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung BChemical Sciences. zum 70. Geburtstag
  5. Research Articles
  6. Ferrocenylmethylation of theophylline
  7. Electron density of a cyclic tetrasaccharide composed of benzoylated galactose units
  8. Orthoamide und Iminiumsalze, CIX. Umsetzungen von Orthoamiden der Alkincarbonsäuren mit Diolen, Ethandithiol und CH-aciden Nitroverbindungen
  9. 1,4-Divinylphenylene-bridged diruthenium complexes with 2-hydroxypyridine- and 2- or 8-hydroxyquinoline-olate ligands
  10. The calcium oxidotellurates Ca2(TeIVTeVIO7), Ca2(TeIVO3)Cl2 and Ca5(TeIVO3)4Cl2 obtained from salt melts
  11. N-heterocyclic carbene-mediated oxidation of copper(I) in an imidazolium ionic liquid
  12. Synthesis, crystal structure, thermal and spectroscopic properties of ZnX2-2-methylpyrazine (X = Cl, Br, I) coordination compounds
  13. Solid-state molecular structures of Se(IV) and Te(IV) dihalides X2Se(CH3)(C6F5) and the gas-phase structure of Se(CH3)(C6F5)
  14. Ein neuartiger T-förmiger 14-Elektronen-Iridium(I)-Komplex stabilisiert durch eine agostische Ir–H-Wechselwirkung
  15. Exploring dicyanamides with two different alkali-metal cations: phase separations, solid solutions and the new compound Rb1.667Cs0.333[N(CN)2]2
  16. Eu4Al13Pt9 – a coloring variant of the Ho4Ir13Ge9 type structure
  17. Decoration of the [Nb6O19]8– cluster shell with six Cu2+-centred complexes generates the [(Cu(cyclen))6Nb6O19]4+ moiety: room temperature synthesis, crystal structure and selected properties
  18. Structure and spectroscopic properties of etherates of the beryllium halides
  19. The palladium-rich silicides RE3Pd20Si6 (RE = Sc, Y and Lu)
  20. Azido and desamino analogs of the marine natural product oroidin
  21. High-pressure high-temperature preparation of CeGe3
  22. On the synthesis and crystal structure of praseodymium(III) metaborate molybdate(VI) – PrBO2MoO4
  23. A third polymorph of the zwitterionic complex trichlorido-((dimethylphosphoryl)methanaminium-κO)zinc(II)
  24. Mechanochemical synthesis and structural evaluation of a metastable polymorph of Ti3Sn
  25. Synthesis and application of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) nanoparticles for early strength enhancement by eco-friendly low carbon binders
  26. Sterically crowded di-indazolyl-pyridines: Iron(II) complexation studies
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2023-0307/html
Scroll to top button