Home Numerical investigation on implication of innovative hydrogen strut injector on performance and combustion characteristics in a scramjet combustor
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Numerical investigation on implication of innovative hydrogen strut injector on performance and combustion characteristics in a scramjet combustor

  • Sribhashyam Krishna Kireeti , Gadepalli Ravikiran Sastry and Santosh Kumar Gugulothu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 8, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A detailed numerical analysis on a scramjet combustor is carried out by introducing an innovative shaped strut in place of the conventional strut. The design of newly added strut aids in generating intense vorticity which helps in efficient mixing of fuel and oxidizer. The air from the isolator enters the combustor at Mach 2.0, whereas fuel enters from the trailing edge of the strut sonically. In this study the flow dynamics with finite volume approach on commercial software Ansys-Fluent 20.0 to solve the two-dimensional Reynolds average Navier Stokes equation (RANS) with compressible fluid flow by considering the density-based solver with SST k-ε turbulent model. The species transport model with volumetric reaction and finite rate/eddy dissipation turbulence chemistry interaction is adopted to study the combustion phenomena and validated with the experimental results, and it is found that the interaction of the shear shock layer enhances the mixing rate by intensifying turbulence. The modified strut injector’s mixing efficiency is compared to the base strut and observed that with a 40% reduction in length, the modified strut injection technique exhibited a mixing efficiency of >95%. The combustion efficiency is then estimated streamwise, and the plot follows the same pattern as the mixing efficiency with fuel burns down completely when x = 150 mm for the modified strut whereas x = 200 mm for the base strut. This can compact the combustion chamber and increases the thrust-to-weight ratio. So, the innovative strut adopted can improvise the combustion efficiency.


Corresponding author: Santosh Kumar Gugulothu, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 534 101, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Waidmann, W, Alff, F, Böhm, M, Brummund, U, Clauss, W, Oschwald, M. Supersonic combustion of hydrogen/air in a scramjet combustion chamber. Space Technol 1995;6:421–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-9270(95)00017-8.Search in Google Scholar

2. Manna, P, Behera, R, Chakraborty, D. Liquid-fueled strut-based scramjet combustor design: a computational fluid dynamics approach. J Propul Power 2008;24:274–81. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28333.Search in Google Scholar

3. Génin, F, Menon, S. Simulation of turbulent mixing behind a strut injector in supersonic flow. AIAA J 2010;48:26–539.10.2514/1.43647Search in Google Scholar

4. Oevermann, M. Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling. Aero Sci Technol 2000;4:463–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1270-9638(00)01070-1.Search in Google Scholar

5. Choubey, G, Pandey, KM. Effect of different wall injection schemes on the flow-field of hydrogen fuelled strut-based scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2018;145:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.034.Search in Google Scholar

6. Huang, W. Investigation on the effect of strut configurations and locations on the combustion performance of a typical scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;29:5485–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1150-6.Search in Google Scholar

7. Huang, ZW, He, GQ, Qin, F, Wei, XG. Large eddy simulation of flame structure and combustion mode in a hydrogen fueled supersonic combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40:9815–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

8. Huang, ZW, He, GQ, Qin, F, Wei, XG. Large eddy simulation of strut enhanced mixing for supersonic combustion. J Solid Rocket Technol 2015;38:664–70.Search in Google Scholar

9. Pandey, KM, Roga, S, Choubey, G. Computational analysis of hypersonic combustor using strut injector at flight Mach 7. Combust Sci Technol 2015;187:1392–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2015.1035371.Search in Google Scholar

10. Huang, ZW, He, GQ, Wang, S, Qin, F, Wei, XG, Shi, L. Simulations of combustion oscillation and flame dynamics in a strut-based supersonic combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:8278–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.142.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lakka, S, Randive, P, Pandey, KM. Implication of geometrical configuration of cavity on combustion performance in a strut-based scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2021;178:793–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.040.Search in Google Scholar

12. Yan, L, Liao, L, Meng, YS, Li, SB, Huang, W. Investigation on the mode transition of a typical three-dimensional scramjet combustor equipped with a strut. Energy 2020;208:118419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118419.Search in Google Scholar

13. Baoxi, W, Bing, C, Minglei, Y, Xinxing, S, Xu, X. Operational sensitivities of an integrated aerodynamic-ramp-injector/gas-portfire flame holder in a supersonic combustor. Acta Astronaut 2012;81:102–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.014.Search in Google Scholar

14. Maddalena, L, Campioli, TL, Schetz, JA. Experimental and computational investigation of light-gas injectors in a Mach 4.0 crossflow. J Propul Power 2006;22:1027–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19141.Search in Google Scholar

15. Eklund, D, Gruber, M. Study of a supersonic combustor employing an aerodynamic ramp pilot injector. In: 35th joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Los Angeles, USA: AIAA; 1999:2249 p.10.2514/6.1999-2249Search in Google Scholar

16. Jacobsen, LS, Gallimore, SD, Schetz, JA, O’Brien, WF, Goss, LP. Improved aerodynamic-ramp injector in supersonic flow. J Propul Power 2003;19:663–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6155.Search in Google Scholar

17. Athithan, AA, Jeyakumar, S, Sczygiol, N, Urbanski, M, Hariharasudan, A. The combustion characteristics of double ramps in a strut-based scramjet combustor. Energies 2021;14:831. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040831.Search in Google Scholar

18. Li, LQ, Huang, W, Yan, L, Du, ZB, Fang, M. Numerical investigation and optimization on the micro-ramp vortex generator within scramjet combustors with the transverse hydrogen jet. Aero Sci Technol 2019;84:570–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.011.Search in Google Scholar

19. Takahashi, H, Tu, Q, Segal, C. Effects of pylon-aided fuel injection on mixing in a supersonic flowfield. J Propul Power 2010;26:1092–101. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.48393.Search in Google Scholar

20. Montes, D, King, P, Gruber, M, Carter, C, Hsu, M. Mixing effects of pylon-aided fuel injection located upstream of a flameholding cavity in supersonic flow. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. AIAA: Tucson, USA; 2005:3913 p.10.2514/6.2005-3913Search in Google Scholar

21. Li, Z, Gerdroodbary, MB, Sheikholeslami, M, Shafee, A, Babazadeh, H, Moradi, R. Mixing enhancement of multi hydrogen jets through the cavity flameholder with extended pylon. Acta Astronaut 2020;175:300–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

22. Oamjee, A, Sadanandan, R. Effects of pylon geometry on mixing enhancement in a scramjet pylon-cavity flameholder. Aeronaut J 2020;124:1262–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2020.27.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kim, KM, Baek, SW, Han, CY. Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2004;47:271–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

24. Mahto, NK, Choubey, G, Suneetha, L, Pandey, KM. Effect of variation of length-to-depth ratio and Mach number on the performance of a typical double cavity scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2016;128:540–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.08.010.Search in Google Scholar

25. Wang, H, Wang, Z, Sun, M, Qin, N. Large eddy simulation of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor with dual cavity. Acta Astronaut 2015;108:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.12.008.Search in Google Scholar

26. Huang, W, Wang, ZG, Yan, L, Liu, WD. Numerical validation and parametric investigation on the cold flow field of a typical cavity-based scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2012;80:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

27. Choubey, G, Pandey, KM. Effect of different strut + wall injection techniques on the performance of two-strut scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:13259–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.024.Search in Google Scholar

28. Huang, W, Li, MH, Yan, L. Mixing augmentation mechanism induced by the pseudo shock wave in transverse gaseous injection flow fields. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:10961–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.078.Search in Google Scholar

29. Verma, KA, Pandey, KM, Ray, M, Sharma, KK. Effect of transverse fuel injection system on combustion efficiency in scramjet combustor. Energy 2021;218:119511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119511.Search in Google Scholar

30. Jeong, E, O’Byrne, S, Jeung, IS, Houwing, AFP. The effect of fuel injection location on supersonic hydrogen combustion in a cavity-based model scramjet combustor. Energies 2020;13:193. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010193.Search in Google Scholar

31. Zettervall, N, Fureby, C. A computational study of ramjet, scramjet and dual-mode ramjet combustion in combustor with a cavity flameholder. In: 2018 AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. Kissimee, Florida: AIAA; 2018:1146 p.10.2514/6.2018-1146Search in Google Scholar

32. Yan, L, Liao, L, Huang, W, Li, LQ. Nonlinear process in the mode transition in typical strut-based and cavity-strut based scramjet combustors. Acta Astronaut 2018;145:250–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.061.Search in Google Scholar

33. Wang, T, Li, G, Yang, Y, Wang, Z, Cai, Z, Sun, M. Combustion modes periodical transition in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor with rear-wall-expansion cavity flameholder. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:3209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.118.Search in Google Scholar

34. Zhang, X, Yue, L, Huang, T, Zhang, Q, Zhang, X. Numerical investigation of mode transition and hysteresis in a cavity-based dual-mode scramjet combustor. Aero Sci Technol 2019;94:105420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105420.Search in Google Scholar

35. Ouyang, H, Liu, W, Sun, M. The influence of cavity parameters on the combustion oscillation in a single-side expansion scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2017;137:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.03.018.Search in Google Scholar

36. Zhang, D, Song, W. Experimental study of cone-struts and cavity flameholders in a kerosene-fueled round scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2017;139:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.025.Search in Google Scholar

37. Suneetha, L, Randive, P, Pandey, KM. Numerical investigation on implication of dual cavity on combustion characteristics in strut based scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44:32080–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.064.Search in Google Scholar

38. Natarajan, V, Padmanabhan, S, Sanal Kumar, VR, Nejaamtheen, MN, Murugesh, P. Diagnostic investigation of reacting flow characteristics of a cavity based scramjet with multiple bumps. In: 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference. Atlanta, GA: AIAA; 2017:4987 p.10.2514/6.2017-4987Search in Google Scholar

39. Pandey, KM, Choubey, G, Ahmed, F, Laskar, DH, Ramnani, P. Effect of variation of hydrogen injection pressure and inlet air temperature on the flow-field of a typical double cavity scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:20824–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.026.Search in Google Scholar

40. Liu, Q, Baccarella, D, Landsberg, W, Veeraragavan, A, Lee, T. Cavity flameholding in an optical axisymmetric scramjet in Mach 4.5 flows. Proc Combust Inst 2019;37:3733–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.08.037.Search in Google Scholar

41. Cai, Z, Zhu, X, Sun, M, Wang, Z. Experiments on flame stabilization in a scramjet combustor with a rear-wall-expansion cavity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:26752–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.059.Search in Google Scholar

42. Ruan, JL, Domingo, P, Ribert, G. Analysis of combustion modes in a cavity-based scramjet. Combust Flame 2020;215:238–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.034.Search in Google Scholar

43. Suneetha, L, Randive, P, Pandey, KM. Implication of diamond shaped dual strut on combustion characteristics in a cavity-based scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:17562–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.217.Search in Google Scholar

44. Chang, J, Zhang, J, Bao, W, Yu, D. Research progress on strut-equipped supersonic combustors for scramjet application. Prog Aero Sci 2018;103:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

45. Zhang, J, Chang, J, Tian, H, Li, J, Bao, W. Flame interaction characteristics in scramjet combustor equipped with strut/wall combined fuel injectors. Combust Sci Technol 2020;192:1863–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2019.1627342.Search in Google Scholar

46. Zhang, J, Chang, J, Gao, L, Bao, W. Flame propagation and flashback characteristics in a kerosene fueled supersonic combustor equipped with strut/wall combined fuel injectors. Aero Sci Technol 2019;93:105303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105303.Search in Google Scholar

47. Zhang, J, Chang, J, Kong, C, Qiu, H, Bao, W. Flame oscillation characteristics in a kerosene fueled dual mode combustor equipped with thin strut flameholder. Acta Astronaut 2019;161:222–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.037.Search in Google Scholar

48. Zhang, J, Chang, J, Ma, J, Wang, Y, Bao, W. Investigations on flame liftoff characteristics in liquid-kerosene fueled supersonic combustor equipped with thin strut. Aero Sci Technol 2019;84:686–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.017.Search in Google Scholar

49. Zhang, B. The influence of wall roughness on detonation limits in hydrogen–oxygen mixture. Combust Flame 2016;169:333–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

50. Zhang, B, Liu, H, Li, Y. The effect of instability of detonation on the propagation modes near the limits in typical combustible mixtures. Fuel 2019;253:305–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.006.Search in Google Scholar

51. Zhang, B, Liu, H. Theoretical prediction model and experimental investigation of detonation limits in combustible gaseous mixtures. Fuel 2019;258:116132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116132.Search in Google Scholar

52. Ciccarelli, G, Dorofeev, S. Flame acceleration and transition to detonation in ducts. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2008;34:499–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2007.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

53. Oschwald, M, Guerra, R, Waidmann, W. Investigation of the flowfield of a scramjet combustor with parallel H 2-injection through a strut by particle image displacement velocimetry. Int J Energ Mater Chem Propuls 1994;3:1–6.10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v3.i1-6.510Search in Google Scholar

54. Zingg, DW, Godin, P. A perspective on turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 2009;23:327–35.10.1080/10618560902776802Search in Google Scholar

55. Kireeti, SK, Sastry, GRK, Gugulothu, SK. Numerical investigations on the performance of a multistrut hydrogen injector in a scramjet combustor. Heat Transf 2021;50:7195–214.10.1002/htj.22224Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-24
Accepted: 2021-10-29
Published Online: 2021-11-08

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. The International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines
  3. The aerothermodynamic cycle optimal design of a turbofan engine
  4. Multi-condition design optimization of groove flow control technique in an axial-flow pump
  5. Analysis on impulse characteristics of pulse detonation engine with nozzles
  6. Numerical investigation on implication of innovative hydrogen strut injector on performance and combustion characteristics in a scramjet combustor
  7. Optimization of Kiel geometry for better recovery factor in high temperature measurement in aero gas turbine engine
  8. Applicability of correlational data-mining to small-scale turbojet performance map generation
  9. Effect of multi-zone effusion cooling on an adiabatic flat plate for gas turbine application
  10. Flow quality improvement of the wind tunnel testing for a highly-loaded compressor cascade at high incidence
  11. Modeling and analysis of 3D radiative heat transfer in combustor
  12. A creep-fatigue life prediction model considering multi-factor coupling effect
  13. Optimization-based transient control of turbofan engines: a sequential quadratic programming approach
  14. Investigations on the interaction between the front and aft purge flow and the downstream vane of 1.5-stage turbine
  15. A study on design optimization for compressor blisks
  16. Exploration of an unconventional validation tool to investigate aero engine transonic fan flutter signature
  17. Evaluation of non-uniform water film behavior on the performance of an axial aeroengine compressor
  18. Predicting remaining useful life of turbofan engines using degradation signal based echo state network
  19. Effect of G-type integral squeeze film damper on the dynamic characteristics in rotor system
  20. Development of a one-dimensional code for the initial design of a micro gas turbine mixed flow compressor stage
  21. Numerical and experimental investigations of tip clearance effects in a high-flow-coefficient centrifugal compressor
  22. Experimental and numerical investigation on the effect of turboprop engine exhaust gas impingement on pusher aircraft
  23. Heat transfer distribution of single oblique jet impingement in crossflow under different inlet conditions
  24. Performance enhancement and flow separation control in an S-duct by air injection
  25. Gas dynamic analysis of the modern single shaft gas turbine engine flow path
  26. Aero engine health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance: an overview
  27. Influence of leading edge point on aerodynamic performance of asymmetric leading edge compressor airfoils
  28. The aerothermal performance of turbine blade squealer tip at various Reynolds numbers and Mach numbers with moving endwall
  29. Numerical investigation of a variable stator vane with nonuniform partial radial gaps in an annular compressor cascade
  30. Effect of self-recirculating casing treatment on the unsteady flow and stability of counter-rotating axial-flow compressor
  31. Research on temperature rise characteristics of end V-groove ring seal
  32. Research on the influence of honeycomb cell blockage on the seal leakage characteristics
  33. Vortex structure control based bleed in axial compressor cascade with tip clearance using large eddy simulation
  34. Development and application of a profile loss model considering the low-Re effect in low-pressure turbine
  35. Optimization of ACE mode transition control schedule considering geometric adjustment speed
  36. Numerical investigation of flow control in low-pressure turbine cascade using Gurney Flaps
  37. The design method of the V-shaped groove piston ring
  38. Control of subsonic jets using vanes as vortex generators
  39. Impact investigation of inlet environmental changes on the rated condition performance of a high-pressure compressor
  40. Research on new integral squeeze film damper vibration control of micro turbojet engine at high speed
  41. Effect of the distribution of the upstream probe support on performance of compressor cascade
  42. Effect of bypass ratio on sonic underexpanded co-flow jets with finite lip thickness
  43. Machine learning augmented multi-sensor data fusion to detect aero engine fan rotor blade flutter
  44. CFD analysis of flow control in compressor cascade using MVGs
  45. Quantitative investigation of the evaporation and resistance characteristics of inlet jet precooling
  46. Study on laser de-weight and dynamic balance technology of rotating machines
  47. Integrated design and analysis of inlet and missile with two side layout
  48. Research on turboprop engine control method based on linear parameter varying model
  49. Modeling and validation of the volume effect on the axial fan transient performance
  50. Ground effects on the aerodynamics of a wing with slot type distributed propulsion system for VTOL applications
  51. Multidisciplinary sensitivity analysis for turbine blade considering thickness uncertainties
  52. Accurate measurement and evaluation method of axial compressor efficiency under the influence of multiple factors
  53. Control mechanism of secondary flow in a turbine cascade with non-axisymmetric endwall profiling under Co-rotating incoming vortex
  54. Infrared simulation of aircraft rear fuselage based on a coupled CFD method
  55. Effect of multi-hole trench cooling on an adiabatic flat plate for gas turbine application
  56. Numerical study of transition process in different zones of a compressor cascade channel
Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2021-0055/html
Scroll to top button