A distinctness approach to clitic combinations in Romance

References

Abney, Steven. 1986. Functional elements and licensing. In Paper presented at IXth GLOW, Gerona, Spain.Suche in Google Scholar

Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology disertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Ackema, Peter. 2001. On the relation between V-to-I and the structure of the inflectional paradigm. Linguistic Review 18(3). 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2001.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024109008573.10.1023/A:1024109008573Suche in Google Scholar

Arnal, María Luisa. 1998. El habla de la Baja Ribagorza occidental. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiadou Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2007. The subject-in-situ generalization revisited. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language?: Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 31–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552.31Suche in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 2005. Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Judy. 2008. English th-forms. In Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination, 213–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.99.12berSuche in Google Scholar

Bittner, Maria & Ken Hale. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic inquiry 27. 1–68.Suche in Google Scholar

Bleam, Tonia. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling. Delaware: University of Delaware Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric & Txuss Martin. 2013. El clític datiu és més que un clític. Lleida: Pagès.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia. 1995. Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13. 607–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992853.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia. 2008. The person case constraint and repair strategies. In Roberta d’Alessandro, Susann Fischer & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargaron (eds.), Agreement restrictions, 103–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207835.103Suche in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia & Maria-Rosa Lloret. 2002. OCP effects in Catalan cliticization. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1. 19–39. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.54.Suche in Google Scholar

Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Campos, Héctor. 1986. Indefinite object drop. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 354–359.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna. 2008. On different types of clitic clusters. In Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The Bantu-Romance connection, 41–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.131.06carSuche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna. 2010. Morphologically complex clitic pronouns and spurious se once again. In Vicenç Torrens, Linda Escobar & Anna Gavarró & Juncar Gutiérrez (eds.), Movement and clitics: Adult and child grammar, 238–259. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804010.145Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. Current Studies in Linguistics Series 45. 133–166. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.223.01choSuche in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Restructuring and functional structure. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 132–191. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.10.1093/oso/9780195179545.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2013. Spanish clitic clusters: Three of a perfect pair. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2. 191–220. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2692.Suche in Google Scholar

Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (Current Studies in Linguistics 42), 21–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic inquiry 33(3). 409–442. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168554.Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández Ordóñez, Inés. 1999. Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (coord.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1317–1398. Madrid: Espasa.Suche in Google Scholar

Franco, Jon & Alazne Landa. 1991. The syntax and semantics of null objects in Basque Spanish. In Katharine Hunt, Thomas A. Perry & Vida Samiian (eds.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, WECOL, vol. 91, 117–128. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics at California State University, Fresno.Suche in Google Scholar

Franco, Jon & Alazne Landa. 1992. Objetos nulos en el castellano del País Vasco: dos estatus para dos interpretaciones. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 26(3). 777–792.Suche in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2016. A phase-theoretic approach to cliticization in Romance. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 9(1). 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2016-0003.Suche in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. & Juan Uriagareka. 2016. Condiciones de ensamble en las combinaciones de clíticos. En Ángel J. Gallego, Yolanda Rodríguez & Javier Fernández (eds.), Relaciones sintácticas: homenaje a Josep M. Brucart y M. Lluïsa Hernanz, 663–680. Barcelona: UAB.Suche in Google Scholar

Giralt, Javier. 1998. Aspectos gramaticales de las hablas de La Litera (Huesca). Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3). 482–526. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0158.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, James W. 1992. The form classes of Spanish substantives. In Geert Booij, & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 65–88. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_6Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Suche in Google Scholar

Heggie, Lorie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds). 2005. Clitic and affix combinations. Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.74Suche in Google Scholar

Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa & Gemma Rigau. 1984. Auxiliaritat i reestructuració. Els Marges: revista de llengua i literatura 31. 29–51.Suche in Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2010. The syntactic OCP. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), The proceedings of the 11th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 35–56. Hituzi: Tokyo.Suche in Google Scholar

Huidobro, Susana. 2009. Datives as “concordial” case: Evidence from Spanish and Galician. Unpublished manucript, Stony Brook University & Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.Suche in Google Scholar

Jeong, Youngmi. 2006. The landscape of applicatives. College Park: University of Maryland disertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Jeong, Youngmi. 2007. Applicatives: Structures and interpretation from a minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.104Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In Ovaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 239–261. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_8Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic inquiry 22(4). 647–686.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1993. The antisymmetry of syntax. Unpublished manuscript, City University of New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax (No. 25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195102352.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 2002. Pronouns and their antecedents. In Samuel David Epstein (ed.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 133–166. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755662.ch7Suche in Google Scholar

Kramer, Martin. 2012. Underlying representations. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511978821Suche in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Alwin. 2008. El dialecto altoaragonés. Zaragoza: Xordiga.Suche in Google Scholar

Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1993. A syntactic view of Romance pronominal sequences. Probus 5(3). 242–270. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1993.5.3.241.Suche in Google Scholar

Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1994. Enclitic clustering: The case of French positive imperatives. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 19. 71–104.Suche in Google Scholar

Landa, Alazne. 1995. Conditions on null objects in Basque Spanish and their relation to leísmo and clitic doubling. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Landa, María. 2005. Las combinaciones de clíticos en el cheso. Alazet 17. 113–133.Suche in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 1999. El artículo. In Violeta Demonte & Ignacio Bosque (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol 1, 787–890. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 2004. Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 75–114. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.106.Suche in Google Scholar

Leu, Tom. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. New York City, NY: NYU dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Longa, Víctor, Guillermo Lorenzo & Gemma Rigau. 1996. Expressing modality by recycling clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 5(1). 67–79.Suche in Google Scholar

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1980. Remarks on infinitives: A case for a filter. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5(1). 101–152.Suche in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2007. Locality and the architecture of syntactic dependencies. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.10.1057/9780230597471Suche in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambrideg, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9165.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia. 2011. Grammatical categories: Variation in Romance languages, vol. 128. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511974489Suche in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In German Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk, Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.1075/la.34.04marSuche in Google Scholar

Martin, Txuss. 2012. Deconstructing Catalan object clitics. New York: New York University Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, Lise & Brian MacWhinney. 1984. The repeated morph constraint: Toward an explanation. Language 60(3). 519–541. https://doi.org/10.2307/413990.Suche in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic antisymmetry (No. 38). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nagore, Francho. 1986. El aragonés de Panticosa. Gramática. Huesca: IEA.Suche in Google Scholar

Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot. 2005. Syntactic haplology. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 685–710. Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch69Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(2). 273–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco. 2002. Some clitic combinations in the syntax of Romance. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1. 201–224. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.59.Suche in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco. 2012. Clitics in Spanish. In José, I. Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rouke (eds.), The handbook of Spanish Linguistics, 423–453. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118228098.ch21Suche in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco & Francesc Roca. 2014. Differential object marking (DOM) and clitic subspecification in Catalonian Spanish. In Angel Gállego (ed.), The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects. Available at: https://linguistics.stonybrook.edu/people/_bios/_linguistics-faculty/_faculty-files/ordonez/pre-publication.draft_.OUP_.Ordonez-Roca.pdf.10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2007. The object agreement constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2). 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9010-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013a. Differential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2. 221–239. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2808.Suche in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013b. Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus 25(2). 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0012.Suche in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2018. Number agreement in se constructions. Unpublsihed manuscript, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) and University of Extremadura (UEx).Suche in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2019. The formal properties of non paradigmatic SE. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 8. 55–84. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4704.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1989. Parameters in the grammar of Basque: A GB approach to Basque syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110876741Suche in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Suche in Google Scholar

Pescarini, Diego. 2010. Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from clitic clusters. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3). 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00003.Suche in Google Scholar

Pescarini, Diego. 2015. Le costruzioni con «si». Italiano, dialetti e lingue romanze. Rome: Carocci Editore.Suche in Google Scholar

Picallo, M. Carme. 1994. A mark of specificity in indefinite nominals. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1). 143–167.Suche in Google Scholar

Picallo, M. Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio 7(1). 47–66.Suche in Google Scholar

Planells, Samanta. 2018. La concordancia desdoblada en la IMPse. In Paper presented at Spanish Dialect Meeting, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real.Suche in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Binnick (eds.), In Papers from the 5th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 209–239. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Suche in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 49). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering trees, vol. 56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, Marc & Theresa Biberauer. 2005. Explaining expl. In Marcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, 115–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.78.06ricSuche in Google Scholar

Rigau, Gemma. 1978. “Hi” datiu inanimat. Els Marges 12. 99–102.Suche in Google Scholar

Rigau, Gemma. 1982. Inanimate indirect object in Catalan. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 146–150.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Negation, wh-movement and the null subject parameter. In Luigi Rizzi Issues in Italian syntax, 117–184. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110883718.117Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalan (eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics, 391–419. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110878516-025Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ían G. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals, vol. 59. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Roca, Francesc. 1992. Object clitics in Spanish and Catalan. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 245–280.Suche in Google Scholar

Roca, Francesc. 1996. La determinación y la modificación nominal en español. Barcelona: Autonomous University of Barcelona Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking. Connecticut: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Romero, Juan. 2008. Los dativos en el español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Suche in Google Scholar

Saura, José Antonio. 1998. Incrementos átonos benasqueses. Alazet 10. 159–180.Suche in Google Scholar

Siegel, Dorothy C. 1974. Topics in English morphology. Cambride, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Sistac, Ramon. 1993. El Ribagorçà a l’alta Llitera: els parlars de la vall de la Sosa de Peralta. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Suche in Google Scholar

Solà-Pujols, Joan. 1998. Clitics are inflection. Evidence from Catalan. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, 213–226. Girona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Girona.Suche in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 1997. Subject clitics in French and Romance: Complex inversion and clitic doubling. In Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts (eds.), Studies in comparative syntax, 189–221. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_8Suche in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 1998. Partitions and atoms of clause structure. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 391–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133904.Suche in Google Scholar

Suñer, Margarita & María Yépez. 1988. Null definite objects in Quiteño. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 511–519.Suche in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 245–265.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1988. Operadores en las exclamativas con artículo determinado. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 1. 109–122. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v36i1.666.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1992. Case and agreement structure. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects, vol. 34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 2002. Arguments for a derivational approach to syntactic relations based on clitics. In Samuel, D. Epstein & T.D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 249–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755662.ch11Suche in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On government. Mansfield, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1). 79–123.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1998. Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009763305416.10.1023/A:1009763305416Suche in Google Scholar

Walkow, Martin. 2012. Goals, big and small. Cambridge, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Walkow, Martin. 2013. Locating variation in person restrictions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(28). 247–256.Suche in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. The syntax of pronouns: Evidence from Halkomelem Salish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(1). 157–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014214222614.10.1023/A:1014214222614Suche in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 1998. Heads or phrases? Particles in particular. In Richard Wiese & Wolfgang Kehrein (eds.), Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages, 267–296. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.10.1515/9783110919769.267Suche in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2004. Two types of restructuring—Lexical vs. functional. Lingua 114(8). 991–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(03)00102-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 1998. Identity avoxidance in phonology and morphology. In Steven, G. Lapointe, Diane, K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farell (eds.), Mophology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 216–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1999. The cl(itic) projection in questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7. 253–277.Suche in Google Scholar