Nominal predication with estar
-
Carmelo Bazaco
und
Melvin González-Rivera
Abstract
Spanish is a dual copula system — ser and estar. According to traditional interpretations of their distribution, estar does not take nominal complements. Instead, this type of complements appears with the copula ser. There are, however, some counterexamples to this rule. On the one hand, we have examples such as Pepe estuvo torero ayer ‘Pepe was like a bullfighter yesterday.’ In this example, the noun torero does not have its usual interpretation, but rather it refers to the prototypical qualities associated with bullfighters — bravery, unfazed by danger. In this manner, the restriction that Spanish imposes on the copula estar regarding NP complementation does not seem apply in cases where the NP does not provide an identificational interpretation, but rather one associated with the prototypical qualities associated with the noun. A second case in which estar can take nominal complements can be seen in examples such as Esta película está una masa ‘This movie is pretty cool.’ This type of estar predication has a different interpretation than the ones presented in the previous example. While the former provides a predication denoting the properties associated with the noun, the nouns in the latter are expressing a measure of quality regarding their subject. The subjects película ‘movie’ is not being identified with the prototypical qualities of a mass but rather are expressions of high quality. In this respect, the estar predication in this example can be ascribed to the evidential uses of estar. Not every dialect of Spanish can produce examples such as the ones found in the está una masa example, while data similar to está torero is common in all the dialectal continuum. The focus of this investigation is to examine these two types of nominal complements with estar and provide an analysis of the differences between them, as well as provide an explanation regarding their acceptability in estar predications.
References
Arche, María José. 2012. On the aspectuality of the individual-level/stage-level dichotomy. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(2). 109–132. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.2.2385.Suche in Google Scholar
Baglini, Rebecca. 2012. The scalar source of stative passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 16, 29–41.Suche in Google Scholar
Bale, Alan Clinton. 2008. A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9028-z.Suche in Google Scholar
Bale, Alan Clinton. 2011. Scales and comparison classes. Natural Language Semantics 19(2). 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9068-0.Suche in Google Scholar
Barker, Stephen J. 2000. Is value content a component of conventional implicature? Analysis 60(3). 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/60.3.268.Suche in Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate & Theo Vennemann. 1972. The grammar of relative adjectives and comparison. Linguistische Berichte 20. 19–32.10.1007/3-540-07016-8_11Suche in Google Scholar
Bazaco, Carmelo. 2017. Ser and estar in Spanish: A scalar account. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Bazaco, Carmelo. 2019. Nominal predication with estar. In Paper presented at Copulas within and across romance languages (COROLA). Spain: Universidad Alcalá de Henares, October 16th.10.1515/shll-2020-2030Suche in Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire. 2011. Bare nouns in predicate position in French. In Sylvain Pogodalla, Myriam Quatrini & Christian Retoré (eds.), Logic and grammar, 1–16. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-21490-5_1Suche in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35(1). 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904322793338.Suche in Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Manfred, Bierwiech & Ewald, Lang (eds.), Dimensional adjectives: Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation, 71–261. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-74351-1_3Suche in Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces: Why languages vary. North-Holland linguistics series: Linguistic variations, vol. 61. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.10.1163/9780585475219Suche in Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Suche in Google Scholar
Bylinina, Elizaveta. 2011. This is so NP! Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6(1). 8. https://doi.org/10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1571.Suche in Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 1997. La distinción aspectual entre ‘ser’ y ‘estar’.In Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo, 93–100.Suche in Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2012. Ser and Estar: The individual/stage‐level distinction and aspectual predication. In Antxon Olarrea & José Ignacio Hualde (eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 453–475. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118228098.ch22Suche in Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2015. What do Spanish copulas have in common with Tibetan evidentials? In Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti & Silvia Gumiel-Molina (eds.), New perspectives on the study of Ser and Estar, 173–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.5.07camSuche in Google Scholar
Cresswell, Max. 1977. The semantics of degree. In Barbara H. Partee (ed.), Montague grammar, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-545850-4.50015-7Suche in Google Scholar
Curat, Hervé. 1999. Les déterminants dans la référence nominale et conditions de leur absence. Genève-Paris: Droz.Suche in Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. A semantics for pseudo-incorporation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
De Swart, Henriette & Joost Zwarts. 2009. Less form–more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. Lingua 119(2). 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.015.Suche in Google Scholar
De Swart, Henriette, Yoad Winter & Joost Zwarts. 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(1). 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4.Suche in Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 2005. Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua 115(6). 857–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.006.Suche in Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Tonia Bleam & M. Teresa Espinal. 2006. Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation. In Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.95.04dobSuche in Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2018. Evidential commitment and feature mismatch in Spanish estar constructions. Journal of Pragmatics 128. 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria & Manuel Leonetti. 2002. Coercion and the stage/individual distinction. In Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (ed.), Words to discourse: Trends in Spanish semantics and pragmatics, 159–179. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585475295_011Suche in Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa. 2013. Bare nominals, bare predicates. In Johannes Kabatek & Albert Wall (eds.), New perspectives on bare noun phrases in romance and beyond, 63–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.141.03espSuche in Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa & Jaume Mateu. 2011. Bare nominals and argument structure in Catalan and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 28(1). 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa & Louise McNally. 2011. Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics 47(1). 87–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226710000228.Suche in Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & Henriëtte de Swart. 2003. The semantics of incorporation: From argument structure to discourse transparency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fernández, Leborans, María, Jesús. 1999. La predicación: las oraciones copulativas. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa.Suche in Google Scholar
Gallego, Angel & Juan Uriagereka. 2011. The lexical syntax of ser and estar. Unpublished manuscript. Barcelona. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and College Park, MD:University of Maryland.Suche in Google Scholar
Gallego, Aangel & Juan Uriagereka. 2016. ‘Estar’=‘Ser’+ X. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 5(1). 123–156. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.5.1.3634.Suche in Google Scholar
Graff, Delia. 2000. Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics 28(1). 45–81. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20002816.Suche in Google Scholar
Gumiel, Silvia & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2012. Aspectual composition in ser/estar+ adjective structures: Adjectival scalarity and verbal aspect in copular constructions. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(1). 33–62. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.1.2321.Suche in Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2015. Comparison classes and the relative/absolute distinction: A degree-based compositional account of the ser/estar alternation in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(3). 955–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9284-x.Suche in Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Brendan Jackson & Tanya Matthews (eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory, vol. 10, 40–64. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v10i0.3102Suche in Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Edward Keenan. 1975. Formal semantics of natural language. In J. A. W. Kamp & Edward L. Keenan (eds.), Two theories about adjectives, 123–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897696.011Suche in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Gradable adjectives denote measure functions, not partial functions. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(1). 65–80.Suche in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0.Suche in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199211616.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 1999. From event structure to scale structure: Degree modification in deverbal adjectives. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9. 163–180. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2820.Suche in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81. 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071.Suche in Google Scholar
Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1). 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00351812.Suche in Google Scholar
Klein, Ewan. 1991. Comparatives. In A. von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch der Zeitgenössischen Forschung. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110126969.8.673Suche in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review 88. 513–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184843.Suche in Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giovanni. 2001. How comparative is semantics? A unified parametrictheory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural Language Semantics 9(4). 335–369. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014861111123.10.1023/A:1014861111123Suche in Google Scholar
Ludlow, Peter. 1989. Implicit comparison classes. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00632474.Suche in Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael. 2004. Entre ser y estar. Madrid: Arco libros.Suche in Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1973. The syntax and semantics of comparative constructions in English. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 2004. Bare plurals in Spanish are interpreted as properties. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 115–133. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.107.Suche in Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 2009a. Properties, entity correlates of properties, an existentials. In Anastasia Giannakidou & Monika Rathert (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 163–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199541089.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 2009b. The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of gradable adjectives. In Rick Nouwen, Robert van Rooij, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Christian Schmitz (eds.), International workshop on vagueness in communication, 151–168. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_9Suche in Google Scholar
Meier, Cécile. 2003. The meaning of too, enough, and so… that. Natural Language Semantics 11(1). 69–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023002608785.10.1023/A:1023002608785Suche in Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Hans Van de Koot & Jenny Doetjes. 2006. Degree expressions. The Linguistic Review 21(1). 1–66.10.1515/tlir.2004.001Suche in Google Scholar
Pardo, Alfreo & Mythili Menon. 2016. The aspectual structure of the adjective: Spanish ser and estar. In Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds.), Hispanic linguistics: Current issues and new directions, 138–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Roby, David Brian. 2009. Aspect and the categorization of states: The case of ser and estar in Spanish (Vol. 114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.114Suche in Google Scholar
Romeu, Jaume. 2015. Ser, estar and two different modifiers. In Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti & Silvia Gumiel-Molina (eds.), New perspectives on the study of ser and estar, 51–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.5.03romSuche in Google Scholar
Rotstein, Carmen & Yoad Winter. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12(3). 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:nals.0000034517.56898.9a.10.1023/B:NALS.0000034517.56898.9aSuche in Google Scholar
Roy, Isabelle Anaïs. 2006. Non-verbal predications: A syntactic analysis of predicational copular sentences. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1944. Grading, a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11(2). 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/286828.Suche in Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit W. 2010. Measurement theory in linguistics. Synthese 174(1). 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9687-5.Suche in Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit W. 2011. Adjectival vs. nominal categorization processes: The rule vs. similarity hypothesis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 104–147.10.1075/bjl.25.06sasSuche in Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit W. 2012. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics 30(3). 335–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs012.Suche in Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit W. 2013. Vagueness, gradability and typicality: The interpretation of adjectives and nouns. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789004248588Suche in Google Scholar
Sassoon, Galit W. 2015. A degree-approach account of multidimensional gradability. Unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar
Silvagni, Federico. 2015. Ser-I, estar-S. Lingue e Linguaggio 14(2). 215–232.Suche in Google Scholar
Stvan, Laurel Smith. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of bare singular noun phrases. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Stvan, Laurel Smith. 2009. Semantic incorporation as an account for some bare singular count noun uses in English. Lingua 119(2). 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.017.Suche in Google Scholar
Toledo, Aassaf & Galit W. Sassoon. 2011. Absolute vs. relative adjectives-variance within vs. between individuals. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 21. 135–154. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v21i0.2587.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, vol. 90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90Suche in Google Scholar
Von Stechow, Armin. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3. 1–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/3.1-2.1.Suche in Google Scholar
Wheeler, Samuel C. 1972. Attributives and their modifiers. Noûs 6(4). 310–334.10.2307/2214308Suche in Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 2012. Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. Cahiers Chronos 25. 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208345_016.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Nominal predication with estar
- A distinctness approach to clitic combinations in Romance
- Mirativity as Expressive Meaning: The Case of adiós
- The Internal Structure of Perfective Adjectives: States and Blocking
- L2 Acquisition of Spanish VOT by English-Speaking Immigrants in Spain
- The Use of the Glottal Stop as a Variant of /s/ in Puerto Rican Spanish
- On the Gradient Lenition of Spanish Voiced Obstruents: A Look at Onset Clusters
- On the Contrasts Between sí ‘yes’ and sí que ‘yes that’ in Spanish and the Structure of the Complementizer Phrase Domain
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Nominal predication with estar
- A distinctness approach to clitic combinations in Romance
- Mirativity as Expressive Meaning: The Case of adiós
- The Internal Structure of Perfective Adjectives: States and Blocking
- L2 Acquisition of Spanish VOT by English-Speaking Immigrants in Spain
- The Use of the Glottal Stop as a Variant of /s/ in Puerto Rican Spanish
- On the Gradient Lenition of Spanish Voiced Obstruents: A Look at Onset Clusters
- On the Contrasts Between sí ‘yes’ and sí que ‘yes that’ in Spanish and the Structure of the Complementizer Phrase Domain
