Introduction: A sociosemiotic exploration of identity and discourse

References

Aransiola, Joshua Oyeniyi & Suraj Olalekan Asindemade. 2011. Understanding cybercrime perpetrators and the strategies they employ in Nigeria. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14. 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0307.Suche in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. In Michael Holquist (ed.), Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Buchanan, Tom & Monica T. Whitty. 2014. The online dating romance scam: Causes and consequences of victimhood. Psychology, Crime and Law 20(3). 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2013.772180.Suche in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5). 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407.Suche in Google Scholar

Burr, Vivian. 2003. Social constructionism, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203694992Suche in Google Scholar

Button, Mark, Chris Lewis & Jackie Tapley. 2009. Fraud typologies and victims of fraud. London: National Fraud Authority.Suche in Google Scholar

Candlin, Christopher N. 1997. General editor’s preface. In Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell & Bengt Norberg (eds.), The construction of professional discourse, vii–xiv. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Chandler, Daniel. 2002. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203166277Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & King Kui Sin. 2008. Terminological equivalence in legal translation: A semiotic approach. Semiotica 172(1/4). 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2008.088.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & King Kui Sin. 2011. A sociosemiotic interpretation of linguistic modality in legal settings. Semiotica 185(1/4). 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.036.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Winnie Cheng. 2012. Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction. Semiotica 191(1/4). 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0086.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Winnie Cheng & King Kui Sin. 2014. Revisiting legal terms: A semiotic perspective. Semiotica 202(1/4). 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0051.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Candace. 1987. Biography and sympathy margin. American Journal of Sociology 93(2). 290–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/228746.Suche in Google Scholar

Cobley, Paul. 2001. The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Cobley, Paul & Anti Randviir. 2009. Introduction: What is sociosemiotics?. Semiotica 173(1/4). 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2007. The quest for meaning: A guide to semiotic theory and practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2009. Explaining change in language: A cybersemiotic perspective. Entropy 11. 1055–1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/e11041055.Suche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & John Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Peter, Stephen E. G. Lea & Kath M. Evans. 2013. Why do individuals respond to fraudulent scam communications and lose money? The psychological determinants of scam compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43. 2060–2072. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12158.Suche in Google Scholar

Furnell, Steven. 2005. Internet threats to end-users: Hunting easy prey. Network Security 7. 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-4858(05)70258-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1994 [1985]. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Hodge, Robert & Gunther R. Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Jewitt, Carey & Rumiko Oyama. 2001. Visual meaning: A socialsemiotic approach. In Theo van Leeuwen & Jewitt Carey (eds.), Handbook of visual analysis, 134–156. London: SAGE.10.4135/9780857020062.n7Suche in Google Scholar

Ledin, Per & David Machin. 2016. The evolution of performance management discourse in corporate strategy diagrams for public institutions. Discourse, Context & Media 13. 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Jinkook & Horacio Soberon-Ferrer. 1997. Consumer vulnerability to fraud: Influencing factors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 31(1). 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1997.tb00827.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Jian. 2017. A sociosemiotic interpretation of legal terms: A case study on ordinary residence. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University 4. 59–65.Suche in Google Scholar

Marshall, Jessica. 2017. The challenges posed by scammers to online support groups: The “deserving” and the “undeserving” victims of scams. In Tim Owen, Wayne Noble & Faye Christabel Speed (eds.), New perspectives on cybercrime, 213–240. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-53856-3_12Suche in Google Scholar

Matulewska, Aleksandra. 2013. Legilinguistic translatology: A parametric approach to legal translation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0535-3Suche in Google Scholar

McKeller, Gordon Bruce. 1978. The place of socio-semiotics in contemporary thought. In Ross Steelle & Terry Threadgold (eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday, 523–548. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.lt2.81mckSuche in Google Scholar

Mumby, Dennis & Robin Clair. 1997. Organizational discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as structure and process: Discourse studies, vol. 2. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781446289068.n14Suche in Google Scholar

Randviir, Anti & Paul Cobley. 2010. Sociosemiotics. In Cobley Paul (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 118–134. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Rege, Aunshul. 2009. What’s love got to do with it? Exploring online dating scams and identity fraud. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 3. 494–512.Suche in Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant & Stefan Slembrouck. 1996. Language, bureaucracy, and social control. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Titus, Richard M. & Angela R. Gover. 2001. Personal fraud: The victims and the scams. In Graham Farrell & Ken Pease (eds.), Repeat victimization: Crime prevention studies, 133–151. New York: Criminal Justice Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203647028Suche in Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jef. 2008. Understanding pragmatics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Walter, Joseph B.. 1996. Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23(1). 3–43.10.1177/009365096023001001Suche in Google Scholar

Whitty, Monica T. 2018. Do you love me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21(2). 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0729.Suche in Google Scholar

Whitty, Monica T. & Tom Buchanan. 2012. The online romance scam: A serious cybercrime. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15(3). 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0352.Suche in Google Scholar

Whitty, Monica T. & Tom Buchanan. 2016. The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims – both financial and non-financial. Criminology and Criminal Justice 16(2). 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815603773.Suche in Google Scholar

Ye, Ning, Jixian Pang & Jian Li. 2014. A sociosemiotic interpretation of police interrogations. Semiotica 201(1/4). 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0027.Suche in Google Scholar

Ye, Ning, Le Cheng & Yun Zhao. 2019. Identity construction of suspects in telecom and internet fraud discourse: From a sociosemiotic perspective. Social Semiotics 29(3). 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587847.Suche in Google Scholar