Home The Selfish Meme: Dawkins, Peirce, Freud
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Selfish Meme: Dawkins, Peirce, Freud

  • Joel West ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 12, 2020

Abstract

Biologist Richard Dawkins coined the term “meme” by which he meant a unit of culture. Dan Dennett continued by defining a meme as a bunch of bits of information. This paper explores the “meme” and how it is semiotic, both in its technical sense and in its popular sense and explores how memes signify both in terms of classical semiotics and also in terms of post-structuralist thought.


Corresponding author: Joel West, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, E-mail: . https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7148-205X

References

Archive Librarian. 2015. Bereshit Ranbbah. The ethics of suicide digital archive. https://ethicsofsuicide.lib.utah.edu/selections/bereshit-rabbah/ (accessed 21 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and simulation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chandler, Daniel & Rod Munday. 2011. A dictionary of communication. Oxford: Oxford Reference.10.1093/acref/9780199568758.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. 2016. The selfish gene: Fortieth anniversary edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, Dan. 2002. Dan Dennett on dangerous memes. In TED Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on_dangerous_memes (accessed 21 September 2020).10.1037/e597252010-001Search in Google Scholar

Dubuc, B. n.d. Tool module: Chomsky’s universal grammar. In The Brain From Top to Bottom. http://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/capsules/outil_rouge06.html (accessed 17 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976a. Peirce’s notion of interpretant. Comparative Literature 91(6). 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2907146.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976b. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund 1913. On the interpration of dreams, D. A. Brill (trans). New York Macmillan. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Interpretation_of_Dreams (accessed 21 September 2020).10.1037/10561-000Search in Google Scholar

Heinlein, Robert A. 1973. Time enough for love. New York: G. P. Putnam.Search in Google Scholar

Hewitson, O. 2010. What does lacan say about… desire? In Lacan Online. http://www.lacanonline.com/index/2010/05/what-does-lacan-say-about-desire/ (accessed 21 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. 1986. Word, dialogue, and novel. In Toril Moi (ed.), A Kristeva reader, 34–62. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1986. The social stratification of (r) in New York City. In Michael D. Harold & Byron Allen (eds.), Dialect and language variation, 304–329. London: Academic Press https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-12–051130–3.50029-X.10.1016/B978-0-12-051130-3.50029-XSearch in Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques 1985. Sign, symbol, imaginary. In M. Blonsky (ed.), On signs, 201–209. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Miszei-Ward, Rachel. 2012. Politics, race, and political fly-billing. Comparative American Studies 10. 177–187. 10.1179/1477570012Z.00000000013Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce 8 vols. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Search in Google Scholar

Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tily & Edward Gibson. 2012. The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122. 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Pierce, John Robinson 1980. An introduction to information theory: Symbols, signal, and noise. New York: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de 1959. Course in general lingusitics. C. Bally, & S.W. Albert (eds.), W. Baskin (trans.). New York: Philosophical Library. https://archive.org/stream/courseingenerall00saus/courseingenerall00saus_djvu.txt (accessed 23 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, David 2017. One of the last remaining Shakers dies at 89, leaving just 2. AP News. https://apnews.com/749eec6f79634be687653f0aba5773dc (accessed 21 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Smucker, J. M., A. Boyd & D. O Mitchell. n.d. Floating signifier. Beautiful Trouble. https://beautifultrouble.org/theory/floating-signifier/ (accessed 27 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Stang, Nicholas F. 2018. Kant’s transcendental idealism. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism (accessed 21 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Stein, Gertrude. 1922. Sacred Emily. Geography and plays. https://www.lettersofnote.com/p/sacred-emily-by-gertrude-stein.html (accessed 21 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Stein, Stephen 1992. The Shaker experience in America: A history of the United Society of Believers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Urbancic, Anne. 1994. Urban semiotics: Where is downtown? Signifying Behaviour 1(1). 23–34.Search in Google Scholar

Vico, Giambattista. 1984. The new science. T. G. Bergin & M. H. Fisch (trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-10-12
Published in Print: 2020-12-16

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Covenantal trust and semioethics: A reflection on interpersonal and intercultural summoning
  4. The semeiotic self
  5. Peirce’s diagrammatic reasoning and the cinema: Image, diagram, and narrative in The Shape of Water
  6. The three approaches to the semiotics of power
  7. Musical meaning and indexicality in the analysis of ceremonial mbira music
  8. The intersemiotic affordances of photography and poetry
  9. Graphic analogies in the imitation of music in literature
  10. Exploring the politics of visibility: Technology, digital representation, and the mediated workings of power
  11. Smart objects in daily life: Tackling the rise of new life forms in a semiotic perspective*
  12. The dagoba and the gopuram: A semiotic contrastive study of the Sinhalese Buddhist and Tamil Hindu cultures
  13. The Selfish Meme: Dawkins, Peirce, Freud
  14. Towards a semiotic model of interlingual translation
  15. Intermedial references and signification: Perception versus conception
  16. The “material function” in cinema: Resolving the paradox of the glitch
  17. Extending the embodied semiotic square: A cultural-semantic analysis of “Follow your Arrow”
  18. Time embodied as space in graphic narratives: A study in applied Peircean semiotics
  19. The origin of editorial images: Recycling, culture, and cognition
  20. Imago Dei: Metaphorical conceptualization of pictorial artworks within a participant-based framework
  21. On the origins of semiosic translation, the role of semiosis in translation and translating and the nature of sign systems: Response to Jia
  22. Special section: A sociosemiotic exploration of identity and discourse (Le Cheng, Ning Ye and David Machin, guest eds.)
  23. Introduction: A sociosemiotic exploration of identity and discourse
  24. The misleading nature of flow charts and diagrams in organizational communication: The case of performance management of preschools in Sweden
  25. A tentative analysis of legal terminology diachronic changes and the problem of communication effectiveness in legal settings
  26. Re-exploring Language development and identity construction of Hui nationality in China: a sociosemiotic perspective
  27. Evidentiality of court judgments in the People’s Republic of China: A semiotic perspective
Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2019-0033/html
Scroll to top button