Home Intermedial references and signification: Perception versus conception
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Intermedial references and signification: Perception versus conception

  • Irina Melnikova ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 12, 2020

Abstract

The paper focuses on the issue of intermedial references, the matters of conditions, necessity and relevance of their interpretation. It discusses the question of semantic value of an intermedial reference rather than of its aesthetic, pragmatic, modal or other aspects. It considers the lack of coherence between the theoretical propositions of intermedial studies, grounded in the studies of intertextuality, and the practice of analysis. In theory, every intermedial reference configures semantic dialogue between qualified media (configurations), thus requires conceptualisation. Yet, the practice of analysis reveals that some of them perform exclusively aesthetic function and invite to keep reception within the limits of perception. Therefore I make an attempt to define the criteria of textual request for conceptualisation/interpretation set up in a text as such. I propose to revise the relevant insights of different intertextual and semiotic approaches, to perform their revision, modification and extension, to articulate possible solution and exemplify it by filmic references to painting.


Corresponding author: Irina Melnikova, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania, E-mail:

References

Antonioni, Michelangelo. 2007. The architecture of vision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977a. From work to text. In Stephen Heath (trans.), Image, music, text. London: Fontana Press.10.7591/9781501743429-003Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977b. Textual analysis of a tale by Edgar Poe, Donald G. Marshall (trans.). Poe Studies 10(1). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-6095.1977.tb00029.x.Search in Google Scholar

Duckett, Victoria. 2014. Letting Lolita laugh. Literature/Film Quarterly 42(3). 528–540. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43798989. (accessed 21 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Dunning, Eric. 1999. Sport matters: Sociological studies of sport, violence and civilization. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1990. The limits of interpretation. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Elleström, Lars. 2010. The modalities of media: A model for understanding intermedial relations. In Lars Elleström (ed.), Media borders, multimodality and intermediality, 11–48. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230275201_2Search in Google Scholar

Elleström, Lars. 2018. A medium-centered model of communication. Semiotica 224(1/4). 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0024.Search in Google Scholar

Elsaesser, Thomas. 1992. Mirror, muse, medusa: Experiment perilous. Iris 14(15). 147–158.Search in Google Scholar

Felluga, Dino Franco. 2015. Critical theory: The key concepts. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315718873Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree, Channa Newman & Claude Doubinsky (trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Melnikova, Irina. 2015. The archite(x/c)ture of cinematic Milan. Journal of European Studies 45(2). 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047244114559342.Search in Google Scholar

Nabokov, Vladimir. 1997 [1955]. Lolita. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Nabokov, Vladimir. 1990 [1973]. Strong opinions. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Naremore, James. 2007. On Kubrick. London: BFI.10.5040/9781838711412Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Thomas Allen. 2000. Kubrick in Nabokovland. In Kubrick: Inside a film artist’s maze, 56–81. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv14npk46Search in Google Scholar

Plett, Heinrich F. 1991. Intertextualities. In Intertextuality. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Rajewsky, Irina O. 2005. Intermediality, intertextuality and remediation: A literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités 6. 43–64. https://doi.org/10.7202/1005505ar.Search in Google Scholar

Riffaterre, Michael. 1978. Semiotics of poetry. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Riffaterre, Michael. 1980. La trace de l’intertexte. La Pensée 215. 4–18.Search in Google Scholar

Stoker, Bram. 2007. Dracula. New York: Signet.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jean-Jacques & Steven Winspur. 2010. Poeticized language: The foundations of contemporary French poetry. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Michael. 2005. Portraits, paintings and painters. In Hitchcock’s motifs, 319–334. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.1017/9789048505456.031Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Werner. 2002. Intermediality revisited: Reflections on word and music relations in the context of a general typology of intermediality. In Suzanne M. Lodato, Suzanne Aspden & Walter Bernhart (eds.), Word and music studies: Essays in honor of Steven Paul Scher on cultural identity and the musical stage, 13–34. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004334069_003Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Werner. 2005. Intermediality. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 252–256. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Werner. 2011. (Inter)mediality and the study of literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 13(3). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1789.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-10-12
Published in Print: 2020-12-16

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Covenantal trust and semioethics: A reflection on interpersonal and intercultural summoning
  4. The semeiotic self
  5. Peirce’s diagrammatic reasoning and the cinema: Image, diagram, and narrative in The Shape of Water
  6. The three approaches to the semiotics of power
  7. Musical meaning and indexicality in the analysis of ceremonial mbira music
  8. The intersemiotic affordances of photography and poetry
  9. Graphic analogies in the imitation of music in literature
  10. Exploring the politics of visibility: Technology, digital representation, and the mediated workings of power
  11. Smart objects in daily life: Tackling the rise of new life forms in a semiotic perspective*
  12. The dagoba and the gopuram: A semiotic contrastive study of the Sinhalese Buddhist and Tamil Hindu cultures
  13. The Selfish Meme: Dawkins, Peirce, Freud
  14. Towards a semiotic model of interlingual translation
  15. Intermedial references and signification: Perception versus conception
  16. The “material function” in cinema: Resolving the paradox of the glitch
  17. Extending the embodied semiotic square: A cultural-semantic analysis of “Follow your Arrow”
  18. Time embodied as space in graphic narratives: A study in applied Peircean semiotics
  19. The origin of editorial images: Recycling, culture, and cognition
  20. Imago Dei: Metaphorical conceptualization of pictorial artworks within a participant-based framework
  21. On the origins of semiosic translation, the role of semiosis in translation and translating and the nature of sign systems: Response to Jia
  22. Special section: A sociosemiotic exploration of identity and discourse (Le Cheng, Ning Ye and David Machin, guest eds.)
  23. Introduction: A sociosemiotic exploration of identity and discourse
  24. The misleading nature of flow charts and diagrams in organizational communication: The case of performance management of preschools in Sweden
  25. A tentative analysis of legal terminology diachronic changes and the problem of communication effectiveness in legal settings
  26. Re-exploring Language development and identity construction of Hui nationality in China: a sociosemiotic perspective
  27. Evidentiality of court judgments in the People’s Republic of China: A semiotic perspective
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2018-0098/html
Scroll to top button