Home Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites

  • Tanner Alauzen , Shaelyn Ross and Samy Madbouly EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 19, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Polymers have recently been making media headlines in various negative ways. To combat the negative view of those with no polymer experience, sustainable and biodegradable materials are constantly being researched. Shape-memory polymers, also known as SMPs, are a type of polymer material that is being extensively researched in the polymer industry. These SMPs can exhibit a change in shape because of an external stimulus. SMPs that are biodegradable or biocompatible are used extensively in medical applications. The use of biodegradable SMPs in the medical field has also led to research of the material in other applications. The following categories used to describe SMPs are discussed: net points, composition, stimulus, and shape-memory function. The addition of fillers or additives to the polymer matrix makes the SMP a polymer composite. Currently, biodegradable fillers are at the forefront of research because of the demand for sustainability. Common biodegradable fillers or fibers used in polymer composites are discussed in this chapter including Cordenka, hemp, and flax. Some other nonbiodegradable fillers commonly used in polymer composites are evaluated including clay, carbon nanotubes, bioactive glass, and Kevlar. The polymer and filler phase differences will be evaluated in this chapter. The recent advances in biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites will provide a more positive perspective of the polymer industry and help to attain a more sustainable future.


Corresponding author: Samy Madbouly, Plastics Engineering Technology, Penn State Behrend, Erie, USA, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Mu, T, Liu, L, Lan, X, Liu, Y, Leng, J. Shape memory polymers for composites. Compos Sci Technol 2018;160:169–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.018.Search in Google Scholar

2. Lendlein, A, Gould, OE. Reprogrammable recovery and actuation behaviour of shape-memory polymers. Nat Rev Mater 2019;4:116–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0078-8.Search in Google Scholar

3. Madbouly, SA, Lendlein, A. Shape-memory polymer composites. Adv Polym Sci 2010;226:41–95.10.1007/12_2009_28Search in Google Scholar

4. Vijayan, PP. Mechanical properties of shape-memory polymers, polymer blends, and composites. In: Parameswaranpillai, J, Siengchin, S, George, J, Jose, S, editors. Advanced structured materials. Singapore: Springer; 2019:199–217 pp.10.1007/978-981-13-8574-2_9Search in Google Scholar

5. Tsujimoto, T, Takayama, T, Uyama, H. Biodegradable shape memory polymeric material from epoxidized soybean oil and polycaprolactone. Polymers 2015;7:2165–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7101506.Search in Google Scholar

6. Vinod, A, Sanjay, M, Suchart, S, Jyotishkumar, P. Renewable and sustainable biobased materials: an assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and biocomposites. J Clean Prod 2020;258:120978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120978.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lu, H, Yu, K, Liu, Y, Leng, J. Mechanical and shape-memory behavior of shape-memory polymer composites with hybrid fillers. Polym Int 2010;59:766–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2785.Search in Google Scholar

8. Gu, J, Leng, J, Sun, H, Zeng, H, Cai, Z. Thermomechanical constitutive modeling of fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites based on thermodynamics with internal state variables. Mech Mater 2019;130:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

9. Strzelec, K, Sienkiewicz, N, Szmechtyk, T. Classification of shape-memory polymers, polymer blends and composites. In: Parameswaranpillai, J, Siengchin, S, George, J, Jose, S, editors. Advanced structured materials. Singapore: Springer; 2019:21–52 pp.10.1007/978-981-13-8574-2_2Search in Google Scholar

10. Qi, X, Wang, Y. Novel techniques for the preparation of shape-memory polymers, polymer blends and composites at mirco and nanoscales. In: Parameswaranpillai, J, Siengchin, S, George, J, Jose, S, editors. Advanced structured materials. Singapore: Springer; 2019:53–83 pp.10.1007/978-981-13-8574-2_3Search in Google Scholar

11. Basit, A, L’hostis, G, Durand, B. The recovery properties under load of a shape memory polymer composite material. Mater Werkst 2019;50:1555–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201700117.Search in Google Scholar

12. Liu, J, Tan, CSY, Yu, Z, Li, N, Abell, C, Scherman, OA. Tough supramolecular polymer networks with extreme stretchability and fast room-temperature self-healing. Adv Healthcare Mater 2017;26:1–7.10.1002/adma.201605325Search in Google Scholar

13. Jing, Z, Li, J, Xiao, W, Xu, H, Hong, P, Li, Y. Crystallization, rheology and mechanical properties of the blends of poly(l-lactide) with supramolecular polymers based on poly(d-lactide)–poly(ε-caprolactone-co-δ-valerolactone)–poly(d-lactide) triblock copolymers. RSC Adv 2019;9:26067–79. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra04283k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Ruiz-Rubio, L, Pérez-Álvarez, L, Vilas-Vilela, JL. Biodegradable shape-memory polymers. In: Parameswaranpillai, J, Siengchin, S, George, J, Jose, S, editors. Advanced structured materials. Singapore: Springer; 2019:216–36 pp.10.1007/978-981-13-8574-2_10Search in Google Scholar

15. Haskew, MJ, Hardy, JG. A mini-review of shape-memory polymer-based materials : stimuli-responsive shape-memory polymers. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev 2020;64:425–42. https://doi.org/10.1595/205651319x15754757916993.Search in Google Scholar

16. Buckley, CP, Prisacariu, C, Caraculacu, A. Novel triol-crosslinked polyurethanes and their thermorheological characterization as shape-memory materials. Polymer 2007;48:1388–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.051.Search in Google Scholar

17. Liu, T, Zhou, T, Yao, Y, Zhang, F, Liu, L, Liu, Y, et al.. Stimulus methods of multi-functional shape memory polymer nanocomposites: a review. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2017;100:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.022.Search in Google Scholar

18. Dai, L, Tian, C, Xiao, R. Modeling the thermo-mechanical behavior and constrained recovery performance of cold-programmed amorphous shape-memory polymers. Int J Plast 2020;127:102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.102654.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kai, D, Tan, MJ, Prabhakaran, MP, Chan, QY, Liow, SS, Ramakrishna, S, et al.. Biocompatible electrically conductive nanofibers from inorganic-organic shape memory polymers. Colloids Surf, B 2016;148:557–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Murugan, MS, Rao, S, Chiranjeevi, MC, Revathi, A, Rao, KV, Srihari, S, et al.. Actuation of shape memory polymer composites triggered by electrical resistive heating. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2017;28:2362–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x17689944.Search in Google Scholar

21. Chen, H, Wang, L, Zhou, S. Recent progress in shape memory polymers for biomedical applications. Chin J Polym Sci 2018;36:905–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-018-2118-7.Search in Google Scholar

22. Fang, T, Cao, L, Chen, S, Fang, J, Zhou, J, Fang, L, et al.. Preparation and assembly of five photoresponsive polymers to achieve complex light-induced shape deformations. Mater Des 2018;144:129–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.029.Search in Google Scholar

23. Liu, Y, Chen, H, Yang, G, Zheng, X, Zhou, S. Water-induced shape-memory poly(d,l-lactide)/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 2014;10:101–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Liu, C, Lu, H, Li, G, Hui, D, Fu, Y-Q. A ‘cross-relaxation effects’ model for dynamic exchange of water in amorphous polymer with thermochemical shape memory effect. J Phys D Appl Phys 2019;52:345305. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab2860.Search in Google Scholar

25. Yang, J, Zheng, Y, Sheng, L, Chen, H, Zhao, L, Yu, W, et al.. Water induced shape memory and healing effects by introducing carboxymethyl cellulose sodium into poly(vinyl alcohol). Ind Eng Chem Res 2018;57:15056–3. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03230.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zare, M, Prabhakaran, MP, Parvin, N, Ramakrishna, S. Thermally-induced two-way shape memory polymers: mechanisms, structures, and applications. Chem Eng J 2019;374:706–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.167.Search in Google Scholar

27. Wu, Y, Hu, J, Zhang, C, Han, J, Wang, Y, Kumar, B. A facile approach to UV/heat dual-responsive triple shape memory polymer. J Mater Chem 2014;1:1–4.10.1039/C4TA04881DSearch in Google Scholar

28. Tian, M, Gao, W, Hu, J, Xu, X, Ning, N, Yu, B, et al.. Multidirectional triple-shape-memory polymer by tunable cross-linking and crystallization. ACS Appl Mater Interfac 2020;12:6426–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19448.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Živković, I, Fragassa, C, Pavlović, A, Brugo, T. Influence of moisture absorption on the impact properties of flax, basalt and hybrid flax/basalt fiber reinforced green composites. Compos B Eng 2017;111:148–64.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.018Search in Google Scholar

30. Feng, X, Zhang, G, Zhuo, S, Jiang, H, Shi, J, Li, F, et al.. Dual responsive shape memory polymer/clay nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2016;129:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.008.Search in Google Scholar

31. Zhang, H, Wang, D, Wu, N, Li, C, Zhu, C, Zhao, N, et al.. Recyclable, self-healing, thermadapt triple-shape memory polymers based on dual dynamic bonds. ACS Appl Mater Interfac 2020;12:9833–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b22613.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Wang, G, Yu, D, Kelkar, AD, Zhang, L. Electrospun nanofiber: emerging reinforcing filler in polymer matrix composite materials. Prog Polym Sci 2017;75:73–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

33. Xu, B, Huang, WM, Pei, YT, Chen, ZG, Kraft, A, Reuben, R, et al.. Mechanical properties of attapulgite clay reinforced polyurethane shape-memory nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 2009;45:1904–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

34. Liang, W, Wang, R, Wang, C, Jia, J, Sun, H, Zhang, J, et al.. Facile preparation of attapulgite‐based aerogels with excellent flame retardancy and better thermal insulation properties. J Appl Polym Sci 2019;136:47849. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47849.Search in Google Scholar

35. Frackowiak, S, Ludwiczak, J, Leluk, K. Man-made and natural fibres as a reinforcement in fully biodegradable polymer composites: a concise study. J Polym Environ 2018;26:4360–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1301-9.Search in Google Scholar

36. Ferreira, FV, Pinheiro, IF, Mariano, M, Cividanes, LS, Costa, JC, Nascimento, NR, et al.. Environmentally friendly polymer composites based on PBAT reinforced with natural fibers from the amazon forest. Polym Compos 2019;40:3351–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25196.Search in Google Scholar

37. Terzopoulou, ZN, Papageorgiou, GZ, Papadopoulou, E, Athanassiadou, E, Reinders, M, Bikiaris, DN. Development and study of fully biodegradable composite materials based on poly(butylene succinate) and hemp fibers or hemp shives. Polym Compos 2016;37:407–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23194.Search in Google Scholar

38. Krishnasamy, S, Thiagamani, SM, Kumar, CM, Nagarajan, R, Shahroze, RM, Siengchin, S, et al.. Recent advances in thermal properties of hybrid cellulosic fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;141:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.231.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Meredith, J, Coles, SR, Powe, R, Collings, E, Cozien-Cazuc, S, Weager, B, et al.. On the static and dynamic properties of flax and Cordenka epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 2013;80:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

40. Murali, B, Mohan, DC. Chemical treatment on Hemp/polymer composites. J Chem Pharmaceut Res 2014;6:419–23.Search in Google Scholar

41. Tanasă, F, Zănoagă, M, Teacă, CA, Nechifor, M, Shahzad, A. Modified hemp fibers intended for fiber‐reinforced polymer composites used in structural applications—a review. I. Methods of modification. Polym Compos 2020;41:5–31.10.1002/pc.25354Search in Google Scholar

42. Abida, M, Gehring, F, Mars, J, Vivet, A, Dammak, F, Haddar, M. A viscoelastic–viscoplastic model with hygromechanical coupling for flax fibre reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 2020;189:108018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108018.Search in Google Scholar

43. Dziadek, M, Stodolak-Zych, E, Cholewa-Kowalska, K. Biodegradable ceramic-polymer composites for biomedical applications: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 2017;71:1175–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Rizal, S, Fizree, HM, Hossain, MS, Gopakumar, DA, Ni, EC, Khalil, HA. The role of silica-containing agro-industrial waste as reinforcement on physicochemical and thermal properties of polymer composites. Heliyon 2020;6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03550.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Li, F, Scarpa, F, Lan, X, Liu, L, Liu, Y, Leng, J. Bending shape recovery of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced epoxy-based shape memory polymer composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2019;116:169–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.037.Search in Google Scholar

46. Li, F, Leng, J, Liu, Y, Remillat, C, Scarpa, F. Temperature dependence of elastic constants in unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites. Mech Mater 2020;148:103518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103518.Search in Google Scholar

47. Ren, Z, Liu, L, Liu, Y, Leng, J. Damage and failure in carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy filament-wound shape memory polymer composite tubes under compression loading. Polym Test 2020;85:106387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106387.Search in Google Scholar

48. Park, J, Park, SY, Lee, D, Song, YS. Shape memory polymer composites embedded with hybrid ceramic microparticles. Smart Mater Struct 2020;29:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ab5e53.Search in Google Scholar

49. Jäger, F, Mohn, D, Attin, T, Tauböck, TT. Polymerization and shrinkage stress formation of experimental resin composites doped with nano-vs. micron-sized bioactive glasses. Dent Mater J 2020;40:110–5.10.4012/dmj.2019-382Search in Google Scholar

50. Nazarnezhad, S, Baino, F, Kim, HW, Webster, TJ, Kargozar, S. Electrospun nanofibers for improved angiogenesis: promises for tissue engineering applications. Nanomaterials 2020;10:1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081609.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Fu, S, Yu, B, Tang, W, Fan, M, Chen, F, Fu, Q. Mechanical properties of polypropylene composites reinforced by hydrolyzed and microfibrillated Kevlar fibers. Compos Sci Technol 2018;163:141–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.020.Search in Google Scholar

52. Vasudevan, A, Senthil Kumaran, S, Naresh, K, Velmurugan, R. Layer-wise damage prediction in carbon/Kevlar/S-glass/E-glass fibre reinforced epoxy hybrid composites under low-velocity impact loading using advanced 3D computed tomography. Int J Crashworthiness 2020;25:9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2018.1511234.Search in Google Scholar

53. Sun, X, Sun, H, Li, H, Peng, H. Developing polymer composite materials: carbon nanotubes or graphene? Adv Mater 2013;25:5153–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301926.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Wang, E, Dong, Y, Islam, MZ, Yu, L, Liu, F, Chen, S, et al.. Effect of graphene oxide-carbon nanotube hybrid filler on the mechanical property and thermal response speed of shape memory epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 2019;169:209–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.022.Search in Google Scholar

55. Blokhin, AN, Dyachkova, TP, Maksimkin, AV, Stolyarov, RA, Suhorukov, AK, Burmistrov, IN, et al.. Polymer composites based on epoxy resin with added carbon nanotubes. Fullerenes, Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct 2020;28:45–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383x.2019.1671364.Search in Google Scholar

56. Gao, W, Zhao, N, Yu, T, Xi, J, Mao, A, Yuan, M, et al.. High-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding realized in nacre-mimetic graphene/polymer composite with extremely low graphene loading. Carbon 2020;157:570–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.051.Search in Google Scholar

57. da Luz, FS, del-Río, MT, Nascimento, LF, Pinheiro, WA, Monteiro, SN. Graphene-incorporated natural fiber polymer composites: a first overview. Polymers 2020;12:1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071601.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Arriagada, P, Palza, H, Palma, P, Flores, M, Caviedes, P. Poly(lactic acid) composites based on graphene oxide particles with antibacterial behavior enhanced by electrical stimulus and biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 2017;106:1051–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36307.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Lei, M, Chen, Z, Lu, H, Yu, K. Recent progress in shape memory polymer composites: methods, properties, applications and prospects. Nanotechnol Rev 2019;8:327–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2019-0031.Search in Google Scholar

60. Lan, X, Liu, L, Liu, Y, Leng, J. Thermomechanical and electroactive behavior of a thermosetting styrene-based carbon black shape-memory composite. J Appl Polym Sci 2017;135:45978. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45978.Search in Google Scholar

61. Wong, Y, Kong, J, Widjaja, LK, Venkatraman, SS. Biomedical applications of shape-memory polymers: how practically useful are they? Sci China Chem 2014;57:476–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-013-5061-z.Search in Google Scholar

62. Omid, SO, Goudarzi, Z, Kangarshahi, LM, Mokhtarzade, A, Bahrami, F. Self-expanding stents based on shape memory alloys and shape memory polymers. J Compos Compd 2020;2:92–8.10.29252/jcc.2.2.5Search in Google Scholar

63. Ecker, M, Danda, V, Shoffstall, AJ, Mahmood, SF, Joshi-Imre, A, Frewin, CL, et al.. Sterilization of thiol-ene/acrylate based shape memory polymers for biomedical applications. Macromol Mater Eng 2016;302:1600331. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600331.Search in Google Scholar

64. Zhao, Y, Zhu, B, Wang, Y, Liu, C, Shen, C. Effect of different sterilization methods on the properties of commercial biodegradable polyesters for single-use, disposable medical devices. Mater Sci Eng C 2019;105:110041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

65. Peterson, GI, Dobrynin, AV, Becker, ML. Biodegradable shape memory polymers in medicine. Adv Healthcare Mater 2007;6:1–16.10.1002/adhm.201700694Search in Google Scholar

66. Xiao, R, Huang, WM. Heating/solvent responsive shape‐memory polymers for implant biomedical devices in minimally invasive surgery: current status and challenge. Macromol Biosci 2020;20:2000108. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Wang, K, Stradman, S, Zhu, XX. A mini review: shape memory polymers for biomedical applications. Front Chem Sci Eng 2017;11:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1632-4.Search in Google Scholar

68. Ramaraju, H, Akman, RE, Safranski, DL, Hollister, SJ. Designing biodegradable shape memory polymers for tissue repair. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:1–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002014.Search in Google Scholar

69. Mao, Q, Hoffmann, O, Yu, K, Lu, F, Lan, G, Dai, F, et al.. Self-contracting oxidized starch/gelatin hydrogel for noninvasive wound closure and wound healing. Mater Des 2020;194:108916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108916.Search in Google Scholar

70. Li, M, Chen, J, Shi, M, Zhang, H, Ma, PX, Guo, B. Electroactive anti-oxidant polyurethane elastomers with shape memory property as non-adherent wound dressing to enhance wound healing. Chem Eng J 2019;375:121999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.121999.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2020-0077).


Published Online: 2021-04-19

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
  4. Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
  5. Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
  6. Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
  7. Cellulose-based polymers
  8. Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
  9. Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
  10. Personalized and targeted therapies
  11. Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
  12. Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
  13. Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
  14. Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
  15. Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
  16. Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
  17. Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
  18. Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
  19. Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
  20. Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
  21. Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
  22. A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
  23. Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
  24. An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
  25. Fragment based drug design
  26. Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
  27. Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
  28. Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
  29. Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
  30. Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
  31. Membrane applications in the food industry
  32. Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
  33. Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
  34. Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
  35. Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
  36. Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
  37. Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2020-0077/html
Scroll to top button