Article Open Access

Minimal-time problems for linear control systems on homogeneous spaces of low-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie groups

  • , EMAIL logo , and
Published/Copyright: October 24, 2023

Abstract

In this article, we are concerned with minimal-time optimal problems for the class of controllable linear control system on low-dimensional nonnilpotent solvable Lie groups and their homogeneous spaces.

MSC 2010: 93C05; 93B29

1 Introduction

The linear control system (LCS) notion was first introduced on matrix groups in [1]. Then, a general definition on arbitrary Lie group was given in [2]. In this article, we are concerned with minimal-time optimal problems for the class of controllable LCS, on homogeneous spaces of low-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie groups.

Our specific contributions are twofold. First, we show how it is possible to solve concrete problems by using abstract mathematics: in our case, how to connect two states on a bi-dimensional cylinder through a given dynamics. The analysis involves Lie theory, dynamical systems, and control theory. On the other hand, we challenge the readers to work out similar problems in three-dimensional.

Minimal-time problems are a particular branch of mathematical optimization. It has applications in many different situations. For instance, connecting two states at the minimum time is one of the fundamental issues in any kind of geometry, i.e., the calculus of geodesics. Therefore, the controllability property is essential to face this kind of problem. Precisely, a control system is said to be controllable if any two arbitrary states can be connected through a solution of the systems in nonnegative time. A more realistic point of view comes from the notion of control sets, which are the subsets of the manifold where controllability holds at its interiors. The class of systems in our study is controllable, so the optimal problem to work out makes sense. On the other hand, homogeneous spaces represent the concrete real manifolds. In fact, they form a family of differentiable manifolds of particular importance in mathematics and physics. In fact, planes, spheres, cylinders, torus, hyperbolic planes, and others are classical examples of two-dimensional manifolds that can be seen as homogeneous spaces.[1] More generally, the sphere S n S O ( n + 1 ) S O ( n ) is a homogeneous space of the special rotational group. The flat Euclidean, projective, affine, Grassmannian, and hyperbolic spaces, are also examples of homogeneous spaces. On the other hand, the LCS class on a Lie group G generalizes the well-known class of LCS on Euclidean spaces [3,4]. And it is worth mentioning that due to the equivalence theorem of Jouan [5], any affine control system on a differentiable manifold, which dynamics generate a finite dimensional Lie algebra, it is equivalent to a LCS on homogeneous spaces of the corresponding Lie group. Equivalent systems share the main aspect of their dynamics. Therefore, it is relevant to classify LCSs on homogeneous spaces from all the possible aspects of the control theory, namely, controllability, control sets (maximal regions where the controllability property holds), its topological algebraic properties, and optimality.

The structure of this article is as follows: first, we explain in detail the notion of LCS on any arbitrarily connected Lie group and their homogeneous spaces. We establish the Pontryagin maximum principle (PMP) for this class of control systems, as appears in [6]. Next, we review the recent results of minimal-time problems on a horizontal cylinder realized as a homogeneous space of the solvable Lie group of two-dimensional, [7]. By applying the PMP, we show how to build on the cylinder an optimal solution, transferring among all the admissible curves of the system, each initial state to any arbitrarily desired final state, at the minimum time. In this case, we explicitly show the system in coordinates, the Hamiltonian functions, the associated Hamiltonian equations, and how to use the PMP, to build an appropriate optimal control in order to effectively compute the optimal solution. Furthermore, for the five categories of solvable Lie algebras of three-dimensional, we describe in detail the corresponding groups, the LCSs that satisfy the Lie algebra rank condition (LARC), and the controllability property in any case, as described in [8].

By following the ideas developed for two-dimensional groups, we propose the readers a very interesting challenge: To study minimal-time problems for linear control systems on the homogeneous spaces of nonnilpotent, solvable Lie groups of three-dimensional. Furthermore, the scenario is open to research the same kind of problems on nilpotent, solvable, and semi-simple Lie groups of arbitrary finite dimension.

Finally, for general facts about Lie theory, we suggest [912]. For control systems, we refer to [3,1315]. And for applications, we mention [3,14,16].

2 Two special dynamics on a Lie group G

In this article, we deal with LCS, defined on a connected Lie group and their homogeneous spaces. Its dynamics depends on two kinds of differential equations on G , left-invariant and linear vector fields on the group. In this section, we explain with some details the basic fact about these dynamics.

Let G be a Lie group with identity element e and g be denoted by its Lie algebra. Remind that a vector field X on G is defined by the selection of a tangent vector X g inside the tangent space T g G of G at g , for any g G A left-invariant vector field X on G is determined first by a specific vector X e T e G and then by the group translations. Precisely, let g G and consider the diffeomorphism L g : G G , defined by L g ( h ) = g h , and its derivative ( d L g ) e : T e G T g G . By definition, the value of the left-invariant vector field X on g is given by:

X g = ( d L g ) e ( X e ) T g G .

The vector space g of all left-invariant vector fields of G is a Lie algebra isomorphic to T e G [10]. In fact,

(1) X , Y g [ X , Y ] g ,

and the bilinear map [ , ] : g × g g has two properties. It is skew symmetric, which means that for any X , Y g , [ X , Y ] = [ Y , X ] . And satisfy the Jacobi identity, i.e., for any X , Y , Z g ,

(2) [ X , [ Y , Z ] ] + [ Z , [ X , Y ] ] + [ Y , [ Z , X ] ] = 0 .

As usual, to compute the vector field X at any point X g , we consider the derivative of its flows { X t : t R } . On a matrix Lie group, the situation is favorable, since X t ( g ) = g exp ( t X ) . In other words,

(3) X g = d d t t = 0 X t ( g ) .

Also, the bracket between two matrices [ X , Y ] = X Y Y X is the commutator, and the exponential of X g is given by the series:

(4) exp ( t X ) = n = 0 1 n ! X n , where X 0 = I ,

is the identity matrix.

On the other hand, a vector field X is called a linear vector field if its flow { X t : t R } is a one-parameter group of A u t ( G ) , the group of G -automorphisms [2]. Precisely,

(5) X t ( g h ) = X t ( g ) X t ( h ) , for all t R , g , h G .

One of the nicest properties of linear vector fields is the possibility to associate with X a g -derivation, i.e., a linear transformation on D : g g , which respects the Leibnitz rule, i.e.,

D [ X , Y ] = [ D X , Y ] + [ X , D Y ] , for all X , Y g .

The relationship between X and D is given by the following identities (see [11]):

(6) X t ( exp Y ) = exp ( e t D Y ) , for all Y g .

Since we consider connected groups, any element g G is a finite product of exponential members of g . Thus, the computation of X follows applying the homomorphism property of its flow. A special situation happens when the associated derivation is inner. In this case, there exists an invariant vector field Y such that D ( ) = [ , Y ] . Therefore, D is easily computed using the following formula:

(7) D = a d ( Y ) X g = Y ( g ) + ( d i ) g Y ( g ) , for all g G ,

where

i : G G , i ( g ) = g 1 , is the inversion map.

We finish this section introducing the definition of some special Lie algebras [12]. A Lie algebra g is said to be Abelian, if a d 1 = [ g , g ] = 0 , i.e.,

(8) X , Y g [ X , Y ] = 0 .

g is called nilpotent, if

(9) k 1 : a d 1 = [ g , g ] a d k + 1 = [ a d k , g ] = 0 .

And, g its say to be solvable, if

(10) k 1 : a d 1 a d ( k ) = [ a d ( k 1 ) , a d ( k 1 ) ] = 0 .

Here, for any natural number j 2 , a d ( j ) = [ a d ( j 1 ) , a d ( j 1 ) ] . A Lie group is called Abelian, nilpotent, or solvable, if its Lie algebra has the corresponding property, respectively.

3 LCSs on Lie groups and their homogeneous spaces

Let G be a connected Lie group with Lie algebra g . A LCS Σ G on G is defined by the family of differential equations:

Σ G : g ( t ) = X ( g ( t ) ) + Σ m j = 1 u j ( t ) Y j ( g ( t ) ) , with g ( t ) G and u = ( u 1 , , u m ) U .

Here, the set U is the class of admissible control functions. It reads as

U = { u : R Ω R m ; u is locally integrable } ,

with Ω R m a closed and convex subset of R m with 0 int Ω . The vector field X is linear, and for any j = 1 , , m , the vector field Y j is left-invariant. The system Σ G is called unbounded if Ω = R m and bounded if Ω is compact.

Given any initial condition g G and a control u U , there exists a solution φ ( g , u , t ) of Σ G . It is easy to prove that

φ ( g , u , t ) = X t ( g ) φ ( e , u , t ) ,

where φ ( e , u , t ) is the solution of the system with the same control u through the identity element e , [18].

The reachable set from g G is by definition the set

(11) A ( g ) = { φ ( g , u , t ) : t 0 , u U } ,

i.e., A ( g ) is the set of states of G that can be reached from the initial state g , in nonnegative time, through all the strategies induced by the admissible controls.

The system Σ G is called controllable if for any two arbitrary states g and h in G , there exists an admissible control function u U and a positive time T such that φ ( g , u , T ) = h . In other words, if the system is controllable, it turns out that

(12) A ( g ) = G , for all g G .

Recall that the system satisfies the LARC, if the Lie algebra generated by the vector fields of the system coincides with g , i.e.,

span A { X , Y 1 , , Y m } = g .

Moreover, the system satisfies the ad-rank condition (ADRC), if

s p a n { D k ( Y j ) : j = 1 , , m , k 0 } = g .

Of course, ADRC implies LARC. And due to the orbit theorem [19], we can assume, without loss of generality, that our system satisfies LARC.

We denote by Δ the Lie algebra generated by the control vectors, i.e.,

Δ = s p a n A { Y 1 , , Y m } .

The control system Σ G is a natural extension of the classical LCS Σ R n from the Abelian group R n to a generally connected Lie group G . In the R n case, both the LARC and ADRC are the same and correspond to the very well-known Kalman rank condition [4]. We remark that in both cases, the solution starting on an arbitrary state of G just depends on the solution starting on the identity element of the group.

Next, we show how to extend this class of control systems into a more general setup, the homogeneous spaces of the Lie group G . This is relevant because of the Jouan equivalence theorem [5]. And because homogeneous spaces are strongly related to concrete manifolds. Just in two-dimensional, it includes the plane, sphere, cylinder, torus, hyperbolic plane, and others.

Let H G be a closed subgroup of G and H \ G the associated well-defined differential manifold called a homogeneous space of G . Denote by π : G H \ G the canonical projection and by π its derivative.

It is well-known that any left-invariant vector field can be projected to every homogeneous space of G . The same is not true, in general, for a linear vector field X . However, it is possible to prove that π X is a well-defined vector field on H \ G if and only if its flow { X t : t R } let H invariant. Precisely,

(13) X t ( H ) H , for all t R .

In order to define a LCS on a homogeneous space, it is necessary to be sure that the derivation associated with the linear vector field leaves invariant the Lie subalgebra h determined by the closed Lie subgroup H . Precisely,

(14) D h h .

Just observe that the conditions in (13) and (14) are equivalent if the group H is connected.

Let us assume that the drift vector field of a LCS Σ G is projectable on H \ G . Therefore, the projection of the LCS Σ G to the quotient H \ G is an affine control system Σ H \ G on the homogeneous space determined by the drift vector field X ˜ , the left-invariant vector fields Y j ˜ , j = 1 , , m , and the class of admissible control U , defined as follows.

First, X ˜ and Y j ˜ are the vector fields on H \ G satisfying

(15) π X = X ˜ , and π Y j = Y j ˜ , j = 1 , , m ,

and the LCS Σ H \ G on H \ G reads as:

Σ H \ G : z ˙ ( t ) = X ˜ ( z ( t ) ) + j = 1 m u j ( t ) Y j ˜ ( z ( t ) ) , where z ( t ) H \ G and u U .

We note that the number of control vector fields of the new systems can be reduced. In fact, Y j h Y j ˜ = 0 .

4 PMP

In order to solve minimal-time problems for LCSs on homogeneous spaces, we introduce the PMP, [20], which gives necessary condition for the existence of an optimal control function transferring an initial state to a desired final state at minimum time ([3,16] for applications).

Let M be a differential manifold with co-tangent bundle T M = x M T x M . Here, T x M is the dual of the tangent vector space T x M of M at x .

Consider the affine control system Σ M on M as follows:

(16) Σ M : x ( t ) = f 0 ( x ( t ) ) + j = 1 m u j ( t ) f j ( x ( t ) ) ,

where, f 0 , f 1 , , f m are the smooth vector fields on M , and u U , as previously.

The Σ M -Hamiltonian functions are given by:

( λ x ( t ) , x ( t ) , u ( t ) ) = λ x ( t ) , f 0 ( x ( t ) ) + j = 1 m u j ( t ) f j ( x ( t ) ) , where λ x ( t ) T x ( t ) M .

The PMP for Σ M , [20], reads as follows.

Theorem 4.1

Let x ( t ) be a Σ M solution with control u ˜ ( t ) , t [ 0 , T ] , which minimizes the time (among all the admissible Σ M -solutions), to send the initial condition x ( 0 ) to the desired final state x ( T ) . Therefore, there exists a Lipschitzian curve ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) ) T M of M , such that

  • λ ( t ) 0 for all t [ 0 , T ] ;

  • ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) , u ˜ ( t ) ) = max u U ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) , u ) for almost all t [ 0 , T ] ;

  • ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) , u ˜ ( t ) ) 0 for almost all t [ 0 , T ] ;

  • And, ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) ) satisfies the equations

    x ( t ) = λ ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) , u ˜ ( t ) ) = f 0 ( x ( t ) ) + j = 1 m u ˜ j ( t ) f j ( x ( t ) ) , λ ˙ ( t ) = x ( λ ( t ) , x ( t ) , u ˜ ( t ) ) .

In the sequel, we show how the authors in [6,21] adapt the general PMP, for a LCS Σ G on a connected Lie group G .

In this context, the principle can be written in a more favorable way. In fact, the co-tangent bundle T G of G is trivial and isomorphic to the bundle g × G . Here, g denotes the dual of the vector space g .

For u U , the associated Hamiltonian function H u : g × G R reads as:

(17) H u ( t ) ( λ ( t ) , g ( t ) ) = λ ( t ) , F ( g ( t ) ) + j = 1 m λ ( t ) , Y j ( g ( t ) ) , g ( t ) G , t [ 0 , T ] ,

where

λ ( t ) : g R F ( g ( t ) ) = ( d L g ( t ) 1 ) g ( t ) ( X g ( t ) ) and Y j = ( d L g ( t ) ) g ( t ) 1 Y g ( t ) j .

We note that any vector field was translated from g G to the identity e .

Then, they compute the lifting of any vector field of Σ G . It turns out that, the derivations D and a d ( Y j ) = [ Y j , ] are the lifting vector fields from G to T G , of the corresponding dynamic X and Y j , j = 1 , , m , respectively.

Therefore, the Hamiltonian equations in Theorem 1 reads in our case as:

(18) g ˙ ( t ) = X g ( t ) + j = 1 m u ˜ j ( t ) Y j ( g ( t ) ) and λ ˙ ( t ) = λ ( t ) D + j = 1 m u ˜ j ( t ) a d ( Y j ) .

The second relationship is a linear differential equation in g , which gives additional information in order to compute the optimal control.

Remark 4.2

Consider first an unbounded LCS. Since H u is maximum, and the control u can be chosen arbitrarily, we obtain

(19) j = 1 , , m λ , Y j = 0 .

According to the PMP, the curve ( λ ( t ) , g ( t ) ) satisfies

λ ˙ ( t ) , Y j = 0 and λ ( t ) , D Y j + i = 1 m u i [ Y i , Y j ] = 0 , a.e. , j = 1 , , m .

On the other hand, consider the compact set Ω determined by ρ > 0 , as follows : ρ u j ρ , for any j = 1 , , m .

Because the Hamiltonian H u is maximum, it follows that

u j = s i g n λ , Y j ρ , if λ , Y j 0 .

Moreover, if λ , Y j = 0 , t h e c o m p o n e n t u j of u is not determined. However, according to Filippov’s theorem, still there exists minimizers [13].

In order to apply the PMP for LCS on homogeneous spaces, it will be convenient to identify the co-tangent bundle T ( H \ G ) inside the co-tangent bundle T ( G ) . To do that, we follow reference [22].

Let G be a Lie group and H G a closed subgroup. It is well-known that H \ G = { H g : g G } is an analytic differentiable manifold [11]. The co-tangent bundle reads,

T ( H \ G ) = z G T H z ( H \ G ) .

The canonical projection π : G H \ G is defined by π ( z ) = H z . For any z G , the differential of π at z and its transposes is given by:

d π z : T z G T π ( z ) ( H \ G ) ,

( d π z ) : T π ( z ) ( H \ G ) T z G , where ( d π z ) ( α ) = α d π z .

The linear map d π z is onto, therefore its transpose ( d π z ) is an injective linear map. Thus, for each z G , the co-tangent space T H z ( H \ G ) is isomorphic to its image under ( d π z ) . In other words, elements in T H z ( H \ G ) can be viewed as elements in T z G . Precisely,

T H z ( H \ G ) ( d π z ) T H z ( H \ G ) T z G .

5 Minimal time on a two-dimensional cylinder

Let G = a f f ( R ) = R × ρ R be the connected solvable Lie group of two-dimensional. Precisely, the representation ρ is defined by the usual exponential map ρ x = e x , acting as the semi-direct product through the rule:

( x 1 , y 1 ) ( x 2 , y 2 ) = ( x 1 + x 2 , y 1 + e x 1 y 2 ) .

The Lie algebra g of G is the semi-direct product g = R × θ R , with Lie brackets between the vectors ( α 1 , β 1 ) , ( α 2 , β 2 ) g , defined as follows:

[ ( α 1 , β 1 ) , ( α 2 , β 2 ) ] = ( 0 , α 1 β 2 α 2 β 1 ) .

The exponential map exp : g G is explicitly given by the formula:

exp ( a , b ) = ( 0 , b ) , if a = 0 , a , 1 a ( e a 1 ) b , if a 0 .

It turns out that any left-invariant vector field Y g , and any linear vector field X on G read, respectively as,

Y ( x , y ) = ( α , e x β ) and X ( x , y ) = ( 0 , b y + ( e x 1 ) a ) ,

where ( α , β ) , ( a , b ) R 2 .

As we mention, the flow of a linear vector field is a one-parameter group of automorphisms (see [2, Theorem 1]), which, in this case, is given by:

X t ( x , y ) = ( x , y + t ( e x 1 ) a ) , if b = 0 , x , e t b y + 1 b ( e t b 1 ) ( e x 1 ) a , if b 0 .

It turns out that a LCS Σ G on G is defined by the family of ordinary differential equations:

x ˙ = u α y ˙ = b y + ( e x 1 ) a + u e x β , where u Ω , ( Σ S )

As shown in [23, Section 2.2] Σ G satisfies L A R C if and only if α ( a α + b β ) 0 .

In order to build an LCS on a homogeneous space, we consider the closed subgroup H = { 0 } × Z , which is invariant by the drift vector field if and only if b = 0 .

For this case, the projected LCS on the horizontal cylinder C H H \ G is controllable and given by:

(20) z ˙ = α u [ w ˙ ] = a ( e z 1 ) + u β e z , u Ω .

In addition, through the map f : C H C H defined by:

(21) f ( z , [ w ] ) = z , w β α e z , α 0 ,

it is possible to obtain an equivalent projected system. In fact, the diffeomorphism f conjugates the systems

(22) z ˙ = α u [ w ˙ ] = a ( e z 1 ) + u β e z and z ˙ = α u [ w ˙ ] = a ( e z 1 ) , u Ω .

The solutions of Σ C H starting at P = ( x , [ y ] ) for u Ω are given by:

ϕ ( t , P , u ) = ( x , [ y + t a ( e x 1 ) ] ) , if u = 0 ,

and

(23) ϕ ( t , P , u ) = z + u t , y + a u e x + u t a t , if u 0 .

Since

lim t + ϕ 1 ( t , P , ± ρ ) = lim t + ( x ± ρ t ) = ± ρ + ,

we obtain that Σ C H is controllable.

As a consequence, one can use the PMP to analyze minimal-time trajectories between any two given points of the horizontal cylinder.

It turns out that

T P C H = ( R 2 ) R 2 .

Therefore, any element λ T P C H is identified with a vector of R 2 .

Writing

f ( P ) = ( u , a ( e x 1 ) ) and λ = ( p , q ) T P C H ,

we obtain that the Hamiltonian of Σ C H , for the minimal-time problem, is given by:

H u ( P , λ ) = f ( P ) , λ = ( u , a ( e x 1 ) ) , ( p , q ) = p u + q a ( e x 1 ) .

Moreover, the Hamiltonian equations of Σ C H are

(24) p ˙ = a q e x , q ˙ = 0 .

Therefore, a control u U associated with a minimal-time trajectory t ϕ ( t , P 0 , u ) connecting P 0 and P 1 gives rise to a curve

λ ( t ) = ( p ( t ) , q ( t ) ) T ϕ ( t , P 0 , u ) C H , with λ ( t ) 0 a.e .

From the fact that λ ( t ) satisfies the Hamiltonian equations, we obtain that

q ˙ = 0 q ( t ) q 0 and so p ˙ ( t ) = a q 0 e x ( t ) ,

showing that

p ( t ) p 0 0 when q 0 = 0 and p ˙ ( t ) 0 when q 0 0 .

Therefore, the function p ( t ) changes sign at most one time. On the other hand, the fact that

(25) H u ( t ) ϕ ( t , P 0 , u , λ ( t ) ) = max u Ω { q ( t ) a ( e x ( t ) 1 ) + u p ( t ) } ,

implies that u ( t ) { ρ , ρ } a.e. and that ω changes from ρ to ρ (or vice-versa) at most one time.

6 LCSs on solvable Lie groups of three-dimensional

In this section, we show the five classes of three-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie algebras g and their associated Lie groups G , as they appear in [24]. At any case, we show explicitly the shape of each left-invariant vector field, the linear vector fields, and all possible LCSs on G , which satisfies the LARC. We finish the section with a characterization of the controllability property of each class of system.

6.1 Lie algebras and their associated Lie groups

A general Lie algebra of three-dimensional written in the canonical basis reads,

g = s p a n { X = ( 1 , 0 ) , Y = ( 0 , e 1 ) , Z = ( 0 , e 2 ) } ,

where { e 1 , e 2 } is the canonical basis of R 2 . The classification of three-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie algebras comes from the semi-direct product g θ = R × θ R 2 , where θ is a 2 × 2 matrix.

Any class depends on the representation θ , through the Lie bracket formula,

[ ( z 1 , v 1 ) , ( z 2 , v 2 ) ] = ( 0 , z 1 θ v 2 z 2 θ v 1 ) g .

The three-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie algebras with the corresponding Lie brackets rules are given as follows:

(26) s 2 : θ = 0 0 0 1 , [ X , Z ] = Z , [ X , Y ] = 0 .

(27) s 3 : θ = 1 1 0 1 , [ X , Y ] = Y , [ X , Z ] = Y + Z .

(28) s 3 , a : θ = 1 0 0 a , a R , [ X , Y ] = Y , [ X , Z ] = a Z .

(29) s 3 , a : θ = a 1 1 a , a R , [ X , Y ] = a Y + Z , [ X , Y ] = Y + a Z .

(30) e : θ = 0 1 1 0 , [ X , Y ] = Z , [ X , Z ] = Y .

The associated simply connected Lie groups are denoted by S 2 , S 3 , S 3 , a , S 3 , a , and E , respectively. These groups are determined by the semi-direct product R × ρ R 2 through the representation ρ t = e t θ .

6.2 Left-invariant and linear vector fields

In the sequel, for any Lie group G mentioned in Section 6.1, we show the shape of each left-invariant and any linear vector field on G .

Let g θ = R × θ R 2 be a solvable nonnilpotent Lie algebra with G θ = R × ρ R 2 . Any left-invariant vector field Y and its corresponding flow is given by:

(31) Y = ( a , w ) g θ , Y t ( v ) = ( a , ρ t w ) .

On the other hand, a linear vector field and its associated flows reads

(32) X t ( 0 ) = ( 0 , Λ t ( ξ ) ) , X t ( v ) = ( 0 , D v + Λ t ( ξ ) ) ,

where D is defined through the formula D ( 0 , v ) = ( 0 , D v ) , and

Λ t = ( ρ t 1 ) θ 1 det ( θ ) 0 t 0 0 e t 1 det ( θ ) = 0 . .

6.3 Associated LCSs

Let Σ G be a LCS as in Section 3, on a connected nonnilpotent solvable Lie group G of three-dimensional. In [8], it is shown that if Σ G satisfies the LARC then Σ G reads as one of the following possibilities:

With one control,

g ˙ = X ( g ) + u Y 1 ( g ) , where Y 1 = ( 1 , 0 ) .

With two controls,

(33) g ˙ = X ( g ) + u 1 Y 1 ( g ) + u 2 Y 2 ( g ) , where Y 1 = ( 1 , 0 ) , Y 2 = ( 0 , w ) , w R 2 \ { 0 } .

6.4 Controllability property

Finally, we mention a characterization of the controllability property of any LCS Σ G which satisfies L A R C . First, we need to mention a g -decomposition induced by the derivation D associated with the drift X .

The dynamic behavior of Σ G strongly depends on the spectrum of D . Given an eigenvalue α S p e c ( D ) , the generalized α -eigenspaces induced by D reads

g α = { Y g : ( D α I d ) n Y = 0 , for some n 1 } .

It follows that [ g α , g β ] g α + β if α + β S p e c ( D ) and 0 otherwise.

Therefore, g decomposes as g = g + g 0 g , as follows:

(34) g + = Re ( α ) > 0 g α , g 0 = Re ( α ) = 0 g α , g = Re ( α ) < 0 g α .

Now, we are ready to inform about the controllability property of any LCS on any three dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie group. As before, all of them satisfy the LARC.

Theorem 6.1

[8] Let Σ G : g ˙ = X ( g ) + u Y 1 ( g ) with Y 1 = ( 1 , 0 ) . Then, for

  1. G = S 2 : Σ G is controllable g 0 a f f ( R ) ,

  2. G = E or S 3 : Σ G is controllable g = g 0 and D 0 ,

  3. G = S 3 , a : Σ G is controllable a = 1 and D has a pair of complex eigenvalues,

  4. G = S 3 , a : Σ G is controllable.

On the other hand, for the case of two control vectors,

Theorem 6.2

[8] Let Σ G : g ˙ = X ( g ) + u 1 Y 1 ( g ) + u 2 Y 2 ( g ) , where Y 1 = ( 1 , 0 ) and Y 2 = ( 0 , w ) , for some nonzero w R 2 . Then, for

  1. G = S 2 : Σ G is controllable dim g 0 > 1 or dim g 0 = 1 and Δ a f f ( R ) ,

  2. G = E , or S 3 , λ : Σ G is controllable,

  3. G = S 3 : Σ G is controllable g = g 0 ,

  4. G = S 3 , λ : Σ G is controllable ker D Δ or D has a pair of complex eigenvalues.

7 Minimal-time problem challenges

In this section, we invite to the readers search for time optimal linear problems for the class of LCSs on Lie groups with three-dimensional and their homogeneous spaces.

Furthermore, Chapters 2, 3, and 4 give information for any LCS on a connected Lie group of arbitrary dimension, and their homogeneous spaces. Thus, the challenges also include the search for time optimal problem of linear control system on any of Lie group and their homogeneous spaces for nilpotent, solvable, and semi-simple groups of arbitrary finite dimension.

Given a Lie group G with Lie algebra g , to face this kind of research, it is necessary to consider the following algorithm:

Compute:

  1. The left-invariant vector fields Y of G ,

  2. The linear vector fields X of G and its associated derivations D ,

  3. The LCSs Σ G on G ,

  4. The systems Σ G with u U , which satisfy L A R C ,

  5. The closed subgroups H of G ,

  6. The homogeneous spaces H \ G ,

  7. The closed subgroups of G that are invariant by the flow { X t : t R } of X ,

  8. The projected homogeneous system Σ H \ G ,

  9. The controllability property of Σ H \ G .

The minimal-time problem reads as follows: “given an initial state z 0 H \ G and a desired final state z 1 H \ G , find a control u ˜ U , such that the associated solution φ ( z 0 , u ˜ , t ) satisfies

(35) φ ( z 0 , u ˜ , t z 0 ) = z 1 ,

and t z 0 minimizes the time among all the admissible trajectories φ ( z 0 , u , ) , with u U

In order to build an optimal control, it is necessary to apply the PMP, both for the unrestricted and for the restricted case. For that, we have Remark 2.

In the case of three-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie group, we already have worked out the steps 1, 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, Theorems 4 and 5 complete the step 9 for H = { e } .

8 Conclusion

In this article, a minimal-time optimal problem for the class of controllable LCS on low-dimensional nonnilpotent solvable Lie groups and their homogeneous spaces is solved. As a consequence, one can use the PMP to analyze minimal-time trajectories between any two given points of the projected LCSs on the horizontal cylinder. Furthermore, in Theorem 4, we state the controllability property of LCSs on solvable Lie groups of three-dimensional. With this information, we invite the reader to search for optimal problems in these groups and their homogeneous spaces.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, UNSA, Arequipa, Perú. This article was supported by the Research Project under the Contract IBA-IB-04-2020-UNSA.

  1. Funding information: Maria Torreblanca – Supported by Research Project under the Contract IBA-IB-04-2020-UNSA.

  2. Author contributions: All authors participated in conceptualization, research, and methodology of the article. Maria Torreblanca involved in Writing original draft preparation, review, and editing.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] L. Markus, Controllability of multi-trajectories on Lie groups, in: D. Rand and L. S. Young (eds.), Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol 898. Springer, Berlin, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0091918. 10.1007/BFb0091918Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. Ayala and J. Tirao, Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability, in: G. Ferreyra, R. Gardner, H. Hermes, and H. Sussmann (Eds.), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 64, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/064/1654529. 10.1090/pspum/064/1654529Search in Google Scholar

[3] V. Jurdjevic, Geometric Control Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997. 10.1017/CBO9780511530036Search in Google Scholar

[4] W. M. Whonam, Linear Multivariable Control: A Geometric Approach, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

[5] P. Jouan, Equivalence of control systems with linear systems on lie groups and homogeneous spaces, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 16 (2010), no. 4, 956–973, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2009027. 10.1051/cocv/2009027Search in Google Scholar

[6] V. Ayala, P. Jouan, M. Torreblanca, and G. Zsigmond, Time optimal control for linear systems on Lie groups, Systems Control Lett. 153 (2021), 104956, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2021.104956. 10.1016/j.sysconle.2021.104956Search in Google Scholar

[7] V. Ayala, A. DaSilva, and M. Torreblanca, Minimal time of a linear control system on a solvable 2-dimensional Lie group, arXiv:2304.12754, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.12754.Search in Google Scholar

[8] V. Ayala and A. Da Silva, On the characterization of the controllability property for linear control systems on nonnilpotent, solvable three-dimensional Lie groups, J. Differential Equations 266 (2019), no. 12, 8233–8257, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.12.027. 10.1016/j.jde.2018.12.027Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Helgason, Differential Geometry, Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces, Academic Press, New York, 1978. Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. S. Varadarajan, Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Their Representations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1126-6Search in Google Scholar

[11] F. W. Warner, Foundation of Differential Manifolds and Lie Groups, Graduate Text in Mathematics, Springer, Philadelphia, 1971. Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. A. B. San Martin, Algebras de Lie, Unicamp, Brasil, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. A. Agrachev and Y. L. Sachkov, Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. 10.1007/978-3-662-06404-7Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. W. Brockett, Finite Dimensional Linear Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1970. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Y. L. Sachkov, Controllability of invariant control systems on solvable Lie groups, IFAC Proc. Vol. 29 (1996), 2209–2213, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)58000-3. 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)58000-3Search in Google Scholar

[16] U. Ledzewicz and H. Schättler, Optimal controls for a two compartment model for cancer chemotherapy, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 114 (2002), 609–637, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016027113579. 10.1023/A:1016027113579Search in Google Scholar

[17] B. Komrakov, A. Churyumov, and B. Doubrov, Two-Dimensional Homogeneous Spaces, Matematisk Institutt, Oslo, 1993. Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Da Silva, Controllability of linear systems on solvable Lie groups, SIAM J. Control Optim. 54 (2016), no. 1, 372–390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/140998342. 10.1137/140998342Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. Sussmann, Orbits of families of vector fields and integrability of distributions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 180 (1973), 171–188, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1973-0321133-2. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1973-0321133-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] L. S. Pontriagin, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

[21] V. Ayala and P. Jouan, Almost Riemannian structures and linear control systems on Lie groups, SIAM J. Control Optim. 54 (2016), no. 5, 2919–2947, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1038372. 10.1137/15M1038372Search in Google Scholar

[22] V. Ayala, J. C. Rodríguez, and L. A. B. San Martin, Optimality on homogeneous spaces, and the angle system associated with a bilinear control system, SIAM J. Control Optim. 48 (2009), no. 4, 2051–2870, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/080736867. 10.1137/080736867Search in Google Scholar

[23] V. Ayala and A. Da Silva, The control set of a linear control system on the two dimensional Lie group, J. Differential Equations 268 (2020), no. 11, 6683–6701, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.054. 10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.054Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. L. Onishchik and E. B. Vinberg, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras III, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1994. 10.1007/978-3-662-03066-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-05
Revised: 2023-08-25
Accepted: 2023-08-27
Published Online: 2023-10-24

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue on Future Directions of Further Developments in Mathematics
  2. What will the mathematics of tomorrow look like?
  3. On H 2-solutions for a Camassa-Holm type equation
  4. Classical solutions to Cauchy problems for parabolic–elliptic systems of Keller-Segel type
  5. Control of multi-agent systems: Results, open problems, and applications
  6. Logical perspectives on the foundations of probability
  7. Subharmonic solutions for a class of predator-prey models with degenerate weights in periodic environments
  8. A non-smooth Brezis-Oswald uniqueness result
  9. Luenberger compensator theory for heat-Kelvin-Voigt-damped-structure interaction models with interface/boundary feedback controls
  10. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part II)
  11. Positive solution for a nonlocal problem with strong singular nonlinearity
  12. Analysis of solutions for the fractional differential equation with Hadamard-type
  13. Hilfer proportional nonlocal fractional integro-multipoint boundary value problems
  14. A comprehensive review on fractional-order optimal control problem and its solution
  15. The θ-derivative as unifying framework of a class of derivatives
  16. Review Articles
  17. On the use of L-functionals in regression models
  18. Minimal-time problems for linear control systems on homogeneous spaces of low-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie groups
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a new p(x)-Kirchhoff problem with variable exponents
  21. An extension of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for a power of a convex function
  22. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a fourth-order differential system with instantaneous and non-instantaneous impulses
  23. Relay fusion frames in Banach spaces
  24. Refined ratio monotonicity of the coordinator polynomials of the root lattice of type Bn
  25. On the uniqueness of limit cycles for generalized Liénard systems
  26. A derivative-Hilbert operator acting on Dirichlet spaces
  27. Scheduling equal-length jobs with arbitrary sizes on uniform parallel batch machines
  28. Solutions to a modified gauged Schrödinger equation with Choquard type nonlinearity
  29. A symbolic approach to multiple Hurwitz zeta values at non-positive integers
  30. Some results on the value distribution of differential polynomials
  31. Lucas non-Wieferich primes in arithmetic progressions and the abc conjecture
  32. Scattering properties of Sturm-Liouville equations with sign-alternating weight and transmission condition at turning point
  33. Some results for a p(x)-Kirchhoff type variation-inequality problems in non-divergence form
  34. Homotopy cartesian squares in extriangulated categories
  35. A unified perspective on some autocorrelation measures in different fields: A note
  36. Total Roman domination on the digraphs
  37. Well-posedness for bilevel vector equilibrium problems with variable domination structures
  38. Binet's second formula, Hermite's generalization, and two related identities
  39. Non-solid cone b-metric spaces over Banach algebras and fixed point results of contractions with vector-valued coefficients
  40. Multidimensional sampling-Kantorovich operators in BV-spaces
  41. A self-adaptive inertial extragradient method for a class of split pseudomonotone variational inequality problems
  42. Convergence properties for coordinatewise asymptotically negatively associated random vectors in Hilbert space
  43. Relating the super domination and 2-domination numbers in cactus graphs
  44. Compatibility of the method of brackets with classical integration rules
  45. On the inverse Collatz-Sinogowitz irregularity problem
  46. Positive solutions for boundary value problems of a class of second-order differential equation system
  47. Global analysis and control for a vector-borne epidemic model with multi-edge infection on complex networks
  48. Nonexistence of global solutions to Klein-Gordon equations with variable coefficients power-type nonlinearities
  49. On 2r-ideals in commutative rings with zero-divisors
  50. A comparison of some confidence intervals for a binomial proportion based on a shrinkage estimator
  51. The construction of nuclei for normal constituents of Bπ-characters
  52. Weak solution of non-Newtonian polytropic variational inequality in fresh agricultural product supply chain problem
  53. Mean square exponential stability of stochastic function differential equations in the G-framework
  54. Commutators of Hardy-Littlewood operators on p-adic function spaces with variable exponents
  55. Solitons for the coupled matrix nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations and the related Schrödinger flow
  56. The dual index and dual core generalized inverse
  57. Study on Birkhoff orthogonality and symmetry of matrix operators
  58. Uniqueness theorems of the Hahn difference operator of entire function with a Picard exceptional value
  59. Estimates for certain class of rough generalized Marcinkiewicz functions along submanifolds
  60. On semigroups of transformations that preserve a double direction equivalence
  61. Positive solutions for discrete Minkowski curvature systems of the Lane-Emden type
  62. A multigrid discretization scheme based on the shifted inverse iteration for the Steklov eigenvalue problem in inverse scattering
  63. Existence and nonexistence of solutions for elliptic problems with multiple critical exponents
  64. Interpolation inequalities in generalized Orlicz-Sobolev spaces and applications
  65. General Randić indices of a graph and its line graph
  66. On functional reproducing kernels
  67. On the Waring-Goldbach problem for two squares and four cubes
  68. Singular moduli of rth Roots of modular functions
  69. Classification of self-adjoint domains of odd-order differential operators with matrix theory
  70. On the convergence, stability and data dependence results of the JK iteration process in Banach spaces
  71. Hardy spaces associated with some anisotropic mixed-norm Herz spaces and their applications
  72. Remarks on hyponormal Toeplitz operators with nonharmonic symbols
  73. Complete decomposition of the generalized quaternion groups
  74. Injective and coherent endomorphism rings relative to some matrices
  75. Finite spectrum of fourth-order boundary value problems with boundary and transmission conditions dependent on the spectral parameter
  76. Continued fractions related to a group of linear fractional transformations
  77. Multiplicity of solutions for a class of critical Schrödinger-Poisson systems on the Heisenberg group
  78. Approximate controllability for a stochastic elastic system with structural damping and infinite delay
  79. On extremal cacti with respect to the first degree-based entropy
  80. Compression with wildcards: All exact or all minimal hitting sets
  81. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a class of p-Kirchhoff-type equation RN
  82. Geometric classifications of k-almost Ricci solitons admitting paracontact metrices
  83. Positive periodic solutions for discrete time-delay hematopoiesis model with impulses
  84. On Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for systems of partial differential inequalities in the plane
  85. Existence of solutions for semilinear retarded equations with non-instantaneous impulses, non-local conditions, and infinite delay
  86. On the quadratic residues and their distribution properties
  87. On average theta functions of certain quadratic forms as sums of Eisenstein series
  88. Connected component of positive solutions for one-dimensional p-Laplacian problem with a singular weight
  89. Some identities of degenerate harmonic and degenerate hyperharmonic numbers arising from umbral calculus
  90. Mean ergodic theorems for a sequence of nonexpansive mappings in complete CAT(0) spaces and its applications
  91. On some spaces via topological ideals
  92. Linear maps preserving equivalence or asymptotic equivalence on Banach space
  93. Well-posedness and stability analysis for Timoshenko beam system with Coleman-Gurtin's and Gurtin-Pipkin's thermal laws
  94. On a class of stochastic differential equations driven by the generalized stochastic mixed variational inequalities
  95. Entire solutions of two certain Fermat-type ordinary differential equations
  96. Generalized Lie n-derivations on arbitrary triangular algebras
  97. Markov decision processes approximation with coupled dynamics via Markov deterministic control systems
  98. Notes on pseudodifferential operators commutators and Lipschitz functions
  99. On Graham partitions twisted by the Legendre symbol
  100. Strong limit of processes constructed from a renewal process
  101. Construction of analytical solutions to systems of two stochastic differential equations
  102. Two-distance vertex-distinguishing index of sparse graphs
  103. Regularity and abundance on semigroups of partial transformations with invariant set
  104. Liouville theorems for Kirchhoff-type parabolic equations and system on the Heisenberg group
  105. Spin(8,C)-Higgs pairs over a compact Riemann surface
  106. Properties of locally semi-compact Ir-topological groups
  107. Transcendental entire solutions of several complex product-type nonlinear partial differential equations in ℂ2
  108. Ordering stability of Nash equilibria for a class of differential games
  109. A new reverse half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with one partial sum involving one derivative function of higher order
  110. About a dubious proof of a correct result about closed Newton Cotes error formulas
  111. Ricci ϕ-invariance on almost cosymplectic three-manifolds
  112. Schur-power convexity of integral mean for convex functions on the coordinates
  113. A characterization of a ∼ admissible congruence on a weakly type B semigroup
  114. On Bohr's inequality for special subclasses of stable starlike harmonic mappings
  115. Properties of meromorphic solutions of first-order differential-difference equations
  116. A double-phase eigenvalue problem with large exponents
  117. On the number of perfect matchings in random polygonal chains
  118. Evolutoids and pedaloids of frontals on timelike surfaces
  119. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing cosine
  120. The 𝔪-WG° inverse in the Minkowski space
  121. Stability result for Lord Shulman swelling porous thermo-elastic soils with distributed delay term
  122. Approximate solvability method for nonlocal impulsive evolution equation
  123. Construction of a functional by a given second-order Ito stochastic equation
  124. Global well-posedness of initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order KdV equation posed on finite interval
  125. On pomonoid of partial transformations of a poset
  126. New fractional integral inequalities via Euler's beta function
  127. An efficient Legendre-Galerkin approximation for the fourth-order equation with singular potential and SSP boundary condition
  128. Eigenfunctions in Finsler Gaussian solitons
  129. On a blow-up criterion for solution of 3D fractional Navier-Stokes-Coriolis equations in Lei-Lin-Gevrey spaces
  130. Some estimates for commutators of sharp maximal function on the p-adic Lebesgue spaces
  131. A preconditioned iterative method for coupled fractional partial differential equation in European option pricing
  132. A digital Jordan surface theorem with respect to a graph connectedness
  133. A quasi-boundary value regularization method for the spherically symmetric backward heat conduction problem
  134. The structure fault tolerance of burnt pancake networks
  135. Average value of the divisor class numbers of real cubic function fields
  136. Uniqueness of exponential polynomials
  137. An application of Hayashi's inequality in numerical integration
Downloaded on 12.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2023-0119/html
Scroll to top button