Home Average value of the divisor class numbers of real cubic function fields
Article Open Access

Average value of the divisor class numbers of real cubic function fields

  • Yoonjin Lee , Jungyun Lee and Jinjoo Yoo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 31, 2023

Abstract

We compute an asymptotic formula for the divisor class numbers of real cubic function fields K m = k ( m 3 ) , where F q is a finite field with q elements, q 1 ( mod 3 ) , k F q ( T ) is the rational function field, and m F q [ T ] is a cube-free polynomial; in this case, the degree of m is divisible by 3. For computation of our asymptotic formula, we find the average value of L ( s , χ ) 2 evaluated at s = 1 when χ goes through the primitive cubic even Dirichlet characters of F q [ T ] , where L ( s , χ ) is the associated Dirichlet L -function.

MSC 2010: 11M38; 11R29; 11M06; 11R16; 11R58

1 Introduction

There have been many developments in the study of moments of L -function families since they have many connections to the famous Lindelöf hypothesis for such L -functions [1]. In fact, Gauss [2] made two conjectures on the mean value of the class numbers of quadratic number fields: one is for the imaginary case and the other is for the real case. The conjecture on the imaginary case was proved by Lipschitz [3], Mertens [4], Siegel [5], and Vinogradov [6], and the conjecture on the real case was proved by Siegel [5].

In the function field context as well, there has been active research done on the study of moments of L -function families and class numbers of global function fields (e.g., refer to [716]). Let k F q ( T ) be the rational function field and A F q [ T ] , where F q is a finite field of order q . Let K be a global function field, which is an algebraic extension over k . We say that K is real if the infinite place of k splits completely in K ; otherwise, we call K imaginary. Inspired by Gauss’s conjectures, Hoffstein and Rosen [9] computed the mean value of the (divisor) class numbers h m of quadratic function fields k ( m ) , where m is a nonsquare polynomial in A . We point out that they computed both cases of imaginary fields and real fields. In detail, for a positive integer n , let A n + be the set of monic polynomials in A of degree n . They obtained the following results: if n is odd (in this case, k ( m ) is imaginary), then

1 q n m A n + h m = ζ ( 2 ) ζ ( 3 ) q n 1 2 q 1 ,

and if n is even (in this case, k ( m ) is real), then

1 q n m A n + h m = ( q 1 ) 1 ζ ( 2 ) ζ ( 3 ) q n 2 ( 2 + ( 1 q 1 ) ( n 1 ) ) ,

where ζ ( s ) is the zeta function of A . In fact, we note that h m = h ˜ m R m [17, Prop. 14.7], where h ˜ m is the ideal class number of k ( m ) (the order of the ideal class group of the maximal order O k ( m ) of k ( m ) ) and R m is the regulator of k ( m ) .

Now, we discuss the case of cubic fields. As a matter of fact, in the number field situation, there has been no work done on the mean value computation for cubic fields yet. On the other hand, in the function field context, Lee et al. [18] obtained an asymptotic formula for the mean value of the divisor class numbers of cubic function fields K m = k ( m 3 ) , where q 1 ( mod 3 ) , m F q [ T ] is a cube-free polynomial, and deg ( m ) 1 ( mod 3 ) ; in this case, K m is imaginary. Therefore, the goal of this article is to compute an asymptotic formula for the mean value of the divisor class numbers of real cubic function fields K m ; in this case, deg ( m ) is divisible by 3. We note that the infinite place of k splits completely in K m when the degree of m is divisible by 3. To achieve our goal, we compute the mean value of L ( s , χ ) 2 evaluated at s = 1 when χ average runs through the primitive cubic even Dirichlet characters of F q [ T ] as in Theorem 1.1, where L ( s , χ ) is the associated Dirichlet L -function.

We state the main results as follows.

Theorem 1.1

Let h be a polynomial in A F q [ T ] with deg ( h ) = g + 2 . Let S g be the set of primitive cubic even characters with conductor g. Then, we have the following:

(1) χ S g L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = ( C 1 g + C 2 ) q g + 2 + O q g 2 + ε g + 1 .

Furthermore, the average value of L ( 1 , χ ) 2 is given as follows:

χ S g L ( 1 , χ ) 2 S g = C 1 g + C 2 B 1 g + B 2 + O q ε g g 2 ,

where B i and C i ( i = 1 , 2 ) are defined in Notation 1 as follows:

Notation 1.

P q deg A with P A , ξ 3 is the third root of unity, ( x , y ) P ( 1 x 2 deg ( P ) y 2 deg ( P ) ( x y ) deg ( P ) + ( x 2 y ) deg ( P ) + ( x y 2 ) deg ( P ) ) , B 1 = 1 3 1 q , 1 q , B 2 = 2 3 1 q , 1 q 1 q d d x ( x , x ) x = 1 q 1 q , ξ 3 q ξ 3 g + 1 1 ξ 3 ξ 3 2 q , 1 q ξ 3 2 g + 2 1 ξ 3 2 , D ( x , y , u , w ) P ( 1 x deg ( P ) ) ( 1 y deg ( P ) ) 1 ( u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) P 6 + ( x deg ( P ) + y deg ( P ) ) ( 1 f ( u , w ) ) , C 1 = ζ ( 2 ) ζ ( 3 ) 2 3 D 1 q , 1 q , 1 , 1 , C 2 = ζ ( 2 ) ζ ( 3 ) 2 3 D 1 q , 1 q , 1 , 1 1 q d d x D ( x , x , 1 , 1 ) x = 1 q D 1 q , ξ 3 q , 1 , 1 ξ 3 g + 1 1 ξ 3 D ξ 3 2 q , 1 q , 1 , 1 ξ 3 2 g + 2 1 ξ 3 2 , f ( u , w ) u 3 deg ( P ) P 3 + ( u w ) deg ( P ) P 2 + w 3 deg ( P ) P 3 ( u 4 w ) deg ( P ) P 5 ( u w 4 ) deg ( P ) P 5 ( u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) P 6 + ( u 4 w 4 ) deg ( P ) P 8 .

As a consequence, we find an asymptotic formula for the average value of the class numbers of cubic real function fields in Theorem 1.2.

Theorem 1.2

Let M g be the set of monic cube-free polynomials m in A F q [ T ] such that the degree of m is divisible by 3 and the genus of K m = k ( m 3 ) is g, where g is a positive integer. Let h m be the divisor class number of K m , which is defined to be the order of the divisor class group of K m .

Then, the average value of the class numbers h m of real cubic function fields K m is given as follows:

m M g h m M g = q g ( C 1 g + C 2 ) B 1 g + B 2 + O ( q g 2 + ε g ) ,

where B i and C i ( i = 1 , 2 ) are defined in Notation 1.

We briefly mention the difference between our current work and the previous work [18] as follows. For computation of the mean value of L ( s , χ ) 2 evaluated at s = 1 , in [18], χ runs through the primitive cubic odd Dirichlet characters of F q [ T ] ; in this article, we deal with the case of the even Dirichlet characters of F q [ T ] . We emphasize that the computational complexity for L ( 1 , χ ) 2 with even characters χ increases significantly compared with the case of odd characters χ . In fact, the major difference between the even case and the odd case in terms of complexity comes from the difference between two functional equations of L ( s , χ ) for odd and even primitive characters as follows. Let χ be a primitive character of modulus R 1 . By [1, Theorem 3.9], if χ is odd, then the functional equation is

L ( s , χ ) = W ( χ ) q deg R 1 2 ( q s ) deg R 1 L ( 1 s , χ ¯ ) ,

and if χ is even, then the functional equation satisfies the following:

( q 1 s 1 ) L ( s , χ ) = W ( χ ) q deg R 2 ( q s 1 ) ( q s ) deg R 1 L ( 1 s , χ ¯ ) ,

with W ( χ ) = 1 .

For the case where χ is odd, taking the squared modulus of both sides of the functional equation and letting s = 1 , we obtain [18, Lemma 3.1] the following:

L ( 1 , χ ) 2 n = 0 deg R 1 0 i , j < deg R i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) q n + q g n = 0 deg R 2 0 i , j < deg R i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ,

where L i ( χ ) deg a = i , a A + χ ( a ) .

Unlike the odd case, if χ is even, we need to take derivatives of both sides of the functional equation of L ( s , χ ) with respect to s twice. Letting s = 1 , we obtain

L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = 1 2 n = 1 deg R 0 i , j deg R i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n + n = 1 deg R 1 0 i , j deg R i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 4 n ) 2 q deg R ,

where M i ( χ ) q L i 1 ( χ ) L i ( χ ) , L 1 ( χ ) 0 , and L g + 2 ( χ ) = 0 . Due to this difference, we point out that Lemma 3.2 plays a significant role for our main computation.

This article is organized as follows: in Section 2, we recall some basic definitions and necessary lemmas that are useful for our main results; in Section 3, we estimate the value χ L ( 1 , χ ) 2 (Lemmas 3.13.5), and for the computation of χ L ( 1 , χ ) 2 , we divide the formula of χ L ( 1 , χ ) 2 into three parts; and finally in Section 4, we give the proofs of our main results: Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.

2 Preliminaries

Let F q be a finite field of order q , where q is an odd prime power with q 1 ( mod 3 ) . Let k F q ( T ) be the rational function field and A F q [ T ] be a polynomial ring. For a nonzero polynomial f A , the norm of f is defined as f q deg ( f ) . We denote the set of monic polynomials of A by A + .

Definition 2.1

The zeta function of A , denoted by ζ A ( s ) , is defined by the infinite series ζ A ( s ) f A + f s . There are exactly q d monic polynomials of degree d in A ; thus, deg ( f ) d 1 f s = 1 + q q s + q 2 q 2 s + + q d q d s , and consequently, ζ A ( s ) = 1 1 q 1 s for all complex numbers s with Re ( s ) > 1 . Letting u q s , we obtain the identity

ζ A ( s ) = 1 1 q 1 s = 1 1 q u = n = 0 u n q n ;

we use the fact that Re ( s ) > 1 is equivalent to u < 1 q . From now on, for simplicity, we denote ζ A ( s ) by ζ ( s ) .

Definition 2.2

Let h be a monic polynomial in A . A Dirichlet character on A of modulus h is a function χ : A C that satisfies the following properties: for all a , b A ,

  1. χ ( a b ) = χ ( a ) χ ( b ) ;

  2. if a b ( mod h ) , then χ ( a ) = χ ( b ) ;

  3. χ ( a ) 0 if and only if ( a , h ) = 1 .

The trivial Dirichlet character of modulus h is defined by χ ( a ) = 1 if ( a , h ) = 1 , 0 if ( a , h ) 1 ; we denote this by χ 0 . The inverse of a Dirichlet character χ , denoted by χ ¯ , is defined by χ ¯ ( a ) = χ ( a ) ¯ for all a A , where χ ( a ) ¯ is a complex conjugate of χ ( a ) . We say that a character χ is even if χ ( c ) = 1 for all c F q × ; otherwise, it is called an odd character. A character χ such that χ 3 = χ 0 and χ χ 0 is called a cubic Dirichlet character.

A Dirichlet character of modulus h induces a homomorphism ( A h A ) × C × . Conversely, given such a homomorphism, there is a uniquely corresponding Dirichlet character [17, p. 35]. Abusing the notation, let χ : ( A h A ) × C × be a Dirichlet character of modulus h . For a Dirichlet character χ of modulus h , we say that we may define χ mod f for f h if there exists ξ : ( A f A ) × C × such that ξ φ h , f = χ , where φ h , f is a canonical homomorphism from ( A h A ) × to ( A f A ) × . We note that given a Dirichlet character χ of modulus h , there exists a unique monic polynomial f A of minimal degree dividing h such that χ can be defined mod f [19, Theorem 12.6.3].

Definition 2.3

Given a Dirichlet character χ of modulus h , the conductor of χ is f if f A is a monic polynomial of minimal degree dividing h such that χ can be defined mod f . Let f be the conductor of a Dirichlet character χ . If χ is defined mod f, then we say that χ is primitive.

We now introduce the definition of the cubic character χ p defined by the cubic residue symbol, where p A + is an irreducible polynomial.

Definition 2.4

Let p A + be an irreducible polynomial and a be a polynomial in A . Let Ψ be an isomorphism between the cubic roots of unity in C × and the cubic roots of unity in F q . We define a cubic character χ p by means of the cubic residue symbol as follows: if p a , then χ p ( a ) = 0 ; otherwise, χ p ( a ) α , where α is the unique root of unity such that a p 1 3 Ψ ( α ) ( mod p ) .

This definition can be extended to any monic polynomial h A . Let h = i = 1 s p i e i be a prime factorization in A , where e i are positive integers for 1 i s . Then, χ h is defined as follows:

(2) χ h = χ p 1 e 1 χ p 2 e 2 χ p s e s .

Then, χ h is a cubic character of modulus i = 1 s p i .

We now define an important set M g as follows. Let M g be the set of monic cube-free polynomials m in A F q [ T ] such that the degree of m is divisible by 3 and the genus of K m = k ( m 3 ) is g , where g is a positive integer. Since m is a monic cube-free polynomial, there are monic square-free polynomials m 1 and m 2 in A with ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 such that m = m 1 m 2 2 . By [13, Lemma 3.2], we obtain ( 3 1 ) ( deg ( m 1 ) + deg ( m 2 ) 2 ) 2 = g , i.e., deg ( m 1 ) + deg ( m 2 ) = g + 2 . Therefore, the set M g can be written as follows:

(3) M g = { m = m 1 m 2 2 A + m 1 , m 2 are square-free polynomials with ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 , deg ( m 1 m 2 2 ) 0 ( mod 3 ) , deg ( m 1 ) + deg ( m 2 ) = g + 2 } ,

Let χ m be the cubic character associated with K m , where m M g . From the condition that 3 divides the degree of m , the character χ m is even [8, p. 1273]. In addition, we note that the conductor of χ m is m 1 m 2 .

Definition 2.5

Let χ be a Dirichlet character. The associated Dirichlet L-function is defined for Re ( s ) > 1 by

L ( s , χ ) = f A + χ ( f ) f s .

For the proof of our main results, we introduce a crucial lemma, i.e., known as Perron’s formula. For convenience, we let A n + ( A n + ) be the set of monic polynomials of A of degree n (degree n ), respectively.

Lemma 2.6

[8, Lemma 2.1] (Perron’s formula) If the generating series A ( u ) = f A + a ( f ) u deg f is absolutely convergent in u r < 1 , then

f A n + a ( f ) = 1 2 π i u = r A ( u ) u n d u u

and

f A n + a ( f ) = 1 2 π i u = r A ( u ) u n ( 1 u ) d u u .

3 Necessary lemmas for main computations

In this section, we prove five important lemmas for finding the second moment of the class numbers of real cubic function fields with q 1 ( mod 3 ) .

We define a set S g to be

(4) S g { χ m m M g } ;

we note that S g is a set of primitive cubic even characters with conductor whose degree is g .

For our computation, we need the following lemma.

Lemma 3.1

Let q be an odd prime power such that q 1 ( mod 3 ) and χ a be a cubic character defined in equation (2). Let S g be the set that is defined in equation (4). Then, we have the following:

χ av ( a ) χ S g χ ( a ) = d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) m 1 A d 1 m 2 A d 2 ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 χ a ( m 1 m 2 2 ) ,

where d i = deg ( m i ) and A d i is the set of monic square-free polynomials of A of degree d i for i = 1 , 2 .

Proof

By equation (4), we obtain χ = χ m for m M g , where χ S g . According to the description of M g in equation (3), we have d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 and d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) , where d i = deg ( m i ) for i = 1 , 2 . Then, we obtain

χ S g χ ( a ) = m M g χ m ( a ) = m M g χ a ( m ) ;

the second equality, which follows from reciprocity law [17, Theorem 3.5] under the assumption that q is an odd prime power and q 1 ( mod 3 ) . The rest of the proof follows immediately from [8, Lemma 2.9].□

We recall that A + refers to the set of monic polynomials of A = F q [ T ] and A d is the set of monic square-free polynomials of A of degree d . From now on, we denote by A the set of monic square-free polynomials of A . In addition, for some f A + , we denote by a b 2 = if a b 2 can be written as f 3 . If not, we put a b 2 .

Notation 2.

A g , a , b A + deg ( a b ) g a b 2 = χ av ( a b 2 ) a b A ˜ g a , b A + deg ( a b ) g a b 2 χ av ( a b 2 ) a b = ν , a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν a b 2 = χ av ( a b 2 ) ˜ = ν a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν a b 2 χ av ( a b 2 ) ν , a , b A + deg ( a b ) ν a b 2 = χ av ( a b 2 ) ˜ ν a , b A + deg ( a b ) ν a b 2 χ av ( a b 2 ) G ν a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν χ av ( a b 2 ) a b i ( g 1 ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 ( deg ( a b ) i χ av ( a b 2 ) )

Lemma 3.2

Let S g be a set of all primitive cubic even characters with conductor g as defined in equation (4). Then, we obtain the following:

χ S g L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = ( g + 2 ) 2 2 G g + 2 ( g 2 + 6 g + 7 ) 2 G g + 1 + A g , + A ˜ g + q g 2 ( q 1 ) 2 2 2 ( g 1 ) 2 ( q 1 ) ( q + g q g 2 ) 1 ( g 1 ) + ( 2 ( q 1 ) ( g + 2 ) ( q g g 2 ) + q ( 2 q 1 ) ) ( g 1 , + ˜ g 1 ) q ( g + 3 ) 2 ( g + 4 ) 2 2 ( = g , + ˜ = g ) + ( g + 3 ) 2 2 ( = g + 1 , + ˜ = g + 1 ) ( q 1 ) 2 ( g + 2 ) 2 .

Proof

We first claim that

(5) L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = ( g + 2 ) 2 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 2 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b ( g 2 + 6 g + 7 ) 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b + a , b A + deg ( a b ) g χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b + q g 2 ( q 1 ) 2 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 ( deg ( a b ) ) 2 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) 2 ( q 1 ) ( q + g q g 2 ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 deg ( a b ) χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) + ( 2 ( q 1 ) ( g + 2 ) ( g q g 2 ) + q ( 2 q 1 ) ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) q ( g + 3 ) 2 ( g + 4 ) 2 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) + ( g + 3 ) 2 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) ( q 1 ) 2 ( g + 2 ) 2 ) ,

where χ ¯ ( b ) = χ ( b 2 ) is the inverse of χ ( b ) . Using this claim and Lemma 3.1, the result follows immediately as desired.

Now, it is sufficient to prove our claim (5). By [1, p. 250, proof of Lemma 3.11], we have the following:

(6) ( q 1 s 1 ) 2 L ( s , χ ) 2 = n = 0 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) q n s + q g 2 n = 0 g + 1 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) q ( 1 s ) ( 2 g + 4 n ) ,

where M i ( χ ) q L i 1 ( χ ) L i ( χ ) , L i ( χ ) deg a = i , a A + χ ( a ) , L 1 ( χ ) 0 , and L g + 2 ( χ ) = 0 . We note that L 0 ( χ ) = deg a = 0 , a A + χ ( a ) = q 1 since χ is an even character.

Taking the derivatives of both sides of equation (6) twice with respect to s and letting s = 1 , we have the following:

(7) L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = 1 2 n = 1 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n + n = 1 g + 1 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 4 n ) 2 q ( g 2 ) 1 2 ( 1 + q g 2 2 ) .

We first compute the first term of equation (7), i.e., 1 = n = 1 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n .

1 = n = 0 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n = n = 0 g + 2 q 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n L i 1 ( χ ) L j 1 ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n n = 0 g + 2 q 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n L i 1 ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n q n = 0 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j 1 ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n + n = 0 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n

= n = 0 g 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( n + 2 ) 2 q n 2 n = 0 g + 1 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( n + 1 ) 2 q n + n = 0 g + 2 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n = n = 0 g 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( n + 2 ) 2 q n 2 n = 0 g + 1 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( n + 1 ) 2 q n + n = 0 g + 2 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) n 2 q n + ( L 0 ( χ ) L g + 2 ( χ ¯ ) + L g + 2 ( χ ) L 0 ( χ ¯ ) ) ( g + 2 ) 2 q ( g + 2 ) = 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = g + 1 L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( g + 1 ) 2 q ( g + 1 ) + 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = g + 2 L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( g + 2 ) 2 q ( g + 2 ) 4 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = g + 1 L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( g + 1 ) q ( g + 1 ) 2 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = g + 1 L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) q ( g + 1 ) + 2 n = 0 g 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) q n + ( L 0 ( χ ) L g + 2 ( χ ¯ ) + L g + 2 ( χ ) L 0 ( χ ¯ ) ) ( g + 2 ) 2 q ( g + 2 )

= ( g + 1 ) 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b + ( g + 2 ) 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 2 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b 4 ( g + 1 ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b + 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) g χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b = ( g + 2 ) 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 2 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b ( g 2 + 6 g + 7 ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b + 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) g χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) a b .

Now, we compute 2 , i.e., the second term of equation (7). We note that

2 = n = 1 g + 1 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 4 n ) 2 = n = 0 g + 1 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n M i ( χ ) M j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 4 n ) 2 ( q 1 ) 2 ( 2 g + 4 ) 2 ;

we use the fact that M 0 ( χ ) = q 1 ( χ ) 0 ( χ ) = ( q 1 ) .

2 + ( q 1 ) 2 ( 2 g + 4 ) 2 = q 2 n = 0 g 1 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 2 n ) 2 2 q n = 0 g 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 3 n ) 2 + n = 0 g + 1 0 i , j g + 2 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) ( 2 g + 4 n ) 2 .

For simplicity, let n 0 i , j g + 1 i + j = n L i ( χ ) L j ( χ ¯ ) and r g + 2 . Then, we obtain

2 + ( q 1 ) 2 ( 2 g + 4 ) 2 = q 2 n = 0 r 3 n ( 2 r n 2 ) 2 2 q n = 0 r 2 n ( 2 r n 1 ) 2 + n = 0 r 1 n ( 2 r n ) 2 = n = 0 r 3 ( q 2 ( 2 r n 2 ) 2 2 q ( 2 r n 1 ) 2 + ( 2 r n ) 2 ) n N 1 ( 2 q ( r + 1 ) 2 ( r + 2 ) 2 ) r 2 + ( r + 1 ) 2 r 1 N 2 .

Using n = a , b A + deg ( a b ) = n χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) , N 1 and N 2 can be computed as follows:

N 1 = ( q 1 ) 2 n = 0 g 1 n 2 n 4 ( q 1 ) ( r q q r ) n = 0 g 1 n n + ( 4 r 2 ( q 1 ) 2 8 r q ( q 1 ) + 4 q 2 2 q ) n = 0 g 1 n = ( q 1 ) 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 ( deg ( a b ) ) 2 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) 4 ( q 1 ) ( q + g q g 2 ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 deg ( a b ) χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) + ( 4 ( q 1 ) ( g + 2 ) ( g q g 2 ) + 2 q ( 2 q 1 ) ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b )

and

N 2 = ( 2 q ( g + 3 ) 2 + ( g + 4 ) 2 ) a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) + ( g + 3 ) 2 a , b A + deg ( a b ) = g + 1 χ ( a ) χ ¯ ( b ) ;

thus, we obtain the desired result.□

From now on, we compute the asymptotic values of A g , , = ν , , and ν , in Lemma 3.3, A ˜ g , ˜ = ν , and ˜ ν in Lemma 3.4, and finally, G ν and i ( g 1 ) ( i = 1 , 2 ) in Lemma 3.5.

Lemma 3.3

Let χ S g , where the set S g is as defined in equation (4). Let ν be a nonnegative integer, and let all the notations be the same as in Notations 1 and 2. Then, we have the following:

  1. A g , = C 1 g q g + 2 + C 2 q g + 2 + O ( q g 2 + ε g ) ;

  2. = ν , = O g ( q ν 6 + g + ( 2 ν + g ) ε ) ;

  3. ν , = O g ( q ν 6 + g + ( 2 ν + g ) ε ) .

Proof

We first compute A g , . By Lemma 3.1, we have

A g , = d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) m 1 A d 1 m 2 A d 2 ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 a , b A + deg ( a b ) g ( a b , m 1 m 2 ) = 1 a b 2 = 1 a b ,

where d i = deg ( m i ) for i = 1 , 2 . We consider the following generating series, which is defined in [18, Section 3.1.1]:

(8) C ( x , y , u , w ) m 1 , m 2 A ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 a , b A + ( a b , m 1 m 2 ) = 1 a b 2 = x deg ( m 1 ) y deg ( m 2 ) u deg ( a ) w deg ( b ) a b .

As given in [18, Section 3.1.1], we can obtain the following:

(9) A g , = d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) e = 0 g 1 ( 2 π i ) 4 x = 1 q ε + 1 y = 1 q ε + 1 w = 1 q ε u = 1 q 2 ε C ( x , y , u , w ) x d 1 y d 2 w e u g e ( 1 u ) d u u d w w d y y d x x = ζ ( 2 ) ζ ( 3 ) 2 ( 2 π i ) 2 d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) x = 1 q ε + 1 y = 1 q ε + 1 D ( x , y , 1 , 1 ) ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) x d 1 y d 2 d y y d x x + O ( q g 2 + ε g ) ,

where e deg ( b ) and D ( x , y , u , w ) is defined in Notation 1.

Now, we compute the integrals over x and y of equation (9). Let 2 g + 1 α ( mod 3 ) and g β ( mod 3 ) , where 0 α , β 2 . Since d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 and d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) , we have

d 1 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 = 2 ( g + 2 ) 2 g + 1 α ( mod 3 ) .

Thus, as in [18, Section 3.1.1], equation (9) is

(10) ζ ( 2 ) ζ ( 3 ) 2 ( 2 π i ) 2 x = 1 q 3 y = 1 q 2 D ( x , y , 1 , 1 ) ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) ( y 3 x 3 ) y 2 + α β x g + 1 + α β x 3 α y g + 2 α d y y d x x .

Following the computation method in [18, Section 3.1.1], we obtain A g , = C 1 g q g + 2 + C 2 q g + 2 + O ( q g 2 + ε g ) as desired.

For computation of = ν , , we consider the following generating series:

(11) C ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) m 1 , m 2 A ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 a , b A + ( a b , m 1 m 2 ) = 1 deg ( a b ) = ν a b 2 = x deg ( m 1 ) y deg ( m 2 ) u deg ( a ) w deg ( b ) .

As in [18, Section 3.2.1], the generating series C ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) can be expressed as follows:

(12) C ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) = 1 1 q u w 1 1 q u 3 1 1 q w 3 1 1 q x 1 1 q y D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) ,

where

D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) P ( 1 x 2 deg ( P ) y 2 deg ( P ) ( x y ) deg ( P ) + ( x 2 y ) deg ( P ) + ( x y 2 ) deg ( P ) ( u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) + ( x u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) + ( y u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) ( x y u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) f ˜ ( u , w ) ( x deg ( P ) + y deg ( P ) x 2 deg ( P ) 2 ( x y ) deg ( P ) y 2 deg ( P ) + ( x 2 y ) deg ( P ) + ( x y 2 ) deg ( P ) ) ) and f ˜ ( u , w ) u 3 deg ( P ) + ( u w ) deg ( P ) + w 3 deg ( P ) ( u 4 w ) deg ( P ) ( u w 4 ) deg ( P ) ( u 3 w 3 ) deg ( P ) + ( u 4 w 4 ) deg ( P ) .

We note that D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) converges absolutely when x < 1 q , y < 1 q , u < 1 q 6 , and w < 1 q 6 . Applying Lemma 2.6 to equation (12) four times and e deg ( b ) , we obtain

(13) d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) e = 0 ν 1 ( 2 π i ) 4 x = 1 q ε + 1 y = 1 q ε + 1 w = 1 q ε + 1 6 u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 × D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( 1 q w 3 ) ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) x d 1 y d 2 w e u ν e d u u d w w d y y d x x .

Using the same computation as in A g , , the integrals over u and w of equation (13) can be evaluated as follows:

(14) 1 ( 2 π i ) 2 w = 1 q ε + 1 6 u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 e = 0 ν D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( 1 q w 3 ) w e u ν e d u u d w w = 1 ( 2 π i ) 2 w = 1 q ε + 1 6 d w ( 1 q w 3 ) w ν + 1 u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) ( w ν + 1 u ν + 1 ) d u ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( w u ) u ν + 1 = 1 ( 2 π i ) 2 w = 1 q ε + 1 6 d w ( 1 q w 3 ) u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) d u ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( w u ) u ν + 1 1 ( 2 π i ) 2 w = 1 q ε + 1 6 d w ( 1 q w 3 ) w ν + 1 u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) d u ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( w u ) .

Noting that the second double integral of equation (14) vanishes since the integrand has no pole inside the regions, we have the following:

(15) = ν , = 1 ( 2 π i ) 2 d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) x = 1 q 1 + ε y = 1 q 1 + ε 1 ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) y d 2 x d 1 × w = 1 q ε + 1 6 d w ( 1 q w 3 ) u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) d u ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( w u ) u ν + 1 d y y d x x = O g ( q ν 6 + g + ( 2 ν + g + 4 ) ε ) .

Finally, we compute ν , . We consider the generating series (equation (11)). Applying Lemma 2.6 to equation (12) four times with e deg ( b ) , we obtain

(16) d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) e = 0 ν 1 ( 2 π i ) 4 x = 1 q ε + 1 y = 1 q ε + 1 w = 1 q ε + 1 6 u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 × D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( 1 q w 3 ) ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) x d 1 y d 2 w e u ν e ( 1 u ) d u u d w w d y y d x x .

As in [18, Section 3.2.1], we have the following:

(17)□ ν , = ζ ( 2 ) 3 ( 2 π i ) 2 d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) x = 1 q 1 + ε y = 1 q 1 + ε 1 ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) y d 2 x d 1 × w = 1 q ε + 1 6 d w ( 1 q w 3 ) u = 1 q 2 ε + 1 6 D ˜ ( x , y , u , w ) d u ( 1 q u w ) ( 1 q u 3 ) ( 1 u ) ( w u ) u ν + 1 d y y d x x = O g ( q ν 6 + g + ( 2 ν + g + 4 ) ε ) .

Lemma 3.4

For nonnegative integers g and ν , let A ˜ g , ˜ = ν , and ˜ = ν be the same as in Notation 2. Then, we have the following:

  1. A ˜ g = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ( g + 1 ) ) ;

  2. ˜ = ν = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + ν ) ;

  3. ˜ ν = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + ν ) .

Proof

We note that

(18) χ av ( a b 2 ) = χ av ( f ) = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ) ;

this follows by using a similar computation method as [18, Section 3.1.2]. By equation (18), we obtain

A ˜ g = O g q g 2 + ε g + 1 a , b A + deg ( a b ) g a b 2 1 a b = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ( g + 1 ) ) .

The desired results for ˜ = ν = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + ν + 1 ) and ˜ ν = O g ( q g 2 + ε g + ν + 1 ) follow immediately from equation (18).□

Lemma 3.5

For nonnegative integers g and ν , we have the following:

  1. G ν = O g ( q 5 ν 6 + g + ( 2 ν + g ) ε ) + O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ) ;

  2. i ( g 1 ) = ( g 1 ) i O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) for i = 1 , 2 ,

where G ν and i ( g 1 ) are defined in Notation 2.

Proof

(i) Using Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4, we obtain the following:

a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν χ av ( a b 2 ) a b = 1 q ν a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν χ av ( a b 2 ) = 1 q ν a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν a b 2 = χ av ( a b 2 ) + a , b A + deg ( a b ) = ν a b 2 χ av ( a b 2 ) = 1 q ν = ν , + ˜ = ν = 1 q ν ( O g ( q ν 6 + g + ( 2 ν + g + 4 ) ε ) + O g ( q g 2 + ε g + ν + 1 ) ) .

(ii) For i = 1 , 2 , the desired results hold by Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 as follows:

a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 deg ( a b ) i χ av ( a b 2 ) ( g 1 ) i a , b A + deg ( a b ) g 1 χ av ( a b 2 ) = ( g 1 ) i g 1 , + ˜ g 1 = ( g 1 ) i ( O g ( q g 1 6 + g + ( 3 g + 2 ) ε ) + O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) ) = ( g 1 ) i O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) .

4 Average value of the divisor of class numbers

In this section, we prove our main results: computing the average value of χ L ( 1 , χ ) 2 (Theorem 1.1) and finding an asymptotic formula for the average value of the divisor class numbers of cubic real function fields (Theorem 1.2), where χ runs through the primitive cubic even Dirichlet characters of A . For estimating the average value of χ L ( 1 , χ ) 2 , the following lemma plays an important role.

Lemma 4.1

Let q be an odd prime power such that q 1 ( mod 3 ) and M g be the set that is defined in equation (3). Then, we have the following:

M g = B 1 g q g + 2 + B 2 q g + 2 + O ( q g 2 + ε g ) ,

where ( x , y ) P ( 1 x 2 deg ( P ) y 2 deg ( P ) ( x y ) deg ( P ) + ( x 2 y ) deg ( P ) + ( x y 2 ) deg ( P ) ) , B 1 = 1 3 1 q , 1 q , and B 2 = 2 3 [ 1 q , 1 q 1 q d d x ( x , x ) x = 1 q 1 q , ξ 3 q ξ 3 g + 1 1 ξ 3 ξ 3 2 q , 1 q ξ 3 2 g + 2 1 ξ 3 2 ] .

Proof

For i = 1 , 2 , let d i deg m i . Using equation (3), the cardinality of M g can be represented as follows:

M g = d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) m 1 , m 2 A ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 1 .

For the computation of M g , we consider the generating series

C ( x , y ) = m 1 , m 2 A ( m 1 , m 2 ) = 1 x deg ( m 1 ) y deg ( m 2 ) .

As in the proof of [18, Lemma 4.1], we obtain

(19) C ( x , y ) = 1 1 q x 1 1 q y ( x , y ) ,

where ( x , y ) = P ( 1 x 2 deg ( P ) y 2 deg ( P ) ( x y ) deg ( P ) + ( x 2 y ) deg ( P ) + ( x y 2 ) deg ( P ) ) . We note that ( x , y ) converges absolutely when x < 1 q and y < 1 q . Applying Lemma 2.6 to equation (19) twice, we obtain

M g = d 1 + d 2 = g + 2 d 1 + 2 d 2 0 ( mod 3 ) 1 ( 2 π i ) 2 x = 1 q ε + 1 y = 1 q ε + 1 ( x , y ) ( 1 q x ) ( 1 q y ) x d 1 y d 2 d y y d x x .

By a similar computation method used in equation (9), we have the desired result.□

Proof of Theorem 1.1

By Lemma 3.2, we have the following:

(20) χ S g L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = ( g + 2 ) 2 2 G g + 2 ( g 2 + 6 g + 7 ) 2 G g + 1 + A g , + A ˜ g + q g 2 ( q 1 ) 2 2 2 ( g 1 ) 2 ( q 1 ) ( q + g q g 2 ) 1 ( g 1 ) + q g 2 ( 2 ( q 1 ) ( g + 2 ) ( q g g 2 ) + q ( 2 q 1 ) ) ( g 1 , + ˜ g 1 ) q g 2 q ( g + 3 ) 2 ( g + 4 ) 2 2 ( = g , + ˜ = g ) + ( g + 3 ) 2 2 ( = g + 1 , + ˜ = g + 1 ) q g 2 ( ( q 1 ) 2 ( g + 2 ) 2 ) ;

all the notations follow from Lemmas 3.33.5. We now compute each summand of equation (20) as follows: the values of A g , and A ˜ g follow from Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4, respectively. By Lemma 3.5, we obtain G g + 1 = G g + 2 = O ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ) . Thus, the first summand of equation (20) can be computed as follows:

(21) ( g + 2 ) 2 2 G g + 2 ( g 2 + 6 g + 7 ) 2 G g + 1 + A g , + A ˜ g = ( g + 2 ) 2 2 O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ) ( g 2 + 6 g + 7 ) 2 O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ) + C 1 g q g + 2 + C 2 q g + 2 + O g ( q g 2 + ε g ) + O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ( g + 1 ) ) = C 1 g q g + 2 + C 2 q g + 2 + O g ( q g 2 + ε g + 1 ) .

Using Lemma 3.5, the second summand of equation (20) is

(22) q g 2 ( q 1 ) 2 2 2 ( g 1 ) 2 ( q 1 ) ( q + g q g 2 ) 1 ( g 1 ) = q g 2 ( q 1 ) 2 2 ( g 1 ) 2 O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) 2 ( q 1 ) ( q + g q g 2 ) ( g 1 ) O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) = ( g 1 ) 2 2 O g ( q 1 2 g + ε g ) 2 ( g 1 ) O g ( q 1 2 g + ε g ) = O g ( q 1 2 g + ε g ) .

By Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4, we obtain the following:

g 1 , + ˜ g 1 = O g ( q g 1 6 + g + ( 3 g 2 ) ε ) + O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) = O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) = g , + ˜ = g = O g ( q 7 g 6 + 3 ε g ) + O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) = O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g ) = g + 1 , + ˜ = g + 1 = O g ( q g + 1 6 + g + ( 3 g + 2 ) ε ) + O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g + 1 ) = O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g + 1 ) .

Therefore, the sum of the third and fourth summands of equation (20) is

(23) q g 2 O g ( q 3 2 g + ε g + 1 ) = O g ( q 1 2 g + ε g ) .

Combining equations (21), (22), and (23) altogether, we obtain

χ S g L ( 1 , χ ) 2 = ( 21 ) + ( 22 ) + ( 23 ) q g 2 ( q 1 ) 2 ( g + 2 ) 2 = C 1 g q g + 2 + C 2 q g + 2 + O q g 2 + ε g + 1 .

Therefore, the average value of L ( 1 , χ ) 2 is obtained directly from Lemma 4.1.□

Proof of Theorem 1.2

Since 3 divides the degree of m , we can see that the infinite place of k splits completely in K m = k ( m 3 ) ; therefore, K m is real.

By [16, Theorem 1.5], we obtain

(24) L ( 1 , χ m ) 2 = ( q 1 ) 2 h ˜ m R m d m ,

where h ˜ m is the order of the ideal class group of the maximal order O K m of K m , R m is the regulator of K m , and d m is the discriminant of K m . In fact, we note that h m = h ˜ m R m . In addition, the discriminant of K m is ( m 1 m 2 ) 2 , which follows from [16, Theorem 1.2]. Therefore, the denominator of equation (24) d m is equal to = ( m 1 m 2 ) 2 = q g + 2 , where we use the fact that the degree of m 1 m 2 is g + 2 .

Consequently, using equation (24), Lemma 4.1, and Theorem 1.1 all together, for m M g , the average value of h m is given as follows:

m M g h m M g = q g + 2 ( q 1 ) 2 m M g L ( 1 , χ m ) 2 M g = q g + 2 ( q 1 ) 2 C 1 g + C 2 B 1 g + B 2 + O q ε g g 2 ;

thus, we obtain the result.□

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their very helpful suggestions, which improved the clarity of this article.

  1. Funding information: Y. Lee is supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No. 2019R1A6A1A11051177) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (NRF-2022R1A2C1003203). J. Lee is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1I1A3057692). J. Yoo is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (Nos. 2020R1A4A1016649 and 2022R1A2C1009297), and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2021R1I1A1A01047765).

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

[1] J. C. Andrade and M. Yiasemides, The fourth power mean of Dirichlet L-functions in Fq[T], Rev. Mat. Complut. 34 (2021), no. 1, 239–296, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13163-020-00350-2. 10.1007/s13163-020-00350-2Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. F. Gauss, Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, English ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7560-0Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. Lipschitz, Ueber die asymptotischen Gesetze von gewisser Gattungen zahlentheoretischer Funktionen, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (1865), 174–185. Search in Google Scholar

[4] F. Mertens, Ueber einige asymptotische Gesetze der Zahlentheorie, J. Reine Angew. Math. 77 (1874), 289–338. 10.1515/9783112368824-012Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. L. Siegel, The average measure of quadratic forms with given determinant and signature, Ann. Math. 45 (1944), no. 4, 667–685, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1969296. 10.2307/1969296Search in Google Scholar

[6] I. M. Vinogradov, On the number of integer points in a sphere, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 27 (1963), 957–968. Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Baier and M. P. Young, Mean values with cubic characters, J. Number Theory 130 (2010), no. 4, 879–903, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2009.11.007. 10.1016/j.jnt.2009.11.007Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. David, A. Florea, and M. Lalín, The mean values of cubic L-functions over function fields, Algebra Number Theory 16 (2022), no. 5, 1259–1326, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2022.16.1259. 10.2140/ant.2022.16.1259Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Hoffstein and M. Rosen, Average values of L-series in function fields, J. Reine Angew. Math. 426 (1992), 117–150, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1992.426.117. 10.1515/crll.1992.426.117Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Jung, Note on average of class numbers of cubic function field, Korean J. Math. 22 (2014), no. 3, 419–427, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11568/kjm.2014.22.3.419. 10.11568/kjm.2014.22.3.419Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Lee and Y. Lee, Non-vanishing of L-functions for cyclotomic characters in function fields, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), no. 2, 455–468, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15144. 10.1090/proc/15144Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Lee and Y. Lee, Mean values of derivatives of L-functions for cyclotomic characters in function fields, Taiwanese J. Math. 26 (2022), no. 6, 1113–1131, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11650/tjm/220701. 10.11650/tjm/220701Search in Google Scholar

[13] Y. Lee and J. Yoo, Indivisibility of divisor class numbers of Kummer extensions over the rational function field, J. Number Theory 192 (2018), 270–292, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2018.04.016. 10.1016/j.jnt.2018.04.016Search in Google Scholar

[14] W. Luo, On Hecke L-series associated with cubic characters, Compos. Math. 140 (2004), no. 5, 1191–1196, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X0400051X. 10.1112/S0010437X0400051XSearch in Google Scholar

[15] J. Yoo and Y. Lee, Infinite families of cyclotomic function fields with any prescribed class group rank, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 225 (2021), no. 9, 106658, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106658. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106658Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Rosen, Average value of class numbers in cyclic extensions of the rational function field, CMS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 15, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1994, pp. 307–323. Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. I. Rosen, Number Theory in Function Fields, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6046-0Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. Lee, Y. Lee, and J. Yoo, The mean value of the class numbers of cubic function fields, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 517 (2023), no. 1, 126582, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126582. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126582Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. D. V. Salvador, Topics in the Theory of Algebraic Function Fields, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-19
Revised: 2023-11-07
Accepted: 2023-11-20
Published Online: 2023-12-31

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue on Future Directions of Further Developments in Mathematics
  2. What will the mathematics of tomorrow look like?
  3. On H 2-solutions for a Camassa-Holm type equation
  4. Classical solutions to Cauchy problems for parabolic–elliptic systems of Keller-Segel type
  5. Control of multi-agent systems: Results, open problems, and applications
  6. Logical perspectives on the foundations of probability
  7. Subharmonic solutions for a class of predator-prey models with degenerate weights in periodic environments
  8. A non-smooth Brezis-Oswald uniqueness result
  9. Luenberger compensator theory for heat-Kelvin-Voigt-damped-structure interaction models with interface/boundary feedback controls
  10. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part II)
  11. Positive solution for a nonlocal problem with strong singular nonlinearity
  12. Analysis of solutions for the fractional differential equation with Hadamard-type
  13. Hilfer proportional nonlocal fractional integro-multipoint boundary value problems
  14. A comprehensive review on fractional-order optimal control problem and its solution
  15. The θ-derivative as unifying framework of a class of derivatives
  16. Review Articles
  17. On the use of L-functionals in regression models
  18. Minimal-time problems for linear control systems on homogeneous spaces of low-dimensional solvable nonnilpotent Lie groups
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a new p(x)-Kirchhoff problem with variable exponents
  21. An extension of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for a power of a convex function
  22. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a fourth-order differential system with instantaneous and non-instantaneous impulses
  23. Relay fusion frames in Banach spaces
  24. Refined ratio monotonicity of the coordinator polynomials of the root lattice of type Bn
  25. On the uniqueness of limit cycles for generalized Liénard systems
  26. A derivative-Hilbert operator acting on Dirichlet spaces
  27. Scheduling equal-length jobs with arbitrary sizes on uniform parallel batch machines
  28. Solutions to a modified gauged Schrödinger equation with Choquard type nonlinearity
  29. A symbolic approach to multiple Hurwitz zeta values at non-positive integers
  30. Some results on the value distribution of differential polynomials
  31. Lucas non-Wieferich primes in arithmetic progressions and the abc conjecture
  32. Scattering properties of Sturm-Liouville equations with sign-alternating weight and transmission condition at turning point
  33. Some results for a p(x)-Kirchhoff type variation-inequality problems in non-divergence form
  34. Homotopy cartesian squares in extriangulated categories
  35. A unified perspective on some autocorrelation measures in different fields: A note
  36. Total Roman domination on the digraphs
  37. Well-posedness for bilevel vector equilibrium problems with variable domination structures
  38. Binet's second formula, Hermite's generalization, and two related identities
  39. Non-solid cone b-metric spaces over Banach algebras and fixed point results of contractions with vector-valued coefficients
  40. Multidimensional sampling-Kantorovich operators in BV-spaces
  41. A self-adaptive inertial extragradient method for a class of split pseudomonotone variational inequality problems
  42. Convergence properties for coordinatewise asymptotically negatively associated random vectors in Hilbert space
  43. Relating the super domination and 2-domination numbers in cactus graphs
  44. Compatibility of the method of brackets with classical integration rules
  45. On the inverse Collatz-Sinogowitz irregularity problem
  46. Positive solutions for boundary value problems of a class of second-order differential equation system
  47. Global analysis and control for a vector-borne epidemic model with multi-edge infection on complex networks
  48. Nonexistence of global solutions to Klein-Gordon equations with variable coefficients power-type nonlinearities
  49. On 2r-ideals in commutative rings with zero-divisors
  50. A comparison of some confidence intervals for a binomial proportion based on a shrinkage estimator
  51. The construction of nuclei for normal constituents of Bπ-characters
  52. Weak solution of non-Newtonian polytropic variational inequality in fresh agricultural product supply chain problem
  53. Mean square exponential stability of stochastic function differential equations in the G-framework
  54. Commutators of Hardy-Littlewood operators on p-adic function spaces with variable exponents
  55. Solitons for the coupled matrix nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations and the related Schrödinger flow
  56. The dual index and dual core generalized inverse
  57. Study on Birkhoff orthogonality and symmetry of matrix operators
  58. Uniqueness theorems of the Hahn difference operator of entire function with a Picard exceptional value
  59. Estimates for certain class of rough generalized Marcinkiewicz functions along submanifolds
  60. On semigroups of transformations that preserve a double direction equivalence
  61. Positive solutions for discrete Minkowski curvature systems of the Lane-Emden type
  62. A multigrid discretization scheme based on the shifted inverse iteration for the Steklov eigenvalue problem in inverse scattering
  63. Existence and nonexistence of solutions for elliptic problems with multiple critical exponents
  64. Interpolation inequalities in generalized Orlicz-Sobolev spaces and applications
  65. General Randić indices of a graph and its line graph
  66. On functional reproducing kernels
  67. On the Waring-Goldbach problem for two squares and four cubes
  68. Singular moduli of rth Roots of modular functions
  69. Classification of self-adjoint domains of odd-order differential operators with matrix theory
  70. On the convergence, stability and data dependence results of the JK iteration process in Banach spaces
  71. Hardy spaces associated with some anisotropic mixed-norm Herz spaces and their applications
  72. Remarks on hyponormal Toeplitz operators with nonharmonic symbols
  73. Complete decomposition of the generalized quaternion groups
  74. Injective and coherent endomorphism rings relative to some matrices
  75. Finite spectrum of fourth-order boundary value problems with boundary and transmission conditions dependent on the spectral parameter
  76. Continued fractions related to a group of linear fractional transformations
  77. Multiplicity of solutions for a class of critical Schrödinger-Poisson systems on the Heisenberg group
  78. Approximate controllability for a stochastic elastic system with structural damping and infinite delay
  79. On extremal cacti with respect to the first degree-based entropy
  80. Compression with wildcards: All exact or all minimal hitting sets
  81. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a class of p-Kirchhoff-type equation RN
  82. Geometric classifications of k-almost Ricci solitons admitting paracontact metrices
  83. Positive periodic solutions for discrete time-delay hematopoiesis model with impulses
  84. On Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for systems of partial differential inequalities in the plane
  85. Existence of solutions for semilinear retarded equations with non-instantaneous impulses, non-local conditions, and infinite delay
  86. On the quadratic residues and their distribution properties
  87. On average theta functions of certain quadratic forms as sums of Eisenstein series
  88. Connected component of positive solutions for one-dimensional p-Laplacian problem with a singular weight
  89. Some identities of degenerate harmonic and degenerate hyperharmonic numbers arising from umbral calculus
  90. Mean ergodic theorems for a sequence of nonexpansive mappings in complete CAT(0) spaces and its applications
  91. On some spaces via topological ideals
  92. Linear maps preserving equivalence or asymptotic equivalence on Banach space
  93. Well-posedness and stability analysis for Timoshenko beam system with Coleman-Gurtin's and Gurtin-Pipkin's thermal laws
  94. On a class of stochastic differential equations driven by the generalized stochastic mixed variational inequalities
  95. Entire solutions of two certain Fermat-type ordinary differential equations
  96. Generalized Lie n-derivations on arbitrary triangular algebras
  97. Markov decision processes approximation with coupled dynamics via Markov deterministic control systems
  98. Notes on pseudodifferential operators commutators and Lipschitz functions
  99. On Graham partitions twisted by the Legendre symbol
  100. Strong limit of processes constructed from a renewal process
  101. Construction of analytical solutions to systems of two stochastic differential equations
  102. Two-distance vertex-distinguishing index of sparse graphs
  103. Regularity and abundance on semigroups of partial transformations with invariant set
  104. Liouville theorems for Kirchhoff-type parabolic equations and system on the Heisenberg group
  105. Spin(8,C)-Higgs pairs over a compact Riemann surface
  106. Properties of locally semi-compact Ir-topological groups
  107. Transcendental entire solutions of several complex product-type nonlinear partial differential equations in ℂ2
  108. Ordering stability of Nash equilibria for a class of differential games
  109. A new reverse half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with one partial sum involving one derivative function of higher order
  110. About a dubious proof of a correct result about closed Newton Cotes error formulas
  111. Ricci ϕ-invariance on almost cosymplectic three-manifolds
  112. Schur-power convexity of integral mean for convex functions on the coordinates
  113. A characterization of a ∼ admissible congruence on a weakly type B semigroup
  114. On Bohr's inequality for special subclasses of stable starlike harmonic mappings
  115. Properties of meromorphic solutions of first-order differential-difference equations
  116. A double-phase eigenvalue problem with large exponents
  117. On the number of perfect matchings in random polygonal chains
  118. Evolutoids and pedaloids of frontals on timelike surfaces
  119. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing cosine
  120. The 𝔪-WG° inverse in the Minkowski space
  121. Stability result for Lord Shulman swelling porous thermo-elastic soils with distributed delay term
  122. Approximate solvability method for nonlocal impulsive evolution equation
  123. Construction of a functional by a given second-order Ito stochastic equation
  124. Global well-posedness of initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order KdV equation posed on finite interval
  125. On pomonoid of partial transformations of a poset
  126. New fractional integral inequalities via Euler's beta function
  127. An efficient Legendre-Galerkin approximation for the fourth-order equation with singular potential and SSP boundary condition
  128. Eigenfunctions in Finsler Gaussian solitons
  129. On a blow-up criterion for solution of 3D fractional Navier-Stokes-Coriolis equations in Lei-Lin-Gevrey spaces
  130. Some estimates for commutators of sharp maximal function on the p-adic Lebesgue spaces
  131. A preconditioned iterative method for coupled fractional partial differential equation in European option pricing
  132. A digital Jordan surface theorem with respect to a graph connectedness
  133. A quasi-boundary value regularization method for the spherically symmetric backward heat conduction problem
  134. The structure fault tolerance of burnt pancake networks
  135. Average value of the divisor class numbers of real cubic function fields
  136. Uniqueness of exponential polynomials
  137. An application of Hayashi's inequality in numerical integration
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2023-0160/html
Scroll to top button