Startseite Measuring academic satisfaction in nursing students: a systematic review of the instruments
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Measuring academic satisfaction in nursing students: a systematic review of the instruments

  • Silvia Rossini ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Rocco Mazzotta , Mari Kangasniemi , Sondra Badolamenti , Loreana Macale , Alessandro Sili , Ercole Vellone , Rosaria Alvaro und Giampiera Bulfone
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. September 2022

Abstract

Student academic satisfaction is one of the most important factors affecting the success and quality of a higher education institute and is an indicator about teaching and learning. This study aims to summarize and critically evaluate the instruments assessing academic satisfaction in nursing education. A systematic review was undertaken, PRISMA were used for the screening of studies. MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and CINAHL were searched using MeSH terms; seven eligible articles were identified referring to five assessment tools. COSMIN was used for evaluation of the methodological of the instruments. The systematic review identified five satisfaction measurement tools used in nursing education. The analysis of the instruments rarely considered a confirmative validity structure, measurement error or criterion validity. The best available instrument was the Nursing Students Satisfaction Scale (NSSS) for validation methodology; however, it needs further validation studies that consider CFA, reliability, criteria validity, hypothesis testing and measurement error.


Corresponding author: Silvia Rossini, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1-00133 Rome, Italy, Phone: +39 3478429841, Fax: +39 0672596961, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  2. Author contribution: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

Altuntaş, S. (2014). Factors affecting the job satisfaction levels and quit intentions of academic nurses. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Ansari, W. E. (2002). Student nurse satisfaction levels with their courses: Part I – effects of demographic variables. Nurse Education Today, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0682.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Anthoine, E., Moret, L., Regnault, A., Sébille, V., & Hardouin, J.-B. (2014). Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527692Suche in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.Suche in Google Scholar

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24).10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer [review]. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(149). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Brown, J. F., & Marshall, B. L. (2008). Continuous quality improvement: An effective strategy for improvement of program outcomes in a higher education setting. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(4), 205–211.Suche in Google Scholar

Bryant, J. L. (2006). Assessing expectations and perceptions of the campus experience: The Noel-Levitz student satisfaction Inventory. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2006(134), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.234.Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron, J., Roxburgh, M., Taylor, J., & Lauder, W. (2011). An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and midwifery education: Why do students stay? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(9–10), 1372–1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03336.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Harlaar, N., Greven, C. U., & Plomin, R. (2010). More than just IQ: A longitudinal examination of self-perceived abilities as predictors of academic performance in a large sample of UK twins. Intelligence, 38(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Chen, H. C., Farmer, S., Barber, L., & Wayman, M. (2012). Development and psychometric testing of the nursing student satisfaction scale. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(6), 369–373.10.5480/1536-5026-33.6.369Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, H.-C., & Lo, H.-S. (2012). Development and psychometric testing of the nursing student satisfaction scale for the associate nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 2, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v2n3p25.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological Testing and assessment: An Introduction to Tests and measurement. McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Dennison, S., & El-Masri, M. M. (2012). Development and psychometric assessment of the undergraduate nursing student academic satisfaction scale (UNSASS). Journal of Nursing Measurement, 2, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.20.2.75.Suche in Google Scholar

DiBiase, D. (2004). The impact of increasing enrollment on faculty workload and student satisfaction over time. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i2.1827.Suche in Google Scholar

Espeland, V., & Indrehus, O. (2003). Evaluation of students’ satisfaction with nursing education in Norway. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02611.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Franklin, A. E., Burns, P., & Lee, C. S. (2014). Psychometric testing on the NLN student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, simulation design scale, and educational practices questionnaire using a sample of pre-licensure novice nurses. Nurse Education Today, 34(10), 1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Freeman-Gibb, L., Jones, B., Rehman, S., & Ragier, J. (2017). Collaborative baccalaureate programs: Preliminary data on Canadian undergraduate nursing students’ satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 56(7), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170619-06.Suche in Google Scholar

Freeman, J. P., Hall, E. E., & Bresciani, M. J. (2007). What leads students to have thoughts, talk to someone about, and take steps to leave their institution? [report]. College Student Journal, 41, 755.Suche in Google Scholar

García-Aracil, A. (2009). European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education. Higher Education, 57(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9121-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90050-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirsch, C. D., Barlem, E. L., Barlem, J. G., Dalmolin Gde, L., Pereira, L. A., & Ferreira, A. G. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nursing Student Satisfaction Scale for use with Brazilian nursing students. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 24, e2776. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1053.2776.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jaradeen, N., Jaradat, R., Safi, A. A., & Tarawneh, F. A. (2012). Students satisfaction with nursing program. Bahrain Medical Bulletin, 34, 1–6.Suche in Google Scholar

Jeffries, P. R., & Rizzolo, M. A. (2006). Designing and implementing Models for the innovative Use of Simulation to teach nursing Care of ill Adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. National League for Nursing and Laerdal Medical.Suche in Google Scholar

Liegler, R. M. (1997). Predicting student satisfaction in baccalaureate nursing programs: Testing a causal model. Journal of Nursing Education, 36(8), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19971001-04.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Löfmark, A., Thorkildsen, K., Råholm, M.-B., & Natvig, G. K. (2012). Nursing students’ satisfaction with supervision from preceptors and teachers during clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(3), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.12.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Long, P., Tricker, T., Rangecroft, M., & Gilroy, P. (1999). Measuring the satisfaction gap: Education in the market-place. Total Quality Management, 10(4–5), 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412997794.Suche in Google Scholar

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Motlagh, S. E., Amrai, K., Yazdani, M. J., altaib Abderahim, H., & Souri, H. (2011). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement in high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 765–768.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.180Suche in Google Scholar

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.Suche in Google Scholar

Özgüngör, S. (2010). Identifying dimensions of students’ ratings that best predict students’ self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. European Journal of Educational Research, 10, 146–163.Suche in Google Scholar

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Papastavrou, E., Dimitriadou, M., Tsangari, H., & Andreou, C. (2016). Nursing students’ satisfaction of the clinical learning environment: A research study. BMC Nursing, 15(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0164-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2018). In A. Palese (Ed.), Fondamenti di ricerca infermieristica (2 ed.). McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Pollock, A., & Berge, E. (2017). How to do a systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 13(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743796.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Ramos, A. M., Barlem, J. G. T., Lunardi, V. L., Barlem, E. L. D., Silveira, R. S. D., & Bordignon, S. S. (2015). Satisfaction with academic experience among undergraduate nursing students. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 24, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072015002870013.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studyng. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02493.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Rossini, S., Bulfone, G., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2021). Nursing students’ satisfaction with the curriculum: An integrative review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(3), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, M. R., Grealish, L., & Henderson, S. (2018). Shaping a valued learning journey: Student satisfaction with learning in undergraduate nursing programs, a grounded theory study. Nurse Education Today, 64, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Story, L., Butts Janie, B., Bishop Sandra, B., Green, L., Johnson, K., & Mattison, H. (2010). Innovative strategies for nursing education program evaluation. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(6), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100217-07.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Suhre, C. J. M., Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Harskamp, E. G. (2007). Impact of degree program satisfaction on the persistence of college students. Higher Education, 54(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-2376-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tosterud, R., Petzäll, K., Hedelin, B., & Hall-Lord, M. L. (2014). Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the questionnaire, Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning, used in simulation. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(6), 704–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Unver, V., Basak, T., Watts, P., Gaioso, V., Moss, J., Tastan, S., Iyigun, E., & Tosun, N. (2017). The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale, simulation design scale, and educational practices questionnaire. Contemporary Nurse, 53(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Watson, R. T., & Webster, J. (2020). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(3), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591.Suche in Google Scholar

Winslow, S., DeGuzman, P., Kulbok, P., & Jackson, S. (2014). Nurses’ self-efficacy and academic degree advancement. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 30(3), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnd.0000000000000038.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2021-0159).


Received: 2021-12-08
Revised: 2022-06-21
Accepted: 2022-07-26
Published Online: 2022-09-19

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Nurses’ and nurse educators’ experiences of a Pediatric Nursing Continuing Professional Development program in Rwanda
  2. Literature Reviews
  3. Measuring academic satisfaction in nursing students: a systematic review of the instruments
  4. Pediatric practicums in undergraduate nursing programs: an integrative review
  5. Research Articles
  6. Nursing educators’ collaboration and professional development: a cross-sectional study
  7. Ethical tension in nursing education: a challenge for faculty values and beliefs
  8. Improving practicing nurses’ knowledge and perceptions of older people: a quasi-experimental study
  9. Embracing diversity: measuring the impact of an international immersion learning experience on nursing students’ cultural beliefs and values
  10. Lower academic performance and dropout rates among University students with children: a prospective cohort study of nursing students in Bogotá, Colombia
  11. Supporting the transition to practice: preceptor behaviors that foster a positive student preceptorship experience
  12. Faculty supportive behaviors and nursing student mental health: a pilot study
  13. Intention and motivation to pursue higher education among registered nurses and midwives: a cross-sectional study during COVID-19
  14. An analysis of nursing and medical students’ attitudes towards and knowledge of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
  15. Assessing non-technical skills in undergraduate nursing students: a validation study
  16. Developing nursing students’ informatics competencies – A Canadian faculty perspective
  17. A creative approach for undergraduate nursing students to learn anatomy and physiology: a qualitative exploratory study
  18. Resilience and GRIT among undergraduate nursing students during the COVID 19 pandemic
  19. The effect of advocacy education of nursing students on attitudes towards disability: a quasi-experimental study
  20. Knowledge and perceptions of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among prelicensure nursing students
  21. Narrative photography with an expert patient as a method to improve empathy: a satisfaction study with health sciences students
  22. Self-efficacy beliefs among baccalaureate nursing students – A cross-sectional, comparative study
  23. Learning on the periphery: a modified Delphi study of a nursing student communities of practice model
  24. Clinical instruction in mental health nursing: students’ perceptions of best practices
  25. The experience of novice nurse faculty in Saudi Arabia
  26. Effective factors and challenges of forming transformational education in the nursing education system: a qualitative study
  27. Predictors associated with new nursing faculty’s intent to leave nursing academia: teaching preparation in doctoral program, institutional supports, and job satisfaction
  28. Flipped or traditional online teaching? Two different strategies to handle teaching in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic
  29. Application of the cognitive load theory in prelicensure nursing education: a quantitative measurement focusing on instructional design
  30. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  31. Finding the right balance: student perceptions of using virtual simulation as a community placement
  32. Virtual patients: an option for future distance midwifery education?
Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2021-0159/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen