Home Nursing student and faculty attitudes about a potential genomics-informed undergraduate curriculum
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Nursing student and faculty attitudes about a potential genomics-informed undergraduate curriculum

  • Sarah Dewell ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Carla Ginn , Karen Benzies and Cydnee Seneviratne
Published/Copyright: August 9, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

To explore attitudes about adding genomic content to an undergraduate nursing curriculum. Genomic knowledge is essential to nursing education, but challenges exist for curriculum innovation. Few countries have guiding documents from national nursing organizations on genomic competencies for practice or education. Information on attitudes about genomics may provide guidance for curriculum development.

Methods

Nineteen undergraduate nursing students and two faculty from a school of nursing with two sites in western Canada participated. Five focus groups and four interviews were conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Coding was inductive.

Results

Characteristics of participants, eight key themes, and four future focal areas were identified to guide future research and curriculum development.

Conclusions

Global development of genomics-informed curricula will require a focus on increasing knowledge, defining scope and role, increasing visibility of role models, and preparing to implement precision health.


Corresponding author: Dr. Sarah Dewell, School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, V2N 4Z9 BC, Canada, E-mail:

Funding source: University of Calgary http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008459

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the student and faculty participants for their contribution to this study.

  1. Research funding: Sarah Dewell was supported by a University of Calgary Eyes High Doctoral Recruitment Scholarship. The sponsor had no input into study design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for publication.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (REB18-0786).

References

Brantl, V. M., & Esslinger, P. N. (1962). Genetics-implications for the nursing curriculum. Nursing Forum, 1(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.1962.tb00109.x.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Search in Google Scholar

Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Culp, S., & Badzek, L. (2018). Hospital nursing leadership-led interventions increased genomic awareness and educational intent in Magnet settings. Nursing Outlook, 66(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.10.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Culp, S., Caskey, S., & Badzek, L. (2014). Introducing a new competency into nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30098-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Nicol, N., Skirton, H., Feero, W. G., & Green, E. D. (2013). Relevance of genomics to healthcare and nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 45(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01464.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Yates, J., Cusack, G., Wallen, G. R., Liewehr, D. J., & McBride, C. (2012). Survey of nursing integration of genomics into nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44(4), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01475.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Calzone, K. A., Kirk, M., Tonkin, E., Badzek, L., Benjamin, C., & Middleton, A. (2018a). The global landscape of nursing and genomics. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12380.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Calzone, K. A., Kirk, M., Tonkin, E., Badzek, L., Benjamin, C., & Middleton, A. (2018b). Increasing nursing capacity in genomics: Overview of existing global genomics resources. Nurse Education Today, 69, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Camak, D. J. (2016). Increasing importance of genetics in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 44, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Connors, L., & Schorn, M. (2018). Genetics and genomics content in nursing education: A national imperative. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(4), 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.06.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Consensus Panel on Genetic/Genomic Nursing Competencies (2009). Essentials of genetic and genomic nursing: Competencies, curricula guidelines and outcome indicators. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association. Retrieved from https://www.genome.gov/Pages/Careers/HealthProfessionalEducation/geneticscompetency.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Dewell, S., Benzies, K., & Ginn, C. (2020). Precision health and nursing: Seeing the familiar in the foreign. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562120945159.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dewell, S., Benzies, K., Ginn, C., & Seneviratne, C. (2020). Assessing knowledge of genomic concepts among Canadian nursing students and faculty. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 17(1), 20200058. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2020-0058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dumo, A. M., Laing, B., Lim, A. G., Palaganas, E., Abad, P. J., Valdehueza, O., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2020). Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of web-based Genomics Nursing Education Intervention for undergraduate nursing students: A study protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(11), 3136–3146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14477.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fu, M. R., Kurnat-Thoma, E., Starkweather, A., Henderson, W. A., Cashion, A. K., Williams, J. K., & Coleman, B. (2020). Precision health: A nursing perspective. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 7(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.12.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ginsburg, G. S., & Phillips, K. A. (2018). Precision medicine: From science to value. Health Affairs, 37(5), 694–701. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1624.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jenkins, J., & Calzone, K. A. (2014). Genomics nursing Faculty Champion initiative. Nurse Educator, 39(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jenkins, J., Calzone, K. A., Caskey, S., Culp, S., Weiner, M., & Badzek, L. (2015). Methods of genomic competency integration in practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(3), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12131.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kronk, R., Colbert, A., & Lengetti, E. (2018). Assessment of a competency-based undergraduate course on genetics and genomics. Nurse Educator, 43(4), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000443.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Leach, V., Tonkin, E., Lancastle, D., & Kirk, M. (2016). A strategy for implementing genomics into nursing practice informed by three behaviour change theories. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 22(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12431.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Munroe, T., & Loerzel, V. (2016). Assessing nursing students’ knowledge of genomic concepts and readiness for use in practice. Nurse Educator, 41(2), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000210.Search in Google Scholar

National Human Genome Research Institute. (2018). Genetics vs. genomics fact sheet. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health. Retrieved from https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Genetics-vs-Genomics.Search in Google Scholar

Nisselle, A., Janinski, M., Martyn, M., McClaren, B., Kaunein, N., Maguire, J., … Gaff, C. (2021). Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: Reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics). Genetics in Medicine, 23, 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x.10.1038/s41436-021-01140-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.Search in Google Scholar

Plunkett-Rondeau, J., Hyland, K., & Dasgupta, S. (2015). Training future physicians in the era of genomic medicine: Trends in undergraduate medical genetics education. Genetics in Medicine, 17(11), 927–934. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sharoff, L. (2020). A pilot assessment: Integrating a cystic fibrosis simulation scenario to enhance pre-licensure educational understanding of genomics. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 10(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v10n1p24.Search in Google Scholar

Skirton, H. (2017). Genetics and nursing: A whole new ball game or back to basics? Nursing and Health Sciences, 19(4), 401–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12377.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Statistics, Canada. (2016). Population and dwelling count highlight tables, 2016 census. Ottawa, Canada: Goverment of Canada. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/hlt-fst/pd-pl/Table.cfm?Lang=Eng&T=302&SR=1&S=86&O=A&RPP=9999&PR=48.Search in Google Scholar

Tonkin, E., Calzone, K. A., Badzek, L., Benjamin, C., Middleton, A., Patch, C., & Kirk, M. (2020). A maturity matrix for nurse leaders to facilitate and benchmark progress in genomic healthcare policy, infrastructure, education, and delivery. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12586.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ward, L. D., Haberman, M., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of the genomic nursing concept inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(9), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140806-04.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2020-0109).


Received: 2020-10-26
Accepted: 2021-07-21
Published Online: 2021-08-09

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Global inequity in nursing education: a call to action
  3. Research Articles
  4. Nursing students’ experiences and perceptions of an innovative graduate level healthcare grand challenge course: a qualitative study
  5. Quality of life and academic resilience of Filipino nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
  6. Nursing students’ adverse childhood experience scores: a national survey
  7. Depression, anxiety and stress among Australian nursing and midwifery undergraduate students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
  8. Development and psychometric evaluation of the motivation for nursing student scale (MNSS): a cross sectional validation study
  9. The assessment and exploration of forensic nursing concepts in undergraduate nursing curricula: a mixed-methods study
  10. New nurse graduates and rapidly changing clinical situations: the role of expert critical care nurse mentors
  11. Nursing students’ experiences of virtual simulation when using a video conferencing system – a mixed methods study
  12. A mixed-methods assessment of the transition to a dedicated educational unit: nursing students’ perceptions and achievements
  13. Nursing student and faculty attitudes about a potential genomics-informed undergraduate curriculum
  14. Factors that influence the preceptor role: a comparative study of Saudi and expatriate nurses
  15. Testing and e-learning activity designed to enhance student nurses understanding of continence and mobility
  16. Incivility among Arabic-speaking nursing faculty: testing the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of incivility in nursing education-revised
  17. Understanding clinical leadership behaviors in practice to inform baccalaureate nursing curriculum: a comparative study between the United States and Australia novice nurses
  18. A deep learning approach to student registered nurse anesthetist (SRNA) education
  19. Developing teamwork skills in baccalaureate nursing students: impact of TeamSTEPPS® training and simulation
  20. Preparing ABSN students for early entry and success in the clinical setting: flipping both class and skills lab with the Socratic Method
  21. Virtual clinical simulation in nursing education: a concept analysis
  22. COVID-19 pandemic and remote teaching: transition and transformation in nursing education
  23. Development and validation of the nursing clinical assessment tool (NCAT): a psychometric research study
  24. Becoming scholars in an online cohort of a PhD in nursing program
  25. Senior BSN students’ confidence, comfort, and perception of readiness for clinical practice: the impacts of COVID-19
  26. Relational and caring partnerships: (re)creating equity, genuineness, and growth in mentoring faculty relationships
  27. Comparison of simulation observer tools on engagement and maximising learning: a pilot study
  28. Gamification in nursing literature: an integrative review
  29. A conceptual framework of student professionalization for health professional education and research
  30. Writing a compelling integrated discussion: a guide for integrated discussions in article-based theses and dissertations
  31. Teaching evidence-based practice piece by PEACE
  32. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  33. Increasing student involvement in research: a collaborative approach between faculty and students
  34. Capacity building in nurse educators in a Global Leadership Mentoring Community
  35. Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner student perceptions of integrated collaborative care
  36. Igniting the leadership spark in nursing students: leading the way
  37. Quilting emergent advanced practice nursing educator identity: an arts-informed approach
  38. The expanding role of telehealth in nursing: considerations for nursing education
  39. Literature Reviews
  40. What do novice faculty need to transition successfully to the nurse faculty role? An integrative review
  41. Reflective writing pedagogies in action: a qualitative systematic review
  42. Appraisal of disability attitudes and curriculum of nursing students: a literature review
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2020-0109/html
Scroll to top button