Home Performance Study of a Thermally Double Coupled Multi-Tubular Reactor by Considering the Effect of Flow Type Patterns
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance Study of a Thermally Double Coupled Multi-Tubular Reactor by Considering the Effect of Flow Type Patterns

  • Mohsen Abbasi EMAIL logo , Mehdi Farniaei , Sedigheh Kabiri , Mohammad Reza Rahimpour and Saeid Abbasi
Published/Copyright: October 30, 2015

Abstract

In this study, a steady-state heterogeneous one-dimensional model predicts the performance of a thermally double coupled auto-thermal multi-tubular reactor for simultaneous production of hydrogen, benzene, methanol and dimethyether (DME) in an economical approach for both co- and counter- current modes of operation. Reversed flow of cyclohexane has been considered for the counter-current flow regime. The simulation results for co- and counter-current modes have been investigated and compared with corresponding predictions for conventional methanol reactor and traditional coupled methanol reactor. In addition, various operating parameters along the reactor have been studied. The simulation results present that methanol yield in co- and counter- current modes are reached to 0.3735 and 0.3363 in a thermally double coupled reactor, respectively. Also, results for counter-current mode show a superior performance in hydrogen and benzene production. Finally, the results of simulation illustrate that the coupling of these reactions could be beneficial.

Nomenclature

ParameterUnitDefinition
avm2 m−3specific surface area of catalyst pellet
Acm2cross section area of each tube
Aom2inside area of inner tube
Aim2outside area of inner tube
Cmol m−3total concentration
CpJ mol−1specific heat of the gas at constant pressure
dpmparticle diameter
Dimtube inside diameter
Domtube outside diameter
Dijm2 s−1binary diffusion coefficient of component i in j
Dimm2 s−1diffusion coefficient of component i in the mixture
Domtube outside diameter
fibarpartial fugacity of component i
Ftmol s−1total molar flow rate
hfW m−2 K−1Gas-solid heat transfer coefficient
hiW m−2 K−1heat transfer coefficient between fluid phase and reactor wall in exothermic side
hoW m−2 K−1heat transfer coefficient between fluid phase and reactor wall in endothermic side
ΔHf,iJ mol−1enthalpy of formation of component i
kmol m−3 Pa−1 s−1rate constant of dehydrogenation reaction
kimol kg−1s−1bar−1/2rate constant of reaction i
kg,im s−1mass transfer coefficient for component i
KWm−1K−1conductivity of fluid phase
Kibar−1adsorption equilibrium constant for component i
KpPa3equilibrium constant for dehydrogenation reaction
Kpiequilibrium constant based on partial pressure for component i in methanol synthesis reaction
KwWm−1K−1thermal conductivity of reactor wall
Lmreactor length
Migmol−1molecular weight of component i
Nnumber of components
Pbartotal pressure
PiPapartial pressure of component i
r1mol kg−1s−1rate of reaction for hydrogenation of CO in methanol synthesis
r2mol kg−1s−1rate of reaction for hydrogenation of CO2 in methanol synthesis
r3mol kg−1s−1rate of reversed water-gas shift reaction in methanol synthesis
rCOmol kg−1s−1rate of reaction for hydrogenation of CO
rCO2mol kg−1s−1rate of reaction for hydrogenation of CO2
rDMEmol kg−1s−1rate of reaction for dehydration of methanol
rCmol m−3s−1rate of reaction for dehydrogenation of cyclohexane
RJ mol−1 K−1universal gas constant
Rpmparticle radius
ReReynolds number
SciSchmidt number of component
TKtemperature
ums−1superficial velocity of fluid phase
ugms−1linear velocity of fluid phase
UWm−2K−1overall heat transfer coefficient between exothermic and endothermic sides
vcicm3 mol−1critical volume of component i
yimol mol−1mole fraction of component i
zmaxial reactor coordinate
Greek letters
µkg m−1 s−1viscosity of fluid phase
ρkg m−3density of fluid phase
ρbkg m−3density of catalytic bed
τtortuosity of catalyst
Superscripts
gin bulk gas phase
sat surface catalyst
Subscripts
0inlet conditions
ichemical species
jreactor side

References

1. Abo-Ghander, N.S., Grace, J.R., Elnashaie, S.S.E.H., Lim, C.J., 2008. Modeling of a novel membrane reactor to integrate dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline. Chemical Engineering Science 7, 1817–1826.10.1016/j.ces.2007.12.007Search in Google Scholar

2. Ali, J.K., Newson, E., Rippin, D., 1994. Exceeding equilibrium conversion with a catalytic membrane reactor for the dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane. Chemical Engineering Science 13, 2129–2134.10.1016/0009-2509(94)E0035-OSearch in Google Scholar

3. Arcoumanis, C., Bae, C., Crookes, R., Kinoshita, E., 2008. The potential of di-methyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel for compression-ignition engines: A review. Fuel 7, 1014–1030.10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.007Search in Google Scholar

4. Basri, S., Kamarudin, S., 2011. Process system engineering in direct methanol fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 10, 6219–6236.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.058Search in Google Scholar

5. Bercic, G., Levec, J., 1993. Catalytic dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether. Kinetic investigation and reactor simulation. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research 11, 2478–2484.10.1021/ie00023a006Search in Google Scholar

6. Biniwale, R.B., Kariya, N., Ichikawa, M., 2005. Dehydrogenation of cyclohexane over Ni based catalysts supported on activated carbon using spray-pulsed reactor and enhancement in activity by addition of a small amount of Pt. Catalysis Letters. 1, 83–87.10.1007/s10562-005-8009-xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Biniwale, R.B., Pande, J.V., Dhakad, M., Labhsetwar, N.K., Ichikawa, M., 2008. Nitric oxide reduction using hydrogen over perovskite catalysts with promotional effect of platinum on catalytic activity. Catalysis Letters 1, 164–171.10.1007/s10562-008-9412-xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Chen, X.-M., Xiao, J., Zhu, Y.-P., Luo, Z.-H., 2013. Intra-particle mass and heat transfer modeling of methanol to olefins process on SAPO-34: A single particle model. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research, 52, 3693–3707.10.1021/ie302736bSearch in Google Scholar

9. Cussler EL., 1984. Diffusion, Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems. University Press, CambridgeSearch in Google Scholar

10. Brown, L., 2001. A comparative study of fuels for on-board hydrogen production for fuel-cell-powered automobiles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 4, 381–397.10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00092-6Search in Google Scholar

11. Farniaei, M., Abbasi, M., Rasoolzadeh, A., Rahimpour, M.R., 2014. Performance enhancement of thermally coupling of methanol synthesis, DME synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation processes: Employment of water and hydrogen perm-selective membranes via different recycle streams. Chemical Engineering Process 85, 24–37.10.1016/j.cep.2014.07.007Search in Google Scholar

12. Farsi, M., Jahanmiri, A., Eslamloueya, R., 2010. Modeling and Optimization of MeOH to DME in Isothermal Fixed-bed Reactor. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering. 8, DOI: 10.2202/1542-6580.2063.DOI: 10.2202/1542-6580.2063Search in Google Scholar

13. Farsi, M., Jahanmiri, A., 2011. Enhancement of DME production in an optimized membrane isothermal fixed-bed reactor. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 8, DOI: 10.1515/1542-6580.2296.DOI: 10.1515/1542-6580.2296Search in Google Scholar

14. Flores, J., Peixoto, D., Appel, L., de Avillez, R., Silva, M., 2011. The influence of different methanol synthesis catalysts on direct synthesis of DME from syngas. Catalysis Today 1, 218–225.10.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.063Search in Google Scholar

15. Galindo Cifre, P., Badr, O., 2007. Renewable hydrogen utilisation for the production of methanol. Energy Conversion and Management 2, 519–527.10.1016/j.enconman.2006.06.011Search in Google Scholar

16. Garcia Villaluenga, J., Tabe-Mohammadi, A., 2000. A review on the separation of benzene/cyclohexane mixtures by pervaporation processes. Journal of Membrane Science 2, 159–174.10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00337-3Search in Google Scholar

17. Graaf, G., Scholtens, H., Stamhuis, E., Beenackers, A., 1990. Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis. Chemical Engineering Science 4, 773–783.10.1016/0009-2509(90)85001-TSearch in Google Scholar

18. Graaf, G., Stamhuis, E., Beenackers, A., 1988. Kinetics of low-pressure methanol synthesis. Chemical Engineering Science 12, 3185–3195.10.1016/0009-2509(88)85127-3Search in Google Scholar

19. Iranshahi, D., Pourazadi, E., Bahmanpour, A., Rahimpour, M., 2011. A comparison of two different flow types on performance of a thermally coupled recuperative reactor containing naphtha reforming process and hydrogenation of nitrobenzene. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 5, 3483–3495.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.033Search in Google Scholar

20. Itoh, N., Watanabe, S., Kawasoe, K., Sato, T., Tsuji, T., 2008. A membrane reactor for hydrogen storage and transport system using cyclohexane–methylcyclohexane mixtures. Desalination 1, 261–269.10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.093Search in Google Scholar

21. Jain, I., Lal, C., Jain, A., 2010. Hydrogen storage in Mg: A most promising material. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 10, 5133–5144.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.088Search in Google Scholar

22. Ji, C., Liang, C., Wang, S., 2011. Investigation on combustion and emissions of DME/gasoline mixtures in a spark-ignition engine. Fuel 3, 1133–1138.10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.033Search in Google Scholar

23. Khademi, M., Rahimpour, M., Jahanmiri, A., 2010. Differential evolution (DE) strategy for optimization of hydrogen production, cyclohexane dehydrogenation and methanol synthesis in a hydrogen-permselective membrane thermally coupled reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 5, 1936–1950.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.080Search in Google Scholar

24. Khademi, M., Farsi, M., Rahimpour, M., Jahanmiri, A., 2011. DME synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation reaction in an optimized thermally coupled reactor. Chemical Engineering Process 1, 113–123.10.1016/j.cep.2010.12.004Search in Google Scholar

25. Khademi, A., Rahimpour, M.R., Jahanmiri, M. 2012. A comparison of a novel recuperative configuration and conventional methanol synthesis reactor. Chemical Engineering Communication 199, 889–911.10.1080/00986445.2011.598972Search in Google Scholar

26. Kirk-Othmer. 1978. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.Search in Google Scholar

27. Lindsay, A.L., Bromley, L.R.A., 1950. Thermal conductivity of gas mixtures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 8, 1508–1511.10.1021/ie50488a017Search in Google Scholar

28. Lu, W.Z., Teng, L.H., Xiao, W.D., 2004. Simulation and experiment study of dimethyl ether synthesis from syngas in a fluidized-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 22, 5455–5464.10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.031Search in Google Scholar

29. Naika P.S., Ryub T., Buib V., Millerb D.J., Drinnanc N. B., Zmierczak W., 2011. Synthesis of DME from CO2/H2 gas mixture. Chemical Engineering Journal 167, 362–368.10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.087Search in Google Scholar

30. Nie, Z., Fang, D., 2004. Global Kinetics of Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Ether from Syngas Containing N2 over Bifunctional Mixed Catalyst. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology 4, 370–374.Search in Google Scholar

31. Ponce-Ortega, J.M., Al-Thubaiti, M.M., El-Halwagi, M.M., 2012. Process intensification: New understanding and systematic approach. Chemical Engineering Process 53, 63–75.10.1016/j.cep.2011.12.010Search in Google Scholar

32. Rahimpour, M., Ghader, S., 2003. Theoretical Investigation of a Pd membrane Reactor for Methanol Synthesis. Chemical Engineering Technology 8, 902–907.10.1002/ceat.200301717Search in Google Scholar

33. Reid R.C., Sherwood T.K., Prausnitz J., 1997. The Properties of Gases and Liquids. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Search in Google Scholar

34. Samimi, F., Kabiri, S., Mirvakili, A., Rahimpour, M.R. 2013. The concept of integrated thermally double coupled reactor for simultaneous production of methanol, hydrogen and gasoline via differential evolution method. Journal of Natural Gas Science Engineering 14, 144–157.10.1016/j.jngse.2013.06.009Search in Google Scholar

35. Semelsberger, T.A., Borup, R.L., Greene, H.L., 2006. Dimethyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel. Journal of Power Sources 2, 497–511.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.082Search in Google Scholar

36. Shi, D.-P., Luo, Z.-H., Guo, A.-Y., 2010. Numerical simulation of the gas-solid Flow in fluidized-bed polymerization reactors. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research 49, 4070–4079.10.1021/ie901424gSearch in Google Scholar

37. Smith J.M., 1980. Chemical Engineering Kinetics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Search in Google Scholar

38. Sun, Z., Liu, F.S., Liu, X., Sun, B., Sun, D.W., 2012. Research and development of hydrogen fuelled engines in China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37, 664–681.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.114Search in Google Scholar

39. Vakili, R., Pourazadi, E., Setoodeh, P., Eslamloueyan, R., Rahimpour, M., 2011a. Direct dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis through a thermally coupled heat exchanger reactor. Applied Energy 4, 1211–1223.10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.023Search in Google Scholar

40. Vakili, R., Rahmanifard, H., Maroufi, P., Eslamloueyan, R., Rahimpour, M., 2011b. The effect of flow type patterns in a novel thermally coupled reactor for simultaneous direct dimethyl ether (DME) and hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 7, 4354–4365.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.135Search in Google Scholar

41. Veziroğlu, T.N., 2008. 21st Century’s energy: Hydrogen energy system. Energy Conversion Management 7, 1820–1831.10.1016/j.enconman.2007.08.015Search in Google Scholar

42. Wilke, C., 1949. Estimation of liquid diffusion coefficients. Chemical Engineering Progress 3, 218–224.Search in Google Scholar

43. Zanfir, M., Gavriilidis, A., 2003. Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 17, 3947–3960.10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00279-3Search in Google Scholar

44. Zhuang, Y.-Q., Chen, X.-M., Luo, Z.-H., Xiao, J., 2014. CFD-DEM modeling of gas-solid flow and catalytic MTO reaction in a fluidized bed reactor. Computers Chemical Engineering 60, 1–16.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-10-30
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Novel Membrane Reactor Concepts for Hydrogen Production from Hydrocarbons: A Review
  4. Research Articles
  5. Modeling and Simulation Study of an Industrial Radial Moving Bed Reactor for Propane Dehydrogenation Process
  6. Oxidative Degradation of Methylene Blue in Aqueous Medium Catalyzed by Lab Prepared Nickel Hydroxide
  7. CFD Modelling of a Hollow Fibre Membrane for CO2 Removal by Aqueous Amine Solutions of MEA, DEA and MDEA
  8. Performance Study of a Thermally Double Coupled Multi-Tubular Reactor by Considering the Effect of Flow Type Patterns
  9. Radiative Three-Dimensional Flow with Chemical Reaction
  10. Three-Phase Model of a Fluidized-Bed Catalytic Reactor for Polyethylene Synthesis
  11. Study on the Effect of Nickel Doping on Mo-Bi Based Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of Isobutene to Methacrolein
  12. DM Water Plant Sedimentation as a Cheap and Waste Source of Catalyst for Biodiesel Production
  13. Recovery of Biogas from Meat Industry Wastewater Using Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR): Modeling and Optimization
  14. Comparison of CFD Simulation and Simplified Modeling of a Fluidized Bed CO2 Capture Reactor
  15. Kinetic Study for Platinum Extraction from Spent Catalyst in Cyanide Solution at High Temperatures
  16. Hydroisomerization of Biomass Derived n-Hexadecane Towards Diesel Pool: Effect of Selective Removal External Surface Sites from Pt/ZSM-22
  17. Heat Flux and Variable Thermal Conductivity Effects on Casson Flow and Heat Transfer due to an Exponentially Stretching Sheet with Viscous Dissipation and Heat Generation
  18. Optimization of Nickel Chemical Extraction from Hazardous Residue
  19. Green Approach for Biodiesel Production from Jojoba Oil Supported by Process Modeling and Simulation
  20. Differentiating Process Performance of Various Coagulants in Removal of Congo red and Orange G Dyes
  21. CFD Simulation of Hydrodynamic of a Bubble Column Reactor Operating in Churn-Turbulent Regime and Effect of Gas Inlet Distribution on System Characteristics
  22. Transformation of Phenolic Compounds by Fe(III) in the Aqueous Solution in Dark and Under Irradiation
  23. Transient Predictive Model for Dynamic Analysis, Kinetic Study, and Reactor Design of Triglycerides Transesterification to Biodiesel
  24. Screening of Alternative Carbon Sources for Recombinant Protein Production in Pichia pastoris
  25. Optimization of a Large Scale Industrial Reactor Towards Tailor Made Polymers Using Genetic Algorithm
  26. Model of Reactive Transport within a Light Photocatalytic Textile
  27. Preparation of Chitosan based Nanofibers: Optimization and Modeling
  28. Adsorption of As (III) on Iron Coated Quartz Sand: Influence of Temperature on the Equilibrium Isotherm, Thermodynamics and Isosteric Heat of Adsorption Analysis
  29. Resistance Characteristics of Coal Slime in Pipe Flow at High Pressure
  30. Activity Comparison of Acidic Resins in the Production of Valuable Glycerol Acetates
  31. Bulk Polymerization of Styrene using Multifunctional Initiators in a Batch Reactor: A Comprehensive Mathematical Model
  32. An Effective Reaction Rate Model for Gas-Solid Reactions with High Intra-Particle Diffusion Resistance
  33. Heart-Like Micro-Flow Mixer
  34. Hydrogen Production by Hydrolysis of NaBH4 with Cr-Ni-W-B Catalyst: Effects of Cold Plasma and Chromium Content
  35. Prediction of Reactivity Ratios in Free Radical Copolymerization from Monomer ResonancePolarity (Q–e) Parameters: Genetic Programming-Based Models
  36. Steady-State Modeling of Pt-Catalyzed H2 Combustion in a Monolithic Reactor: From Micro- to Macro-kinetics
  37. Premixed Methanol–Air Combustion Characteristics in a Mini-scale Catalytic Combustor
  38. Kinetic Modeling of VOC Photocatalytic Degradation Using a Process at Different Reactor Configurations and Scales
  39. Improvement of Activated Sludge Process Using a Nonlinear PI Controller Design via Adaptive Gain
  40. Modeling and Simulation of a Pilot-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier for the Gasification of High Ash Indian Coal Using Eulerian Granular Approach
  41. Performance of a Catalytic Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed Reactor in the Presence of Interparticle Forces
  42. Mathematical Modeling of Biodiesel Production under Intense Agitation
  43. Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Reactor (EAASR) for Removal of Nitrobenzene: Air Stripped or Biologically Removed?
  44. CFD Modeling of Algae Flash Pyrolysis in the Batch Fluidized Bed Reactor Including Heat Carrier Particles
  45. A Robust Extended State Observer for the Estimation of Concentration and Kinetics in a CSTR
  46. Dynamic Modeling of CATOFIN® Fixed-Bed Iso-Butane Dehydrogenation Reactor for Operational Optimization
  47. Effect of Biomass Compositions on Combustion Kinetic Parameters using Response Surface Methodology
  48. Short Communications
  49. Discussions on Particle Flux Measurement in Gas-Solids Risers
  50. Use of New Regeneration Processes for Thermolabile Amines
  51. Oxidative-Extractive Desulfurization of Liquid Fuel by Dimethyl Sulfoxide and ZnCl2 Based Ionic Liquid
  52. Corrigendum
  53. Corrigendum to: Performance Analysis of Immobilized Enzyme Semifluidised Bed Bioreactors
Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2015-0098/pdf
Scroll to top button