Home CFD Modelling of a Hollow Fibre Membrane for CO2 Removal by Aqueous Amine Solutions of MEA, DEA and MDEA
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

CFD Modelling of a Hollow Fibre Membrane for CO2 Removal by Aqueous Amine Solutions of MEA, DEA and MDEA

  • Sina Gilassi and Nejat Rahmanian EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 4, 2015

Abstract

A mass transfer model was developed to capture CO2 from a gas mixture in hollow fibre membrane contactors under laminar flow conditions. The axial and radial diffusions through membrane and convection in tube and shell sides with chemical reaction were investigated. COMSOL software was used to numerically solve a system of non-linear equations with boundary conditions by use of the finite element method. Three different amine solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA) and n-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) were chosen as absorbent in lumen to consider the mass transfer rate of CO2 and its removal efficiency. The modelling results were compared with experimental data available in the literature and a good agreement was observed. The CFD results revealed that MEA had the best performance for CO2 removal as compared to DEA and MDEA under various operating conditions due to the different CO2 loading factor of absorbents. Furthermore, efficiency of CO2 removal was highly dependent on the absorbent concentration and flow rate, increasing of the gas flow rate caused a reduction in gas residence time in the shell and consequently declined CO2 mass transfer. The modelling results showed the effect of absorbent concentration on the CO2 mass transfer was improved due to availability of absorbent reactants at the gas-liquid interface.

Nomenclature

A

membrane surface area (m2)

C

concentration (mol/m3)

D

diffusivity coefficient (m2/s)

J

molar flux (mol/m2s)

H

Henry’s constant

P

pressure (bars)

Q

flow rate (m3/s)

R

reaction rate (mol/m3s)

r1

inner tube radius (mm)

r2

outer tube radius (mm)

r3

inner shell radius (mm)

Tg

gas temperature (°C)

U

velocity (m/s)

Greek symbols
φ

module volume fraction

η

CO2 removal efficiency

Abbreviations
HFMC

hollow fibre membrane contactor

DEA

Diethanolamine

MEA

Monoethanolamine

MDEA

n-methyldiethanolamine

References

1. Al-Marzouqi, M., El-Naas, M., Marzouk, S., Abdullatif, N., 2008. Modeling of chemical absorption of CO2 in membrane contactors. Separation and Purification Technology 62(3), 499–506.10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.009Search in Google Scholar

2. Albarracin Zaidiza, D., Billaud, J., Belaissaoui, B., Rode, S., Roizard, D., Favre, E., 2014. Modeling of CO2 post-combustion capture using membrane contactors, comparison between one- and two-dimensional approaches. Journal of Membrane Science 455(0), 64–74.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.012Search in Google Scholar

3. Aroonwilas, A., Veawab, A., 2004. Characterization and comparison of the CO2 absorption performance into single and blended alkanolamines in a packed column. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43(9), 2228–2237.10.1021/ie0306067Search in Google Scholar

4. Baker, R., 2012. Membrane Technology and Applications. UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118359686Search in Google Scholar

5. Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N., 2007. Transport Phenomena. US: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

6. Casper, J.K., 2010. Greenhouse Gases: Worldwide Impacts. US: Infobase Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

7. Chang, D., Min, J., Oh, S., Moon, K., 1998. Effect of pressure drop on performance of hollow-fiber membrane module for gas permeation. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 15(4), 396–403.10.1007/BF02697129Search in Google Scholar

8. Faiz, R., Al-Marzouqi, M., 2009. Mathematical modeling for the simultaneous absorption of CO2 and H2S using MEA in hollow fiber membrane contactors. Journal of Membrane Science 342(1), 269–278.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.050Search in Google Scholar

9. Gilassi, S., Rahmanian, N., 2014. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of CO2/CH4 separation in a polymeric membrane. Applied Mathematical Modelling: pp. In Process.10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.010Search in Google Scholar

10. Gilassi, S., Rahmanian, N., Year. An experimental investigation on permeability and selectivity of PTFE membrane: A mixture of methane and carbon dioxide. in International conference on membrane science and technology (MST) 2013. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: University Technology of Malaysia.Search in Google Scholar

11. Halmann, M.M., Steinberg, M., 1998. Greenhouse Gas Carbon Dioxide Mitigation: Science and Technology. CRC press.10.1201/9781482227833Search in Google Scholar

12. Happel, J., 1959. Viscous flow relative to arrays of cylinders. AIChE Journal 5(2), 174–177.10.1002/aic.690050211Search in Google Scholar

13. Hedayat, M., Soltanieh, M., Mousavi, S.A., 2011. Simultaneous separation of H2S and CO2 from natural gas by hollow fiber membrane contactor using mixture of alkanolamines. Journal of Membrane Science 377(1–2), 191–197.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.051Search in Google Scholar

14. Kothandaraman, A., Nord, L., Bolland, O., Herzog, H J., McRae, G.J., 2009. Comparison of solvents for post-combustion capture of CO2 by chemical absorption. Energy Procedia 1(1), 1373–1380.10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.180Search in Google Scholar

15. Li, J.L., Chen, B.H., 2005. Review of CO2 absorption using chemical solvents in hollow fiber membrane contactors. Separation and Purification Technology 41(2), 109–122.10.1016/j.seppur.2004.09.008Search in Google Scholar

16. Mansourizadeh, A., Ismail, A.F., 2007. Hollow fiber gas-liquid membrane contactors for acid gas capture. 147–182.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.026Search in Google Scholar

17. Mills, A.F., 2001. Mass Transfer. Vol. 2. US: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

18. Moulijn, J.A., Makkee, M., Van Diepen, A.E., 2013. Chemical Process Technology, 2nd ed., UK: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nield, D., 2009. The Beavers–Joseph boundary condition and related matters: a historical and critical note. Transport in Porous Media 78(3), 537–540.10.1007/s11242-009-9344-ySearch in Google Scholar

20. Paul, S., Ghoshal, A.K., Mandal, B., 2008. Theoretical studies on separation of CO2 by single and blended aqueous alkanolamine solvents in flat sheet membrane contactor (FSMC).Chemical Engineering Journal 144(3), 352–360.10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.036Search in Google Scholar

21. Rangwala, H.A., 1996. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous solutions using hollow fiber membrane contactors. Journal of Membrane Science 112(2), 229–240.10.1016/0376-7388(95)00293-6Search in Google Scholar

22. Razavi, S.M.R., Razavi, S.M.J., Miri, T., Shirazian, S., 2013. CFD simulation of CO2 capture from gas mixtures in nanoporous membranes by solution of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and piperazine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 15(0), 142–149.10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.011Search in Google Scholar

23. Saidi, M., Heidarinejad, S., Rahimpour, H.R., Talaghat, M.R., Rahimpour, M.R., 2014. Mathematical modeling of carbon dioxide removal using amine-promoted hot potassium carbonate in a hollow fiber membrane contactor. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 18, 274–285.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.03.001Search in Google Scholar

24. Sakwattanapong, R., Aroonwilas, A., Veawab, A., 2009. Reaction rate of CO2 in aqueous MEA-AMP solution: experiment and modeling. Energy Procedia 1(1), 217–224.10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.031Search in Google Scholar

25. Veawab, A., Aroonwilas, A., Tontiwachwuthikul, P., 2002. CO2 Absorption Performance of Aqueous alkanolamines in Packed Columns. Fuel Chemistry Division Preprints 47(1), 49–50.Search in Google Scholar

26. Versteeg, G.F., Van Swaalj, W., 1988. Solubility and diffusivity of acid gases (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide) in aqueous alkanolamine solutions. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 33(1), 29–34.10.1021/je00051a011Search in Google Scholar

27. Yan, S.P., Fang, M.X., Zhang, W.F., Wang, S.Y., Xu, Z.K., Luo, Z.Y., Cen, K.F., 2007. Experimental study on the separation of CO2 from flue gas using hollow fiber membrane contactors without wetting. Fuel Processing Technology 88(5), 501–511.10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.12.007Search in Google Scholar

28. Yang, J., Yu, X., Yan, J., Tu, S.T., Dahlquist, E., 2012. Effects of SO2 on CO2 capture using a hollow fiber membrane contactor. Applied Energy 112, 755–764.10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.052Search in Google Scholar

29. Zhang, Y., Wang, R., 2013. Gas–liquid membrane contactors for acid gas removal: recent advances and future challenges. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 255–262.10.1016/j.coche.2013.03.008Search in Google Scholar

30. Zhang, H.Y., Wang, R., Liang, D.T., Wang, R. Liang, D T., Tay, J H. 2006. Modeling and experimental study of CO2 absorption in a hollow fiber membrane contactor. Journal of Membrane Science 279(1), 301–310.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.017Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-11-4
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Novel Membrane Reactor Concepts for Hydrogen Production from Hydrocarbons: A Review
  4. Research Articles
  5. Modeling and Simulation Study of an Industrial Radial Moving Bed Reactor for Propane Dehydrogenation Process
  6. Oxidative Degradation of Methylene Blue in Aqueous Medium Catalyzed by Lab Prepared Nickel Hydroxide
  7. CFD Modelling of a Hollow Fibre Membrane for CO2 Removal by Aqueous Amine Solutions of MEA, DEA and MDEA
  8. Performance Study of a Thermally Double Coupled Multi-Tubular Reactor by Considering the Effect of Flow Type Patterns
  9. Radiative Three-Dimensional Flow with Chemical Reaction
  10. Three-Phase Model of a Fluidized-Bed Catalytic Reactor for Polyethylene Synthesis
  11. Study on the Effect of Nickel Doping on Mo-Bi Based Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of Isobutene to Methacrolein
  12. DM Water Plant Sedimentation as a Cheap and Waste Source of Catalyst for Biodiesel Production
  13. Recovery of Biogas from Meat Industry Wastewater Using Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR): Modeling and Optimization
  14. Comparison of CFD Simulation and Simplified Modeling of a Fluidized Bed CO2 Capture Reactor
  15. Kinetic Study for Platinum Extraction from Spent Catalyst in Cyanide Solution at High Temperatures
  16. Hydroisomerization of Biomass Derived n-Hexadecane Towards Diesel Pool: Effect of Selective Removal External Surface Sites from Pt/ZSM-22
  17. Heat Flux and Variable Thermal Conductivity Effects on Casson Flow and Heat Transfer due to an Exponentially Stretching Sheet with Viscous Dissipation and Heat Generation
  18. Optimization of Nickel Chemical Extraction from Hazardous Residue
  19. Green Approach for Biodiesel Production from Jojoba Oil Supported by Process Modeling and Simulation
  20. Differentiating Process Performance of Various Coagulants in Removal of Congo red and Orange G Dyes
  21. CFD Simulation of Hydrodynamic of a Bubble Column Reactor Operating in Churn-Turbulent Regime and Effect of Gas Inlet Distribution on System Characteristics
  22. Transformation of Phenolic Compounds by Fe(III) in the Aqueous Solution in Dark and Under Irradiation
  23. Transient Predictive Model for Dynamic Analysis, Kinetic Study, and Reactor Design of Triglycerides Transesterification to Biodiesel
  24. Screening of Alternative Carbon Sources for Recombinant Protein Production in Pichia pastoris
  25. Optimization of a Large Scale Industrial Reactor Towards Tailor Made Polymers Using Genetic Algorithm
  26. Model of Reactive Transport within a Light Photocatalytic Textile
  27. Preparation of Chitosan based Nanofibers: Optimization and Modeling
  28. Adsorption of As (III) on Iron Coated Quartz Sand: Influence of Temperature on the Equilibrium Isotherm, Thermodynamics and Isosteric Heat of Adsorption Analysis
  29. Resistance Characteristics of Coal Slime in Pipe Flow at High Pressure
  30. Activity Comparison of Acidic Resins in the Production of Valuable Glycerol Acetates
  31. Bulk Polymerization of Styrene using Multifunctional Initiators in a Batch Reactor: A Comprehensive Mathematical Model
  32. An Effective Reaction Rate Model for Gas-Solid Reactions with High Intra-Particle Diffusion Resistance
  33. Heart-Like Micro-Flow Mixer
  34. Hydrogen Production by Hydrolysis of NaBH4 with Cr-Ni-W-B Catalyst: Effects of Cold Plasma and Chromium Content
  35. Prediction of Reactivity Ratios in Free Radical Copolymerization from Monomer ResonancePolarity (Q–e) Parameters: Genetic Programming-Based Models
  36. Steady-State Modeling of Pt-Catalyzed H2 Combustion in a Monolithic Reactor: From Micro- to Macro-kinetics
  37. Premixed Methanol–Air Combustion Characteristics in a Mini-scale Catalytic Combustor
  38. Kinetic Modeling of VOC Photocatalytic Degradation Using a Process at Different Reactor Configurations and Scales
  39. Improvement of Activated Sludge Process Using a Nonlinear PI Controller Design via Adaptive Gain
  40. Modeling and Simulation of a Pilot-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier for the Gasification of High Ash Indian Coal Using Eulerian Granular Approach
  41. Performance of a Catalytic Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed Reactor in the Presence of Interparticle Forces
  42. Mathematical Modeling of Biodiesel Production under Intense Agitation
  43. Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Reactor (EAASR) for Removal of Nitrobenzene: Air Stripped or Biologically Removed?
  44. CFD Modeling of Algae Flash Pyrolysis in the Batch Fluidized Bed Reactor Including Heat Carrier Particles
  45. A Robust Extended State Observer for the Estimation of Concentration and Kinetics in a CSTR
  46. Dynamic Modeling of CATOFIN® Fixed-Bed Iso-Butane Dehydrogenation Reactor for Operational Optimization
  47. Effect of Biomass Compositions on Combustion Kinetic Parameters using Response Surface Methodology
  48. Short Communications
  49. Discussions on Particle Flux Measurement in Gas-Solids Risers
  50. Use of New Regeneration Processes for Thermolabile Amines
  51. Oxidative-Extractive Desulfurization of Liquid Fuel by Dimethyl Sulfoxide and ZnCl2 Based Ionic Liquid
  52. Corrigendum
  53. Corrigendum to: Performance Analysis of Immobilized Enzyme Semifluidised Bed Bioreactors
Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2014-0142/html
Scroll to top button