Startseite Dynamic Modeling of CATOFIN® Fixed-Bed Iso-Butane Dehydrogenation Reactor for Operational Optimization
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Dynamic Modeling of CATOFIN® Fixed-Bed Iso-Butane Dehydrogenation Reactor for Operational Optimization

  • Zeeshan Nawaz EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Dezember 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The catalytic dehydrogenation of iso-butane to iso-butylene is an equilibrium limited endothermic reaction and requires high temperature. The catalyst deactivates quickly, due to deposition of carbonaceous species and countered by periodic regeneration. The reaction-engineering constraints are tied up with operation and/or technology design features. CATOFIN® is a sophisticated commercialized technology for propane/iso-butane dehydrogenation using multiple adiabatic fixed-bed reactors having Cr2O3/Al2O3 as catalyst, that undergo cyclic operations (~18–30m); dehydrogenation, regeneration, evacuation, purging and reduction. It is always a concern, how to maintain CATOFIN® reactor at an optimum production, while overcoming gradual decrease of heat in catalyst bed and deactivation. A homogeneous one-dimensional dynamic reactor model for a commercial CATOFIN® fixed-bed iso-butane dehydrogenation reactor is developed in an equation oriented (EO) platform Aspen Custom Modeler (ACM), for operational optimization and process intensification. Both reaction and regeneration steps were modeled and results were validated. The model predicts the dynamic behavior and demonstrates the extent of catalyst utilization with operating conditions and time, coke formation and removal, etc. The model computes optimum catalyst bed temperature profiles, feed rate, pre-heating, rates for reaction and regeneration, fuel gas requirement, optimum catalyst amount, overall cycle time optimization, and suggest best operational philosophy.

Nomenclature

FH

Fixed horizon

DOS

Days on Stream

PI

Profit Index

DRO

Dehydrogenation Reactor Optimization

HC

Hydrocarbon

MOR

Middle of Run

EOR

End of Run

EORXR

Equation Oriented reactor

RL

Run Length

A

Cross sectional area of reactor (m2)

a

Interfacial area (m2/m3)

Amean

Pre-exponential factor

CA

molar concentration of A (mol/m3)

Cpg, j

Specific heat capacity of gas at node j (J/mol/K)

Cp, in

Specific heat capacity of external feed added (J/mol/K)

Cis, r

Molar concentration of species i at radial location r (mol/m3)

csg

specific heat of gas (J/kg∙oC)

Ci

Molar concentration of species i in bulk gas (mol/m3)

cscat

specific heat of gas [J/(kg∙oC)]

Dies

Effective diffusivity of species i (m2/s)

Dim

Gas molecular diffusion of species I (m2/s)

Dik

Knudsen diffusivity of species I (m2/s)

dp

Diameter of catalyst particle (m)

Dzg

axial dispersion coefficient (m2/s)

E

Activation Energy

Fi

Flow rate of species I (mol/s)

Ftotin

External total feed addition (mol/s)

Ftot

Total flow rate of all species (mol/s)

FV

actual volumetric flow rate (m3/s)

G

Gas flux (kg/s/m2)

hg

Bed heat transfer coefficient (W/m2/K)

∆Hr, n

Heat of reaction n (J/mol)

k

Arrhenius type kinetic constant

K

Absorption equilibrium constant

kig

Mass transfer coefficient of species I (m/s)

MWi

Molecular weight of species I (kg/kmol)

Ps, r

Partial pressure of species i at radial location r (bar)

Pi

Partial pressure of species i in bulk gas (bar)

∆P

Bed pressure drop (Pa)

Rg

Gas constant (J/mol/K)

rrn

Rate of reaction n (mol/kgcat/s)

RAS

production/consumption of A per unit volume of solid (mol/(m3cats))

Rpore

Radius of pore (m)

r

Radial position in pellet (m)

rrk

rate of reaction k per unit volume of solid (mol/(m3cats))

ST

Stichometric Matrix

Tin

Temperature of external feed added (oC)

T

Temperature of bulk gas (oC)

Ts, r

Pellet temperature at radial location r (oC)

Δt

time increment (s)

u

Superficial velocity of gas (m/s)

w

actual velocity in the empty reactor tube (m/s)

wcoke

Carbon loaded on catalyst (Kg/m3)

yiin

Mole fraction of species i in external feed added (kmol/kmol)

yi

Mole fraction of species i (kmol/kmol)

z

Axial distance from reactor inlet (m)

Δz

Space increment (m)

ρb

Bulk density of catalyst (kg/m3)

vn, i

Stoichiometry of species i in reaction n

ηk

effectiveness factor for reaction k

ηn

Effectiveness factor for reaction n

ρg

Molar density of gas (mol/m3)

ρp

Catalyst Density (kg/m3)

λs

Effective thermal conductivity (W/m/K)

λze

effective axial thermal conductivity of the catalyst bed (J/(oC·m·s))

εb

Bed voidage

ρmass

Density of gas (kg/m3)

ρcat

gas density (kg/m3)

µg

Viscosity of gas (kg/m/s)

εs

Particle porosity

τ

Particle tortuosity

Acknowledgment and forward statement

Author acknowledged the technical support of Prof. Ing. Dr. Tedor Todinca, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Food Technology, University Politechenica Timisoara, Romania. Moreover, the article may contain forward-looking statements based on assumptions, knowledge based forecasts, known and unknown risks, uncertainties, financial situation, development or performance and the estimates/designs presented here. Therefore, author or company assumes no liability whatsoever to update these forward-looking statements or to conform them to future events or developments.

References

1. Airaksinen S.M.K., Harlin M.E., Krause, A.O.I., 2002. Kinetic Modeling of Dehydrogenation of Isobutane on Chromia/Alumina Catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 5619–5626.10.1021/ie020371jSuche in Google Scholar

2. Airaksinen, S., 2005. Chromium oxide catalysts in the dehydrogenation of alkanes, PhD thesis, Helsinki University, Finland.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Al-Ghamdi, A.A., Al-Bassam, M.A., Draus, J.L., 1994. Start-up of world’s largest isobutane dehydrogenation plant for MTBE production, Annual Meeting of the National Petroleum Refiners Association, an Antonio, TX, USA, Paper AM-94-28. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/7078217; http://worldwidescience.org/topicpages/w/world+single-state+start.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

4. Ali, M.A., Hamid, H., 2004. Handbook of MTBE and Other Gasoline Oxygenates, Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York: CRC Press.10.1201/9780203021446Suche in Google Scholar

5. AspenTech Single-Period and Multi-Period Model Report (DRO), 2005Suche in Google Scholar

6. Atkins, M.P., Evans, G.R., 1995. A Review of Current Processes and Innovations in Catalytic Dehydrogenation. Erdoel Erdgas Kohle 6, 271–274.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Bakhshi, A., Ehsani, M.R., Moheb, A., 2010. Mathematical Modeling of a Fixed Bed Reactor for Dehydrogenation of Isobutane, The 13th Asia Pacific Confederation of Chemical Engineering Congress (APCChE 2010), Taipei.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Beesley, E., Wipp, B., 2010. Butane Dehydrogenation at Billingham. Chem. Ind. (London) 1953, S50.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Bhasin, M.M., McCain J.H., Vora, B.V., Imai, T., Pujado, P.R., 2001. Dehydrogenation and Oxy-Dehydrogenation of Paraffins to Olefins. Appl. Catal. A. 221, 397–419.10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00816-XSuche in Google Scholar

10. Borealis K.N.V., Cousaert, R., Weyne, K., 2005. Flow distribution in the Catofin Reactors; Regeneration Air Piping, Air Inlet Baffle, Reactor Internals, Borealis, Catofin Technology Conference, Munich.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Brockwell, H.L., Sarathy, P.R., Trotta, R., 1991. Synthesize Ethers. Hydrocarbon Processing 70, 133–135.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Bruckner, A., Radnik, J., Hoang, D.L., Lieske, H., 1999. In Situ Investigation of Active Sites in Zirconia-Supported Chromium Oxide Catalysts During the Aromatization of n-Octane. Catal. Lett. 60, 183–189.10.1023/A:1019067309929Suche in Google Scholar

13. Chaku, P., Spence, D., CATOFIN Technology Improvements, Lummus Global, CATOFIN Technology Conference, Lisbon, Purtagal.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Cimino, A., Cordischi, D., DeRossi, S., Ferraris, G., Gazzoli, D., Indovina, V., Minelli, G., Occhiuzzi, M., Valigi, M., 1991. Studies on Chromia/Zirconia Catalysts I. Preparation and Characterization of the System. J. Catal. 127, 744–760.10.1016/0021-9517(91)90196-BSuche in Google Scholar

15. Craig, R.G., Spence, D.C., 1986. Catalytic dehydrogenation of liquefied petroleum gas by the Houdry Catofin and Catadiene processes. in: Meyers, R. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Craig, R.G., Spence, D.C., 1986. Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY and London.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Dumez, F.J., Froment, G.F. 1976. Dehydrogenation of 1–Butene Into Butadiene-Kinetics, Catalyst Coking, and Reactor Design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 291, 15.10.1021/i260058a014Suche in Google Scholar

18. Ercan, C., Gartside, R.J., 1996. Reactor Performance and Stability in an Alternating Reaction-Reheat Paraffin Dehydrogenation System.Can. J. Chem. Eng. 74, 626–637.10.1002/cjce.5450740512Suche in Google Scholar

19. Frey, F.E., Huppke, H.F., 1937. Processes for converting hydrocarbons, US Patent 2098959.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Fridman, V., Urbancic, M., 2005. Next Generation Catalyst for HOUDRY Dehydrogenation, Sud Chemie Inc. Cataofin Technology Conference, Munich.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Fridman, V.Z., Merriam, J., Urbancic, M., 2009. Catalytically inactive heat generator and improved dehydrogenation process, US Patent 7622623.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Fridman, V.Z., Urbancic, M., 2011. Endothermic hydrocarbon conversion process, US Patent 7973207.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Ghandhi, D., Romeo, J., Ponzi, P., 2005. CATOFIN Reactor CFD Analysis, CATOFIN Technology Conference, Munich.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Grunert, W., Saffert, W., Feldhaus, R., Anders, K., 1986. Reduction and Aromatization Activity of Chromia-Alumina Catalysts: I. Reduction and Break-in Behavior of a Potassium-Promoted Chromia-Alumina Catalyst. J. Catal. 99, 149–158.10.1016/0021-9517(86)90208-3Suche in Google Scholar

25. Hornaday, G.F., Ferrell, F.M., 1961, Advances in Petroleum Chemistry and Refining, Vol.4, Interscience, Paris, pp. 451–488.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Hornaday, G.F., Ferrell, F.M., Mills, G.A., 1961. Manufacture of mono and diolefins from paraffins by catalytic dehydrogenation. In Advances in Petroleum Chemistry and Refining; InterScience: Pans vol.4.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Martyanov, I., Sayari, A., 2008. Sol–Gel Assisted Preparation of Chromia–Silica Catalysts for Non-Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane. Catal. Lett. 126, 164–172.10.1007/s10562-008-9599-xSuche in Google Scholar

28. Michorczyk, P., Ogonowski, J., Zenczak, K., 2011. Activity of Chromium Oxide Deposited on Different Silica Supports in the Dehydrogenation of Propane with CO2 – A Comparative Study.J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 349, 1–12.10.1016/j.molcata.2011.08.019Suche in Google Scholar

29. Mickley, H.S., Nesyor, J.W., Leonard Jr., Gould, A., 1965. A Kinetic Study of the Regeneration of a Dehydrogenation Catalyst. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 4, 61–68.10.1002/cjce.5450430203Suche in Google Scholar

30. Nawaz Z., Wei, F., 2011. Pt-Sn-based Catalyst’s Intensification using Al2O3-SAPO-34 as a Support for Propane Dehydrogenation to Propylene. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 17, 389–393.10.1016/j.jiec.2010.09.027Suche in Google Scholar

31. Nawaz, Z., 2010. Integrated study of light alkane dehydrogenation to propylene using Pt-based SAPO-34 catalyst, PhD Thesis, Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Reaction Engineering & Technology (FLOTU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Nawaz, Z., 2015. Light Alkane Dehydrogenation to Light Olefin Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 31, 413–436.10.1515/revce-2015-0012Suche in Google Scholar

33. Nawaz, Z., Baksh, F., Ramzan, N., Al-qahtani, A., 2012. Chapter No. 1, pages: 3–14, Rational Asymmetric Catalyst Design, Intensification and Modeling, Advances in Chemical Engineering, INTECH, Rijeka, Croatia.10.5772/39209Suche in Google Scholar

34. Nawaz, Z., Shu, Q., Naveed, S., Wei, F., 2009a. Light Alkane (Mixed Feed) Selective Dehydrogenation using Bi-Metallic Zeolite Supported Catalyst. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiopia 23, 429–436.10.4314/bcse.v23i3.47667Suche in Google Scholar

35. Nawaz, Z., Tang X.P., Zhang, Q., Dezheng, W., Wei, F., 2009b. A Highly Selective Pt-Sn/SAPO-3 Catalyst for Propane Dehydrogenation to Propylene. Catal. Commun. 10, 1925–1930.10.1016/j.catcom.2009.07.008Suche in Google Scholar

36. Nawaz, Z., Qing, S., Gao, J., Tang, X.P., Wei, F., 2010a. Effect of Si/Al Ratio on Performance of Pt-Sn-based Catalyst Supported on ZSM-5 Zeolite for n-Butane Conversion to Light Olefins. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16, 57–62.10.1016/j.jiec.2010.01.021Suche in Google Scholar

37. Nawaz, Z., Tang, X., Wang, Y., Wei, F., 2010b. Parametric Characterization and Influence of Tin on the Performance of Pt-Sn/SAPO-34 Catalyst for Selective Propane Dehydrogenation to Propylene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 1274–1280.10.1021/ie901465sSuche in Google Scholar

38. Nawaz, Z., Tang, X.P., Chu, Y., Wei, F., 2010c. Influence of Calcinations Temperature and Reaction Atmosphere on Catalytic Properties of Pt-Sn/SAPO-34 Novel Catalyst for Propane Dehydrogenation to Propylene. Chin. J. Catal. 31, 552–556.10.1016/S1872-2067(09)60071-1Suche in Google Scholar

39. Nawaz, Z., Tang, X.P., Wei, F., 2009. Influence of Operating Conditions, Si/Al Ratio and Doping of Zinc on Pt-Sn/ZSM-5 Catalyst for Propane Dehydrogenation to Propene, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 26, 1528–1532.10.1007/s11814-009-0233-4Suche in Google Scholar

40. Nawaz, Z., Wei, F., 2009. The Pt-Sn-based SAPO-34 Supported Novel Catalyst for n-Butane Dehydrogenation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 7442–7447.10.1021/ie900801mSuche in Google Scholar

41. Nawaz, Z., Wei, F., 2010. Hydrothermal Study of Pt-Sn-based SAPO-34 Supported Novel Catalyst Used for Selective Propane Dehydrogenation to Propylene. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16, 774–784.10.1016/j.jiec.2010.07.002Suche in Google Scholar

42. Nawaz, Z., Wei, F., 2013. Light Alkane Oxidative dehydrogenation to Light Olefins over Pt-based SAPO-34 Zeolite Supported Catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 346–352.10.1021/ie301422nSuche in Google Scholar

43. Nijhuis, T.A., Tinnemans, S.J., Visser, T., Weckhuysen, B.M., 2004. Towards Real-Time Spectroscopic Process Control for the Dehydrogenation of Propane over Supported Chromium Oxide Catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 5487–5492.10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.103Suche in Google Scholar

44. Puurunen, R.L., Beheydt, B.G., Weckhuysen, B.M., 2001. Monitoring Chromia/Alumina Catalysts in Situ during Propane Dehydrogenation by Optical Fiber UV–Visible Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. J. Catal. 204, 253–257.10.1006/jcat.2001.3372Suche in Google Scholar

45. Quina, M.J., Almeida-Costa, A.C., Quinta-Ferriera, R.M. 2007. Fixed-Bed Reactor Modeling and Simulation with e-Learning Tools, International Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Refractory Bricks Installation and Maintenance in CATOFIN Reacrtors, 2007. Catofin/Catadiene Technology Conference Lisbon.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Rokicki, A., Brummer, R., Fridman, V.Z., 2011. Catalyst and process improvements for increased stability CATOFIN i-C4 and C3 dehydrogenation, Catalysts in Petroleum Refining and Petrochemicals, Proceeding of Saudi-Japanese Symposium, 11th, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Sanfilippo, D., 2011. Dehydrogenations in Fluidized Bed: Catalysis and Reactor Engineering, Catal. Today 178, 142– 150.10.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.013Suche in Google Scholar

49. Sanfilippo, D., Miracca, I., 2006. Dehydrogenation of Paraffins: Synergies between Catalyst Design and Reactor Engineering. Catal. Today 111, 133–139.10.1016/j.cattod.2005.10.012Suche in Google Scholar

50. Sanfilippo, D., Rylander, P.N., 2009. Hydrogenation and dehydrogenation, in: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH. 18, 451–471.10.1002/14356007.a13_487.pub2Suche in Google Scholar

51. Sattler, J.J.H.B., Ruiz-Martinez, J., Santillan-Jimenez, E., Weckhuysen, B.M., 2014. Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Light Alkanes on Metals and Metal Oxides. Chem. Rev. 114, 10613–10653.10.1021/cr5002436Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Seung-Taek, S., Wangyun, W., Lee, K.S., Jung, C., Lee, S., 2007. Repetitive control of CATOFIN process, Korean J. Chem. Eng 24, 921–926.10.1007/s11814-007-0098-3Suche in Google Scholar

53. Urbancic, M.A., Fridman, V.Z., Rokicki, A., 2005. A New Houdry Catalyst for the ‘Third wave’ – Propane Dehydrogenation, Proceedings of 19th North American Catalysis Society Meeting, Philadelphia, USA.Suche in Google Scholar

54. Vernikovskaya, N.V., Savin, I.G., Kashkin, V.N., Pakhomov, N.A., Ermakova, A., Molchanov, V.V., Nemykina, E.I, Parahin, O.A., 2011. Dehydrogenation of Propane – Isobutane Mixture in a Fluidized Bed Reactor over Cr2O3/Al2O3 Catalyst: Experimental Studies and Mathematical Modeling. Chem. Eng. J. 176–177, 158–164.10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.115Suche in Google Scholar

55. Wachowski, L., Kirszensztejn, P., Lopatka, R., Czajka, B., 1994. Studies of Physicochemical and Surface Properties of Alumina Modified with Rare-Earth Oxides I. Preparation, Structure and Thermal Stability. Mater. Chem. Phys. 37, 29–38.10.1016/0254-0584(94)90067-1Suche in Google Scholar

56. Waddams, A. L. 1980. Chemicals from Petroleum, 4th ed. Gulf Publishing Company: Houston.Suche in Google Scholar

57. Weckhuysen, B.M., Bensalem, A., Schoonheydt, R.A., 1998. In-situ UV-VIS Diffuse-Reflectance Spectroscopy on line activity measurements – Significance of CRN-Butane Dehydrogenation Catalyzed by Supported Cr-Oxide Catalyst (Species (N = 2, 3 and 6) in N).J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94, 2011–2014.10.1039/a801710gSuche in Google Scholar

58. Weckhuysen, B.M., Schoonheydt R.A., 1999a. Alkane Dehydrogenation over Supported Chromium Oxide Catalysts. Catal. Today 51, 223–232.10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00047-4Suche in Google Scholar

59. Weckhuysen, B.M., Schoonheydt, R.A., 1999b. Alkane Dehydrogenation over Supported Chromium Oxide Catalysts. Catal. Today 51, 223–232.10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00047-4Suche in Google Scholar

60. Weckhuysen, B.M., Verberckmoes, A.A., Debaere, J., Ooms, K., Langhans, I., Schoonheydt, R.A., 2000. In Situ UV-Vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy – On Line Activity Measurements of Supported Chromium Oxide Catalysts: Relating Isobutane Dehydrogenation Activity with Cr-Speciation via Experimental Design. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 151, 115–131.10.1016/S1381-1169(99)00259-9Suche in Google Scholar

61. Wei, F., Tang, X.P., Zhou, H., Nawaz, Z., 2008. Development of Propylene Production Enhancement Technology. Petrochem. Technol. 37, 979–986 (in Chinese).Suche in Google Scholar

62. Won, W., Lee, K.W., Lee, S., Jung, C., 2010. Repetative control and on-line optimization of Catofin Propane Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 34, 508–517.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.12.011Suche in Google Scholar

63. Zhang, X.P., Sui, Z., Zhou, X., Yuan, W., 2010. Modeling and Simulation of Coke Combustion Regeneration for Coked Cr2O3/Al2O3 Propane Dehydrogenation Catalyst. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 18, 618–625.10.1016/S1004-9541(10)60265-0Suche in Google Scholar

64. Zhao, H., Song, H., Xu, L., Chou, L., 2013. Isobutane Dehydrogenation over the Mesoporous Cr2O3/Al2O3 Catalysts Synthesized from a Metal-Organic Framework MIL-101, Appl. Catal. A 456, 188–196.10.1016/j.apcata.2013.02.018Suche in Google Scholar

65. Zhu, J., Cui, Y., Nawaz, Z., Wang,. Y., Wei, F., 2010. In situ Synthesis of SAPO-34 Zeolites in Kaolin Microspheres for a Fluidized Methanol or Dimethyl Ether to Olefins Process. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 18, 979–987.10.1016/S1004-9541(09)60156-7Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-12-22
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Novel Membrane Reactor Concepts for Hydrogen Production from Hydrocarbons: A Review
  4. Research Articles
  5. Modeling and Simulation Study of an Industrial Radial Moving Bed Reactor for Propane Dehydrogenation Process
  6. Oxidative Degradation of Methylene Blue in Aqueous Medium Catalyzed by Lab Prepared Nickel Hydroxide
  7. CFD Modelling of a Hollow Fibre Membrane for CO2 Removal by Aqueous Amine Solutions of MEA, DEA and MDEA
  8. Performance Study of a Thermally Double Coupled Multi-Tubular Reactor by Considering the Effect of Flow Type Patterns
  9. Radiative Three-Dimensional Flow with Chemical Reaction
  10. Three-Phase Model of a Fluidized-Bed Catalytic Reactor for Polyethylene Synthesis
  11. Study on the Effect of Nickel Doping on Mo-Bi Based Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of Isobutene to Methacrolein
  12. DM Water Plant Sedimentation as a Cheap and Waste Source of Catalyst for Biodiesel Production
  13. Recovery of Biogas from Meat Industry Wastewater Using Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR): Modeling and Optimization
  14. Comparison of CFD Simulation and Simplified Modeling of a Fluidized Bed CO2 Capture Reactor
  15. Kinetic Study for Platinum Extraction from Spent Catalyst in Cyanide Solution at High Temperatures
  16. Hydroisomerization of Biomass Derived n-Hexadecane Towards Diesel Pool: Effect of Selective Removal External Surface Sites from Pt/ZSM-22
  17. Heat Flux and Variable Thermal Conductivity Effects on Casson Flow and Heat Transfer due to an Exponentially Stretching Sheet with Viscous Dissipation and Heat Generation
  18. Optimization of Nickel Chemical Extraction from Hazardous Residue
  19. Green Approach for Biodiesel Production from Jojoba Oil Supported by Process Modeling and Simulation
  20. Differentiating Process Performance of Various Coagulants in Removal of Congo red and Orange G Dyes
  21. CFD Simulation of Hydrodynamic of a Bubble Column Reactor Operating in Churn-Turbulent Regime and Effect of Gas Inlet Distribution on System Characteristics
  22. Transformation of Phenolic Compounds by Fe(III) in the Aqueous Solution in Dark and Under Irradiation
  23. Transient Predictive Model for Dynamic Analysis, Kinetic Study, and Reactor Design of Triglycerides Transesterification to Biodiesel
  24. Screening of Alternative Carbon Sources for Recombinant Protein Production in Pichia pastoris
  25. Optimization of a Large Scale Industrial Reactor Towards Tailor Made Polymers Using Genetic Algorithm
  26. Model of Reactive Transport within a Light Photocatalytic Textile
  27. Preparation of Chitosan based Nanofibers: Optimization and Modeling
  28. Adsorption of As (III) on Iron Coated Quartz Sand: Influence of Temperature on the Equilibrium Isotherm, Thermodynamics and Isosteric Heat of Adsorption Analysis
  29. Resistance Characteristics of Coal Slime in Pipe Flow at High Pressure
  30. Activity Comparison of Acidic Resins in the Production of Valuable Glycerol Acetates
  31. Bulk Polymerization of Styrene using Multifunctional Initiators in a Batch Reactor: A Comprehensive Mathematical Model
  32. An Effective Reaction Rate Model for Gas-Solid Reactions with High Intra-Particle Diffusion Resistance
  33. Heart-Like Micro-Flow Mixer
  34. Hydrogen Production by Hydrolysis of NaBH4 with Cr-Ni-W-B Catalyst: Effects of Cold Plasma and Chromium Content
  35. Prediction of Reactivity Ratios in Free Radical Copolymerization from Monomer ResonancePolarity (Q–e) Parameters: Genetic Programming-Based Models
  36. Steady-State Modeling of Pt-Catalyzed H2 Combustion in a Monolithic Reactor: From Micro- to Macro-kinetics
  37. Premixed Methanol–Air Combustion Characteristics in a Mini-scale Catalytic Combustor
  38. Kinetic Modeling of VOC Photocatalytic Degradation Using a Process at Different Reactor Configurations and Scales
  39. Improvement of Activated Sludge Process Using a Nonlinear PI Controller Design via Adaptive Gain
  40. Modeling and Simulation of a Pilot-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier for the Gasification of High Ash Indian Coal Using Eulerian Granular Approach
  41. Performance of a Catalytic Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed Reactor in the Presence of Interparticle Forces
  42. Mathematical Modeling of Biodiesel Production under Intense Agitation
  43. Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Reactor (EAASR) for Removal of Nitrobenzene: Air Stripped or Biologically Removed?
  44. CFD Modeling of Algae Flash Pyrolysis in the Batch Fluidized Bed Reactor Including Heat Carrier Particles
  45. A Robust Extended State Observer for the Estimation of Concentration and Kinetics in a CSTR
  46. Dynamic Modeling of CATOFIN® Fixed-Bed Iso-Butane Dehydrogenation Reactor for Operational Optimization
  47. Effect of Biomass Compositions on Combustion Kinetic Parameters using Response Surface Methodology
  48. Short Communications
  49. Discussions on Particle Flux Measurement in Gas-Solids Risers
  50. Use of New Regeneration Processes for Thermolabile Amines
  51. Oxidative-Extractive Desulfurization of Liquid Fuel by Dimethyl Sulfoxide and ZnCl2 Based Ionic Liquid
  52. Corrigendum
  53. Corrigendum to: Performance Analysis of Immobilized Enzyme Semifluidised Bed Bioreactors
Heruntergeladen am 16.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2015-0087/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen