Home Topical treatment of adult house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), with Beauveria bassiana in combination with three entomopathogenic bacteria
Article Open Access

Topical treatment of adult house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), with Beauveria bassiana in combination with three entomopathogenic bacteria

  • Dana M. Johnson , Emma N. I. Weeks , Eric D. LoVullo and Christopher J. Geden ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 17, 2024

Abstract

Biological control of house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) has the potential to improve the efficacy and sustainability of integrated pest management. In a previous study, we demonstrated that three bacteria species (Serratia marcescens Bizio [Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae], Photorhabdus temperata Fischer-Le Saux et al. [Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae], and Pseudomonas protegens Ramette et al. [Pseudomonadales: Pseudomonadaceae]) are extremely virulent, inducing rapid morbidity and high mortality in adult house flies when injected into the hemocoel but show little effect when applied topically. Here we tested the hypothesis that topical application of these species in combination with the entompathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals. Criv.) Vuill. (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) would result in an increased and rapid mortality if fungal penetration of the fly cuticle allowed for increased delivery of the bacteria into the fly hemocoel. Bacteria and B. bassiana were tested either by application at the same time or by sequential application of the two pathogens 48 h apart. Results indicated little evidence for synergy between B. bassiana and any of the bacterial pathogens. However, P. protegens caused early mortality (<50 % at 3 days) when applied alone and in combination with B. bassiana. A modified disc diffusion assay indicated that P. temperata and P. protegens had inhibitory effects on the vegetative growth of B. bassiana suggesting the release of antifungal molecules by the bacteria. Results with P. protegens were sufficiently encouraging to warrant further investigation of this species and its associated toxins as house fly biological control tools.

Resumen

El control biológico de la mosca doméstica, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) tiene el potencial de mejorar la eficacia y sostenibilidad del manejo integrado de plagas. En un estudio anterior, demostramos que tres especies de bacterias (Serratia marcescens Bizio [Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae], Photorhabdus temperata Fischer-Le Saux et al. [Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae] y Pseudomonas protegens Ramette et al. [Pseudomonadales: Pseudomonadaceae]) son extremadamente virulentas, induciendo una rápida morbilidad y una alta mortalidad en moscas domésticas adultas cuando se inyecta en el hemocele, pero estas muestran poco efecto cuando se aplica tópicamente. Es este estudio probamos la hipótesis de que la aplicación tópica de estas especies en combinación con el hongo entompatógeno Beauveria bassiana (Bals. Criv.) Vuill. (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) daría como resultado un aumento y una mayor rapidez de mortalidad si es que la penetración del hongo en la cutícula de la mosca permitiera una mayor entrega de bacterias al hemocele de la mosca. Las bacterias y B. bassiana se probaron mediante aplicación simultánea o mediante aplicación secuencial de los dos patógenos con 48 horas de diferencia. Los resultados indicaron poca evidencia de sinergia entre B. bassiana y cualquiera de los patógenos bacterianos. Sin embargo, P. protegens causó mortalidad temprana (<50 % a los 3 días) cuando se aplicó sola y en combinación con B. bassiana. Un ensayo de difusión en disco modificado indicó que P. temperata y P. protegens tenían efectos inhibidores sobre el crecimiento vegetativo de B. bassiana, lo que sugiere la liberación de moléculas antifúngicas por parte de las bacterias. Los resultados con P. protegens son suficientemente alentadores como para justificar una mayor investigación de esta especie y sus toxinas asociadas como herramientas de control biológico de la mosca doméstica.

1 Introduction

House flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), are a worldwide pest of human environments and animal agriculture systems and carry a myriad of disease-causing agents (Geden et al. 2021; Khamesipour et al. 2018; Malik et al. 2007; Nayduch and Burrus 2017). The use of chemical insecticides to control M. domestica has long been the standard management tactic, but the notorious capacity of house flies for developing insecticide resistance has made it increasingly difficult to manage persistent pest populations (Freeman et al. 2019). Currently available and effective biological control agents mainly target the immature stages, especially pupal parasitoids (Machtinger and Geden 2018). Development of microbial agents that are pathogenic to adult flies would provide a welcome addition to house fly management options (Weeks et al. 2018).

The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals. Criv.) Vuill. (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) is known to infect house flies naturally in the field, albeit at low infection percentages (Geden et al. 1995; Skovgärd and Steenberg 2002; Steinkraus et al. 1990). Although B. bassiana has shown promise as a biological control agent for house flies, a major drawback is that following infection the fungus typically takes 5 days to begin to kill flies and up to 7 days for 90–100 % mortality, which limits the ability of this pathogen to prevent reproduction and break the life cycle (Acharya et al. 2015; Geden et al. 1995; Lecuona et al. 2005; Mwamburi et al. 2010; White et al. 2021).

Studies on the use of bacteria for filth fly management have been limited and warrant further investigation. In a previous study (Johnson et al. 2019), we topically applied three different gammaproteobacteria species, Serratia marcescens Bizio (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae), Photorhabdus temperata Fischer-Le Saux et al. (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae), and Pseudomonas protegens Ramette et al. (Pseudomonadales: Pseudomonadaceae), to the house fly thorax. P. protegens showed promising results causing more than 50 % mortality 3 d post application. In contrast, individually injecting all three bacteria resulted in rapid high mortality, with P. protegens killing 100 % of tested house flies within 24 h at a dose of 1 × 104 colony forming units (cfu) per injection. This indicates that these bacteria could be lethal if it were possible to maneuver past the outer defenses of the house fly and gain access to the hemocoel.

Most studies on the virulence of entomopathogens have been conducted in assays involving a single pathogen at a time. It would be advantageous to research the combination of different pathogens to see if additive, or synergistic effects on the mortality of adult house flies could be achieved. Wraight and Ramos (2005) observed additive effects of B. bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner subsp. tenebrionis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) against the Colorado potato beetle, and Mwamburi et al. (2009) found evidence for additivity, if not synergy, between B. bassiana and B. thuringiens i s var. israelensis against house fly larvae. Similarly, Lednev et al. (2008) reported an additive effect of B. bassiana with Pseudomonas sp. against migratory locusts. B. bassiana and Pseudomonas sp. also were observed to increase mortality synergistically against leafminers, and this increase in virulence was further promoted by incorporating chitin into the formulation (Senthilraja et al. 2010). These results suggest that combination products of B. bassiana with bacterial entomopathogens for house fly management warrant further study.

The goal of this study was to build on the findings of Johnson et al. (2019) to determine the topical efficacy of combinations of B. bassiana with three bacteria species on adult house flies. Specific objectives were to assess: (1) the effect of treating house flies topically with B. bassiana and bacteria simultaneously; (2) the effect of treating house flies topically with B. bassiana and bacteria sequentially; and (3) the interaction between bacteria species and B. bassiana.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Entomopathogens

The L90 strain of B. bassiana was obtained from Dr. Drion Boucias at the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS), Entomology and Nematology Department. This strain was originally isolated from wild caught house flies in upstate New York and is known to be virulent to adult M. domestica (Geden et al. 1995; Johnson et al. 2019; White et al. 2021). The Db11 strain of S. marcescens was obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC) of the University of Minnesota (Saint Paul, Minnesota). This strain is a streptomycin-resistant mutant of strain Db10 (Iguchi et al. 2014) and was chosen because while S. marcescens is ubiquitous in the environment this strain was shown to be entomopathogenic (Flyg et al. 1980). The NC19 strain of P. temperata was provided by Dr. Byron Adams at Brigham Young University (Provo, Utah). This strain was selected because previous work demonstrated its insecticidal properties, and its genome has been sequenced and is predicted to contain many genes for insecticidal toxins (Hurst et al. 2015). This species has a symbiotic relationship with Heterorhabditis entomopathogenic nematodes, in which the bacteria colonize the nematode gut and then once the nematode infects the insect the bacteria are regurgitated where they replicate, eventually causing mortality of the insect (Clarke 2014). The Pf-5 strain of P. protegens was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, Virginia). This strain was formerly classified as Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula but was reclassified as P. protegens as it was found to cluster away from the fluorescent pseudomonads (Takeuchi et al. 2014). This strain was selected due to its entomopathogenic qualities, as demonstrated in Hermetia illucens L. (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) (Shah et al. 2023).

2.2 House fly rearing and handling

The Orlando Normal strain was used for these studies. This insecticide-susceptible strain had been reared at the Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (Gainesville, FL) since 1958. Flies were maintained at 28 °C in wire mesh cages (37.5 × 37.5 × 37.5 cm), and fed a diet consisting of dried milk, sugar, and dried egg yolk in an 8:8:1 ratio by volume. Female flies used in the bioassays were less than 3 days old, presumed to have mated, and were aspirated from rearing cages, lightly sedated with CO2 to sort and count by sex, and topically treated with pathogen suspensions. Treated flies (20 flies per treatment) were placed into screen-covered 500 ml plastic containers (Instawares, Kennesaw, Georgia) containing 50 mg of diet and a 30 ml plastic container with water and a lid with a dental wick (to prevent flies from drowning), and held at 28 °C.

2.3 Bacterial and fungal cultivation

Bacterial strains were cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates (LB broth, Fisher BioReagents, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), incubated at 28 °C for 48 h then stored at 4 °C. For preparation of bacteria inocula for bioassays, cultures were set up a day before and left overnight. Cultures consisted of 3 mL LB broth in a 14 mL round bottom tube with the respective bacterial colony picked with a sterile loop from the refrigerated agar plates, then the tubes were incubated in a controlled environment shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, New Jersey) at 28 °C and 250 rpm. The following morning, the culture tubes were transferred into a 50 ml glass flask at a 1:20 dilution with fresh LB broth and then grown while shaking at 28 °C and 250 rpm until reaching an optical density (OD) of 0.5 as measured using a spectrophotometer (absorbance set to 600 nm; Biochrom LKB Ultrospec II; Cambridge, UK). According to Johnson et al. (2019), 0.5 OD600 equates to 1.5 × 108 cfu/ml in P. protegens, 3.0 × 108 cfu/ml in S. marcescens and 2.1 × 108 cfu/ml in P. temperata.

B. bassiana was cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar with yeast extract (SDAY; 2 % glucose, 1 % peptone, 0.5 % yeast extract; pH 7.0) at 24 °C for 7 days to produce a dense lawn of fungal conidia on the surface of the plate. Plates were dried in a sterile biosafety cabinet for an additional 7 days. After drying, conidia were scraped from each plate with a sterile small metal spatula and stored at 4 °C in a sterile glass vial for up to 4 weeks. Conidial concentrations (conidia/mg) were determined for each batch by suspending 10 mg of dried conidia in 0.1 % Tween® 20 (Sigmal-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri) and distilled water and using an automated cell counter (Cellometer® Vision HSL; Nexcelom Bioscience LLC, Lawrence, Massachusetts) to determine the conidial concentration.

2.4 Simultaneous applications of B. bassiana and bacteria

Pathogen suspensions were prepared in a 0.5 % solution of the surfactant, CapSil® (Aquatrols, Paulsboro, New Jersey) with 1X phosphate buffered saline as the diluent. The surfactant and concentration were chosen due to a previous study that found it to spread well on the fly thorax, cause low to no mortality of house flies, and promote growth of the bacteria species to be tested in the current study (Johnson et al. 2019). A concentration of 1 × 106 of B. bassiana conidia/µl was used as this concentration was known to cause high but less than 100 % mortality (Johnson et al. 2019). Although higher concentrations of B. bassiana would cause 100 % mortality this was not desirable as this would not allow detection of increased mortality in the presence of bacteria. The same concentration (1 × 106 cfu/μl) of bacteria was used in all treatments. For each trial, 0.5 % CapSil was prepared that contained either no microorganisms (control), B. bassiana alone (106 conidia/μl), the bacteria alone (106 cfu/μl), or the two pathogens combined so that 1 μl of the combination contained 106 of both B. bassiana conidia and bacteria cfus. Female flies were immobilized with cold and treated by pipetting 1 μl of the suspensions onto the dorsal thorax. Treated flies were transferred to small observation containers with food and water, and dead flies were counted daily for 7 days. The experiment was replicated on three occasions with different generations of flies and pathogen suspensions using 20 flies per treatment per replication (60 flies per treatment, n = 3).

2.5 Sequential applications of B. bassiana and bacteria

The same concentrations described in the previous section were used in sequential topical applications. In these tests, flies were first treated with one pathogen and then with a second one 48 h after the first application. That is, flies were either treated with B. bassiana first and the bacteria two days later or with the bacteria first and the B. bassiana two days later. The goal was to allow the first pathogen to establish before the second pathogen was applied. B. bassiana conidia usually germinate in 14–24 h. For each trial, 0.5 % CapSil that contained either no microorganisms (control), B. bassiana alone (106 conidia/μl), or the bacteria alone (106 cfu/μl) also were prepared. Flies were sedated and treated with 1 μl of pathogen suspension per fly. Fly mortality was monitored for 7 days after the first application. Trials were replicated three times using 20 flies for each bacteria and B. bassiana combination (60 flies per treatment, n = 3).

2.6 Modified disc diffusion assay to test for antagonistic effects of the three bacteria species on B. bassiana growth

A modified disc diffusion assay (Bauer et al. 1966) was used to determine the compatibility of each bacterial strain with B. bassiana. Suspensions of B. bassiana were prepared by diluting conidia into fresh SDY broth at 1 × 106 conidia/ml. An aliquot of 100 μl of this dilution was spread evenly onto an SDAY plate to create a fungal lawn. The plate was allowed to dry for 30 min in a biosafety cabinet, then one blank 6 mm filter disc (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Washington, DC) was placed in the center of each SDAY plate. Bacteria in LB media (10 µl from the culture tube containing approximately 108 cfu) were pipetted onto the center of the blank disc. Three separate plates for each bacterial strain were evaluated for the three bacteria-B. bassiana combinations. Amphotericin B (10 µl; Fungizone®, 250 μg/ml; Sigma Alrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was used as a positive control, and a blank disc was the negative control. The zone of inhibition was measured after 72 h by first determining the diameter of the zone around the disc that had no fungal growth. The zone of inhibition is expressed as the shortest linear distance (diameter) from the edge of the central disc to the fungal growth. If there was no inhibition of fungal growth, then the measurement was recorded as 0 mm.

2.7 Statistical analysis

B. bassiana usually kills house flies in 5 days so we chose to examine the mortality data from the pathogen combination bioassays on days 3 (before B. bassiana mortality), 5 (during B. bassiana mortality), and 7 (after B. bassiana mortality) using a linear mixed model fitted with the effects of treatment, time and the interaction using repeated measures ANOVA through the Mixed Procedure as implemented in SAS (Proc Mixed), version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Residual terms were modelled by considering an autoregressive order 1 error structure and the degrees of freedom were adjusted using the Kenward-Roger method. Adjusted treatment means at each time point (3, 5 or 7 days) were compared using Tukey’s honest significant difference tests at α = 0.05. Data from the central disc test experiment appeared normal on a plot of quantiles (Q-Q plot) and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out in R 0.99.491 (RStudio, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts); differences between means were evaluated by Tukey’s honest significant difference multiple comparison tests.

3 Results

3.1 Simultaneous applications of B. bassiana and bacteria

Combinations of B. bassiana and P. temperata did not result in substantial mortality, either alone or in combination, until day 5, and there was no indication that the two-pathogen combinations caused higher mortality than B. bassiana alone throughout the test (Figure 1A). Significant differences were seen with treatment over time (F 21, 64 = 6.84, P < 0.001). There was no significant treatment effect on day 3 (P > 0.05). On day 5, mortality in the B. bassiana treatments with and without bacteria (40–53 %) did not differ significantly from each other but both treatments caused significantly higher mortality than the control (P < 0.05). On day 7 mortality in the B. bassiana treatments with and without bacteria (65–85 %) did not differ significantly from each other but both treatments caused significantly higher mortality than the control or P. temperata alone (P < 0.001).

Figure 1: 
Mortality (%, mean ±SE) of adult female house flies 3, 5, and 7 days after 1 μl topical application of 0.5 % CapSil containing Photorhabdus temperata (A, P.t), Serratia marcescens (B, S.m), and Pseudomonas protegens (C, P.p) (all 106 cfu) and Beauveria bassiana (106 conidia, B.b) alone or in combination at the same time. Bars with the same letter within a time point (3, 5, or 7 days) do not differ at p = 0.05 (Tukeys HSD). Control = CapSil 0.5 % alone.
Figure 1:

Mortality (%, mean ±SE) of adult female house flies 3, 5, and 7 days after 1 μl topical application of 0.5 % CapSil containing Photorhabdus temperata (A, P.t), Serratia marcescens (B, S.m), and Pseudomonas protegens (C, P.p) (all 106 cfu) and Beauveria bassiana (106 conidia, B.b) alone or in combination at the same time. Bars with the same letter within a time point (3, 5, or 7 days) do not differ at p = 0.05 (Tukeys HSD). Control = CapSil 0.5 % alone.

Results with S. marcescens combinations (Figure 1B) were similar to those with P. temperata, with low mortality until day 5 and no evidence of higher mortality in the two-pathogen combination compared to the treatment with B. bassiana alone. A significant interaction was observed between treatment and time (F 21, 64 = 4.31, P < 0.001). There was no significant treatment effect on day 3 (P > 0.05). On day 5 mortality in the B. bassiana treatments with and without bacteria (38–54 %) did not differ significantly from each other and the only treatment that was significantly different from the control was B. bassiana alone (P < 0.05). Mortality in the B. bassiana treatments with and without bacteria (65–85 %) did not differ significantly from each other on day 7 but both treatments caused significantly higher mortality than the control (P < 0.001).

In contrast, P. protegens combined with B. bassiana caused 50 % mortality after 3 days and continued in an upward trend until day 7 (Figure 1C). There was a significant difference with treatment over time (F 21, 64 = 10.52, P<0.0001). On day 3, the two treatments with P. protegens caused significantly higher mortality (53–60 %) than the control or B. bassiana alone (P < 0.01). Mortality in the three pathogen treatments was similar but significantly higher than the control on days 5 (P < 0.001) and 7 (P < 0.001).

3.2 Sequential applications of pathogens

Mortality due to P. temperata or B. bassiana applied alone were similar to the previous tests, with maximum mortality on day 7 of 21 and 85 %, respectively (Figure 2A). Treating flies with B. bassiana followed two days later with P. temperata resulted in no significant treatment effect on day 3. On day 5, mortality in the treatments that included initial B. bassiana applications with and without bacteria were similar to each other and significantly higher than the other three treatments (P < 0.01). On day 7, mortality in the three treatments that included B. bassiana were similar to each other and significantly higher than the controls and P. temperata alone (P < 0.01).

Figure 2: 
Sequential applications of bacteria and Beauveria bassiana at three time points: 3, 5, and 7 days. Topical application of 1 μl of 0.5 % CapSil containing Photorhabdus temperata (A, P.t), Serratia marcescens (B, S.m), and Pseudomonas protegens (C, P.p) (all 106 cfu) and Beauveria bassiana (B.b; 106 conidia), alone or in sequence with 48 h between treatments. Bars represent mean percentage mortality ± standard errors, and different letters within a time point denote significant differences (Tukeys HSD P ≤ 0.05) among treatments. Sequential treatments are indicated with an arrow → to indicate the pathogen applied first and second. Control = CapSil 0.5 % alone.
Figure 2:

Sequential applications of bacteria and Beauveria bassiana at three time points: 3, 5, and 7 days. Topical application of 1 μl of 0.5 % CapSil containing Photorhabdus temperata (A, P.t), Serratia marcescens (B, S.m), and Pseudomonas protegens (C, P.p) (all 106 cfu) and Beauveria bassiana (B.b; 106 conidia), alone or in sequence with 48 h between treatments. Bars represent mean percentage mortality ± standard errors, and different letters within a time point denote significant differences (Tukeys HSD P ≤ 0.05) among treatments. Sequential treatments are indicated with an arrow → to indicate the pathogen applied first and second. Control = CapSil 0.5 % alone.

Similar results were observed in sequential treatments of S. marcescens and B. bassiana, with no evidence of accelerated mortality in species combinations compared with B. bassiana alone (Figure 2B). There was a significant difference with treatment over time (F 28, 80 = 2.7, P < 0.0001). No significant treatment effects were observed on days 3 (P > 0.05) or 5 (P > 0.05). On day 7 mortality in the three treatments that included B. bassiana were similar to each other and significantly higher than the controls and S. marcescens alone (P < 0.01).

With P. protegens, there were no significant treatment effects on day 3 (Figure 2C) (P > 0.05). On day 5, mortality was highest when P. protegens was followed by B. bassiana, but this was only significantly different from the control (P < 0.001). Mortality on day 7 was highest in the three treatments that included B. bassiana (P < 0.05), which were all higher than in the controls.

3.3 Modified disc diffusion assay to test for antagonistic effects of the three bacteria species on B. bassiana growth

S. marcescens and P. protegens were slightly motile in this assay even on 1.5 % agar, and the bacteria grew beyond the diameter of the disc creating a halo effect (Figure 3). Comparing each bacterial strain to the blank control (zone of inhibition = 0 mm), P. temperata and P. protegens both inhibited the growth of B. bassiana (zone of inhibition = 3.25 ± 0.5 mm; P < 0.001), whereas S. marcescens did not inhibit growth (zone of inhibition = 0 mm; P > 0.05). Similarly, when bacteria strains were compared with the positive control, amphotericin B (zone of inhibition = 3.6 ± 0.6 mm), P. temperata (P = 0.808) and P. protegens (P = 0.808) showed no significant difference in zones of inhibition.

Figure 3: 
Sabouraud dextrose agar with yeast extract plate with Pseudomonas protegens on the disc (black line) showing zone of inhibition (red line) against Beauveria bassiana lawn, as well as a bacterial halo that grew beyond the disc.
Figure 3:

Sabouraud dextrose agar with yeast extract plate with Pseudomonas protegens on the disc (black line) showing zone of inhibition (red line) against Beauveria bassiana lawn, as well as a bacterial halo that grew beyond the disc.

4 Discussion

The goal of this study was to build on the findings of Johnson et al. (2019) to determine the topical efficacy of combinations of B. bassiana with three bacteria species on adult house flies. We found that Pseudomonas protegans resulted in fast but limited mortality before 3 days and combinations with B. bassiana did not have any enhanced effect but did result in almost complete mortality by 7 days.

In a previous study, we found that all three of the bacteria tested here were extremely virulent to house fly adults when they were injected into the host hemocoel, whereas P. protegens was the only species that caused substantial mortality when applied topically to the fly cuticle (Johnson et al. 2019). These results were sufficiently encouraging to warrant examination of topical application of combinations of B. bassiana with bacteria. There has long been speculation that application of B. bassiana in microbe-rich environments such as poultry houses could result in septicemia of the fly due to bacteria being transported into the hemocoel during fungal penetration and establishment of infection in the fly host (Kaufman et al. 2005). The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that known entomopathogenic bacteria could be delivered to the hemocoel of the fly by B. bassiana and thus bypass the formidable barrier presented by the cuticle. Moreover, if B. bassiana were able to facilitate bacterial entry into the fly hemocoel, then P. protegens would be likely to kill the host rapidly as was shown by Johnson et al. (2019). The results presented in this study indicate that B. bassiana may not promote invasion by these three topically-applied bacteria species, in any combination or sequence, or subsequent septicemia. Penetration and invasion of the cuticle by B. bassiana thus does not appear to provide an avenue for bacterial pathogens to circumvent cuticular defenses and reach the host hemocoel. However, we only tested one strain each of three bacteria species of three different genera, and it is possible that another species might be more effective. Likewise, it is possible that the strain of B. bassiana that we used was not the most efficient, although its virulence is well established and its performance in the study was standard for B. bassiana on house flies (Geden et al. 1995; Johnson et al. 2019; White et al. 2021). Moreover, it may be that the timeframes that we used for the bacterial and B. bassiana treatments (either simultaneous or 48 h apart) did not include windows where synergy between the pathogens might have occurred. It is also relevant to note that the immune system of the fly may have been primed by the first pathogen, which might then diminish the effect of the second pathogen. However, this study was not designed to test this phenomenon.

Our results confirm previous results that P. protegens has a deleterious effect on adult house flies when applied topically (Johnson et al. 2019). This could be due to the motility of this species (Fabian et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2023), which may aid in evading the hosts immune system or in gaining entry to the fly. While the results show that combinations of P. protegens and B. bassiana do not result in a significant additive or synergistic effect they also do not appear to result in an antagonistic effect on mortality caused by either pathogen. Therefore, application of a combined product might still be worthwhile due to the initial early effect of P. protegens on house fly survival followed by a later more complete mortality due to B. bassiana. This combined effect might be enough to interrupt reproduction and reduce the population size providing control. Based on the results presented in this paper and our earlier published research (Johnson et al. 2019), P. protegens is clearly virulent once inside the hemocoel. The FitD toxin has been implicated as a virulence factor causing mortality in P. protegens-infected insects although the mechanism or presence of other factors has not been well studied (Ruffner et al. 2015). The recent publication of the genome of P. protegens (Zhang et al. 2020) may allow exploration of endo- and exotoxins that could be helpful in managing house flies and other arthropod pests.

Due to the lack of additive or synergistic effects between B. bassiana and entomopathogenic bacteria in this study we decided to see how these pathogens interacted on growth media during vegetative growth of B. bassiana, while recognizing that these interactions could change substantially when the fungal–bacterial combinations were tested on house fly cuticle. Combining living organisms can be a delicate task because of possible negative interactions such as competition and antagonism. Of the three bacteria species, S. marcescens was the only bacterial pathogen that did not inhibit the growth of B. bassiana using the modified disc diffusion method. One possible explanation for lack of inhibition is that the strain used in this study (DB11) lacks the red pigment prodigiosin, which is known to have antifungal properties (Darshan and Manonmani 2015). P. temperata and P. protegens inhibited B. bassiana growth to a degree that was similar to amphotericin B. P. protegens is known for its antifungal properties while residing in the rhizosphere of plants and for its ability to ward off a variety of plant pathogens (Zhang et al. 2020). However, the inhibition of vegetative fungal growth on agar plates does not necessarily rule out the use of P. protegens in combination with B. bassiana to kill house flies. Our on-insect testing provides some evidence that these bacteria with antifungal properties do not have an antagonistic effect on B. bassiana conidia vegetative growth and sporulation in house flies.

In conclusion, we have confirmed our earlier results (Johnson et al. 2019) that P. protegens is an entomopathogen of interest for house fly management. While there was some antagonistic action between the bacteria and B. bassiana in culture this phenomenon did not seem to translate to the on-insect studies. The possibility of interrupting house fly reproduction with a combined P. protegens-B. bassiana product seems promising and should be studied further.


Corresponding author: Christopher J. Geden, USDA, ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, 1600 SW 23 Dr, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Roxie White for assisting in the bioassays.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  4. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

Acharya, N., Rajotte, E., Jenkins, N., and Thomas, M. (2015). Potential for biocontrol of house flies, Musca domestica, using fungal biopesticides. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 25: 513–524, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2014.992862.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M.M., Sherris, J.C., and Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 36: 493–496, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, D.J. (2014). The genetic basis of the symbiosis between Photorhabdus and its invertebrate hosts. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 88: 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800260-5.00001-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Darshan, N. and Manonmani, H.K. (2015). Prodigiosin and its potential applications. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52: 5393–5407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1740-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Fabian, B.K., Foster, C., Asher, A., Hassan, K.A., Paulsen, I.T., and Tetu, S.G. (2024). Identifying the suite of genes central to swimming in the biocontrol bacteria Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. Microb. Genom. 10: 001212, https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001212.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Flyg, C., Kenne, K., and Boman, H.G. (1980). Insect pathogenic properties of Serratia marcescens: phage resistant mutants with a decreased resistance to Cecropia immunity and a decreased virulence to Drosophila. J. Gen. Microbiol. 120: 173–181, https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-120-1-173.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Freeman, J.C., Ross, D.H., and Scott, J.G. (2019). Insecticide resistance monitoring of house fly populations from the United States. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 158: 61–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.04.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Geden, C.J., Steinkraus, D.C., and Rutz, D.A. (1995). Virulence of different isolates and formulations of Beauveria bassiana for house flies and the parasitoid Muscidifurax raptor. Biol. Control 5: 615–621, https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1995.1073.Search in Google Scholar

Geden, C.J., Nayduch, D., Scott, J.G., Burgess, I.V.E., Gerry, A.C., Kaufman, P.E., Thomson, J., Pickens, V., and Machtinger, E.T. (2021). House fly (Diptera: Muscidae): biology, pest status, current management prospects, and research needs. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 12: 39, https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmaa021.Search in Google Scholar

Hurst, 4th S., Rowedder, H., Michaels, B., Bullock, H., Jackobeck, R., Abebe-Akele, F., Durakovic, U., Gately, J.Janicki, E., and Tisa, L.S. (2015). Elucidation of the Photorhabdus temperata genome and generation of a transposon mutant library to identify motility mutants altered in pathogenesis. J. Bacteriol. 197: 2201–2216, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00197-15.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Iguchi, A., Nagaya, Y., Pradel, E., Ooka, T., Ogura, Y., Katsura, K., Kurokawa, K., Oshima, K., Hattori, M., Parkhill, J, et al.. (2014). Genome evolution and plasticity of Serratia marcescens, an important multi-drug resistant nosocomial pathogen. Genome Biol. Evol. 6: 2096–2110, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu160.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Johnson, D.M., Weeks, E.N.I., LoVullo, E.D., Shirk, P.D., and Geden, C.J. (2019). Mortality effects of three bacterial pathogens and Beauveria bassiana when topically applied or injected into house flies (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Med. Entomol. 56: 774–783, https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjy218.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kaufman, P.E., Reaser, C., Rutz, D.A., Ketzis, J.K., and Arends, J.J. (2005). Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana applications against adult house fly, Musca domestica, in commercial caged-layer poultry facilities in New York State. Biol. Control 33: 360–367, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

Khamesipour, F., Lankarani, K.B., Honarvar, B., and Kwenti, T.E. (2018). A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.). BMC Publ. Health 18: 1049, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5934-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Lecuona, R.E., Turica, M., Tarocco, F., and Crespo, D.C. (2005). Microbial control of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) with selected strains of Beauveria bassiana. J. Med. Entomol. 42: 332–336, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/42.3.332.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lednev, G.R., Kryukov, V.Y., Khodyrev, V.P., Levchenko, M.A., Duisembekov, B.A., Sagitov, A.O., and Glupov, V.V. (2008). Dynamics of mortality of the migratory locust under synchronous infection with entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae) and bacteria Pseudomonas spp. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 1: 210–213, https://doi.org/10.1134/s1995425508020069.Search in Google Scholar

Machtinger, E.T. and Geden, C.J. (2018). Biological control with parasitoids. In: Garros, C., Bouyer, J., Takken, W., and Smallegange, R.C. (Eds.). Pests and vector-borne diseases in the livestock industry. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 3562–3567.10.3920/978-90-8686-863-6_11Search in Google Scholar

Malik, A., Singh, N., and Satya, S. (2007). House fly (Musca domestica): a review of control strategies for a challenging pest. J. Environ. Sci. Health 42: 453–469, https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230701316481.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mwamburi, L.A., Laing, M.D., and Miller, R. (2009). Interaction between Beauveria bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis for the control of house fly larvae and adults in poultry houses. Poult. Sci. 88: 2307–2314, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00212.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mwamburi, L.A., Laing, M.D., and Miller, R.M. (2010). Laboratory screening of insecticidal activities of Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces lilacinus against larval and adult house fly (Musca domestica L.). Afr. Entomol. 18: 38–46, https://doi.org/10.4001/003.018.0106.Search in Google Scholar

Nayduch, D. and Burrus, R.G. (2017). Flourishing in filth: house fly–microbe interactions across life history. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 110: 6–18, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saw083.Search in Google Scholar

Ruffner, B., Péchy-Tarr, M., Höfte, M., Bloemberg, G., Gunder, J., Keel, C., and Maurhofer, M. (2015). Evolutionary patchwork of an insecticidal toxin shared between plant-associated pseudomonads and the insect pathogens Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. BMC Genom. 16: 609, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1763-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Senthilraja, G., Anand, T., Durairaj, C., Raguchander, T., and Samiyappan, R. (2010). Chitin-based bioformulation of Beauveria bassiana and Pseudomonas fluorescens for improved control of leafminer and collar rot in groundnut. Crop Protect. 29: 1003–1010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Shah, P.N., Ruan, X., van Loon, J.J.A., and Dicke, M. (2023). Temperature-modulated interactions between Hermetia illucens L. (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) and Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. J. Invert. Pathol. 198: 107934, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2023.107934.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Skovgärd, H. and Steenberg, T. (2002). Activity of pupal parasitoids of the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans and prevalence of entomopathogenic fungi in the stable fly and the house fly, Musca domestica. BioControl 47: 45–60.Search in Google Scholar

Steinkraus, D.C., Geden, C.J., Rutz, D.A., and Kramer, J.P. (1990). First report of the natural occurrence of Beauveria bassiana (Moniliales: Moniliaceae) in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Med. Entomol. 27: 309–312, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/27.3.309.Search in Google Scholar

Takeuchi, K., Noda, N., Katayose, Y., Mukai, Y., Numa, H., Yamada, K., and Someya, N. (2014). Rhizoxin analogs contribute to the biocontrol activity of newly isolated Pseudomonas strain. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. J. 28: 333–342, https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-09-14-0294-fi.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J., Wang, Y., Lou, H., and Wang, W. (2023). AlgU controls environmental stress adaptation, biofilm formation, motility, pyochelin synthesis and antagonism potential in Pseudomonas protegens SN15-2. Microbiol. Res. 272: 127396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127396.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Weeks, E.N.I., Machtinger, E.T., Leemon, D., and Geden, C.J. (2018). Biological control of livestock pests: entomopathogens. In: Garros, C., Bouyer, J., Takken, W., and Smallegange, R.C. (Eds.). Pests and vector-borne diseases in the livestock industry. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 1142–1147.10.3920/978-90-8686-863-6_12Search in Google Scholar

White, R.L., Geden, C.J., Kaufman, P.E., and Johnson, D. (2021). Comparative virulence of Metarhizium anisopliae and four strains of Beauveria bassiana against house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) adults with attempted selection for faster mortality. J. Med. Entomol. 58: 1771–1778, https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjab027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wraight, S.P. and Ramos, M.E. (2005). Synergistic interaction between Beauveria bassiana- and Bacillus thuringiensis tenebrionis- based biopesticides applied against field populations of Colorado potato beetle larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 90: 139–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2005.09.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, Q.X., Kong, X.W., Li, S.Y., Chen, X.J., and Chen, X.J. (2020). Antibiotics of Pseudomonas protegens FD6 are essential for biocontrol activity. Australas. Plant Pathol. 49: 307–317, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-020-00696-7.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-30
Accepted: 2024-07-24
Published Online: 2024-10-17

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of the Florida Entomological Society

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Distribution and dispersal of adult spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), in organically grown strawberries in Florida
  4. A comparison of the capture of non-target arthropods between control methods and monitoring traps of Anastrepha ludens in citrus agroecosystems
  5. Development of microsatellite markers for colony delineation of the invasive Asian subterranean termite (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in South Florida and Taiwan
  6. Biology and life table of Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) on three host plants
  7. Relative captures and detection of male Ceratitis capitata using a natural oil lure or trimedlure plugs
  8. Evaluation of HOOK SWD attract-and-kill on captures, emergence, and survival of Drosophila suzukii in Florida
  9. Rearing Neoseiulus cucumeris and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) on non-target species reduces their predation efficacy on target species
  10. Response of male Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae) to methyl eugenol: can they be desensitized?
  11. Monitoring of coccinellid (Coleoptera) presence and syrphid (Diptera) species diversity and abundance in southern California citrus orchards: implications for conservation biological control of Asian citrus psyllid and other citrus pests
  12. Topical treatment of adult house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), with Beauveria bassiana in combination with three entomopathogenic bacteria
  13. Laboratory evaluation of 15 entomopathogenic fungal spore formulations on the mortality of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), related drosophilids, and honeybees
  14. Effect of diatomaceous earth on diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), larval feeding and survival on cabbage
  15. Bioactivity of seed extracts from different genotypes of Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae) against Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
  16. Assessment of sugarberry as a host tree of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in southeastern USA agroecosystems
  17. The importance of multigeneration host specificity testing: rejection of a potential biocontrol agent of Nymphaea mexicana (Nymphaeaceae) in South Africa
  18. Endophytic potential of entomopathogenic fungi associated with Urochloa ruziziensis (Poaceae) for spittlebug (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) control
  19. The first complete mitogenome sequence of a biological control agent, Pseudophilothrips ichini (Hood) (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae)
  20. Exploring the potential of Delphastus davidsoni (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the biological control of Bemisia tabaci MEAM 1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
  21. Behavioral responses of Ixodiphagus hookeri (Hymenoptera; Encyrtidae) to Rhipicephalus sanguineus nymphs (Ixodida: Ixodidae) and dog hair volatiles
  22. Illustrating the current geographic distribution of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Campeche, Mexico: a maximum entropy modeling approach
  23. New records of Clusiidae (Diptera: Schizophora), including three species new to North America
  24. Photuris mcavoyi (Coleoptera: Lampyridae): a new firefly from Delaware interdunal wetlands
  25. Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity and synanthropy in a protected natural area and its influence zone in western Mexico
  26. Temperature-dependent development and life tables of Palpita unionalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
  27. Orchid bee collects herbicide that mimics the fragrance of its orchid mutualists
  28. Importance of wildflowers in Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) diet
  29. Bee diversity and abundance in perennial irrigated crops and adjacent habitats in central Washington state
  30. Comparison of home-made and commercial baits for trapping Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberry crops
  31. Miscellaneous
  32. Dr. Charles W. O’Brien: True Pioneer in Weevil Taxonomy and Publisher
  33. Scientific Notes
  34. Nests and resin sources (including propolis) of the naturalized orchid bee Euglossa dilemma (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Florida
  35. Impact of laurel wilt on the avocado germplasm collection at the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Subtropical Horticulture Research Station
  36. Monitoring adult Delia platura (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in New York State corn fields using blue and yellow sticky cards
  37. New distribution records and host plants of two species of Hypothenemus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in mangrove ecosystems of Tamaulipas, Mexico
  38. First record of Trichogramma pretiosum parasitizing Iridopsis panopla eggs in eucalyptus in Brazil
  39. Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) as an alternative host for mass rearing the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
  40. Effects of biochar on ambrosia beetle attacks on redbud and pecan container trees
  41. First report of Diatraea impersonatella (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in Honduras
  42. Book Reviews
  43. Kratzer, C. A.: The Cicadas of North America
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flaent-2024-0029/html
Scroll to top button