Startseite Aristotle on Platonic Efficient Causes. A Rehabilitation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Aristotle on Platonic Efficient Causes. A Rehabilitation

  • Rareș Ilie Marinescu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Dezember 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Elenchos
Aus der Zeitschrift Elenchos Band 45 Heft 2

Abstract

In this paper I show that Aristotle’s widely criticised exclusion of Platonic efficient causes at Metaph. A 6.988a7–17 is defensible as an interpretation of Plato, and that alternative accounts are unpersuasive. I argue that Aristotle is only interested in – what he supposes to be – Plato’s first principles and that the usual candidates that are brought forward in scholarship as possible first principles and efficient causes (e.g. from the Timaeus and the Philebus) all fall short in crucial respects according to Aristotle. This reading has the dual benefit of illuminating Aristotle’s strategy in book A and of letting him appear as a more trustworthy doxographer of his predecessors’ views.


Corresponding author: Rareș Ilie Marinescu, Department of Classics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Drafts of this paper have been presented to audiences in Cologne and Toronto. I would like to thank especially Lloyd Gerson, Roberto Granieri, Kasra Abdavi Azar, Christian Pfeiffer, Christoph Helmig and Jan Opsomer for engaging with my arguments and for making valuable suggestions. I am also grateful to the anonymous referees of this journal for their comments.

  1. Research funding: Research for this paper has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. [885273]) / Advanced Grant, acronym: PlatoViaAristotle.

References

Annas, J. 1982. “Aristotle on Inefficient Causes.” The Philosophical Quarterly 32/129: 311–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218698.Suche in Google Scholar

Baghdassarian, F. 2019. Aristote. Métaphysique Lambda. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1995. “Review of H. Cherniss, L’énigme de l’ancienne Académie.” Classical Review 45/1: 178.10.1017/S0009840X00292998Suche in Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2012. “History and Dialectic (Metaphysics A3, 983a24–984b8).” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Steel, 69–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Benitez, E. E. 1989. Forms in Plato’s Philebus. Assen: Van Gorcum.Suche in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 1986. “Sul carattere dialettico della storiografia di Aristotele.” In Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, edited by G. Cambiano, 101–25. Torino: Tirrenia.Suche in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2000. “Unmoved Mover(s) as Efficient Cause(s) in Metaphysics Λ 6.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by M. Frede, and D. Charles, 181–206. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198237648.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2007a. “Le dottrine platoniche non scritte ‘Intorno al Bene’ nelle testimonianze di Aristotele.” In Nuovi studi aristotelici. Vol. II: Fisica, antropologia e metafisica, edited by E. Berti, 503–38. Brescia: Morcelliana (orig. ed. in Verso una nuova immagine di Platone, edited by G. Reale, 251–94. Milano: Vita e Pensiero 1994).Suche in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2007b. “Il Filebo e le dottrine non scritte di Platone.” In Nuovi studi aristotelici. Vol. II: Fisica, antropologia e metafisica, edited by E. Berti, 539–51. Brescia: Morcelliana (orig. ed. in Il Filebo di Platone e la sua fortuna, edited by P. Cosenza, 191–204. Napoli: M. D’Auria 1996).Suche in Google Scholar

Bignone, E. 1938. Studi sul pensiero antico. Napoli: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Suche in Google Scholar

Bodëus, R. 1993. Aristote. De l’âme. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonitz, H. 1849. Aristotelis Metaphysica. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Bordt, M. 2006. Platons Theologie. Freiburg & München: Karl Albers.Suche in Google Scholar

Boureau, M. L. 2022. “Une occasion manquée: La critique implicite de la chôra dans le livre III du De Caelo d’Aristote.” χώρα 20: 71–91. https://doi.org/10.5840/chora2022205.Suche in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1974. Le meme et l’autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon: un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon. Paris: Klinksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 2000. “Présupposés et conséquences d’une interprétation ésotériste de Platon.” In Lectures de Platon, edited by L. Brisson, 43–110. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 1971. “EE I 8, 1218 a 15-32 et le ΠΕΡΙ ΤΑΓΑΘΟΥ.” In Untersuchungen zur Eudemischen Ethik. Akten des 5. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by P. Moraux, and D. Harlfinger, 197–222. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1962. Weisheit und Wissenschaft. Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon. Nürnberg: Verlag Hans Carl.Suche in Google Scholar

Carter, J. W. 2017. “Aristotle’s Critique of Timaean Psychology.” Rhizomata 5/1: 51–78.10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003Suche in Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, Vol. I. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1945. The Riddle of the Early Academy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1947. “Some War-Time Publications Concerning Plato. II.” American Journal of Philology 68/3: 225–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/291121.Suche in Google Scholar

Delcomminette, S. 2006. Le Philèbe de Platon. Introduction à l’agathologie platonicienne. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789047409137_002Suche in Google Scholar

De Vogel, C. J. 1949. “Problems Concerning Later Platonism I.” Mnemosyne 2/1: 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852549x00221.Suche in Google Scholar

De Vogel, C. J. 1986. Rethinking Plato and Platonism. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004328273Suche in Google Scholar

Diès, A. 1993. Platon. Philèbe. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 2003a. The Heirs of Plato. A Study of the Old Academy (347-274 BC). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198237669.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 2003b. “The Timaeus in the Old Academy.” In Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon, edited by G. Reydams-Schils, 80–94. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Düring, I. 1966. Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Erler, M. 2007. Die Philosophie der Antike. Band 2/2: Platon. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2010. “Der entmythologisierte Demiurg.” In Platon und das Göttliche, edited by D. Koch, I. Männlein-Robert, and N. Weidtmann, 62–81. Tübingen: Attempto.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2022. “Introduzione.” In Platone. Timeo, edited by F. M. Petrucci, and F. Ferrari. xi-cxlviii. Milano: Mondadori.Suche in Google Scholar

Frede, D. 1997. Platon. Philebos. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2012. “The Doctrine of Forms under Critique – Part I (Metaphysics A9, 990a33–991b9).” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Steel, 265–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639984.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2004. “Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy.” Rhizai 1: 9–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. 2001. ΜΕΘΕΞΙΣ. La teoria platonica delle idee e la partecipazione delle cose empiriche. Dai dialoghi giovanili al Parmenide. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Suche in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. 2010a. “La critica aristotelica alla funzione causale delle idee platoniche: Metaph. A 9. 991a8–b9.” In La scienza e le cause a partire dalla Metafisica di Aristotele, edited by F. Fronterotta, 93–119. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. 2010b. “Nature and Structure of the Cause in Philebus 26e1–27b3.” In Plato’s Philebus. Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum, edited by J. Dillon, and L. Brisson, 266–71. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. 1968. Platons ungeschriebene Lehre. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2013. From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801452413.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2014. “Harold Cherniss and the Study of Plato Today.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52/3: 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2014.0059.Suche in Google Scholar

Gigon, O. 1987. Aristotelis Opera, Volumen Tertium. Librorum deperditorum fragmenta collegit et adnotationibus instruxit Olof Gigon. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110826661Suche in Google Scholar

Gosling, J. C. B. 1975. Plato. Philebus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Granieri, R. 2024a. “Unmixed Forms and Ordered Sensibles: On Philebus 16c9–D1.” Ancient Philosophy 44: 83–97. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20244415.Suche in Google Scholar

Granieri, R. 2024b. “Aristotle’s On the Good and the ‘Categorial Reduction Argument’.” Mnemosyne: 1–19.10.1163/1568525x-bja10257Suche in Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. 1980. Plato’s Thought. London: The Athlone Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hackforth, R. 1945. Plato’s Examination of Pleasure. The Philebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Happ, H. 1971. Hyle. Studien zum aristotelischen Materiebegriff. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110816747Suche in Google Scholar

Harte, V. 2022. “The Fourfold Classification and Socrates’ Craft Analogy in the Philebus.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, edited by D. Ebrey, and R. Kraut, 493–521. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108557795.017Suche in Google Scholar

Ilievski, V. 2022. “The Demiurge and His Place in Plato’s Metaphysics and Cosmology.” In Time and Cosmology in Plato and the Platonic Tradition, edited by D. Vázquez, and A. Ross, 44–77. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004504691_004Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1982. Senocrate – Ermodoro. Frammenti. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1992. “Sesto, Platone, l’Accademia antica e i pitagorici.” Elenchos 13: 119–67.Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1993. “Platone e il problema degli agrapha.” Méthexis 6: 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000145.Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1997. Testimonia Platonica. Per una raccolta dei passi principali della tradizione indiretta riguardante i λεγόμενα ἄγραφα δόγματα. Le testimonianze di Aristotele. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1998. Testimonia Platonica. Per una raccolta dei passi principali della tradizione indiretta riguardante i λεγόμενα ἄγραφα δόγματα. Le testimonianze di età ellenistica e di età imperiale. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 2000. “Alessandro d’Afrodisia e il Περὶ τἀγαθοῦ di Aristotele.” In La filosofia in età imperiale, edited by A. Brancacci, 245–70. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackson, J. 1882. “The Philebus and Aristotle’s Metaphysics I 6.” Journal of Philology 10: 253–98.Suche in Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2010. “Should Aristotle Have Recognised Final Causes in Plato’s Timaeus?” In Plato’s Timaeus Today, edited by R. Mohr, and B. Sattler, 179–99. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2022. “A Cosmos before the Cosmos? Aristotle’s Criticism of the Pre-cosmic Traces in the Timaeus.” χώρα 20: 59–74. https://doi.org/10.5840/chora2022204.Suche in Google Scholar

Judson, L. 2019. Aristotle. Metaphysics Book Λ. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00265863Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2015. “Empty Words.” In Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, edited by D. Ebrey, 199–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107295155.011Suche in Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. 1959. Arete bei Platon und Aristoteles. Zum Wesen und zur Geschichte der platonischen Ontologie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. 1968. “Die grundsätzlichen Fragen der indirekten Platonüberlieferung.” In Idee und Zahl. Studien zur platonischen Philosophie, edited by H.-G. Gadamer, K. Gaiser, and W. Schadewaldt, 106–50. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Kühn, W. 1999. “Quatre catégories cosmologiques employées en éthique (23b–26d).” In La fêlure du plaisir, 2 vols., edited by M. Dixsaut, and F. Teisserenc, Vol. 1, 89–154. Paris: Vrin.10.4000/books.vrin.5770Suche in Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2013. “Aristote, lecteur de Platon.” In Lectures de Platon, edited by M. Dixsaut, A. Castel-Bouchouchi, and G. Kévorkian, 291–320. Paris: Ellipses.Suche in Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2017. “Théophraste sur les principes physiques de Platon dans le fr. 230 FHS&G et dans sa Métaphysique.” In Les principes cosmologique de platonisme, edited by M.-A. Gavray, and A. Michalewski, 63–89. Turnhut: Brepols.10.1484/M.MON-EB.5.114799Suche in Google Scholar

Leggatt, S. 1995. Aristotle. On the Heavens I and II. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.10.3828/liverpool/9780856686627.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Leszl, W. 1975. Aristotle’s Conception of Ontology. Padova: Antenore.Suche in Google Scholar

Lorenz, H. 2019. “Intelligence as Cause. Philebus 27c–31b.” In Plato’s Philebus. A Philosophical Discussion, edited by P. Dimas, R. E. Jones, and G. Richardson Lear, 90–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198803386.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. 2006. “Plato in Tübingen. A Discussion of Konrad Gaiser Gesammelte Schriften.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31: 349–400.Suche in Google Scholar

Mansion, S. 1961. “Le rôle de l’exposé et de la critique des philosophies antérieures chez Aristote.” In Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, edited by S. Mansion, 35–56. Louvain & Paris: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, A. J. 2014. “On the Status of Nous in the Philebus.” Phronesis 59: 143–69. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341264.Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1995. Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2009. “Aporiai 13–14.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta, edited by M. Crubellier, and A. Laks, 211–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199546770.003.0010Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2012. “Critique of Earlier Philosophers on the Good and the Causes (Metaphysics A7–A8 989a18).” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Steel, 201–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639984.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. (forthcoming). The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mesch, W. 2020. “Aristoteles über Platons Vernachlässigung finaler Ursachen. Eine Kritik und die Frage nach ihrer Berechtigung.” In Aristoteles – Antike Kontexte, gegenwärtige Perspektive. Winter Universitätsverlag, edited by P. König, and J.-I. Lindén, 77–136. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Suche in Google Scholar

Migliori, M. 1993. L’uomo fra piacere, intelligenza e bene. Commentario storico-filosofico al Filebo di Platone. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Suche in Google Scholar

Moraux, P. 1951. Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote. Louvain & Paris: Louvain Publications Universitaires.Suche in Google Scholar

Movia, G. 1979. Aristotele. L’anima. Napoli: Loffredo.Suche in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 1997. “Le cause del Timeo e la teoria delle quattro cause.” In Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias, edited by T. Calvo, and L. Brisson, 207–13. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 2003. “La forma platonica è una causa formale?” In Platon und Aristoteles – sub ratione veritatis. Festschrift für Wolfgang Wieland zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by G. Damschen, R. Eskat, and A. G. Vigo, 158–73. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 2013. “Aitia in Plato and Aristotle. From Everyday Language to Technical Vocabulary.” In Aitia I. Les quatres cause d’Aristote: origines et interprétations, edited by C. Viano, C. Natali, and M. Zingano, 39–73. Leuven: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Brien, C. S. 2015. “The Demiurge in Ancient Thought.” In Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139871723Suche in Google Scholar

Owens, J. 1978. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.10.1163/9789004626249Suche in Google Scholar

Primavesi, O. 2012. “Aristotle, Metaphysics A. A New Critical Edition with Introduction.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Steel, 385–516. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639984.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Prior, W. J. 1986. “Rev. of K. M. Sayre, Plato’s Late Ontology. A Riddle Resolved.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68: 292–6.Suche in Google Scholar

Robin, L. 1908. La théorie platonicienne des idées et des nombres d’apres Aristote. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D., ed. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sayre, K. M. 1983. Plato’s Late Ontology. A Riddle Resolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shields, C., ed. 2016. Aristotle. De Anima. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shorey, P. 1888. “Recent Platonism in England.” American Journal of Philology 9/3: 274–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/287629.Suche in Google Scholar

Siwek, P. 1965. Aristotelis tractatus de anima. Roma: Desclée.Suche in Google Scholar

Smyth, H. W. 1920. A Greek Grammar for Colleges. New York: American Book Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Steel, C. 2012. “Plato as Seen by Aristotle (Metaphysics A6).” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Steel, 167–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639984.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Stenzel, J. 1959. Zahl und Gestalt bei Platon und Aristoteles. Bad Homburg vor der Höhe: Hermann Gentner Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, N. 2023. Causality and Causal Explanation in Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197660867.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Striker, G. 1970. Peras und Apeiron. Das Problem der Formen in Platons Philebos. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Táran, L. 1971. “The Creation Myth in Plato’s Timaeus.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. P. Anton, and G. L. Kustas, 372–407. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Theiler, W. 1959. Aristoteles. Über die Seele. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Tredennick, H. 1968. Aristotle. Metaphysics. Books 1–9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tricot, J. 1934. Aristote. De l’âme. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Riel, G. 2013. Plato’s Gods. Aldershot: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Vázquez, D. 2022. “Aristotle on Efficient and Final Causes in Plato.” Elenchos 43/1: 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0003.Suche in Google Scholar

Viano, C. 1996. “La doxographie du De Anima (I, 2-5) ou le contre-modèle de l’âme.” In Corps et âme, edited by C. Viano, 51–79. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilpert, P. 1949a. Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre. Regensburg: Verlag Josef Habbel.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilpert, P. 1949b. “Platons Altersvorlesung über das Gute.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 59: 1–13.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-12-11
Published in Print: 2024-12-17

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/elen-2024-0012/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen