L’interpretazione dei proemi dei dialoghi nel Commento all’Alcibiade I di Proclo

Bibliografia

Ambury, J. M. 2024. Neoplatonic Pedagogy and the Alcibiades I. Crafting the Contemplative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009109963Search in Google Scholar

Aronadio, F. 2008. Platone. Dialoghi Spuri. Torino: UTET.Search in Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. 1995. “Introduzione.” In Platone. Alcibiade Primo, Alcibiade Secondo. Milano: BUR.Search in Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. 2017. “The Skopos Assumption: Its Justification and Function in the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Plato.” International Journal of the Neoplatonic Tradition 11 (2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341377.Search in Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. 2020. “Civic Virtues and the Goal of Likeness to God in Proclus’ Republic Commentary.” In Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy, edited by E. Anagnostou-Laoutides, and K. Parry, 197–236. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004429567_010Search in Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. 1953. “The Origin of the Greater Alcibiades.” The Classical Quarterly 3: 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800002597.Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1982. Platon. Les mots et les mythes. Paris: Maspero.Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1987. “Le discours comme univers et l’univers comme discours.” In Le texte et ses représentations, edited by M. Costantini, J. Lallot, and A. Le Boulluec, 121–8. Paris: Presses des L’École Normale Supérieure.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. 1997. “First Words: A Valedictory Lecture.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 43: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s006867350000211x.Search in Google Scholar

Busse, A., ed. 1900. Eliae in Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Categorias Commentaria. (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (CAG), Vol. 18). Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 2005. “Introduzione e note.” In Platone. Fedro. Roma & Bari: Laterza (19981).Search in Google Scholar

Coulter, J. 1976. The Literary Microcosm. Theory of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450752Search in Google Scholar

D’Andrès, N. 2020. Socrate néoplatonicien. Une science de l’amour dans le Commentaire de Proclus sur le Premier Alcibiade. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. 2020. “Plato’s Phaedrus as a Manual for Neoplatonic Hermeneutics: The Case of the Anonymous Prolegomena to Plato’s Philosophy.” In The Reception of Plato’s Phaedrus from Antiquity to the Renaissance, edited by P. d’Hoine, S. Delcomminette, and M.-A. Gavray, 131–52. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110683936-009Search in Google Scholar

Dalsgaard Larsen, B. 1972. Jamblique de Chalcis, exégète et philosophe. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Search in Google Scholar

Denyer, N. 2001. Plato: Alcibiades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J., ed. 1973. Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis Dialogos Commentaria. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320444Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J., ed. 1987. Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 1999. “A Case Study in Commentary: The Neoplatonic Exegesis of the Prooimia of Plato’s Dialogues.” In Kommentare-Commentaries, edited by G. W. Most, 206–22. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.10.4324/9781351219228-24Search in Google Scholar

Dorandi, T., ed. 2013. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843440Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, M. 1976. “Iamblichus, Thrasyllus, and the Reading Order of Plato’s Dialogues.” In The Significance of Neoplatonism, edited by R. B. Harris, 59–80. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2012. “Eros, paideia e filosofia: Socrate tra Diotima e Alcibiade.” In Eros e pulchritudo. Tra antico e moderno, edited by V. Sorge, and L. Palumbo, 29–46. Napoli: La Scuola di Pitagora.10.14195/1984-249X_9_6Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2022. “A Middle Platonist Plato: Introductory Schemata and the Construction of a System in Diogenes Laertius.” In Isagogical Crossroads from the Early Imperial Age to the End of Antiquity, edited by A. Motta, and F. M. Petrucci, 33–48. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004506190_004Search in Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. 1969. “L’ordre de lecture des dialogues du Platon aux Ve/Vie Siècles.” Museum Helveticum 26: 281–96.Search in Google Scholar

Gersh, S. 1978. From Iamblichus to Eriugena. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004621930Search in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2005. Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501716966Search in Google Scholar

Gribble, D. 1999. Alcibiades and Athens: A Study of Literary Presentation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198152675.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hadot, I., J.-P. Mahé, P. Hadot, and P. Hoffmann, eds. 1990. Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristote, t. 1. Leiden & New York: Brill.10.1163/9789004320727_002Search in Google Scholar

Huh, M.-J. 2020. “Les Prolégomènes à la philosophie et les commentaires de Boèce à l’Isagogè de Porphyre.” In Introduction générale à la philosophie chez les commentateurs néoplatoniciens, edited by M.-J. Huh, 55–96. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.MON-EB.5.120303Search in Google Scholar

Layne, D. A. 2009. “Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus.” Epoché 13: 347–62. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche200913211.Search in Google Scholar

Layne, D. A. 2014a. “The Character of Socrates and the Good of Dialogue Form: Neoplatonic Hermeneutics.” In The Neoplatonic Socrates, edited by D. A. Layne, and H. Tarrant, 80–96. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812210002.80Search in Google Scholar

Layne, D. A. 2014b. “A Fatal or Providential Affair? Socrates and Alcibiades in Proclus’ Commentary on the Alcibiades I.” In Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought, edited by P. d’Hoine, and G. Van Riel, 267–90. Leuven: Leuven University Press.10.2307/j.ctt9qdwbf.18Search in Google Scholar

Luna, C., and A.-Ph. Segonds, eds. 2007–2017. Proclus. Commentaire sur le Parménide de Platon, Vol. 6. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1994. Prolegomena. Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Leiden & New York & Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004320833Search in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1998. Prolegomena Mathematica. From Apollonius of Perga to Late Neoplatonists. Leiden & Boston & Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004321052Search in Google Scholar

Markus, D. 2016. “Anagogic Love between Neoplatonic Philosophers and Their Disciples in Late Antiquity.” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10: 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341331.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A., ed. 2014. Anonimo. Prolegomeni alla filosofia di Platone. Roma: Armando.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2018. λόγους ποιεῖν. L’eredità platonica e il superamento dell’aporia dei dialoghi. Loffredo: Napoli.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2019. “Gli schemata isagogica e la questione metafisico-letteraria dello skopos.” In Studi sul Medioplatonismo e il Neoplatonismo, edited by E. Cattanei, and C. Natali, 73–99. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2021. “Problemi di filologia filosofica: la letteratura isagogica.”Rendiconti dell’Accademia di Archeologia Lettere e Belle Arti 80: 107–23.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2022a. “From the Stoic Division of Philosophy to the Reading Order of Plato’s Dialogues.” In Isagogical Crossroads from the Early Imperial Age to the End of Antiquity, edited by A. Motta, and F. M. Petrucci, 91–109. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004506190_007Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2022b. “La peculiare solennità dell’isagoge procliana al Parmenide di Platone.” In Plato’s Parmenides. Selected Papers of the Twelfth Symposium Platonicum, edited by L. Brisson, A. Macé, and O. Renaut, 509–16. Baden-Baden: Academia.10.5771/9783985720217-509Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A. 2023. “The Theme and Target of Plato’s Dialogues in Neoplatonist Cosmo-Literary Theory.” The Classical Quarterly 73 (1): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838823000332.Search in Google Scholar

Motta, A., and F. M. Petrucci. 2022. “Introduction: Towards the Isagogical Crossroads.” In Isagogical Crossroads from the Early Imperial Age to the End of Antiquity, edited by A. Motta, and F. M. Petrucci, 1–15. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004506190_002Search in Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. 2010. “Olympiodorus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, II, edited by L. P. Gerson, 697–710. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Palumbo, L. 2010. “Socrate e la conoscenza di sé: per una nuova lettura di Alc. I 133a–c.” In Socratica 2008. Studies in Ancient Socratic Literature, edited by L. Rossetti, and A. Stavru, 185–209. Bari: Levante.Search in Google Scholar

Pasquali, G., ed. 1908. Proclus Diadochus in Platonis Cratylum commentaria. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Plezia, M. 1949. De commentariis Isagogicis. Kraków: Nakladem Polskiej Akad. Umiejetności.Search in Google Scholar

Pradeau, J. F., ed. 1999. Platon. Alcibiade. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Radke-Uhlmann, G. 2006. Das Lächeln des Parmenides. Proklos’ Interpretationen zur Platonischen Dialogform. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110916287Search in Google Scholar

Reis, B. 1997. “The Circle Simile in the Platonic Curriculum of Albinus.” In The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism, edited by J. J. Cleary, 236–67. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reis, B., ed. 1999. Der Platoniker Albinos und sein sogenannter Prologos. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Remes, P. 2021. “The Prooimion and the Skopos. Proclus’ Commentary of the Alcibiades I.” In Framing the Dialogues: How to Read Openings and Closures in Plato, edited by E. Kaklamanou, M. Pavlou, and A. Tsakmakis, 263–79. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004443990_016Search in Google Scholar

Renaud, F., and H. Tarrant. 2015. The Platonic Alcibiades I. The Dialogue and its Ancient Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Riedweg, Ch. 1987. Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens von Alexandrien. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110867350Search in Google Scholar

Roueché, M. 1990. “The Definitions of Philosophy and a New Fragment of Stephanus the Philosopher.” Jahrbuch der Osterreichischen Byzantinistik 40: 107–28.Search in Google Scholar

Saffrey, H.-D., and L. G. Westerink, eds. 1968–1997. Proclus. Théologie Platonicienne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2008. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520253643.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Segonds, A.-Ph., ed. 1985–1986. Proclus. Sur le premier Alcibiade de Platon, 2 Vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. 2021. “‘In Plato We Can See the Bad Characters Being Changed by the Good and Instructed and Purified’: Attitudes to Platonic Dialogue in Later Neoplatonism.” In Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition, edited by M. Erler, J. E. Heßler, and F. M. Petrucci, 227–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108921596.012Search in Google Scholar

Smith, N. D. 2004. “Did Plato Write the Alcibiades I?” Apeiron 38: 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.2004.37.2.93.Search in Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators (200–600 AD), 3 Vols. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Steel, C., ed. 2007–2009. Procli in Platonis Parmenidem commentaria (with the Collaboration of P. d’Hoine, A. Gribbomont, C. Mac., and L. Van Campe), 3 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. 1993. Thrasyllan Platonism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501737947Search in Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. 2000. Plato’s First Interpreters. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Tornau, Ch. 2021. “Kathēgemōn: The Importance of the Personal Teacher in Proclus and Later Neoplatonism.” In Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition, edited by M. Erler, J. E. Heßler, and F. M. Petrucci, 201–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108921596.011Search in Google Scholar

Tresnie, C. 2020. “Orgueil et enseignement: À propos de quelques remarques du Commentaire au Premier Alcibiade de Proclus.” Philosophie Antique 20: 237–61. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.3936.Search in Google Scholar

Van den Berg, R. 2014. “Proclus and Iamblichus on Moral Education.” Phronesis 59 (3): 272–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341269.Search in Google Scholar

Van den Berg, R. 2020. “Experiencing Beauty: Reading the Symposium and Phaedrus in the Neoplatonic Academy of Athens.” Classics Ireland 27: 78–97.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Meeren, S. 2017. “L’‘entretien’ philosophique d’après le commentaire de Proclus au Premier Alcibiade de Platon.” In Langage des dieux, langage des démons, langage des hommes dans l’Antiquité, edited by L. G. Santoprete, and Ph. Hoffmann, 231–62. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.RRR-EB.5.114841Search in Google Scholar

Van Riel, G., ed. 2022. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum Commentaria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G., ed. 1956. Olympiodorus. Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G., J. Trouillard, and A.-Ph. Segonds, eds. 1990. Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar