Abstract
Can everyone be wise? Is wisdom open to all or an exception reserved for a few, or perhaps for none? In this context, what is the role of the ‘example’ and the ‘imitation’? Aim of my paper is to reflect on these questions in reference to Ancient Cynicism. Specifically, my goal is to analyze whether the Cynic wisdom and, consequently, life (bios) – characterized by a complete opposition to that of the common man – was intended for everyone or only for exceptional individuals, for specific types of people. In examining this aspect, I will focus particularly on the example represented by the life of the first Cynic, Diogenes of Sinope. I will show how it has been differently interpreted and understood throughout the long history of Cynicism. My attention will be primarily on Onesicritus of Astypalaea, who, contrary to certain modern simplifications and negations, represents a very interesting case in the history of Cynicism. He was a Cynic who did not live cynically. Therefore, more generally, I will demonstrate how differently Cynic philosophy could not only be followed but also reinterpreted: another sign of the theoretical fertility of this philosophical movement.
Ringraziamenti
Questo lavoro è stato svolto all’interno del progetto PRIN PNRR 2022: “The Fragility of Athens: The Greek Philosophers’ Criticism of Demokratia as an Opportunity to Rethink Democratic Citizenship”. CUP N. B53D23028890001. Parte di questo testo è stata presentata alla conferenza “Dialoghi. Conversazioni tra gli allievi dell’Istituto” (25-05-2023) presso l’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici di Napoli. Ringrazio Elena Alessiato e Marta Herling per il gentile invito, così come gli uditori, specialmente i borsisti dell’Istituto, per le molte e interessanti domande. Un sentito ringraziamento va a Francesco Verde per aver discusso con me il contenuto di questo testo fornendomi preziosi commenti e suggerimenti. Ringrazio Emidio Spinelli per avermi ‘messo in guardia’ da errori e semplificazioni, aiutandomi a migliorare le mie argomentazioni. Ringrazio altresì Anna Motta e Pietro Zaccaria per avermi dato utili consigli e spunti di riflessione; nonché i valutatori anonimi per avermi permesso di riflettere meglio su alcuni significativi problemi e temi.
Bibliografia
Alessandrelli, M. 2022. “Il sapiente stoico può esistere?” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 114: 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Alesse, F. 2000. La Stoa e la tradizione socratica. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Alesse, F. 2022. “Il saggio stoico tra paradosso e parenesi.” Antiquorum Philosophia 16: 59–72.Search in Google Scholar
Basta Donzelli, G. 1970. “Un’ideologia ‘contestataria’ del secolo IV a. C.” Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 42: 225–51.Search in Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. 1978, Epiktet. Vom Kynismus. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Bodei Giglioni, G. 1984. “Una leggenda sulle origini dell’Ellenismo: Alessandro e i cinici.” Studi ellenistici 1: 51–73.Search in Google Scholar
Bosman, P. R. 2007. “Kings Meets Dog: The Origin of the Meeting between Alexander and Diogenes.” Acta Classica 50: 51–63.Search in Google Scholar
Bosman, P. R. 2017. “Ancient Cynicism. For the Elite or for the Masses?” In Mass and Elite in the Greek and Roman Worlds, edited by R. Evans, 34–48. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315605159-4Search in Google Scholar
Bracht Branham, R. 1996. “Defacing the Currency: Diogenes’ Rhetoric and the Invention of Cynicism.” In The Cynics, edited by R. Bracht Branham, and M.-O. Goulet-Cazé, 81–104. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520921986-005Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 1992. “I κοινῇ ἀρέσκοντα dei Cinici e la κοινωνία tra cinismo e stoicismo nel libro VI (103-105).” In ANRW II 36.6, edited by W. Haase, and H. Temporini, 4049–75. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110864298-003Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2008. “Askesis e Logos nella tradizione cinica.” In Id., Studi di storiografia filosofica antica, 105–17. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2008. “Temistio e il cinismo.” In Id., Studi di storiografia filosofica antica, 131–45. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2015. “La ragione cinica e l’arte del vivere.” Iride 28: 55–70.Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2018. “Rev. of M.-O. Goulet-Cazé (2017). Le cynisme: une philosophie antique.” Elenchos 39: 421–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2018-0023.Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2019. “Eudemonismo, askesis e piacere in Diogene il Cinico.” Museum Helveticum 76: 191–207. https://doi.org/10.24894/mh.2019.00013.Search in Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2002–2003. “Sheer Doggedness or Love of Neighbor? Motives for Self-Sufficiency in the Cynics and Others.” Illinois Classical Studies 27/28: 77–96.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, T. S. 1949. Onesicritus. A Study in Hellenistic Historiography. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Buora, M. 1973–1974. “L’incontro tra Alessandro e Diogene: tradizione e significato.” Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Classe di Scienze Morali, Lettere ed Arti 132: 243–64.Search in Google Scholar
Caciorgna, M. 2023. Un libro di marmo. Il pavimento del Duomo di Siena. Livorno: Sillabe.Search in Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. 2013. I filosofi in Grecia e a Roma. Quando pensare era un modo di vivere. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar
Chapuis, M. 2021. Figures de la marginalité dans la pensée grecque. Autour de la tradition cynique. Paris: Garnier.Search in Google Scholar
Chapuis, M. 2024. “Imiter, simuler et contrefaire: les simulacres du cynisme.” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 42: 79–103.Search in Google Scholar
Chase, M. 2023. “Filosofia e arte della vita.” Bollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana 240: 7–74.Search in Google Scholar
Chouinard, I. 2021. “Un tonneau sous le Portique: la réception du cynisme chez les stoïciens.” PhD diss., Univ. de Montréal & Sorbonne Université.Search in Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1996. “Picturing Diogenes.” In The Cynics, edited by R. Bracht Branham, and M.-O. Goulet-Cazé, 366–87. Berkeley& Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520921986-017Search in Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. 1966. Antisthenis Fragmenta. Milano & Varese: Istituto Editoriale Cisalpino.Search in Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 1999. “Organization and Structure of the Philosophical Schools.” In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield, 55–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.004Search in Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., and E. Spinelli. 2016. “Ellenismo: periodizzazione e cronologia delle scuole filosofiche.” In Storia della filosofia antica. III: L’età ellenistica, edited by E. Spinelli, 19–31. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Döring, K. 1995. “Diogenes und Antisthenes.” In La tradizione socratica: seminario di studi, edited by G. Giannantoni, 125–50. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2014. “Antisthène et l’autarcie.” In Antisthenica Cynica Socratica, edited by V. Suvák, 282–307. Praha: Oikoymenh.Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2021. “L’autarcie et le fondement de la cité. Platon, Diogène et Aristote.” In Les Trois Républiques, edited by S. Husson, and J. Lemaire, 79–103. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Downey, G., and A. F. Norman. 1974. Themistii orationes quae supersunt, Vol. III. Leipzig: Teubner.10.2307/4347898Search in Google Scholar
Dudley, D. R. 1937. A History of Cynicism. From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. London: Methuen (rist. Hildesheim: Olms 1967).Search in Google Scholar
Erler, M. 1992. “Orthodoxie und Anpassung: Philodem, ein Panaitios des Kepos?” Museum Helveticum 49: 171–200.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2011 (ed. or. 2009). Il coraggio della verità. Il governo di sé e degli altri. Il corso al Collège de France (1984). Milano: Feltrinelli.Search in Google Scholar
Flores-Júnior, O. 2021. La vie facile. Une lecture du cynisme ancien. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Fuentes González, P. P. 1998. Les Diatribes de Télès. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Fuentes Gonzales, P. P. 2005. “La lampe d’Épictète ou le choix inaliénable.” Fortunatae 15: 61–82.Search in Google Scholar
Fuentes González, P. P. 2014. “En defensa del encuentro entre dos Perros, Antístenes y Diógenes: historia de una tensa amistad.” In Antisthenica Cynica Socratica, edited by V. Suvák, 11–71. Praha: Oikoymenh.10.5209/rev_CFCG.2013.v23.41550Search in Google Scholar
García González, J. M., and P. P. Fuentes González. 2000. “Hipparchia de Maronée.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. III, edited by R. Goulet, 742–50. Paris: CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. 1988. “Cinici e Stoici su Alessandro Magno.” In I filosofi e il potere nella società e nella cultura antiche, edited by G. Casertano, 75–87. Napoli: Guida.Search in Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. 1990. Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. 1993. “Antistene fondatore della scuola cinica?” In Le cynisme ancien et ses prolongements, edited by M.-O. Goulet-Cazé, and R. Goulet, 15–34. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar
Giesecke, A. 1891. De Philosophorum veterum quae ad exilium spectant sententiis. Diss. Lipsiae.Search in Google Scholar
Gigante, M. 1992. Cinismo e epicureismo. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Goettling, K. W. 1851. Diogenes der Cyniker oder die Philosophie des griechischen Proletariats. In Gesammelte Abhandlungen aus dem classischen Alterthume, Vol. I, 251–77. Halle: Buchh. des Waisenhauses (rist. in Die Kyniker in der modernen Forschung, edited by M. Billerbeck, 31–58. Amsterdam: Hakkert 1991).10.1075/bsp.15.05goeSearch in Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. 2013 (ed. or. 1922). Pensatori greci. Storia della filosofia antica dalle origini ad Aristotele e alla sua Scuola, introd. di G. Reale, trad. it. di L. Bandini. Milano: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. 1986. L’ascèse cynique. Paris: Vrin (rist. 2000).Search in Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. 1990. “Le Cynisme à l’époque impériale.” In ANRW II, Vol. 36, edited by W. Haase, and H. Temporini, 2720–833. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872880-012Search in Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. 2003. Les kynika du stoïcisme. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Search in Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. 2005. “Onésicrite d’Astypalaea.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. IV, edited by R. Goulet, 776–80. Paris: CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. 2013. “Michel Foucault et sa vision du cynisme dans Le courage de la vérité.” In Michel Foucault: éthique et vérité (1980–1984), edited by D. Lorenzini, A. Revel, and A. Sforzini, 105–24. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Guglielmina, I. 2006. Diogène Laërce et le Cynisme. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Search in Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1988 (ed. or. 1987). Esercizi spirituali e filosofia antica, trad it. di A. M. Marietti. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. 1988. Die Orakelkritik, des Kynikers Oenomaus. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Search in Google Scholar
Helmer, É. 2017. Diogène le cynique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.10.14375/NP.9782251446561Search in Google Scholar
Höistad, R. 1948. Cynic Hero and Cynic King. Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. Uppsala: Boktryckeri.Search in Google Scholar
Horn, C. 2004 (ed. or. 1998). L’arte della vita nell’antichità. Felicità e morale da Socrate ai Neoplatonici, trad. it. a cura di E. Spinelli. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Husson, S. 2011. La République de Diogène. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. 1980. Aristone di Chio e lo Stoicismo antico. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Izzo, D. 2018. “Uomo o donna? Intorno al gesto dell’ἀνασύρειν. D.L. VI 97-98.” In Figure del corpo nel mondo antico, edited by M. Barbanera, 249–65. Perugia: Aguaplano.Search in Google Scholar
Izzo, D. 2019. “Studi sulle intersezioni tra Cinismo antico e commedia.” PhD diss. Università degli Studi di Trento & Université de Lille.Search in Google Scholar
Lapini, W. 2003. “Ipparchia Desnuda.” In Id., Studi di filologia filosofica, 217–30. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar
Lomiento, L. 1993. Cercidas. Roma: Gruppo Editoriale Int.Search in Google Scholar
López Cruces, J. L. 1995. Les Méliambes de Cercidas de Megálopolis. Politique et tradition littéraire. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenzini, D. 2017. La force du vrai. De Foucault à Austin. Lormont: Le bord de l’eau.10.14375/NP.9782385192563Search in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1999. “Sources.” In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield, 3–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.002Search in Google Scholar
Matuszewski, R. 2022. “When a Man is an Island. Introductory Remarks on Being Alone in Antiquity.” In Being Alone in Antiquity: Greco-Roman Ideas and Experiences of Misanthropy, Isolation and Solitude, edited by R. Matuszewski, 1–19. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110758078-002Search in Google Scholar
Mecci, S. 2020. “Diogenes the Cynic and the Gods (Diogenes Laertius VI, 44 [= V B 322]).” Philosophia [Academy of Athens] 50: 157–63.Search in Google Scholar
Mecci, S. 2023a. “I Cinici e la ridefinizione dei valori. Il sapiente come modello ‘politico’ e ‘religioso.” In Filosofia e religione civile. Un problema storico, edited by A. L. Schino, and F. Verde, Archivio di Filosofia 91: 21–31.Search in Google Scholar
Mecci, S. 2023b. “La politeia cinica di Diogene di Sinope. Autenticità, contenuto e significato,” Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 35: 1–22.Search in Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1983. “Honestius quam ambitiosius? An Exploration of the Cynic’s Attitude to Moral Corruption in His Fellow Men.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 103: 103–23 (rist. in The Collected Papers of J. L. Moles, edited by J. Marincola, 317–52. Leiden: Brill 2023).10.2307/630531Search in Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1995. “The Cynics and Politics.” In Justice and Generosity. Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, edited by A. Laks, and M. Schofield, 129–58. Cambridge: CUP (rist. in The Collected Papers of J. L. Moles, edited by J. Marincola, 389–420. Leiden: Brill 2023).10.1017/CBO9780511518485.007Search in Google Scholar
Moles, J. 2008. “The Cynics.” In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by C. Rowe, and M. Schofield, 415–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (rist. in The Collected Papers of J. L. Moles, edited by J. Marincola, 440–61. Leiden: Brill 2023).10.1017/CHOL9780521481366.023Search in Google Scholar
Niehues-Pröbsting, H. 1979. Der Kynismus des Diogenes und der Begriff des Zynismus. München: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Noussa, M. 2017. “Crates of Thebes.” In Hellenistic Poetry: A Selection, edited by D. Sider, 561–70. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2019. The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674242975Search in Google Scholar
Paone, C. 2018. “Diogenes the Cynic on Law and World Citizenship.” Polis 35: 478–98. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340176.Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, L. 1960. The Lost Histories of Alexander the Great. New York: American Philological Association.Search in Google Scholar
Penna, R. 1977. “San Paolo (1 Cor 7, 29 b-31 a) e Diogene il Cinico.” Biblica 58: 237–45 (rist. in R. Penna, L’apostolo Paolo. Studi di esegesi e teologia, Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo 1991: 213–22).Search in Google Scholar
Pià-Comella, J. 2020. “Un tournant majeur de l’acculturation du cynisme à Rome: le De philosophia de Varron.” Elenchos 41: 269–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2020-0015.Search in Google Scholar
Prince, S. 2015. Antisthenes of Athens. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.5730060Search in Google Scholar
Rich, A. N. M. 1956. “The Cynic Conception of ΑΥΤΑΡΚΕΙΑ.” Mnemosyne 4: 23–9.10.1163/156852556X00034Search in Google Scholar
Roca Ferrer, J. 1974. Kynikos Trópos: cinismo y subversión literaria en la antiguedad. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar
Roubineau, J.-M. 2020. Diogène: L’antisocial. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1965. “A New Text of Diogenes Laertius.” Classical Review 15: 174–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x0022026x.Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2007. “Epictetus on Cynicism.” In The Philosophy of Epictetus, edited by T. Scaltsas, and A. S. Mason, 71–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233076.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Small, H. 2020. The Function of Cynicism at the Present Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198861935.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. 2014. “Filosofia, cioè vita.” Iride 27: 643–53.10.1590/S0103-49792014000300013Search in Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. 1939. “Alexander, Cynics and Stoics.” American Journal of Philology 60: 41–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/290882.Search in Google Scholar
Trabattoni, F. 2021. “L’interprétation de l’heritage de Socrate dans les Républiques de Platon, de Zénon (et Diogène).” In Les trois Républiques, edited by S. Husson, and J. Lemaire, 47–62. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2013. Epicuro. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2016. “Diogene di Sinope: un addendum (AP V 302).” Revue des Études Anciennes 118: 443–9. https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.2016.6778.Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2022. “La polemica sulla natura del saggio tra Epicuro e Stilpone e in Colote.” Antiquorum Philosophia 16: 73–92.Search in Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. 2011. Die hellenistischen Utopien. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110263893Search in Google Scholar
Zaccaria, P. 2021. Felix Jacoby. Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker ‘Continued. IV A: Biography. Fascicle 5. The First Century BC and Hellenistic Authors of Uncertain Date [Nos. 1035-1045]. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Variazioni sul tema. Il cinismo antico e lo stile di vita: tra imitazione e interpretazione
- Aristotle on Platonic Efficient Causes. A Rehabilitation
- Aristotle’s Critique of Form-Number
- Yet Another Heuristic: Assessing Eudaimon versus Makarios in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
- L’interpretazione dei proemi dei dialoghi nel Commento all’Alcibiade I di Proclo
- Filone Alessandrino a Venezia nel ’500. Le prime traduzioni in volgare italiano
- Notes
- Un passo di Michele di Efeso e l’origine del commento composito all’Etica Nicomachea
- Reviews
- M. Laura Gemelli Marciano (a c. di): Presocratici. Volume I: Sentieri di sapienza attraverso la Ionia e oltre. Da Talete a Eraclito
- Anca Vasiliu, Elsa Grasso: Platon et la Pensée de l’image
- Pierre-Marie Morel: La nature et le bien. L’éthique d’Aristote et la question naturaliste
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Variazioni sul tema. Il cinismo antico e lo stile di vita: tra imitazione e interpretazione
- Aristotle on Platonic Efficient Causes. A Rehabilitation
- Aristotle’s Critique of Form-Number
- Yet Another Heuristic: Assessing Eudaimon versus Makarios in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
- L’interpretazione dei proemi dei dialoghi nel Commento all’Alcibiade I di Proclo
- Filone Alessandrino a Venezia nel ’500. Le prime traduzioni in volgare italiano
- Notes
- Un passo di Michele di Efeso e l’origine del commento composito all’Etica Nicomachea
- Reviews
- M. Laura Gemelli Marciano (a c. di): Presocratici. Volume I: Sentieri di sapienza attraverso la Ionia e oltre. Da Talete a Eraclito
- Anca Vasiliu, Elsa Grasso: Platon et la Pensée de l’image
- Pierre-Marie Morel: La nature et le bien. L’éthique d’Aristote et la question naturaliste