Yet Another Heuristic: Assessing Eudaimon versus Makarios in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
-
Kelsey Boor
Abstract
This paper discusses the debate regarding the terms makarios (“blessed”) and eudaimon (“happy”) in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. In it, I identify two scholarly conclusions regarding these terms: (1) the distinction thesis: that the words mean different things in the text, and (2) the interchangeability thesis: that the words do not mean different things in the text, and may be substituted for one another. I argue that the theories should both be used as heuristic tools of analysis, rather than only one of them being used as a universal rule to be applied to the text. Additionally, I argue that a third heuristic device is needed: I forward that while makarios and eudaimon are sometimes interchangeable (contra the distinction thesis) they are not synonymous (contra the interchangeability thesis). Rather, in some cases, both terms can be translated as “happy,” but they are being used by Aristotle in reference to subjects with distinct natures. In these instances, eudaimonia can sometimes be interpreted as a properly human term, which we cannot apply to the gods. Or, if it is applied to the gods, it must be applied in a distinct, qualified way. Meanwhile, makarios can sometimes be interpreted as a properly divine term, used in reference to the gods or to a god-like status achieved by a human being who has superseded normal human achievement or capacity.
References
Primary Sources
Bodéüs, R. 2004. Ethique à Nicomaque. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Broadie, S., and C. Rowe. 2002. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bywater, J. 1894. Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A., and J. Y. Jolif. 1959. Aristote. L’Éthique à Nicomaque. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1999. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. 1962. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Bobbs-Merril Co.Search in Google Scholar
Rackham, H. 1935. Aristotle. Eudemian Ethics (Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 20). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. Aristotle. Politics. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Annas, J. 1995. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1985. “Aristotle on the Goods of Fortune.” The Philosophical Review 94 (2): 173–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185427.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1988. “Review of M. C. Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness.” The Philosophical Review 97/4: 543–64.Search in Google Scholar
Joachim, H. 1951. Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. A Commentary, edited by D. A. Rees. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1965–1966. “Happiness.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society N.S. 66: 93–102, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/66.1.93.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pakaluk, M. 2005. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, D. 2012. Happiness for Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stewart, J. 1973. Notes on the Ethics of Aristotle. New York: Arno Press.Search in Google Scholar
White, S. 1992. Sovereign Virtue: Aristotle on the Relation Between Happiness and Prosperity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Variazioni sul tema. Il cinismo antico e lo stile di vita: tra imitazione e interpretazione
- Aristotle on Platonic Efficient Causes. A Rehabilitation
- Aristotle’s Critique of Form-Number
- Yet Another Heuristic: Assessing Eudaimon versus Makarios in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
- L’interpretazione dei proemi dei dialoghi nel Commento all’Alcibiade I di Proclo
- Filone Alessandrino a Venezia nel ’500. Le prime traduzioni in volgare italiano
- Notes
- Un passo di Michele di Efeso e l’origine del commento composito all’Etica Nicomachea
- Reviews
- M. Laura Gemelli Marciano (a c. di): Presocratici. Volume I: Sentieri di sapienza attraverso la Ionia e oltre. Da Talete a Eraclito
- Anca Vasiliu, Elsa Grasso: Platon et la Pensée de l’image
- Pierre-Marie Morel: La nature et le bien. L’éthique d’Aristote et la question naturaliste
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Variazioni sul tema. Il cinismo antico e lo stile di vita: tra imitazione e interpretazione
- Aristotle on Platonic Efficient Causes. A Rehabilitation
- Aristotle’s Critique of Form-Number
- Yet Another Heuristic: Assessing Eudaimon versus Makarios in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
- L’interpretazione dei proemi dei dialoghi nel Commento all’Alcibiade I di Proclo
- Filone Alessandrino a Venezia nel ’500. Le prime traduzioni in volgare italiano
- Notes
- Un passo di Michele di Efeso e l’origine del commento composito all’Etica Nicomachea
- Reviews
- M. Laura Gemelli Marciano (a c. di): Presocratici. Volume I: Sentieri di sapienza attraverso la Ionia e oltre. Da Talete a Eraclito
- Anca Vasiliu, Elsa Grasso: Platon et la Pensée de l’image
- Pierre-Marie Morel: La nature et le bien. L’éthique d’Aristote et la question naturaliste
