Home Religion, Bible and Theology Coram cruce oder cum cruce? Gerhard Ebelings regulativer Gebrauch der theologia crucis
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Coram cruce oder cum cruce? Gerhard Ebelings regulativer Gebrauch der theologia crucis

  • Philipp Stoellger
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Christology Revised
This chapter is in the book Christology Revised

Abstract

Gerhard Ebeling appeals centrally to the theology of the cross as regulative. Theology as a whole is to be characterized as theologia crucis; it is “interpretation of the cross.” In taking this approach, Ebeling was standing, at the same time, against a theology dominated by the incarnation or by the resurrection. In conversation with Ebeling, the ‘before the cross’ (coram cruce) must be thought further hermeneutically with regard to its interpretive potential. In the process, Ebeling’s own starting point will be investigated critically and at the same constructively by means of the ‘experience with the death of Jesus.’ Finally, it will be shown that Ebeling introduces the authoritative horizon of understanding of the cross from the standpoint of Easter and operates with a cum cruce rather than a coram cruce. Is it not the case that it is not theology of the cross that is being done here but rather a theology of the resurrection has been made to be the basic figure?

Abstract

Gerhard Ebeling appeals centrally to the theology of the cross as regulative. Theology as a whole is to be characterized as theologia crucis; it is “interpretation of the cross.” In taking this approach, Ebeling was standing, at the same time, against a theology dominated by the incarnation or by the resurrection. In conversation with Ebeling, the ‘before the cross’ (coram cruce) must be thought further hermeneutically with regard to its interpretive potential. In the process, Ebeling’s own starting point will be investigated critically and at the same constructively by means of the ‘experience with the death of Jesus.’ Finally, it will be shown that Ebeling introduces the authoritative horizon of understanding of the cross from the standpoint of Easter and operates with a cum cruce rather than a coram cruce. Is it not the case that it is not theology of the cross that is being done here but rather a theology of the resurrection has been made to be the basic figure?

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Inhaltsverzeichnis V
  3. Introduction 1
  4. I Paradigmen: Kreuz – Auferweckung – Menschwerdung
  5. Die Auferweckung des Gekreuzigten 9
  6. Ökumenische Inkarnations-Christologie heute. Modernitätstheoretische Sondierungsversuche 37
  7. Die Bedeutung der patristischen Christologie für die Christologie heute. Historische und systematische Perspektiven 57
  8. Johanneische Christologie zwischen Genese und Geltung 77
  9. Im Horizont des Dialogs. Zur Entwicklung evangelisch-theologischer Versöhnungslehre und ihrem Beitrag zu interkonfessioneller und interreligiöser Verständigung 107
  10. II Author meets Critic: Heinrich Assel, Elementare Christologie 1–3, 2020
  11. Das kritische Erbe der theologia crucis in der Versöhnungslehre angesichts feministischer Kritik und black theology. Heinrich Assels Elementare Christologie 1 135
  12. Das kritische Erbe der theologia crucis und die politische Christologie 153
  13. Evangelien-Hermeneutik und „Jesus Remembered“. Heinrich Assels Elementare Christologie 2 167
  14. Gedächtnis, Geschichte, Vergessen – Jesus Remembered 179
  15. Inkarnationschristologie und messianisches Denken im Dialog mit dem jüdischen Philosophen Emmanuel Levinas. Heinrich Assels Elementare Christologie 3 195
  16. Gott ist Mensch, creator est creatura. Sprachlogische und schöpfungsphilosophische Horizontöffnungen eines Dialogs über Inkarnation des Menschen und Menschwerdung Gottes 213
  17. Transitorische Momente der Christologie – göttlich-menschliches Miteinander am Kreuz? 229
  18. III Author meets Critic: Bruce McCormack, The Humility of the Eternal Son, 2021
  19. ‘The Humility of the Eternal Son’ 259
  20. Eine mögliche Antwort aus Sicht der Theologie Eberhard Jüngels 269
  21. Kenotische Erbengemeinschaft. Hans-Georg Geyer und Bruce McCormack als legitime Erben der Christologie Karl Barths 281
  22. Author Meets Critics: Response 295
  23. IV Christology – Revised
  24. Der Koran und der christliche Inkarnationsglaube 315
  25. Christology today. Remarks on some proposals and possible ways forward 337
  26. Incarnation and the Body. Intercorporeal Considerations 353
  27. Coram cruce oder cum cruce? Gerhard Ebelings regulativer Gebrauch der theologia crucis 373
  28. Christologie als theologische Meta-Ethik. Einige Erwägungen zur ethischen Relevanz christologischer Reflexion 387
  29. Register der Namen 409
Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111340951-021/html
Scroll to top button