Startseite Philosophie Hegel’s Metaphysical Alternative to the Choice between an Unrealistic Platonic Realism and an Opposing Skeptical Anti-realism
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Hegel’s Metaphysical Alternative to the Choice between an Unrealistic Platonic Realism and an Opposing Skeptical Anti-realism

  • Paul Redding
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Ideas and Idealism in Philosophy
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Ideas and Idealism in Philosophy

Abstract

In this paper I argue for an interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy beyond a choice between two distinctly “unrealistic” options: Robert Brandom’s “robust” realism and Richard Rorty’s skeptical anti-realism. I thus interpret Hegel’s idealism as a form of weakened Platonic realism (a realism about ideas, or realistic idealism) that falls between the interpretations of Rorty and Brandom. This position broadly coincides with the “actualism” found within debates over modality within analytic philosophy and represented there by Arthur Prior and Robert Stalnaker. For the actualist, there is a sense in which the actual world necessarily contains “mind” and its ideational contents, but this is a trivial sense. What we mean by the actual world, in contrast to some of the non-actual possible alternatives to it, is the world as containing us, and we have no option other than to think of ourselves as “minded”.

Abstract

In this paper I argue for an interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy beyond a choice between two distinctly “unrealistic” options: Robert Brandom’s “robust” realism and Richard Rorty’s skeptical anti-realism. I thus interpret Hegel’s idealism as a form of weakened Platonic realism (a realism about ideas, or realistic idealism) that falls between the interpretations of Rorty and Brandom. This position broadly coincides with the “actualism” found within debates over modality within analytic philosophy and represented there by Arthur Prior and Robert Stalnaker. For the actualist, there is a sense in which the actual world necessarily contains “mind” and its ideational contents, but this is a trivial sense. What we mean by the actual world, in contrast to some of the non-actual possible alternatives to it, is the world as containing us, and we have no option other than to think of ourselves as “minded”.

Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110760767-009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen