Home Philosophy De-Symbolization of the World and the Emergence of the Self: A Historically-Idealist Theory of the Subject
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

De-Symbolization of the World and the Emergence of the Self: A Historically-Idealist Theory of the Subject

  • Jure Simoniti
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Ideas and Idealism in Philosophy
This chapter is in the book Ideas and Idealism in Philosophy

Abstract

Idealism has commonly been regarded as a stance endorsing a timeless frame which precedes and preordains all the temporal, worldly phenomena. By contrast, this paper will indicate how the idealist impulse emerges historically, as a very specific juggling act which hangs suspended between two focal points, the process of the de-symbolization of the world on the one side and the formation of the philosophical subject on the other. The first case is provided by Augustine, the inventor of the “private inner space” of the contemplative self and simultaneously an advocate of an ontologically homonomous world, i. e., the Christian monism of good against the Gnostic and Manichean dualisms of good and evil. On grounds of this matrix, the Cartesian ego, the Kantian spontaneous, synthetic unity of apperception, Nietzsche’s overman, Heidegger’s Dasein, or the psychoanalytical subject of gender difference will also be construed as a reaction to the collapsing symbolic values of the world.

Abstract

Idealism has commonly been regarded as a stance endorsing a timeless frame which precedes and preordains all the temporal, worldly phenomena. By contrast, this paper will indicate how the idealist impulse emerges historically, as a very specific juggling act which hangs suspended between two focal points, the process of the de-symbolization of the world on the one side and the formation of the philosophical subject on the other. The first case is provided by Augustine, the inventor of the “private inner space” of the contemplative self and simultaneously an advocate of an ontologically homonomous world, i. e., the Christian monism of good against the Gnostic and Manichean dualisms of good and evil. On grounds of this matrix, the Cartesian ego, the Kantian spontaneous, synthetic unity of apperception, Nietzsche’s overman, Heidegger’s Dasein, or the psychoanalytical subject of gender difference will also be construed as a reaction to the collapsing symbolic values of the world.

Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110760767-004/html
Scroll to top button