Startseite Religionswissenschaft, Bibelwissenschaft und Theologie La tradition paulinienne dans les lettres d’Ignace
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

La tradition paulinienne dans les lettres d’Ignace

  • Enrico Norelli
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Did Ignatius of Antioch know (some of) the letters included in the corpus paulinum and, if so, how did he use them in his own letters? While this question has often been discussed, there is no real consensus yet, though most now reject Wilhelm Schneemelcher’s thesis that we cannot prove the use of any Pauline (or deuteropauline) letter by Ignatius. Most scholars believe that Ignatius knew at least 1 Cor and Rom, and maybe Eph. Annette Merz recently tried to show that the Pauline corpus and especially the Pastoral Epistles deeply influenced the whole of Ignatius’ self-understanding and self-presentation. The present contribution tests a method aimed at assessing whether Ignatius used Paul’s letters and, if so, how he recast their elements in the service of his own goals. It analyses the relevant passages from Ignatius’ Ephesians and tries to show that it drew on deuteropauline Ephesians as well as on 1 Cor. It appears that Ignatius regularly adapted Pauline passages and topics to the needs of his own argument much more than he used them to work out his own theology. Ignatius’ transformation of Pauline material is chiefly based on precise features within it, often involving shifts in meaning.

Abstract

Did Ignatius of Antioch know (some of) the letters included in the corpus paulinum and, if so, how did he use them in his own letters? While this question has often been discussed, there is no real consensus yet, though most now reject Wilhelm Schneemelcher’s thesis that we cannot prove the use of any Pauline (or deuteropauline) letter by Ignatius. Most scholars believe that Ignatius knew at least 1 Cor and Rom, and maybe Eph. Annette Merz recently tried to show that the Pauline corpus and especially the Pastoral Epistles deeply influenced the whole of Ignatius’ self-understanding and self-presentation. The present contribution tests a method aimed at assessing whether Ignatius used Paul’s letters and, if so, how he recast their elements in the service of his own goals. It analyses the relevant passages from Ignatius’ Ephesians and tries to show that it drew on deuteropauline Ephesians as well as on 1 Cor. It appears that Ignatius regularly adapted Pauline passages and topics to the needs of his own argument much more than he used them to work out his own theology. Ignatius’ transformation of Pauline material is chiefly based on precise features within it, often involving shifts in meaning.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Table of Contents V
  3. Preface IX
  4. I Prolegomena
  5. Introduction 3
  6. Paulus im ältesten Christentum 23
  7. II The Reception of the Pauline “Gospel” in EarlyChristianity
  8. Proclaimed Message or Proclamation of the Message? 61
  9. Lorsque Paul parle d’Evangile dans lapremière lettre aux Corinthiens 89
  10. III (Auto-)Biographical Receptions of Paul
  11. Das Selbstverständnis des Paulus als Apostel 115
  12. Biographie und Rhetorik 143
  13. Die Akten des Paulus und der Thekla als biographische Paulusrezeption 175
  14. The Conversion of Paul: A New Perspective (Epistula Apostolorum 31–33) 195
  15. IV Paul and his Work: Sociological and EconomicEffects
  16. Pauline Assemblies and Graeco-Roman Associations 215
  17. Zwischen Elend und Elite 249
  18. V Theological Receptions of Paul
  19. Der Kolosserbrief als ethischer Text –zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte derPaulusrezeption 289
  20. Paulus als Ökumeniker 317
  21. „Dies ist die geistige Auferstehung“ 355
  22. The Ecclesiology of 2 Clement 14 377
  23. VI Literary (Epistolary and Narrative) Receptionsof Paul
  24. Paul et la mémoire lucanienne des Origines 411
  25. Der 2. Thessalonicherbrief im Verhältnis zum 1. Thessalonicherbrief 443
  26. Hébreux et la tradition paulinienne 461
  27. VII Pauline Reception as Pauline Tradition
  28. Paulustradition und Paulusrezeption in den Pastoralbriefen 487
  29. La tradition paulinienne dans les lettres d’Ignace 519
  30. VIII Paul as an Authoritative Figure in EarlyChristianity
  31. Paul, Clement and the Corinthians 555
  32. Apocalipsis Pauli/Visio Pauli – Warum eigentlich Paulus? 579
  33. Apostolic Authority and Women in Second-Century Christianity 607
  34. Pauline Reception in Valentinian and Basilidian Gnosis 623
  35. IX Anti-Paulinism and Conflicts about Paul in EarlyChristianity
  36. Kreuzfeuer 647
  37. Antipauliner oder Zeugen eines nichtpaulinischen Christentums? 675
  38. La construction de l’homme ennemi ou l’anti-paulinisme dans le corpus pseudo-clément 729
  39. X Constructing the “Canonical” Paul
  40. Ungetrennt und Unvermischt? 751
  41. Marcion and the Canonical Paul 779
  42. Sammlungen der Paulusbriefe und die Entstehung des neutestamentlichen Kanons 799
  43. XI Pauline Reception: Archeological and EpigraphicEvidence
  44. Epigraphic Evidence for the Impact of Paul in Central Asia Minor 825
  45. List of Contributors 839
  46. Index of Ancient Sources 841
  47. Index of Modern Authors 896
Heruntergeladen am 19.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110533781-020/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen