Home Linguistics & Semiotics Offene und versteckte Aggression im Gebrauch von Dysphemismen und Euphemismen
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Offene und versteckte Aggression im Gebrauch von Dysphemismen und Euphemismen

  • Paweł Bąk
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Verbale Aggression
This chapter is in the book Verbale Aggression

Abstract

The article sheds light on the connection between euphemism, dys­phemism, and verbal aggression. Dysphemisms mostly appear with a pejorative effect in the literature, whereas euphemisms appear with a preventive or mitigat­ing function. The concept of this article is based on the conviction that euphe­misms and dysphemisms are not to be understood as expressions that inherently contain an enhancing or disavowing function. Rather, they involve euphemistic or dysphemistic acts, respectively, whose success (i.e. effect) is determined by all sorts of factors, and not only by lexical meaning. Among other things, the perlocutionary effect depends on the situational and linguistic context, on the relationship between the interactants (i.e. discourse participants), on their roles in the discourse, and on the individual characteristics of the interactants (i.e. language competence, discourse competence, awareness, empathy, aggressive­ness etc.). In addition to overt verbal aggression, the article also considers rarely investigated aspects of covert aggression based on examples of private and public discourse; that is, verbal attacks through euphemisms and non-aggressive effects of dysphemisms. At the center of these considerations are the prevention of aggression, overt and covert forms of verbal aggression, and intended (i.e. inten­tional) and unintended (i.e. unintentional) hostility. The article discusses with which communicative factors and in which speech acts certain expressions have a euphemistic (i.e. polite) or dysphemistic (i.e. aggressive) effect, and, further­more, which factors constitute euphemisms and dysphemisms. This discussion highlights the most important features of these.

Abstract

The article sheds light on the connection between euphemism, dys­phemism, and verbal aggression. Dysphemisms mostly appear with a pejorative effect in the literature, whereas euphemisms appear with a preventive or mitigat­ing function. The concept of this article is based on the conviction that euphe­misms and dysphemisms are not to be understood as expressions that inherently contain an enhancing or disavowing function. Rather, they involve euphemistic or dysphemistic acts, respectively, whose success (i.e. effect) is determined by all sorts of factors, and not only by lexical meaning. Among other things, the perlocutionary effect depends on the situational and linguistic context, on the relationship between the interactants (i.e. discourse participants), on their roles in the discourse, and on the individual characteristics of the interactants (i.e. language competence, discourse competence, awareness, empathy, aggressive­ness etc.). In addition to overt verbal aggression, the article also considers rarely investigated aspects of covert aggression based on examples of private and public discourse; that is, verbal attacks through euphemisms and non-aggressive effects of dysphemisms. At the center of these considerations are the prevention of aggression, overt and covert forms of verbal aggression, and intended (i.e. inten­tional) and unintended (i.e. unintentional) hostility. The article discusses with which communicative factors and in which speech acts certain expressions have a euphemistic (i.e. polite) or dysphemistic (i.e. aggressive) effect, and, further­more, which factors constitute euphemisms and dysphemisms. This discussion highlights the most important features of these.

Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110522976-007/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button