Home Literary Studies 11. John Dos Passos, Manhattan Transfer (1925)
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

11. John Dos Passos, Manhattan Transfer (1925)

  • Antje Kley

Abstract

In a distinctly modernist experimental gesture, Manhattan Transfer breaks with nineteenth-century realist and linear narrative modes. Adopting filmic montage techniques, the novel spatially juxtaposes episodes from different characters’ lives, presenting New York as an animate environment, made up of contingent occurrences, streams of consciousness, fleeting impressions, and cultural signs. More than a setting, the city becomes the primary object of the novel and even an agency constitutive of its inhabitants’ lives. Manhattan Transfer thus questions traditional notions of individual autonomy: in a capitalist environment experienced in fragments, subjectivity is always already informed by conventionalized signs and ritualized forms of interaction. The novel does not present a consistent story and its narrative components do not yield a seamless world. In a newly obscure reading process, readers are prompted to experience modes of perception engendered by the radical changes of the early twentieth century. The textual structures demand that the individual develop cognitive and implicit understandings of the historicity and cultural co-production of their own lives as well as habits of interaction that enable her or him to negotiate the contingencies of modern experience.

Abstract

In a distinctly modernist experimental gesture, Manhattan Transfer breaks with nineteenth-century realist and linear narrative modes. Adopting filmic montage techniques, the novel spatially juxtaposes episodes from different characters’ lives, presenting New York as an animate environment, made up of contingent occurrences, streams of consciousness, fleeting impressions, and cultural signs. More than a setting, the city becomes the primary object of the novel and even an agency constitutive of its inhabitants’ lives. Manhattan Transfer thus questions traditional notions of individual autonomy: in a capitalist environment experienced in fragments, subjectivity is always already informed by conventionalized signs and ritualized forms of interaction. The novel does not present a consistent story and its narrative components do not yield a seamless world. In a newly obscure reading process, readers are prompted to experience modes of perception engendered by the radical changes of the early twentieth century. The textual structures demand that the individual develop cognitive and implicit understandings of the historicity and cultural co-production of their own lives as well as habits of interaction that enable her or him to negotiate the contingencies of modern experience.

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110422429-013/html
Scroll to top button