Startseite Chapter 12. Multifunctionality and polysemy of the similative marker = kán in Pesh
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 12. Multifunctionality and polysemy of the similative marker = kán in Pesh

  • Claudine Chamoreau
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This paper focuses on the multifunctionality and polysemy of the marker =kánin Pesh, a Chibchan language spoken in Honduras. This multifunctional marker appears in two types of context. First, it appears in noun phrases. In this context, =kánfunctions as a case marker and is encliticised to a noun or a pronoun. It is polysemous, expressing both similarity and comparison of equality. In constituent interrogative clauses, it is used in conjunction with a pronoun or a noun. These combinations have the meaning of awh-question word; the interrogative component is not inherent in these combinations but marked on the verb. Second, the marker =kánmay be encliticised to a verb in dependent clauses, functioning as a subordinator. In this context,=kánis also polysemous and may encode different types of epistemic modality. The dependent clauses in which=kánoccurs may express similarity and simulation, epistemic possibility, hypothetical meaning, irrealis condition, and temporal relation. The use in noun phrases suggests that for the case marker =kán, the manner meaning ‘like’ came first, expressing the notion of similarity, that is, the source function in the grammaticalisation chain. A recent use has developed exhibiting the use of =kánfor expressing comparison of equality.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the multifunctionality and polysemy of the marker =kánin Pesh, a Chibchan language spoken in Honduras. This multifunctional marker appears in two types of context. First, it appears in noun phrases. In this context, =kánfunctions as a case marker and is encliticised to a noun or a pronoun. It is polysemous, expressing both similarity and comparison of equality. In constituent interrogative clauses, it is used in conjunction with a pronoun or a noun. These combinations have the meaning of awh-question word; the interrogative component is not inherent in these combinations but marked on the verb. Second, the marker =kánmay be encliticised to a verb in dependent clauses, functioning as a subordinator. In this context,=kánis also polysemous and may encode different types of epistemic modality. The dependent clauses in which=kánoccurs may express similarity and simulation, epistemic possibility, hypothetical meaning, irrealis condition, and temporal relation. The use in noun phrases suggests that for the case marker =kán, the manner meaning ‘like’ came first, expressing the notion of similarity, that is, the source function in the grammaticalisation chain. A recent use has developed exhibiting the use of =kánfor expressing comparison of equality.

Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.117.13cha/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen