Home Chapter 8. Expressing comparison in Gbaya, a Ubangian language of the Central African Republic
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 8. Expressing comparison in Gbaya, a Ubangian language of the Central African Republic

  • Paulette Roulon-Doko
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Similative and Equative Constructions
This chapter is in the book Similative and Equative Constructions

Abstract

Gbaya, an Ubangian language of Central Africa, shows that all types of comparison are qualitative expressions and not quantitative ones involving a parameter of gradation or degree. Following the theoretical framework proposed inFuchs (2014), this chapter first presents the use of the dedicated similative circumpositionhé … gá. It expresses, in different contexts, a way of doing (modus faciendi) or a way of being (modus essendi). It frames a nominal phrase and can also be used as a subordinating morpheme to frame a clause. Then, the comparison of equality is studied and analysed as a special case of similative comparison, in which the reciprocal morpheme is added to the circumposition. Another construction of comparison of equality, which does not involve the circumposition, also uses the reciprocal and is formed with two verbs‘reach’ andɲɛm‘suit’. As for the comparison of superior inequality, it is shown that it has a dedicated construction, different from the similative and equative constructions. It is formed with a verb sequence including the verbgan‘exceed’. Comparison of inferior inequality does not exist. Finally, the functive morpheme is distinct from the similative one.

Abstract

Gbaya, an Ubangian language of Central Africa, shows that all types of comparison are qualitative expressions and not quantitative ones involving a parameter of gradation or degree. Following the theoretical framework proposed inFuchs (2014), this chapter first presents the use of the dedicated similative circumpositionhé … gá. It expresses, in different contexts, a way of doing (modus faciendi) or a way of being (modus essendi). It frames a nominal phrase and can also be used as a subordinating morpheme to frame a clause. Then, the comparison of equality is studied and analysed as a special case of similative comparison, in which the reciprocal morpheme is added to the circumposition. Another construction of comparison of equality, which does not involve the circumposition, also uses the reciprocal and is formed with two verbs‘reach’ andɲɛm‘suit’. As for the comparison of superior inequality, it is shown that it has a dedicated construction, different from the similative and equative constructions. It is formed with a verb sequence including the verbgan‘exceed’. Comparison of inferior inequality does not exist. Finally, the functive morpheme is distinct from the similative one.

Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.117.09rou/html
Scroll to top button