Startseite Doing We – Working alliance in psychotherapeutic relationships
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Doing We – Working alliance in psychotherapeutic relationships

A recursive model
  • Michael B. Buchholz
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
Relationships in Organized Helping
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Relationships in Organized Helping

Abstract

Larger chunks from psychotherapeutic cooperations are presented. Cooperation is studied in empirical psychotherapeutic process research as “working alliance” of which conceptual conflicts are outlined.

I follow a proposal by Ginzburg and Poesio (2016) to micro-analyze hesitation markers as conversational equivalents to embodied pointing gestures. Several stories by patients are told in order to “point” to comparisons between the stories. The concept of “tacit comparisons” is, thus, introduced. Then, a recursive model of common ground is proposed with reference to cognitive-linguistic theory of metaphor (Cienki und Müller 2010; Lakoff 1987). The conversation creates in describable steps new metaphors indicating important change.

Abstract

Larger chunks from psychotherapeutic cooperations are presented. Cooperation is studied in empirical psychotherapeutic process research as “working alliance” of which conceptual conflicts are outlined.

I follow a proposal by Ginzburg and Poesio (2016) to micro-analyze hesitation markers as conversational equivalents to embodied pointing gestures. Several stories by patients are told in order to “point” to comparisons between the stories. The concept of “tacit comparisons” is, thus, introduced. Then, a recursive model of common ground is proposed with reference to cognitive-linguistic theory of metaphor (Cienki und Müller 2010; Lakoff 1987). The conversation creates in describable steps new metaphors indicating important change.

Heruntergeladen am 16.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.331.03buc/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen