Home Doing We – Working alliance in psychotherapeutic relationships
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Doing We – Working alliance in psychotherapeutic relationships

A recursive model
  • Michael B. Buchholz
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Relationships in Organized Helping
This chapter is in the book Relationships in Organized Helping

Abstract

Larger chunks from psychotherapeutic cooperations are presented. Cooperation is studied in empirical psychotherapeutic process research as “working alliance” of which conceptual conflicts are outlined.

I follow a proposal by Ginzburg and Poesio (2016) to micro-analyze hesitation markers as conversational equivalents to embodied pointing gestures. Several stories by patients are told in order to “point” to comparisons between the stories. The concept of “tacit comparisons” is, thus, introduced. Then, a recursive model of common ground is proposed with reference to cognitive-linguistic theory of metaphor (Cienki und Müller 2010; Lakoff 1987). The conversation creates in describable steps new metaphors indicating important change.

Abstract

Larger chunks from psychotherapeutic cooperations are presented. Cooperation is studied in empirical psychotherapeutic process research as “working alliance” of which conceptual conflicts are outlined.

I follow a proposal by Ginzburg and Poesio (2016) to micro-analyze hesitation markers as conversational equivalents to embodied pointing gestures. Several stories by patients are told in order to “point” to comparisons between the stories. The concept of “tacit comparisons” is, thus, introduced. Then, a recursive model of common ground is proposed with reference to cognitive-linguistic theory of metaphor (Cienki und Müller 2010; Lakoff 1987). The conversation creates in describable steps new metaphors indicating important change.

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.331.03buc/html
Scroll to top button