Startseite Medizin Why can multimodal, multidisciplinary pain clinics not help all chronic pain patients?
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Why can multimodal, multidisciplinary pain clinics not help all chronic pain patients?

  • Harald Breivik EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Oktober 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain Eva-Britt Hysing and her co-workers at the specialised in-hospital clinic of the Pain Center of Uppsala University Hospital describe the severely disabled chronic pain patients admitted [1]. The primary aim of their ongoing prospective study is to identify deeper characteristics of an almost intractable subgroup of patients with chronic pain. Their future goal is to use this information to assess and improve interventions tailored to special needs of this group of patients with complex multiple co-morbidities with pain as the most pronounced of many symptoms [1].

Multimodal pain rehabilitation programs (MMRP) are well established in Scandinavia, many at departments of physical medicine and rehabilitation [2]. The cornerstones of multimodal pain rehabilitation consist of physical fitness training, cognitive behavioural therapy including acceptance commitment therapy, pain education, and early actions aimed for return to work [2,3]. Patients are admitted to MMRP only if they show some degree of acceptance and willingness to actively engage in and work with all aspects of behaviour change and thoughts [2]. Most such pain rehabilitation programs in Sweden collaborate in the central Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SWEPAIN) [3]. Results from these programs are reasonably positive [2,4], also because they do not admit patients who are not motivated enough to take part in the programs [2].

More “traditional multidisciplinary pain clinics” also use similar approaches to their pain patients, documenting that patients who are better educated and have a stable social and working life when a complex pain condition develops, benefit most from such multidisciplinary pain management programs [5,6,7]. About half of the patients in the Helsinki multidisciplinary pain clinic with more complex and negative psychosocial comorbidities did not have better quality of life 3 years after treatment [5].

I am afraid that the honestly reported results from the Helsinki group [5] are typical for pain clinics that accept most patients admitted to them; it is not difficult to get nice outcome figures at a pain clinic if only patients with positive prognostic symptoms and signs are accepted [2].

This is why the specialized in-hospital pain clinic in Uppsala University Hospital is so extremely important; they accept these patients who already have several treatment failures and therefore have been given up as intractable pain patients at other pain clinics. The patients admitted at the in-hospital pain clinic in Uppsala have been considered to have a much too complicated pain condition by other pain clinicians. To illustrate the degree of complexity of the admitted patients [1], the patients reported:

On average 22 (up to 44!) high intensity symptoms other than pain.

Symptoms reported with the highest frequency, by more than 8 of 10 patients, were lethargy, tiredness, headache, difficulties concentrating, severe difficulties sleeping. Three quarters of the patients were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder.

Sixty-nine percent fulfilled the criteria for depression or depression and anxiety disorders, although most (65%) were treated with psychotropic medication.

Alcohol or drug abuse was minimal. Seventy-one percent were on opioid analgesic drugs but the doses were moderate, i.e. less than 100 mg oral morphine equivalents. Pain-intensity ratings were above 7/10 for 60% of the patients.

This interesting and high-impact study by Eva-Britt Hysing and her co-workers is the first in a planned series of publications from their practice that will eventually lead to a better understanding of these most complicated pain patients and how they can be treated better.


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.008



Oslo University Hospital, Department of Pain Management and Research, Pbox 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway. Tel.: +47 23073691;fax: +47 23073690

  1. Conflict of interests: None declared.

References

[1] Hysing E-B, Smith L, Thulin M, Karlsten R, Butler S, Gordh T. Identifying characteristics of the most severely impaired chronic pain patients treated at a specialized inpatient pain clinic. Scand J Pain 2017;17:178–85.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Lemming D. Multimodal Rehabilitation Programs (MMRP) for patients with longstanding complex pain conditions - the need for quality control with follow- up studies of patient outcomes. Scand J Pain 2015;10:104–5.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Joud A, Björk J, Gerdle B, Grimby-Ekman A, Larsson B. The association between pain characteristics, pain catastrophizing and health care use - baseline results from the SWEPAIN cohort. Scand J Pain 2017;16:122–8.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Hållstam A, Löfgren M, Svensén C, Stålnacke BM. Patients with chronic pain - one-year follow-up of a multimodal rehabilitation programme at a pain clinic. Scand J Pain 2016;10:36–42.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Heiskanen T, Roine RP, Kalso E. Multidisciplinary pain treatment - which patients do benefit? Scand J Pain 2012;3:201–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Borchgrevink PC, Stiles TC. What should we assess in outcome-studies to learn which patients benefit from treatments in multidisciplinary pain clinics? Scand J Pain 2012;3:199–200.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Borchgrevink PC. What is required from studies evaluating multidisciplinary treatment in pain clinics? Scand J Pain 2012;3:97–8.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-01
Published in Print: 2017-10-01

© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Observational study
  2. Perceived sleep deficit is a strong predictor of RLS in multisite pain – A population based study in middle aged females
  3. Clinical pain research
  4. Prospective, double blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing vapocoolant spray versus placebo spray in adults undergoing intravenous cannulation
  5. Clinical pain research
  6. The Functional Barometer — An analysis of a self-assessment questionnaire with ICF-coding regarding functional/activity limitations and quality of life due to pain — Differences in age gender and origin of pain
  7. Clinical pain research
  8. Clinical outcome following anterior arthrodesis in patients with presumed sacroiliac joint pain
  9. Observational study
  10. Chronic disruptive pain in emerging adults with and without chronic health conditions and the moderating role of psychiatric disorders: Evidence from a population-based cross-sectional survey in Canada
  11. Educational case report
  12. Management of patients with pain and severe side effects while on intrathecal morphine therapy: A case study
  13. Clinical pain research
  14. Behavioral inhibition, maladaptive pain cognitions, and function in patients with chronic pain
  15. Observational study
  16. Comparison of patients diagnosed with “complex pain” and “somatoform pain”
  17. Original experimental
  18. Patient perspectives on wait times and the impact on their life: A waiting room survey in a chronic pain clinic
  19. Topical review
  20. New evidence for a pain personality? A critical review of the last 120 years of pain and personality
  21. Clinical pain research
  22. A multi-facet pain survey of psychosocial complaints among patients with long-standing non-malignant pain
  23. Clinical pain research
  24. Pain patients’ experiences of validation and invalidation from physicians before and after multimodal pain rehabilitation: Associations with pain, negative affectivity, and treatment outcome
  25. Observational study
  26. Long-term treatment in chronic noncancer pain: Results of an observational study comparing opioid and nonopioid therapy
  27. Clinical pain research
  28. COMBAT study – Computer based assessment and treatment – A clinical trial evaluating impact of a computerized clinical decision support tool on pain in cancer patients
  29. Original experimental
  30. Quantitative sensory tests fairly reflect immediate effects of oxycodone in chronic low-back pain
  31. Editorial comment
  32. Spatial summation of pain and its meaning to patients
  33. Original experimental
  34. Effects of validating communication on recall during a pain-task in healthy participants
  35. Original experimental
  36. Comparison of spatial summation properties at different body sites
  37. Editorial comment
  38. Behavioural inhibition in the context of pain: Measurement and conceptual issues
  39. Clinical pain research
  40. A randomized study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a single dose of the TRPV1 antagonist mavatrep in patients with osteoarthritis
  41. Editorial comment
  42. Quantitative sensory tests (QST) are promising tests for clinical relevance of anti–nociceptive effects of new analgesic treatments
  43. Educational case report
  44. Pregabalin as adjunct in a multimodal pain therapy after traumatic foot amputation — A case report of a 4-year-old girl
  45. Editorial comment
  46. Severe side effects from intrathecal morphine for chronic pain after repeated failed spinal operations
  47. Editorial comment
  48. Opioids in chronic pain – Primum non nocere
  49. Editorial comment
  50. Finally a promising analgesic signal in a long-awaited new class of drugs: TRPV1 antagonist mavatrep in patients with osteoarthritis (OA)
  51. Observational study
  52. The relationship between chronic musculoskeletal pain, anxiety and mindfulness: Adjustments to the Fear-Avoidance Model of Chronic Pain
  53. Clinical pain research
  54. Opioid tapering in patients with prescription opioid use disorder: A retrospective study
  55. Editorial comment
  56. Sleep, widespread pain and restless legs — What is the connection?
  57. Editorial comment
  58. Broadening the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain?
  59. Observational study
  60. Identifying characteristics of the most severely impaired chronic pain patients treated at a specialized inpatient pain clinic
  61. Editorial comment
  62. The burden of central anticholinergic drugs increases pain and cognitive dysfunction. More knowledge about drug-interactions needed
  63. Editorial comment
  64. A case-history illustrates importance of knowledge of drug-interactions when pain-patients are prescribed non-pain drugs for co-morbidities
  65. Editorial comment
  66. Why can multimodal, multidisciplinary pain clinics not help all chronic pain patients?
  67. Topical review
  68. Individual variability in clinical effect and tolerability of opioid analgesics – Importance of drug interactions and pharmacogenetics
  69. Editorial comment
  70. A new treatable chronic pain diagnosis? Flank pain caused by entrapment of posterior cutaneous branch of intercostal nerves, lateral ACNES coined LACNES
  71. Clinical pain research
  72. PhKv a toxin isolated from the spider venom induces antinociception by inhibition of cholinesterase activating cholinergic system
  73. Clinical pain research
  74. Lateral Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (LACNES): A previously unrecognized cause of intractable flank pain
  75. Editorial comment
  76. Towards a structured examination of contextual flexibility in persistent pain
  77. Clinical pain research
  78. Context sensitive regulation of pain and emotion: Development and initial validation of a scale for context insensitive avoidance
  79. Editorial comment
  80. Is the search for a “pain personality” of added value to the Fear-Avoidance-Model (FAM) of chronic pain?
  81. Editorial comment
  82. Importance for patients of feeling accepted and understood by physicians before and after multimodal pain rehabilitation
  83. Editorial comment
  84. A glimpse into a neglected population – Emerging adults
  85. Observational study
  86. Assessment and treatment at a pain clinic: A one-year follow-up of patients with chronic pain
  87. Clinical pain research
  88. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study: Investigation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antihyperalgesic activity of L-4-chlorokynurenine in healthy volunteers
  89. Clinical pain research
  90. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain: Experience of Niger
  91. Observational study
  92. The use of rapid onset fentanyl in children and young people for breakthrough cancer pain
  93. Original experimental
  94. Acid-induced experimental muscle pain and hyperalgesia with single and repeated infusion in human forearm
  95. Original experimental
  96. Swearing as a response to pain: A cross-cultural comparison of British and Japanese participants
  97. Clinical pain research
  98. The cognitive impact of chronic low back pain: Positive effect of multidisciplinary pain therapy
  99. Clinical pain research
  100. Central sensitization associated with low fetal hemoglobin levels in adults with sickle cell anemia
  101. Topical review
  102. Targeting cytokines for treatment of neuropathic pain
  103. Original experimental
  104. What constitutes back pain flare? A cross sectional survey of individuals with low back pain
  105. Original experimental
  106. Coping with pain in intimate situations: Applying the avoidance-endurance model to women with vulvovaginal pain
  107. Clinical pain research
  108. Chronic low back pain and the transdiagnostic process: How do cognitive and emotional dysregulations contribute to the intensity of risk factors and pain?
  109. Original experimental
  110. The impact of the Standard American Diet in rats: Effects on behavior, physiology and recovery from inflammatory injury
  111. Educational case report
  112. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series
  113. Original experimental
  114. Hyperbaric oxygenation alleviates chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced neuropathic pain and inhibits GABAergic neuron apoptosis in the spinal cord
  115. Observational study
  116. Predictors of chronic neuropathic pain after scoliosis surgery in children
  117. Clinical pain research
  118. Hospitalization due to acute exacerbation of chronic pain: An intervention study in a university hospital
  119. Clinical pain research
  120. A novel miniature, wireless neurostimulator in the management of chronic craniofacial pain: Preliminary results from a prospective pilot study
  121. Clinical pain research
  122. Implicit evaluations and physiological threat responses in people with persistent low back pain and fear of bending
  123. Original experimental
  124. Unpredictable pain timings lead to greater pain when people are highly intolerant of uncertainty
  125. Original experimental
  126. Initial validation of the exercise chronic pain acceptance questionnaire
  127. Clinical pain research
  128. Exploring patient experiences of a pain management centre: A qualitative study
  129. Clinical pain research
  130. Narratives of life with long-term low back pain: A follow up interview study
  131. Observational study
  132. Pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, and pain intensity impair life satisfaction through differential patterns of physical and psychological disruption
  133. Clinical pain research
  134. Chronic pain disrupts ability to work by interfering with social function: A cross-sectional study
  135. Original experimental
  136. Evaluation of external vibratory stimulation as a treatment for chronic scrotal pain in adult men: A single center open label pilot study
  137. Observational study
  138. Impact of analgesics on executive function and memory in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Database
  139. Clinical pain research
  140. Visualization of painful inflammation in patients with pain after traumatic ankle sprain using [11C]-D-deprenyl PET/CT
  141. Original experimental
  142. Developing a model for measuring fear of pain in Norwegian samples: The Fear of Pain Questionnaire Norway
  143. Topical review
  144. Psychoneuroimmunological approach to gastrointestinal related pain
  145. Letter to the Editor
  146. Do we need an updated definition of pain?
  147. Narrative review
  148. Is acetaminophen safe in pregnancy?
  149. Book Review
  150. Physical Diagnosis of Pain
  151. Book Review
  152. Advances in Anesthesia
  153. Book Review
  154. Atlas of Pain Management Injection Techniques
  155. Book Review
  156. Sedation: A Guide to Patient Management
  157. Book Review
  158. Basics of Anesthesia
Heruntergeladen am 29.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.10.001/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen