Home Construction of amidinothiourea crosslinked graphene oxide membrane by multilayer self-assembly for efficient removal of heavy metal ions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Construction of amidinothiourea crosslinked graphene oxide membrane by multilayer self-assembly for efficient removal of heavy metal ions

  • Boshen Yang

    Boshen Yang, born in 1998, is a postgraduate in the Department of Materials Engineering of Jingdezhen Ceramic University. Currently, he is an assistant in the Key Laboratory of Inorganic Membrane of Jingdezhen Ceramic University.

    , Xuebing Hu

    Prof. Dr. Xuebing Hu, born in 1979, completed his PhD at the Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, in 2014. Currently, he is working as a Professor of Materials Science in the Department of Materials Engineering of Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, China. His current research interests include adsorption materials, functional coatings, and membrane materials.

    EMAIL logo
    and Qintao Zhou

    Qintao Zhou, born in 1999, is a postgraduate in the Department of Materials Engineering of Jingdezhen Ceramic University. Currently, he is an assistant in the Key Laboratory of Inorganic Membrane of Jingdezhen Ceramic University.

Published/Copyright: February 9, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Amidinothiourea crosslinked graphene oxide membrane was prepared by a multilayer self-assembly method along with (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane modification, while different thicknesses of the membrane layer were obtained by regulating the volume of graphene oxide dispersion. The removal rate of the membrane layer with different thicknesses of heavy metal ions was explored and its removal mechanism was explained. The results show that the membrane can maintain high stability after 90 days of immersion in water. When the volume of graphene oxide dispersant increases from 9 ml to 15 ml, the thickness of the membrane layer enhances from about 120 nm to about 200 nm. After filtration of 140 ml of different nitrate solutions, the water fluxes of different membranes are about 22.6 l m−2 h−1·bar−1, 6.1 l m−2 h−1·bar−1, and 1.4 l m−2 h−1·bar−1, respectively. The removal rates of the preferred membrane for Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+ are 43.3 %, 41.2 %, and 39.7 %, respectively. The ion removal mechanism is mainly due to the Dornan effect.


Corresponding author: Xuebing Hu, 26478 Jingdezhen Ceramic University , Jingdezhen, Jiangxi, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Major Research Plan

Award Identifier / Grant number: 52062021

About the authors

Boshen Yang

Boshen Yang, born in 1998, is a postgraduate in the Department of Materials Engineering of Jingdezhen Ceramic University. Currently, he is an assistant in the Key Laboratory of Inorganic Membrane of Jingdezhen Ceramic University.

Xuebing Hu

Prof. Dr. Xuebing Hu, born in 1979, completed his PhD at the Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, in 2014. Currently, he is working as a Professor of Materials Science in the Department of Materials Engineering of Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, China. His current research interests include adsorption materials, functional coatings, and membrane materials.

Qintao Zhou

Qintao Zhou, born in 1999, is a postgraduate in the Department of Materials Engineering of Jingdezhen Ceramic University. Currently, he is an assistant in the Key Laboratory of Inorganic Membrane of Jingdezhen Ceramic University.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52062021), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China (Grant No. 20212BAB204034), and Graduate Innovation Foundation of Jingdezhen Ceramic University (Grant No. JYC202228).

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

[1] A. Chen, et al.., “PVA-integrated graphene oxide-attapulgite composite membrane for efficient removal of heavy metal contaminants,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., vol. 29, pp. 84410–84420, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20810-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Z. Li, W. Xie, Z. Zhang, S. Wei, J. Chen, and Z. Li, “Multifunctional sodium alginate/chitosan-modified graphene oxide reinforced membrane for simultaneous removal of nanoplastics, emulsified oil, and dyes in water,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 245, 2023, Art. no. 125524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125524.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] S. Han, W. Li, H. Xi, R. Yuan, J. Long, and C. Xu, “Plasma-assisted in-situ preparation of graphene-Ag nanofiltration membranes for efficient removal of heavy metal ions,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 423, 2022, Art. no. 127012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] D. Janwery, et al.., “Lamellar graphene oxide-based composite membranes for efficient separation of heavy metal ions and desalination of water,” ACS Omega, vol. 8, pp. 7648–7656, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07243.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] X. Xu, X. Liu, M. Oh, J. Park, and Y. F. Chen, “Adsorption properties of heavy metal ions in landfill leachate by Na-bentonite,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, pp. 81–87, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111284.Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Ahmad, F. M. Husain, and R. A. Khan, “Graphene oxide lamellar membrane with enlarged inter-layer spacing for fast preconcentration and determination of trace metal ions,” RSC Adv., vol. 11, pp. 11889–11899, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra01055g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] S. Poolachira and S. Velmurugan, “Efficient removal of lead ions from aqueous solution by graphene oxide modified polyethersulfone adsorptive mixed matrix membrane,” Environ. Res., vol. 210, 2022, Art. no. 112924, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112924.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] M. Yari, et al.., “Kinetics of the adsorption of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by graphene oxide and thiol functionalized graphene oxide,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 209, pp. 50–57, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.05.022.Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Zhao, et al.., “Free-standing graphene oxide membrane with tunable channels for efficient water pollution control,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 366, pp. 659–668, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.055.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] M. Baratta, A. Tursi, M. Curcio, G. Cirillo, F. P. Nicoletta, and G. D. Filpo, “GO-SWCNT buckypapers as an enhanced technology for water decontamination from lead,” Molecules, vol. 27, p. 13, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Y. An, et al.., “A critical review on graphene oxide membrane for industrial wastewater treatment,” Environ. Res., vol. 223, 2023, Art. no. 115409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115409.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] H. Zhang, X. Hu, B. Yang, and Q. Zhou, “Effective cross-linking strategy for graphene oxide membrane with high structural stability and enhanced separation performance,” Nanotechnology, vol. 34, p. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/acc111.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] H. G. Alemayehu, R. B. Hailu, and P. Taddesse, “Highly stable graphene oxide/nylon membrane for molecular separation,” Nanotechnology, vol. 34, p. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/acd060.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] X. Hu, Y. Yu, H. Bai, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, and J. Zhou, “Synthesis of graphene oxide with superhydrophilicity and well-defined sheet size distribution,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, pp. 273–276, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111317.Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. K. Vishwakarma, P. K. Narayanam, R. Umamaheswari, and K. Sundararajan, “Surface modified and functionalized graphene oxide membranes for separation of strontium from aqueous solutions,” J. Environ. Manag., vol. 298, 2021, Art. no. 113443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113443.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] H. Wang, et al.., “Recyclable composite membrane of polydopamine and graphene oxide-modified polyacrylonitrile for organic dye molecule and heavy metal ion removal,” Membranes, vol. 12, pp. 938–2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100938.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] P. Sun, et al.., “Selective ion penetration of graphene oxide membranes,” ACS Nano, vol. 7, pp. 428–437, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn304471w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] L. Chen, et al.., “Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing,” Nature, vol. 550, pp. 380–383, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] J. Jang, et al.., “Graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane cooperatively cross-linked by monomer and polymer overcoming the trade-off between flux and rejection in forward osmosis,” J. Membrane Sci., vol. 598, 2020, Art. no. 117684, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117684.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, and T. S. Chung, “Nanometric graphene oxide framework membranes with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 49, pp. 10235–10242, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] P. Li, et al.., “Thin-film nanocomposite NF membrane with GO on macroporous hollow fiber ceramic substrate for efficient heavy metals removal,” Environ. Res., vol. 197, 2021, Art. no. 111040, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] H. Zhang, X. Hu, X. Liu, Z. Yang, Y. Yu, and Y. Wang, “Microstructure adjustment of an asymmetric ceramic membrane with high permeation performance,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, pp. 994–998, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2021-0042.Search in Google Scholar

[23] X. Hu, Y. Yu, W. Hou, J. Zhou, and L. Song, “Effects of particle size and pH value on the hydrophilicity of graphene oxide,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 273, pp. 118–121, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.201.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Y. Han, Y. Jiang, and C. Gao, “High-flux graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by carbon nanotubes,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 7, pp. 8147–8155, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00986.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] X. Hu, Z. Yang, B. Yang, L. Jiang, and C. Lu, “Ecofriendly synthesis of hydrated manganese oxide and its efficient adsorption of lead ions from water,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, pp. 944–951, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0374.Search in Google Scholar

[26] H. Boroumand, H. Alinezhad, B. Maleki, and S. Peiman, “Triethylenetetramine-grafted magnetic graphene oxide (Fe3O4@GO-NH2) as a reusable heterogeneous catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of 2-amino-4H-benzopyran derivatives,” Polycycl. Aromat. Comp., vol. 43, pp. 1–17, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2022.2140683.Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Poolachira and S. Velmurugan, “Exfoliated hydrotalcite-modified polyethersulfone-based nanofiltration membranes for removal of lead from aqueous solutions,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 27, pp. 29725–29736, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06715-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] F. A. Janjhi, et al.., “Recent advances in graphene oxide-based membranes for heavy metal ions separation,” ChemBioEng Rev., vol. 9, pp. 574–590, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202200015.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Y. Han, Z. Xu, and C. Gao, “Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 23, pp. 3693–3700, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202601.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-02-09
Published in Print: 2024-04-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Strain-life behavior of thick-walled nodular cast iron
  3. A novel bearing fault detection approach using a convolutional neural network
  4. Improved Gx40CrNi25-20 grade austenitic stainless steel
  5. Enhanced strength of (CoFeNiMn)100−xCrx (x = 5, 20, 35 at.%) high entropy alloys via formation of carbide phases produced from industrial-grade raw materials
  6. Modeling of thrust force and torque in drilling aluminum 7050
  7. Construction of amidinothiourea crosslinked graphene oxide membrane by multilayer self-assembly for efficient removal of heavy metal ions
  8. Effect of tool rotational speed on friction stir spot welds of AZ31B Mg alloy to AISI 304 stainless steel
  9. A new enhanced mountain gazelle optimizer and artificial neural network for global optimization of mechanical design problems
  10. Effect of particle volume fraction on wear behavior in Al–SiC MMC coated on DIN AlZnMgCu1.5 alloy
  11. Processing, microstructural characterization, and mechanical properties of deep cryogenically treated steels and alloys – overview
  12. Experimental and numerical investigation of patch effect on the bending behavior for hat-shaped carbon fiber composite beams
  13. Influence of water on microstructure and mechanical properties of a friction stir spot welded 7075-T651 Al alloy
  14. Effect of copper powder addition on the product quality of sintered stainless steels
  15. Mechanical and thermal properties of short banana fiber reinforced polyoxymethylene composite materials dependent on alkali treatment
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2023-0352/html
Scroll to top button