Abstract
The mechanical properties of polyurethane foam (PUF) and glass fiber-reinforced PUF (R-PUF), which are widely used in various fields, were investigated considering the influence of lateral confinement. PUF and R-PUF – representative polymeric foams with a porous structure – are suitable for severe environments (e.g. the cryogenic field) because they have an excellent adiabatic function and load-bearing capability. However, when PUF and R-PUF are used in actual structures, the mechanical performance of the foam materials may change depending on the conditions. Assuming that a compressive load acts on these polymeric foams in a confined space, analysis of the material properties resulting from the confining pressure of the adjacent structures is necessary. Therefore, in this study, a comparison and evaluation of the mechanical behavior of PUF and R-PUF were performed with regard to the constraint. The results suggest that it is possible to provide an experimental basis for measuring the strength performance for the application of insulation in a confined space.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (no. 2018R1A2B6007403). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) through GCRC-SOP (no. 2011-0030013).
Conflict of interest statement: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
[1] Menges G, Knipschild F. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1975, 15, 623–627.10.1002/pen.760150810Suche in Google Scholar
[2] Chen W, Lu F, Winfree N. Exp. Mech. 2002, 42, 65–73.10.1007/BF02411053Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Avalle M, Belingardi G, Montanini R. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2001, 25, 455–472.10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Saha MC, Mahfuz H, Chakravarty UK, Uddin M, Kabir ME, Jeelani S. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 2005, 406, 328–336.10.1016/j.msea.2005.07.006Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Mane JV, Chandra S, Sharma S, Ali H, Chavan VM, Manjunath BS, Patel RJ. Procedia Eng. 2017, 173, 726–731.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.160Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Luo H, Zhang Y, Wnag B, Lu H. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. 2010, 132, 1–12.10.1115/1.4000396Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Lee CS, Kim MS, Park SB, Kim J-H, Bang C-S, Lee J-M. Mater. Design 2005, 84, 163–172.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.086Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Han DS, Park IB, Kim MH, Noh B-J, Kim W-S, Lee J-M. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2010, 24, 263–266.10.1007/s12206-009-1136-3Suche in Google Scholar
[9] Chun MS, Kim MH, Kim WS, Kim WS, Kim SH, Lee JM. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 2009, 22, 901–907.10.1016/j.jlp.2008.09.011Suche in Google Scholar
[10] Kim SH, Park HC, Jeong HM, Kim BK. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 2675–2680.10.1007/s10853-010-4248-3Suche in Google Scholar
[11] Lee SJ, Kim MH, Lee DH, Kim JW, Kim YH. Ocean Eng. 2007, 34, 10–20.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.02.007Suche in Google Scholar
[12] Candappa DP, Setunge S, Sanjayan, JG. Cement Concrete Res. 1999, 29, 1977–1982.10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00219-7Suche in Google Scholar
[13] Lokuge WP, Sanjayan JG, Setunge S. J. Mater. Civil. Eng. 2005, 17, 607–616.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(607)Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Chai H. Thin Wall Struct. 2008, 46, 54–64.10.1016/j.tws.2007.08.010Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Duarte I, Vesenjak M, Krstulović-Opara L. Compos. Struct. 2016, 154, 231–238.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.038Suche in Google Scholar
[16] Krishna BV, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 2007, 452, 178–188.10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.080Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Aktay L, Kröplin BH, Toksoy AK, Güden M. Mater. Design 2008, 29, 952–962.10.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.019Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Kolluri M, Karthikeyan S, Ramamurty U. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2007, 38, 2006–2013.10.1007/s11661-007-9245-zSuche in Google Scholar
[19] Chan R, Nakamura M. J. Cell Plast. 1969, 5, 112–118.10.1177/0021955X6900500207Suche in Google Scholar
[20] Ouellet S, Cronin D, Worswick M. Polym. Test 2006, 25, 731–743.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.005Suche in Google Scholar
[21] Daphalapurkar NP, Hanan JC, Phelps NB, Bale H, Lu H. Mech. Mater. Struct. 2008, 15, 594–611.10.1080/15376490802470523Suche in Google Scholar
[22] Zhang J, Kikuchi N, Li V, Yee A, Nusholtz G. Int. J. Impact Eng. 1998, 21, 369–386.10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-0Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Hall IW, Guden M, Yu CJ. Acta Mater. 2000, 43, 515–521.10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00460-7Suche in Google Scholar
[24] Park SB, Lee CS, Choi SW, Kim J-H, Bang C-S, Lee J-M. Compos. Struct. 2016, 136, 258–269.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.002Suche in Google Scholar
[25] Lu G, Yu TX. Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, England, 2003.10.1533/9781855738584Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Oliveira FC, Dias S, Vaz MF, Fernandes JC. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 179–186.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.10.008Suche in Google Scholar
[27] Mills NJ, Fitzgerald C, Gilchrist A, Verdejo R. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 2389–2400.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00272-0Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Ashby MF, Medalist RM. Metall. Trans. A 1983, 14, 1755–1769.10.1007/BF02645546Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 1859–1866.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1Suche in Google Scholar
[30] Song B, Chen W, Yanagita T, Frew DJ. Compos. Struct. 2005, 67, 279–287.10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.011Suche in Google Scholar
[31] Park SB, Choi SW, Kim JH, Bang C-S, Lee J-M. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2016, 93, 317–327.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.008Suche in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Effect of temperature on the impact behavior of PVC/ASA binary blends with various ASA terpolymer contents
- The infrared spectroscopy of chitosan films doped with silver and gold nanoparticles
- The effect of the addition of a slip agent on the rheological properties of polyethylene: off-line and in-line measurements
- Analysis of the mechanical properties of polymer materials considering lateral confinement effects
- Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical and rheological properties of enzyme-catalyzed tragacanth-based injectable hydrogels
- Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
- Preparation and assembly
- Preparation, characterization and kinetics study of chitosan/PVA electrospun nanofiber membranes for the adsorption of dye from water
- Engineering and processing
- Polymer-induced metal diffusion during plastic processing: a reason for deposit formation
- Optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing the volumetric shrinkage and warpage using radial basis function (RBF) coupled with the k-fold cross validation technique
- Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Effect of temperature on the impact behavior of PVC/ASA binary blends with various ASA terpolymer contents
- The infrared spectroscopy of chitosan films doped with silver and gold nanoparticles
- The effect of the addition of a slip agent on the rheological properties of polyethylene: off-line and in-line measurements
- Analysis of the mechanical properties of polymer materials considering lateral confinement effects
- Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical and rheological properties of enzyme-catalyzed tragacanth-based injectable hydrogels
- Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
- Preparation and assembly
- Preparation, characterization and kinetics study of chitosan/PVA electrospun nanofiber membranes for the adsorption of dye from water
- Engineering and processing
- Polymer-induced metal diffusion during plastic processing: a reason for deposit formation
- Optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing the volumetric shrinkage and warpage using radial basis function (RBF) coupled with the k-fold cross validation technique
- Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts