Abstract
In this study, chitosan (CS) nanofibers with two different degrees of deacetylation (DDA) were first successfully fabricated from its solution in 1% aqueous acetic acid solution by mixing with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) solution at a weight ratio of 50/50 via the electrospinning method. Then, the CS/PVA membranes were further modified by glutaraldehyde vapor. The prepared nanofibers were characterized by field electron scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), the tensile test, the contact angle test, the weight loss test and the adsorption test for Congo red (CR). SEM analysis showed defect-free nanofibers and a uniform diameter distribution, with an average diameter of 100–125 nm. Subsequently, FTIR spectroscopy, XRD and TGA indicated that the modified CS/PVA membranes had a relatively higher thermal stability, because the thermal decomposition temperature of the unmodified CS/PVA membranes (~250°C) increased to a higher temperature (~ 300°C) for the modified CS/PVA. The nanofiber membranes after modification possessed better mechanical tensile properties. The membranes with lower DDA had a relatively higher tensile strength, which can withstand the maximum tensile strength of up to 6.36 MPa. Furthermore, the resulting membranes showed excellent hydrophilicity and kept their stability in distilled water, acidic, and basic media for 20 days. In the adsorption study, the maximum adsorption capacity of the membrane for CR was 358 mg/l in the optimum operating conditions of 25°C, pH = 6, 0.3 g membrane and 50 ml of 100 mg/l CR solutions. The resulting nanofibers membranes showed a better fitting to the Langmuir isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetic model.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Scientific Research Program funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (Program no. 16JK1340), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program no. 2017JQ5054), and Xi’an Polytechnic University innovation fund for graduate students (Program no. chx201801).
References
[1] Lyoo WS, Lee HC, Jeong YG, Min BG, Lee SC. Fibers Polym. 2009, 10, 636–642.10.1007/s12221-010-0636-1Search in Google Scholar
[2] Fu FL, Qi WJ. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92, 407–418.10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011Search in Google Scholar
[3] Arvind HJ, Xuan TM, Frank AO. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 348–356.10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.127Search in Google Scholar
[4] Shi B, Li G, Wang D, Feng H, Tang H. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 567–574.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.076Search in Google Scholar
[5] Ahmed W, Rego CA, Cherry R, Afzal A, Ali N, Hassan IU. Vacuum 2000, 56, 153–158.10.1016/S0042-207X(99)00147-5Search in Google Scholar
[6] Wan WS, Ngaha LC, Teonga MA, Hanafiah KM. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 1446–1456.10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.004Search in Google Scholar
[7] Akbari A, Remigy JC, Aptel P. Chem. Eng. Process. 2002, 41, 601–609.10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00181-7Search in Google Scholar
[8] Decher G, Hong JD, Schmitt J, Decher G. Thin Solid Films 1992, 210–211, 831–835.10.1016/0040-6090(92)90417-ASearch in Google Scholar
[9] Zhao XL, Xiao B, Fletcher AJ. Science 2004, 306, 1012–1015.10.1126/science.1101982Search in Google Scholar
[10] Wan N, Wang S, Isa IM. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 67, 1067–1070.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980207)67:6<1067::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar
[11] Adeyemo AA, Adeoye IO, Bello OS. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 543–568.10.1007/s13201-015-0322-ySearch in Google Scholar
[12] Chaúque FCE, Langelihle ND, Adeloduna AA. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 369, 19–28.10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.018Search in Google Scholar
[13] Nithinart C, Scott MH. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 523, 418–429.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.020Search in Google Scholar
[14] Li L, Li YX, Yang CF. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 140, 299–307.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.067Search in Google Scholar
[15] Beheshti HD, Mohammad IN, Hosseini LL. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 557–564.10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.158Search in Google Scholar
[16] Hwang LL, Chen JC, Wey MY. Desalination 2013, 313, 166–175.10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.019Search in Google Scholar
[17] Haider S, Binagag FF, Haider A. J. Polym. Res. 2014, 21, 1–13.10.1007/s10965-014-0371-1Search in Google Scholar
[18] Desai K, Kit K, Li J, Davidson PM, Zivanovic S, Meyer H. Polymer 2009, 50, 3661–3669.10.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.058Search in Google Scholar
[19] Wan N, Wan S, Isa IM. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 67, 1067–1070.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980207)67:6<1067::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar
[20] Huang RH, Qian L, Jie H. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 24–32.10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.05.017Search in Google Scholar
[21] Habiba U, Afifi AM, Salleh A. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 182–194.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.028Search in Google Scholar
[22] Vaz MG, Pereira AGB, Fajardo AR. Water Air Soil Poll. 2017, 228, 14–18.10.1007/s11270-016-3185-4Search in Google Scholar
[23] Jayasantha KH, Krishnamoorthy P, Arumugam TK. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 96, 324–333.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.077Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Zhang YY, Huang XB, Bin D. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2007, 285, 855–863.10.1007/s00396-006-1630-4Search in Google Scholar
[25] Santosh BJ, Pallavi MW, Adivarekar RV. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24, 92–95.10.1007/s10965-017-1238-zSearch in Google Scholar
[26] Çay A, Miraftab M, Kumbasar EPA. Euro. Polym. J. 2014, 61, 253–262.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.017Search in Google Scholar
[27] Kumar M, Tripathi BP, Shahi VK. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1041–1048.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.108Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] Kim JH, Kim JY, Lee YM, Kim KY. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1992, 45, 1711–1717.10.1002/app.1992.070451004Search in Google Scholar
[29] Umirska J, Czerwicka M, Kaczyński Z, Bychowska A, Brzozowski K, Thöming J, Stepnowski P. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1567–1636.10.3390/md8051567Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[30] Abdou ES, Nagy KSA, Elsabee MZ. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1359–1363.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] Li QD, Dunn ET, Grandmaison EW, Goosen MFA. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 1992, 7, 370–397.10.1177/088391159200700406Search in Google Scholar
[32] Yuan Y, Chesnutt BM, Haggard WO, Bumgardner JD. Materials 2011, 4, 1399–1416.10.3390/ma4081399Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] Kumar MNR. React. Funct. Polym. 2000, 46, 1–27.10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9Search in Google Scholar
[34] Chen X, Yang H, Gu Z, Shao ZJ. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79, 1144–1149.10.1002/1097-4628(20010207)79:6<1144::AID-APP190>3.0.CO;2-DSearch in Google Scholar
[35] Yen MT, Yang JH, Mau JL. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 75, 15–21.10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.006Search in Google Scholar
[36] Rehab MA, Hesham AH, Mohamed MH. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 91, 317–332.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.015Search in Google Scholar
[37] Cao WL, Jing DH, Li JM, Gong YD, Zhao NM, Zhang XF. J. Biomater. Appl. 2005, 20, 157–177.10.1177/0885328205049897Search in Google Scholar
[38] Tomihata K, Ikada Y. Biomaterials 1997, 18, 567–575.10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00167-6Search in Google Scholar
[39] Umma H, Tawsif AS, Sepehr T, Jacky J, Li L, Areisman S, Bee CA, Amalina MA. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 191, 79–85.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.081Search in Google Scholar
[40] Fan LL, Ying Z, Li XJ, Luo CN. Colloids Surf., B 2012, 91, 250–257.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.11.014Search in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Effect of temperature on the impact behavior of PVC/ASA binary blends with various ASA terpolymer contents
- The infrared spectroscopy of chitosan films doped with silver and gold nanoparticles
- The effect of the addition of a slip agent on the rheological properties of polyethylene: off-line and in-line measurements
- Analysis of the mechanical properties of polymer materials considering lateral confinement effects
- Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical and rheological properties of enzyme-catalyzed tragacanth-based injectable hydrogels
- Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
- Preparation and assembly
- Preparation, characterization and kinetics study of chitosan/PVA electrospun nanofiber membranes for the adsorption of dye from water
- Engineering and processing
- Polymer-induced metal diffusion during plastic processing: a reason for deposit formation
- Optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing the volumetric shrinkage and warpage using radial basis function (RBF) coupled with the k-fold cross validation technique
- Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Effect of temperature on the impact behavior of PVC/ASA binary blends with various ASA terpolymer contents
- The infrared spectroscopy of chitosan films doped with silver and gold nanoparticles
- The effect of the addition of a slip agent on the rheological properties of polyethylene: off-line and in-line measurements
- Analysis of the mechanical properties of polymer materials considering lateral confinement effects
- Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical and rheological properties of enzyme-catalyzed tragacanth-based injectable hydrogels
- Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
- Preparation and assembly
- Preparation, characterization and kinetics study of chitosan/PVA electrospun nanofiber membranes for the adsorption of dye from water
- Engineering and processing
- Polymer-induced metal diffusion during plastic processing: a reason for deposit formation
- Optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing the volumetric shrinkage and warpage using radial basis function (RBF) coupled with the k-fold cross validation technique
- Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts