Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
-
Yingni Xu
Abstract
Nanocellulose was extracted from bagasse (bagasse nanocellulose, BNC) by hydrolysis with alkali and acid, then grafted by maleic anhydride (MAH) and styrene (St). The modified nanocellulose (BMS) was further investigated to partially replace carbon black (CB) in St butadiene rubber (SBR) composites via coagulation to prepare SBR/BMS/CB composites. Through the comparison of the vulcanization characteristics, processing properties, mechanical properties, and dynamic mechanical performance of them, BMS proved to be more efficient than BNC. The results showed that BMS could activate the vulcanization process, suppress the Payne effect, and increase the modulus and hardness. Moreover, a fine BMS dispersion and strong interfacial interaction were achieved in SBR/BMS/CB composites. The observed reinforcement effects were evaluated based on the results of G′, tanδ and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses of SBR/BMS/CB in comparison with SBR/BNC/CB composites.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 51173046
Funding source: Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 201607010208
Funding statement: The authors are grateful for the financial supports by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51173046) and the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (201607010208).
References
[1] Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA, John M, Narine SS, Thomas S, Anandjiwala R. Cellulose 2013, 20, 417–427.10.1007/s10570-012-9830-1Search in Google Scholar
[2] Abraham E, Thomas MS, John C, Pothen LA, Shoseyov O, Thomas S. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 51, 415–424.10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.09.022Search in Google Scholar
[3] Nikshoar MR, Maleki Z, Nemati Honar B. J. Laser. Med. Sci. 2018, 9, 23–26.10.15171/jlms.2018.06Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[4] Jia D, Luo Y, Gu J, Lin L, Xu S. Patent no.: CN101974172-A. Accessed: 19.10.2010.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Li B, Zhang X. Patent no.: CN104046037-A. Accessed: 17.9.2014.Search in Google Scholar
[6] Kargarzadeh H, Sheltami RM, Ahmad I, Abdullah I, Dufresne A. Polymer 2015, 71, 51–9.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.045Search in Google Scholar
[7] Castellano M, Conzatti L, Costa G, Falqui L, Turturro A, Valenti B, Negroni F. Polymer 2005, 46, 695–703.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.010Search in Google Scholar
[8] Qi Q, Wu YP, Tian M, Liang GH, Zhang LQ, Ma J. Polymer 2006, 47, 3896–3903.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.095Search in Google Scholar
[9] Bendahou A, Kaddami H, Dufresne A. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 609–620.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.12.025Search in Google Scholar
[10] Liu L, Jia DM, Luo YF, Guo BC. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 1905–13.10.1002/app.22614Search in Google Scholar
[11] Frohlich J, Niedermeier W, Luginsland HD. Composites, Part A 2005, 36, 449–460.10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.004Search in Google Scholar
[12] Li ZJ, Wei FQ. Acta Polym. Sin. 2006, 22, 43–47.10.3724/SP.J.1105.2006.00043Search in Google Scholar
[13] Huang J, Liu K, Wang T. Patent no.: CN106633383-A. Accessed: 10.5.2017.Search in Google Scholar
[14] El-Sabbagh SH. Polym. Test. 2003, 22, 93–100.10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00056-9Search in Google Scholar
[15] Pasbakhsh P, Ismail H, Fauzi MNA, Abu Bakar A. Polym. Test. 2009, 28, 548–559.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.04.004Search in Google Scholar
[16] Zheng H, Zhang Y, Peng ZL, Zhang YX. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 638–646.10.1002/app.13560Search in Google Scholar
[17] Saowapark T, Plao-le S, Chaichana E, Jaturapiree A. Mater. Today: Proc. 2017, 4, 06450–06457.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.152Search in Google Scholar
[18] Tager AA, Adamova LV, Blinov VS, Klimova NE, Racheiskova EN, Chudinovskikh TE, Litvinova TV, Mazyrina LA. Vysokomolekulyarnye Soedineniya, Seriya A. 1987, 29, 2327–2332.10.1016/0032-3950(87)90231-0Search in Google Scholar
[19] Choi S-S, Son CE. Polym. Bull. 2016, 73, 3453–3464.10.1007/s00289-016-1666-7Search in Google Scholar
[20] Hasan A, Rochmadi, Sulistyo H, Honggokusumo S. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 213, 012048.10.1088/1757-899X/213/1/012048Search in Google Scholar
[21] Wang Y, Zhang X, Oh J, Chung K. Polym. Composite 2017, 38, 463–471.10.1002/pc.23604Search in Google Scholar
[22] Rui Q, Wu H, Zhu Z. Patent no.: CN107090133-A. Accessed: 25.8.2017.Search in Google Scholar
[23] Yamasaki S, Nishikawa S, Emoto Y, Shiina K, Kazuto S. Patent no.: US2017306063-A1. Accessed: 25.10.2017.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Seo HW, Kim YJ, Kim S, Park J, Choi K, Park I-K, Kin T, Suhr J, Kim KJ, Nam JD. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 33.10.1002/app.46615Search in Google Scholar
[25] Dechnarong N, Nimpaiboon A, Kumarn S, Phinyocheep P, Sakdapipanich J. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 25, 17.10.1007/s10965-017-1420-3Search in Google Scholar
[26] Kumar MKH, Shankar S, Rajasekar R, Kumar PS, Kumar PS. Mater. Test. 2017, 59, 1054–1060.10.3139/120.111109Search in Google Scholar
[27] Shi X, Wang Y, Xiao J, Xiao Y. Patent no.: Univ.CN107325404-A. Accessed: 7.9.2017.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Zhang J. Patent no.: CN106117845-A. Accessed: 16.11.2016.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Xu S, Gu J, Luo Y, Jia D, Yan L. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36, 861–868.10.1002/pc.23005Search in Google Scholar
[30] Raghu P, Nere CK, Jagtap RN. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88, 266–277.10.1002/app.11677Search in Google Scholar
[31] Dechnarong N, Nimpaiboon A, Sakdapipanich J. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 659, 414–417.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.659.414Search in Google Scholar
[32] Abraham E, Elbi PA, Deepa B, Jyotishkumar P, Pothen LA, Narine SS, Thomas S. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2012, 97, 2378–2387.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.028Search in Google Scholar
[33] Maciejewska M, Zaborski M. Polym. Bull. 2018, 75, 4499–4514.10.1007/s00289-018-2281-6Search in Google Scholar
[34] Jasna VC, Anilkumar T, Ramesan MT. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 11.10.1002/app.46538Search in Google Scholar
[35] You Y, Huang WY, Zhang AQ, Lin YL. J. Polym. Sci., Part A-1: Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 3760–3768.10.1002/pola.28275Search in Google Scholar
[36] Rooj S, Das A, Stockelhuber KW, Wang DY, Galiatsatos V, Heinrich G. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 3798–3808.10.1039/c3sm27519aSearch in Google Scholar
[37] Jackson M, Mantsch HH. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 30, 95–120.10.3109/10409239509085140Search in Google Scholar
[38] Kacurakova M, Capek P, Sasinkova V, Wellner N, Ebringerova A. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000, 43, 195–203.10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00151-XSearch in Google Scholar
[39] Das A, Stockelhuber KW, Jurk R, Saphiannikova M, Fritzsche J, Lorenz H, Klüppel M, Heinrich G. Polymer 2008, 49, 5276–5283.10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.031Search in Google Scholar
[40] Merabia S, Sotta P, Long DR. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 8252–8266.10.1021/ma8014728Search in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Effect of temperature on the impact behavior of PVC/ASA binary blends with various ASA terpolymer contents
- The infrared spectroscopy of chitosan films doped with silver and gold nanoparticles
- The effect of the addition of a slip agent on the rheological properties of polyethylene: off-line and in-line measurements
- Analysis of the mechanical properties of polymer materials considering lateral confinement effects
- Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical and rheological properties of enzyme-catalyzed tragacanth-based injectable hydrogels
- Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
- Preparation and assembly
- Preparation, characterization and kinetics study of chitosan/PVA electrospun nanofiber membranes for the adsorption of dye from water
- Engineering and processing
- Polymer-induced metal diffusion during plastic processing: a reason for deposit formation
- Optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing the volumetric shrinkage and warpage using radial basis function (RBF) coupled with the k-fold cross validation technique
- Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Effect of temperature on the impact behavior of PVC/ASA binary blends with various ASA terpolymer contents
- The infrared spectroscopy of chitosan films doped with silver and gold nanoparticles
- The effect of the addition of a slip agent on the rheological properties of polyethylene: off-line and in-line measurements
- Analysis of the mechanical properties of polymer materials considering lateral confinement effects
- Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical and rheological properties of enzyme-catalyzed tragacanth-based injectable hydrogels
- Effects of MAH/St grafted nanocellulose on the properties of carbon reinforced styrene butadiene rubber
- Preparation and assembly
- Preparation, characterization and kinetics study of chitosan/PVA electrospun nanofiber membranes for the adsorption of dye from water
- Engineering and processing
- Polymer-induced metal diffusion during plastic processing: a reason for deposit formation
- Optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing the volumetric shrinkage and warpage using radial basis function (RBF) coupled with the k-fold cross validation technique
- Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts
