Startseite „Politik den Profis überlassen“? Konstellationen des Invektiven im Kontext von Demonstrationen und Bürgerbeteiligung
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

„Politik den Profis überlassen“? Konstellationen des Invektiven im Kontext von Demonstrationen und Bürgerbeteiligung

  • Daphne Weber
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Invective Discourse
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Invective Discourse

Abstract

The article focuses on patronising, paternalistic invectives articulated by speakers in powerful positions. Contemporary discourses on invectives, rudeness and insults mainly focus on articulations within civil society, such as racist speech or expressions of resentment against politicians or “the elites”. Yet what happens when “the elites” themselves take invective stances? I explore this question using two examples: invectives launched against the social movement Fridays for Future and against demonstrators in the Czech Republic. In both instances, the speakers’ positions are elevated and made prominent through tribunes and microphones as well as through distribution in high-circulation newspapers. The speakers self-positioning as being “above” the crowd effects a devaluing of the mob, contributing to a long tradition of devaluation of the (poor) people. The scope of action of the adressed is restricted, as they first of all are forced to react and reject the insult. The “license” to devalue the mob is intertwined with the “license” for political participation: who is licensed to assign value and hold powerful positions, versus who must struggle to participate and be heard.

Abstract

The article focuses on patronising, paternalistic invectives articulated by speakers in powerful positions. Contemporary discourses on invectives, rudeness and insults mainly focus on articulations within civil society, such as racist speech or expressions of resentment against politicians or “the elites”. Yet what happens when “the elites” themselves take invective stances? I explore this question using two examples: invectives launched against the social movement Fridays for Future and against demonstrators in the Czech Republic. In both instances, the speakers’ positions are elevated and made prominent through tribunes and microphones as well as through distribution in high-circulation newspapers. The speakers self-positioning as being “above” the crowd effects a devaluing of the mob, contributing to a long tradition of devaluation of the (poor) people. The scope of action of the adressed is restricted, as they first of all are forced to react and reject the insult. The “license” to devalue the mob is intertwined with the “license” for political participation: who is licensed to assign value and hold powerful positions, versus who must struggle to participate and be heard.

Heruntergeladen am 3.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111146553-007/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen