Home Social Sciences Notes on Invectivity and Metainvectivity
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Notes on Invectivity and Metainvectivity

  • Joachim Scharloth
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Invective Discourse
This chapter is in the book Invective Discourse

Abstract

The article characterizes metainvectivity as a constitutive force in the construction of the invective and the analysis of metainvective debates as a key to understanding the functions of invectivity for the constitution of the social order. Using the concepts of human dignity, honour, shame, politeness, and recognition as examples, the paper illustrates that in core theories constructive exchange is considered the normal case, while the invective dimension is considered to be an exception. In contrast to this, this paper attempts to highlight that the reorientation associated with the notion of invectivity is that it interprets social interactions as fundamentally ambiguous. Based on the insight that metainvective practices always bear the potential to be invective themselves, metainvective debates are characterised as a contested enregisterment for symbolic practices. By looking at recurring patterns in current metainvective debates, the article illustrates that these debates are mediums for negotiating conceptions of social order.

Abstract

The article characterizes metainvectivity as a constitutive force in the construction of the invective and the analysis of metainvective debates as a key to understanding the functions of invectivity for the constitution of the social order. Using the concepts of human dignity, honour, shame, politeness, and recognition as examples, the paper illustrates that in core theories constructive exchange is considered the normal case, while the invective dimension is considered to be an exception. In contrast to this, this paper attempts to highlight that the reorientation associated with the notion of invectivity is that it interprets social interactions as fundamentally ambiguous. Based on the insight that metainvective practices always bear the potential to be invective themselves, metainvective debates are characterised as a contested enregisterment for symbolic practices. By looking at recurring patterns in current metainvective debates, the article illustrates that these debates are mediums for negotiating conceptions of social order.

Downloaded on 26.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111146553-002/html
Scroll to top button